Next Article in Journal
Chromosome Doubling-Enhanced Biomass and Dihydrotanshinone I Production in Salvia miltiorrhiza, A Traditional Chinese Medicinal Plant
Next Article in Special Issue
Photo-Induced Depletion of Binding Sites in DNA-PAINT Microscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activities of Adansonia digitata L. (Baobab) from Mali, as a Source of Health-Promoting Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two-Dimensional Fluorescence Lifetime Correlation Spectroscopy: Concepts and Applications
Article

Single-Molecule Studies on a FRET Biosensor: Lessons from a Comparison of Fluorescent Protein Equipped versus Dye-Labeled Species

1
Forschungszentrum Jülich, ICS-5, 52425 Jülich, Germany
2
RWTH Aachen University, I. Physikalisches Institut (IA), 52056 Aachen, Germany
3
Forschungszentrum Jülich, IBG-1, 52425 Jülich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(12), 3105; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23123105
Received: 31 October 2018 / Revised: 23 November 2018 / Accepted: 24 November 2018 / Published: 27 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Single-Molecule Fluorescence Spectroscopy)
Bacterial periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs) undergo a pronounced ligand-induced conformational change which can be employed to monitor ligand concentrations. The most common strategy to take advantage of this conformational change for a biosensor design is to use a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) signal. This can be achieved by attaching either two fluorescent proteins (FPs) or two organic fluorescent dyes of different colors to the PBPs in order to obtain an optical readout signal which is closely related to the ligand concentration. In this study we compare a FP-equipped and a dye-labeled version of the glucose/galactose binding protein MglB at the single-molecule level. The comparison demonstrates that changes in the FRET signal upon glucose binding are more pronounced for the FP-equipped sensor construct as compared to the dye-labeled analog. Moreover, the FP-equipped sensor showed a strong increase of the FRET signal under crowding conditions whereas the dye-labeled sensor was not influenced by crowding. The choice of a labeling scheme should therefore be made depending on the application of a FRET-based sensor. View Full-Text
Keywords: Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET); single molecule studies; biosensor; fluorescent protein (FP); conformational change; hinge motion; ligand binding; glucose sensor Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET); single molecule studies; biosensor; fluorescent protein (FP); conformational change; hinge motion; ligand binding; glucose sensor
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Höfig, H.; Cerminara, M.; Ritter, I.; Schöne, A.; Pohl, M.; Steffen, V.; Walter, J.; Vergara Dal Pont, I.; Katranidis, A.; Fitter, J. Single-Molecule Studies on a FRET Biosensor: Lessons from a Comparison of Fluorescent Protein Equipped versus Dye-Labeled Species. Molecules 2018, 23, 3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23123105

AMA Style

Höfig H, Cerminara M, Ritter I, Schöne A, Pohl M, Steffen V, Walter J, Vergara Dal Pont I, Katranidis A, Fitter J. Single-Molecule Studies on a FRET Biosensor: Lessons from a Comparison of Fluorescent Protein Equipped versus Dye-Labeled Species. Molecules. 2018; 23(12):3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23123105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Höfig, Henning, Michele Cerminara, Ilona Ritter, Antonie Schöne, Martina Pohl, Victoria Steffen, Julia Walter, Ignacio Vergara Dal Pont, Alexandros Katranidis, and Jörg Fitter. 2018. "Single-Molecule Studies on a FRET Biosensor: Lessons from a Comparison of Fluorescent Protein Equipped versus Dye-Labeled Species" Molecules 23, no. 12: 3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23123105

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop