Review Reports
- Michael Evans1,*,† and
- Gun Ho Jang2,†
Reviewer 1: Jan Hannig Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsSee the attached file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
See the attached file.
Author Response
See attached,
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authorssee pdf
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
See attached.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe revision has answered most of my concern. One minor issue that was probably misunderstood is related to equation (1). For a fixed data and model, MAP estimator can be made to be any value by simply changing the dominating measure mu to
h dmu which results in the posterior density being p/h.
Then all I need to do is to make sure that h is sufficiently close to 0 near the point I want to have the MAP.
The form of equation (1) implicitly presumes a certain kind of dominating measure, that would made the volume of the balls of the same radius the same regardless of location.. This needs to be made clear.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageNone