You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

6 May 2020

The Effects of Maternal and Postnatal Dietary Methyl Nutrients on Epigenetic Changes that Lead to Non-Communicable Diseases in Adulthood

and
Department of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue The Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Both Food Bioactives and Pathogens in Living Organisms

Abstract

The risk for non-communicable diseases in adulthood can be programmed by early nutrition. This programming is mediated by changes in expression of key genes in various metabolic pathways during development, which persist into adulthood. These developmental modifications of genes are due to epigenetic alterations in DNA methylation patterns. Recent studies have demonstrated that DNA methylation can be affected by maternal or early postnatal diets. Because methyl groups for methylation reactions come from methionine cycle nutrients (i.e., methionine, choline, betaine, folate), deficiency or supplementation of these methyl nutrients can directly change epigenetic regulation of genes permanently. Although many studies have described the early programming of adult diseases by maternal and infant nutrition, this review discusses studies that have associated early dietary methyl nutrient manipulation with direct effects on epigenetic patterns that could lead to chronic diseases in adulthood. The maternal supply of methyl nutrients during gestation and lactation can alter epigenetics, but programming effects vary depending on the timing of dietary intervention, the type of methyl nutrient manipulated, and the tissue responsible for the phenotype. Moreover, the postnatal manipulation of methyl nutrients can program epigenetics, but more research is needed on whether this approach can rescue maternally programmed offspring.

1. Non-Communicable Diseases, Perinatal Diet and Epigenetics

Non-communicable diseases (NCD) include complicated and overlapping disease entities, which are likely to further develop significantly and become risk factors themselves [1]. NCD, which includes diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, hypertension, and neurodegenerative diseases, has become a leading cause of death in the world. There has been a rapid rise in the incidence of NCD in the past two decades with the incidence projected to continue to rise further. If the primary risk factors for NCD were eliminated, most of the incidence of NCD can be prevented [2]. Thus, international entities have a great interest in not only understanding how to prevent and control these diseases, but also to continue further research to identify novel causes of NCD [3].
The rapid global changes in social and economic aspects have led to changes in dietary and physical activity patterns in the world. The movement of the world towards industrialization with national economies based on trade within a global market has drastically led to deleterious dietary patterns that contribute towards NCD [1]. Thus, the diet has become a critical etiological factor that plays a major role in the development of NCD. However, more recent research has shown that these dietary influences extend quite early in development. Diet during the fetal and neonatal periods can act as a risk factor to develop NCD in later life. This concept, termed “developmental origins of health and disease” (DOHaD), is well described and suggests nutritional (or environmental) perturbations during fetal, infant and childhood stages can permanently program metabolism and predict the development of NCD in adulthood [1,4]. More specifically, research has well established that maternal dietary intake during the perinatal period has a great influence on the later phenotype of the offspring [5]. This direct relationship between early nutrition and later disease was initially observed in the studies of the Dutch winter famine in the Netherlands during 1944, where individuals born to mothers exposed to famine during gestation exhibited increased risks for obesity, cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, and hypertension in adulthood compared to siblings born during non-famine conditions [6].
Among possible causes of how the maternal diet programs adult chronic diseases, epigenetics has been identified as the leading mechanism [7,8,9]. Epigenetics involves heritable changes in gene expression mediated by extracellular mechanisms that act on DNA, without changing its sequence [10]. For example, cell differentiation and organogenesis are controlled by epigenetic factors through variable regulation of gene expression. The main epigenetic mechanisms involved in the development and differentiation of various cell types are microRNA (noncoding RNAs), covalent histone modification, and DNA methylation. These epigenetic processes involve providing marks on the genome which are responsible for activating or silencing genes leading to a specific phenotype [10]. Thus, they are ultimately responsible for determining phenotypic plasticity [11]. The interaction of nutrients with epigenetics is termed “nutriepigenomics”, where nutrients and their effects on health are mediated by epigenetic modifications. One of the best examples of this concept is the development of a honeybee with identical genomes into a queen or a worker depending on the different diet they feed on: royal jelly or a diet of pollen or nectar, respectively [12].
Most of the epigenetic changes that take place during gametogenesis seems to be erased after a certain point of development. It is crucial to understand how epigenetic marks become heritable, as many marks are not completely erased during very early development and gametogenesis [13,14]. Some methylated sites survive and replicate during cell division and the marked DNA is passed along with the histones, leading to persistent influence of these marks on gene expression throughout life [15]. Moreover, many epigenetic changes occur throughout development, pre- and postnatally, and are preserved in mitotic cell division, providing the mechanism by which any epigenetic perturbation during development can persist into adulthood unchanged. Therefore, epigenetic modifications due to early nutritional exposures that affect the offspring’s phenotype is not only taking place via germline modification, but also mitotically in somatic cells with long-term effects on gene expression [16].
Particularly relevant to nutriepigenomics, DNA methylation of promoter regions of genes is a key focus of research. DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism where the addition of methyl groups to DNA modifies the function of genes affecting its expression by (usually) inhibiting transcription. Differential methylation of promoter regions of various genes seems to be responsible for the plasticity associated with early programming. Nutrients affecting either S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the universal methyl donor, or S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), an inhibitor of methyltransferases, have the potential to modify methylation, and hence expression, of DNA [17]. The perinatal period, which includes both fetal and postnatal stages, acts as a critical window of development and a period in which epigenetic patterns are known to be modifiable. The epigenetic changes that occur within this critical window of development remain stable beyond the window and into adulthood [18]. Thus, the epigenetic alterations caused by nutritional perturbations during this window are likely to persist into adulthood, potentially predisposing the individuals to an altered metabolism that can lead to NCD in later life [19].
Most recent research has focused on the availability of methyl related nutrients during this critical window of the perinatal period, as these nutrients have a direct effect on availability of methyl groups used for methylation in epigenetics. Much research suggests maternal (i.e., prenatal) dietary methyl nutrients can affect the offspring’s risk for NCD in later life via epigenetic alterations [9]. The early postnatal period is also part of the critical window, during which alterations in diet can also contribute to changes in epigenetics that may persist throughout a lifetime. However, whether dietary methyl nutrients during the early postnatal period can reprogram epigenetic alterations from prenatal perturbations is less understood. Indeed, postnatal epigenetic alterations due to changes in methyl nutrients in the infant diet is an emerging area of research in the field [20,21]. Moreover, defining the critical window of epigenetic susceptibility into postnatal life needs more clarification [22]. It is likely that the critical window time frame depends not only on the genes of interest, but also on the target tissue; for example, late developing organs like the brain likely experience epigenetic alterations into adolescence [23].
Since affected traits predisposing the individual to NCD can be inherited via epigenetic changes during the perinatal period, longitudinal studies are required to understand whether early programming of metabolism genes by methyl nutrients are beneficial or detrimental for adult health. As a result, most mechanistic research must be conducted in animal models. However, most animal studies supplement with a combination of methyl nutrients during the prenatal period, expecting to increase methyl metabolism and subsequent influence on epigenetics [24]. Thus, the effects on the epigenome are a result of multiple nutrients [25], complicating the mechanistic explanation and limiting the nutritional relevance to humans since foods are not uniquely rich in methyl nutrients only. Moreover, it is arguably more relevant to the human situation to understand deficiency of methyl nutrients, in addition to excesses, as micronutrient-poor diets are a global concern. Indeed, a typical obesogenic diet comprising of excess ‘empty’ calories might also be considered a micronutrient-poor diet, and the associated deficiency of methyl-related nutrients might explain programming effects of such diets. However, the role of methyl nutrient deficiency in programming of NCD by obesogenic diets is beyond the scope of this review. It is also important to note that the exposure time of methyl nutrient perturbation and the amount of methyl nutrients during the perinatal period will have effects on the phenotypic outcomes. Most studies expose their subjects to methyl nutrients throughout the periconception period, gestation, and lactation. Thus, it is challenging to identify the critical window of the perinatal period that is most susceptible to epigenetic alterations which predisposes the individual to NCD in adult life. Timing of intervention is important to identify not only the deleterious, but also the beneficial epigenetic alterations that could not only predispose, but also prevent development of NCD in adult life. The purpose of this review is to discuss current research findings of methyl related nutrients on epigenetic alterations that lead to NCD development in adulthood.

2. Methyl and Methionine Metabolism Pathways

There are three main pathways related to methyl and methionine metabolism: transmethylation, transsulfuration, and remethylation (Figure 1). Methionine is an essential sulfur-containing amino acid and the primary methyl donor for a large number of transmethylation reactions via the methionine cycle. The methionine cycle transfers the terminal methyl group of methionine to form various methylated products and homocysteine (i.e., transmethylation). Homocysteine can be irreversibly oxidized after the transfer of its sulfur atom for cysteine synthesis (i.e., transsulfuration). Or homocysteine can be remethylated to methionine by using methyl groups derived either from betaine via choline, or from methyltetrahydrofolate (THF) generated from the folate cycle (i.e., remethylation). Thus, dietary betaine, choline, and folate are integral in the remethylation pathways through either betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase (BHMT) or through the vitamin B12-dependent methionine synthase (MS), and along with dietary methionine, these ‘methyl nutrients’ dictate the dietary availability of methyl groups for transmethylation reactions. Among transmethylation reactions, one of the more important pathways is methylation of DNA via DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) utilizing methyl groups from SAM, the universal methyl donor from methionine. Although the partitioning of methyl groups to DNA methylation via DNMT consumes only ~1% of the total dietary methionine in neonatal piglets [26,27,28], this methylation pathway governs the most critical transmethylation reaction, with respect to long term health of the offspring [7,29]. Early life methylation of cytosine-guanine dinucleotides (CpG) located in the promoter regions of DNA may not utilize quantitatively significant amounts of methyl groups, this repression of gene expression persists throughout the lifetime of an individual, predisposing them to NCD.
Figure 1. A summary of methyl and methionine metabolism. Methionine is an ubiquitous amino acid acquired via tissue protein breakdown or dietary intake. Methionine is converted to SAM via irreversible adenosylation, which is used for transmethylation. Utilizing methyl groups from SAM, DNA, GAA, PE, glycine, and a number of other transmethylation precursors are transmethylated to methylated DNA, creatine, PC, sarcosine and other products, respectively. These transmethylation reactions are governed by the dietary availability of methionine, choline, betaine, and serine (via folate cycle) which are the primary methyl donors. The common end product of all transmethylation reactions is SAH, which is then converted to homocysteine. Homocysteine is either irreversibly oxidized to cysteine via the transsulfuration pathway or remethylated to methionine via BHMT or MS. Enzymes involved in methyl metabolism are: MAT, methionine adenosyltransferase; GAMT, guanidinoacetate methyltransferase; PEMT, phosphatidylethanolamine methyltransferase; DNMT, DNA methyltransferase; SAHH, S-adenosylhomocystine hydrolase; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase; CGL, cystathionine gamma-lyase; BHMT, betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase; MS, methionine synthase; SHMT, serine hydroxymethyltransferase; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Metabolite abbreviations: SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; GAA, guanidinoacetic acid; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; DMG, dimethylglycine; THF, tetrahydrofolate; 5,10-CH3-THF, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate; 5-CH3-THF, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate.

5. Conclusions

When considering all the above studies together, it is apparent that the timing of nutrient perturbation contributes to the epigenetically programmed alterations in physiology and metabolism observed in offspring. The critical window of susceptibility to epigenetic programming occurs during the rapid growth and maturation phase of the offspring during the perinatal period, which includes gestation and lactation. In turn, the disease outcome that is programmed depends on the critical window of susceptibility of specific genes governing specific functions in individual tissues. For example, kidneys are more sensitive to programming during the phase of nephrogenesis that occurs during the prenatal period [78]. Whereas, the critical period of development for the brain extends well into childhood because of its continuous postnatal development of neural pathways [79]. Therefore, a more extended period of dietary exposure may have a broader impact on functional outcomes of many developing organs and systems. Apart from the timing, the type of methyl donor and the amount of supplementation also contribute to the manifestation of the observed metabolic changes, mediated by the epigenetic alterations. These factors need to be considered in methyl nutrient dietary interventions in order to elucidate the complex phenotypic outcomes due to specific epigenetic changes. Moreover, the window of susceptibility of these alterations needs to be known, since exposure to methyl nutrients is very dynamic from maternal nutrition during stages of pregnancy, to infant feeding, and to diets in childhood and adolescence.
Although there is substantial evidence that dietary methyl donor status during the perinatal period can lead to the programming of metabolism leading to NCD, more studies are needed that investigate how specific nutrients directly affect epigenetic changes that lead to the disease phenotype. Such knowledge would help develop postnatal dietary strategies that might reverse the epigenetic effects caused by maternal nutrition. In this way, it is important to advise expectant mothers to focus on a healthy, balanced diet during pregnancy, and to emphasize the importance of breastfeeding. Until we have more information, it is critical to not deviate from ‘normal’ healthy nutrition and to avoid extreme exposures to methyl nutrients in order to prevent programming of the metabolism that could lead to NCD in adulthood.

Author Contributions

R.S.R. and R.F.B. developed the concept, researched the material and prepared the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant to R.F.B. (CIHR).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations:

ACCAcetyl-CoA carboxylase
BHMTBetaine-homocysteine methyltransferase
CBSCystathionine beta-synthase
5,10-CH3-THF5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate
5-CH3-THF5-methyltetrahydrofolate
CGLCystathionine gamma-lyase
CpGCytosine-guanine phosphodiester dinucleotide
CYP27α1Cholesterol-27a-hydroxylase
DOHaDDevelopmental origins of health and disease
DMGDimethylglycine
DMRDifferentially methylated region
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
DNMTDNA methyltransferase
FASFatty acid synthase
FBPFructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase
GAAGuanidinoacetic acid
GABABGamma-aminobutyric acid
GALK1Galactokinase-1
GAMTGuanidinoacetate methyltransferase
GRGlucocorticoid receptor
HMGCR3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase
IGFInsulin-like growth factor
LDLLow density lipoprotein
LINE-1Long interspersed nucleotide element-1
MATMethionine adenosyltransferase
mRNAMessenger RNA
MSMethionine synthase
MTHFRMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductase
NCDNon-communicable diseases
PCPhosphatidylcholine
PEPhosphatidylethanolamine
PEMTPhosphatidylethanolamine methyltransferase
PEPCKPhosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase
PPARγPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma
PyrCPyruvate carboxylase
RNARibonucleic acid
SAHS-adenosylhomocysteine
SAMS-adenosylmethionine
SAHHS-adenosylhomocystine hydrolase
SCDStearoyl-CoA desaturase
SHMTSerine hydroxymethyltransferase
SREBP1cSterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c
THFTetrahydrofolate

References

  1. Darnton-Hill, I.; Nishida, C.; James, W.P. A life course approach to diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7, 101–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016, 388, 1659–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shin, H.R.; Varghese, C. WHO Western Pacific regional action plan for the prevention and control of NCDs (2014–2020). Version 2. Epidemiol. Health 2014, 36, e2014007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Harding, J.E. The nutritional basis of the fetal origins of adult disease. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 30, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Navarro, E.; Funtikova, A.N.; Fíto, M.; Schröder, H. Prenatal nutrition and the risk of adult obesity: Long-term effects of nutrition on epigenetic mechanisms regulating gene expression. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 39, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Roseboom, T.; de Rooij, S.; Painter, R. The Dutch famine and its long-term consequences for adult health. Early Hum. Dev. 2006, 82, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vickers, M.H. Early life nutrition, epigenetics and programming of later life disease. Nutrients 2014, 6, 2165–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lillycrop, K.A.; Burdge, G.C. Maternal diet as a modifier of offspring epigenetics. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2015, 6, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McGee, M.; Bainbridge, S.; Fontaine-Bisson, B. A crucial role for maternal dietary methyl donor intake in epigenetic programming and fetal growth outcomes. Nutr. Rev. 2018, 76, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bird, A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature 2007, 447, 396–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Margueron, R.; Reinberg, D. Chromatin structure and the inheritance of epigenetic information. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chittka, A.; Chittka, L. Epigenetics of royalty. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fan, S.; Zhang, X. CpG island methylation pattern in different human tissues and its correlation with gene expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 383, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Trasler, J.M. Epigenetics in spermatogenesis. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 306, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Guibert, S.; Forné, T.; Weber, M. Global profiling of DNA methylation erasure in mouse primordial germ cells. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Skinner, M.K. Environmental epigenetic transgenerational inheritance and somatic epigenetic mitotic stability. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 838–842. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tammen, S.A.; Friso, S.; Choi, S.W. Epigenetics: the link between nature and nurture. Mol. Aspects Med. 2013, 34, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Perera, F.; Herbstman, J. Prenatal environmental exposures, epigenetics, and disease. Reprod. Toxicol. 2011, 31, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Glier, M.B.; Green, T.J.; Devlin, A.M. Methyl nutrients, DNA methylation, and cardiovascular disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McBreairty, L.E.; Bertolo, R.F. The dynamics of methionine supply and demand during early development. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2016, 41, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Robinson, J.L.; Bertolo, R.F. The pediatric methionine requirement should incorporate remethylation potential and transmethylation demands. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chmurzynska, A. Fetal programming: link between early nutrition, DNA methylation, and complex diseases. Nutr. Rev. 2010, 68, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Field, C.J. Early risk determinants and later health outcomes: implications for research prioritization and the food supply. Summary of the workshop. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1533S–1539S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Waterland, R.A.; Dolinoy, D.C.; Lin, J.R.; Smith, C.A.; Shi, X.; Tahiliani, K.G. Maternal methyl supplements increase offspring DNA methylation at Axin Fused. Genesis 2006, 44, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cordero, P.; Milagro, F.I.; Campion, J.; Martinez, J.A. Maternal methyl donors supplementation during lactation prevents the hyperhomocysteinemia induced by a high-fat-sucrose intake by dams. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 24422–24437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McBreairty, L.E.; McGowan, R.A.; Brunton, J.A.; Bertolo, R.F. Partitioning of [methyl-3H]methionine to methylated products and protein is altered during high methyl demand conditions in young Yucatan miniature pigs. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 804–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McBreairty, L.E.; Robinson, J.L.; Furlong, K.R.; Brunton, J.A.; Bertolo, R.F. Guanidinoacetate is more effective than creatine at enhancing tissue creatine stores while consequently limiting methionine availability in Yucatan miniature pigs. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Robinson, J.L.; McBreairty, L.E.; Randell, E.W.; Brunton, J.A.; Bertolo, R.F. Restriction of dietary methyl donors limits methionine availability and affects the partitioning of dietary methionine for creatine and phosphatidylcholine synthesis in the neonatal piglet. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 35, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Williams, K.T.; Schalinske, K.L. New insights into the regulation of methyl group and homocysteine metabolism. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Crider, K.S.; Yang, T.P.; Berry, R.J.; Bailey, L.B. Folate and DNA methylation: a review of molecular mechanisms and the evidence for folate’s role. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guéant, J.L.; Elakoum, R.; Ziegler, O.; Coelho, D.; Feigerlova, E.; Daval, J.L.; Guéant-Rodriguez, R.M. Nutritional models of foetal programming and nutrigenomic and epigenomic dysregulations of fatty acid metabolism in the liver and heart. Pflugers Arch. 2014, 466, 833–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Forges, T.; Monnier-Barbarino, P.; Alberto, J.M.; Guéant-Rodriguez, R.M.; Daval, J.L.; Guéant, J.L. Impact of folate and homocysteine metabolism on human reproductive health. Hum. Reprod. Update 2007, 13, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pellanda, H.; Forges, T.; Bressenot, A.; Chango, A.; Bronowicki, J.P.; Guéant, J.L.; Namour, F. Fumonisin FB1 treatment acts synergistically with methyl donor deficiency during rat pregnancy to produce alterations of H3- and H4-histone methylation patterns in fetuses. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 976–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Garcia, M.M.; Guéant-Rodriguez, R.M.; Pooya, S.; Brachet, P.; Alberto, J.M.; Jeannesson, E.; Maskali, F.; Gueguen, N.; Marie, P.Y.; Lacolley, P.; et al. Methyl donor deficiency induces cardiomyopathy through altered methylation/acetylation of PGC-1α by PRMT1 and SIRT1. J. Pathol. 2011, 225, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Crott, J.W.; Liu, Z.; Choi, S.W.; Mason, J.B. Folate depletion in human lymphocytes up-regulates p53 expression despite marked induction of strand breaks in exons 5-8 of the gene. Mutat. Res. 2007, 626, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jacob, R.A.; Gretz, D.M.; Taylor, P.C.; James, S.J.; Pogribny, I.P.; Miller, B.J.; Henning, S.M.; Swendseid, M.E. Moderate folate depletion increases plasma homocysteine and decreases lymphocyte DNA methylation in postmenopausal women. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fryer, A.A.; Nafee, T.M.; Ismail, K.M.; Carroll, W.D.; Emes, R.D.; Farrell, W.E. LINE-1 DNA methylation is inversely correlated with cord plasma homocysteine in man: a preliminary study. Epigenetics 2009, 4, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fraser, A.; Nelson, S.M.; Macdonald-Wallis, C.; Cherry, L.; Butler, E.; Sattar, N.; Lawlor, D.A. Associations of pregnancy complications with calculated cardiovascular disease risk and cardiovascular risk factors in middle age: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Circulation 2012, 125, 1367–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zeisel, S.H. Nutritional importance of choline for brain development. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2004, 23, 621S–626S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zeisel, S.H. Importance of methyl donors during reproduction. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 673S–677S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zeisel, S. Choline, other methyl-donors and epigenetics. Nutrients 2017, 9, E445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brockington, A.; Lewist, C.; Whartont, S.; Shaw, P.J. Vascular endothelial growth factor and the nervous system. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2004, 30, 427–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mehedint, M.G.; Craciunescu, C.N.; Zeisel, S.H. Maternal dietary choline deficiency alters angiogenesis in fetal mouse hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12834–12839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Niculescu, M.D.; Craciunescu, C.N.; Zeisel, S.H. Dietary choline deficiency alters global and gene-specific DNA methylation in the developing hippocampus of mouse fetal brains. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Craciunescu, C.N.; Albright, C.D.; Mar, M.H.; Song, J.; Zeisel, S.H. Choline availability during embryonic development alters progenitor cell mitosis in developing mouse hippocampus. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 3614–3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Davison, J.M.; Mellott, T.J.; Kovacheva, V.P.; Blusztajn, J.K. Gestational choline supply regulates methylation of histone H3, expression of histone methyltransferases G9a (Kmt1c) and Suv39h1 (Kmt1a), and DNA methylation of their genes in rat fetal liver and brain. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 1982–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wainfan, E.; Dizik, M.; Stender, M.; Christman, J.K. Rapid appearance of hypomethylated DNA in livers of rats fed cancer-promoting, methyl-deficient diets. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 4094–4097. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Kovacheva, V.P.; Mellott, T.J.; Davison, J.M.; Wagner, N.; Lopez-Coviella, I.; Schnitzler, A.C.; Blusztajn, J.K. Gestational choline deficiency causes global and Igf2 gene DNA hypermethylation by up-regulation of Dnmt1 expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31777–31788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jones, M.W.; Errington, M.L.; French, P.J.; Fine, A.; Bliss, T.V.; Garel, S.; Charnay, P.; Bozon, B.; Laroche, S.; Davis, S. A requirement for the immediate early gene Zif268 in the expression of late LTP and long-term memories. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bozon, B.; Davis, S.; Laroche, S. A requirement for the immediate early gene Zif268 in reconsolidation of recognition memory after retrieval. Neuron 2003, 40, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mellott, T.J.; Follettie, M.T.; Diesl, V.; Hill, A.A.; Lopez-Coviella, I.; Blusztajn, J.K. Prenatal choline availability modulates hippocampal and cerebral cortical gene expression. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 1311–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kennedy, B.C.; Dimova, J.G.; Siddappa, A.J.; Tran, P.V.; Gewirtz, J.C.; Georgieff, M.K. Prenatal choline supplementation ameliorates the long-term neurobehavioral effects of fetal-neonatal iron deficiency in rats. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1858–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Craig, S.A. Betaine in human nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lever, M.; Slow, S. The clinical significance of betaine, an osmolyte with a key role in methyl group metabolism. Clin. Biochem. 2010, 43, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Robinson, J.L.; McBreairty, L.E.; Randell, E.W.; Harding, S.V.; Bartlett, R.K.; Brunton, J.A.; Bertolo, R.F. Betaine or folate can equally furnish remethylation to methionine and increase transmethylation in methionine-restricted neonates. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 59, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kettunen, H.; Tiihonen, K.; Peuranen, S.; Saarinen, M.T.; Remus, J.C. Dietary betaine accumulates in the liver and intestinal tissue and stabilizes the intestinal epithelial structure in healthy and coccidia-infected broiler chicks. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2001, 130, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fetterer, R.H.; Augustine, P.C.; Allen, P.C.; Barfield, R.C. The effect of dietary betaine on intestinal and plasma levels of betaine in uninfected and coccidia-infected broiler chicks. Parasitol. Res. 2003, 90, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cai, D.; Jia, Y.; Lu, J.; Yuan, M.; Sui, S.; Song, H.; Zhao, R. Maternal dietary betaine supplementation modifies hepatic expression of cholesterol metabolic genes via epigenetic mechanisms in newborn piglets. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, 1459–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cai, D.; Yuan, M.; Liu, H.; Han, Z.; Pan, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, R. Epigenetic and SP1-mediated regulation is involved in the repression of galactokinase 1 gene in the liver of neonatal piglets born to betaine-supplemented sows. Eur. J. Nutr. 2017, 56, 1899–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, N.; Yang, S.; Hu, Y.; Dong, H.; Zhao, R. Maternal betaine supplementation in rats induces intergenerational changes in hepatic IGF-1 expression and DNA methylation. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Knight, L.S.; Piibe, Q.; Lambie, I.; Perkins, C.; Yancey, P. Betaine in the brain: characterization of betaine uptake, its influence on other osmolytes and its potential role in neuroprotection from osmotic stress. Neurochem. Res. 2017, 42, 3490–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, X.; Sun, Q.; Li, X.; Cai, D.; Sui, S.; Jia, Y.; Song, H.; Zhao, R. Dietary betaine supplementation to gestational sows enhances hippocampal IGF2 expression in newborn piglets with modified DNA methylation of the differentially methylated regions. Eur. J. Nutr. 2015, 54, 1201–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sun, Q.; Li, X.; Jia, Y.; Pan, S.; Li, R.; Yang, X.; Zhao, R. Maternal betaine supplementation during gestation modifies hippocampal expression of GR and its regulatory miRNAs in neonatal piglets. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 78, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  64. Tesic, V.; Perovic, M.; Lazic, D.; Kojic, S.; Smiljanic, K.; Ruzdijic, S.; Rakic, L.; Kanazir, S. Long-term intermittent feeding restores impaired GR signaling in the hippocampus of aged rat. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 149, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. McGowan, P.O.; Meaney, M.J.; Szyf, M. Diet and the epigenetic (re)programming of phenotypic differences in behavior. Brain Res. 2008, 1237, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Schwab, U.; Törrönen, A.; Toppinen, L.; Alfthan, G.; Saarinen, M.; Aro, A.; Uusitupa, M. Betaine supplementation decreases plasma homocysteine concentrations but does not affect body weight, body composition, or resting energy expenditure in human subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 76, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cai, D.; Wang, J.; Jia, Y.; Liu, H.; Yuan, M.; Dong, H.; Zhao, R. Gestational dietary betaine supplementation suppresses hepatic expression of lipogenic genes in neonatal piglets through epigenetic and glucocorticoid receptor-dependent mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1861, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pauwels, S.; Ghosh, M.; Duca, R.C.; Bekaert, B.; Freson, K.; Huybrechts, I.; Langie, S.A.S.; Koppen, G.; Devlieger, R.; Godderis, L. Maternal intake of methyl-group donors affects DNA methylation of metabolic genes in infants. Clin. Epigenetics 2017, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jacometo, C.B.; Zhou, Z.; Luchini, D.; Corrêa, M.N.; Loor, J.J. Maternal supplementation with rumen-protected methionine increases prepartal plasma methionine concentration and alters hepatic mRNA abundance of 1-carbon, methionine, and transsulfuration pathways in neonatal Holstein calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 3209–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jacometo, C.B.; Alharthi, A.S.; Zhou, Z.; Luchini, D.; Loor, J.J. Maternal supply of methionine during late pregnancy is associated with changes in immune function and abundance of microRNA and mRNA in Holstein calf polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 8146–8158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, G.; Abraham, E. MicroRNAs in immune response and macrophage polarization. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Jacometo, C.B.; Zhou, Z.; Luchini, D.; Trevisi, E.; Corrêa, M.N.; Loor, J.J. Maternal rumen-protected methionine supplementation and its effect on blood and liver biomarkers of energy metabolism, inflammation, and oxidative stress in neonatal Holstein calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 6753–6763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sinclair, K.D.; Allegrucci, C.; Singh, R.; Gardner, D.S.; Sebastian, S.; Bispham, J.; Thurston, A.; Huntley, J.F.; Rees, W.D.; Maloney, C.A.; et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19351–19356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Giudicelli, F.; Brabant, A.L.; Grit, I.; Parnet, P.; Amarger, V. Excess of methyl donor in the perinatal period reduces postnatal leptin secretion in rat and interacts with the effect of protein content in diet. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jiao, F.; Yan, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Ma, Y.; Yue, Z.; Ou, H.; Yan, Z. Protective effects of maternal methyl donor supplementation on adult offspring of high fat diet-fed dams. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 34, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cordero, P.; Milagro, F.I.; Campion, J.; Martinez, J.A. Supplementation with methyl donors during lactation to high-fat-sucrose-fed dams protects offspring against liver fat accumulation when consuming an obesogenic diet. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2014, 5, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cho, C.E.; Sánchez-Hernández, D.; Reza-López, S.A.; Huot, P.S.; Kim, Y.I.; Anderson, G.H. High folate gestational and post-weaning diets alter hypothalamic feeding pathways by DNA methylation in Wistar rat offspring. Epigenetics 2013, 8, 710–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Langley-Evans, S.C.; Welham, S.J.; Jackson, A.A. Fetal exposure to a maternal low protein diet impairs nephrogenesis and promotes hypertension in the rat. Life Sci. 1999, 64, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Plagemann, A.; Harder, T.; Rake, A.; Melchior, K.; Rohde, W.; Dörner, G. Hypothalamic nuclei are malformed in weanling offspring of low protein malnourished rat dams. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 2582–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.