Topic Editors

School of Business, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
Prof. Dr. José Manuel Ruano de la Fuente
Department of Political and Administrative Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Sustainability Efforts and Importance of Change Management, 2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
21 May 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
23 July 2026
Viewed by
2188

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Change management and sustainability are intertwined. Successfully integrating sustainability into an organization's operations requires a structured approach to managing the changes that come with adopting more environmentally and socially responsible practices. Sustainability efforts not only benefit the environment and societies but can also lead to increased efficiency and reduced costs and can improve the reputation of corporations. But the sustainability efforts of corporations, whether private, public, or third sector, can be significantly affected by change-management strategies. How change is managed can therefore have a significant impact on sustainability initiatives within corporations. Sustainability refers to the practice of meeting current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This involves finding ways to responsibly operate environmentally, socially, and economically. Change management refers to a structured approach a corporation uses to transition individuals, teams, and the corporation as a whole from a current state to a desired future state. This can involve changes in processes, technologies, structures, and even cultures.

This Topic will address a systemic approach to understanding and, more importantly, describing specific actions undertaken when implementing sustainability efforts. This Topic will focus on the joint efforts of business and policymakers as enablers of preparing and leading changes. It will draw upon key thinkers in business, public policy, and social science to analyze concrete situations of and approaches to successful sustainability efforts. The objectives are to highlight specific issues, explain their significance, and demonstrate how managing changes have positive and potentially negative consequences, along with offering thoughts on implementing change and highlighting the types of changes necessary for change management. We encourage the submission of works that explore the relationship between sustainability and change management in a corporate context and studies are welcome regardless of whether they focus on the public or private sector. Below, we provide a list of broad themes which contributions may fit under, and which are meant to be indicative and not exhaustive.

We are open to the submission of theoretical and empirical papers, using qualitative or quantitative research methods, which address topics such as the following:

  1. Cultural Shift: Improving sustainability often requires a shift in organizational culture and mindset. Change-management methodologies help facilitate this shift by involving employees, aligning values, and promoting a sense of ownership and commitment to sustainability goals, such as the SDGs.
  2. Behavioral Change: Sustainable practices usually require changes in behavior and daily operations. Change management strategies help employees understand the reasons behind these changes, address resistance, and provide the necessary training and support to adopt new behaviors.
  3. Stakeholder Engagement: Sustainability initiatives often involve various stakeholders, both internal (employees, managers) and external (customers, suppliers, communities). Change-management techniques can be used to engage these stakeholders effectively, ensuring their support and participation in sustainability efforts.
  4. Communication: Effective communication is crucial for change management and sustainability. Clear communication helps employees understand the need for sustainable practices, the benefits, and how their individual efforts contribute to larger goals.
  5. Adaptation to Regulations: Sustainability practices are influenced by regulations and industry standards, which can change over time. Change-management strategies assist organizations in adapting to these changing requirements effectively.
  6. Innovation and Technology Adoption: Sustainability often involves adopting new technologies and innovative practices. Change management helps organizations navigate the challenges of adopting these new tools and methods.
  7. Long-Term Integration: Sustainability is a long-term endeavor. Change management ensures that sustainable practices are not just short-term projects but are integrated into the organization's core values and operations.
  8. Measuring and Monitoring: Change-management methodologies emphasize setting measurable goals and monitoring progress. This aligns with sustainability efforts, requiring tracking and reporting on environmental and social performance.
  9. Risk Management: Sustainability risks, such as supply chain disruptions due to environmental factors, can be managed through effective change management strategies that enhance an organization's agility and resilience.
  10. Continuous Improvement: Both change management and sustainability involve a commitment to continuous improvement. They are iterative processes that require organizations to learn, adapt, and evolve. When submitting your manuscript, you will be asked to specify whether it is for a regular issue or one of the named Special Issues, so please select the “Sustainability Efforts and Importance of Change Management” option. The format of the papers must follow the submission guidelines. Submitted papers should not have been previously published or be currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

We look forward to receiving your submissions, Prof. Dr. Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson Prof. Dr. José Manuel Ruano de la Fuente Topic Editors

Prof. Dr. Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson
Prof. Dr. José Manuel Ruano de la Fuente
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • sustainability
  • cultural shift
  • behavior change
  • stakeholder engagement
  • communication
  • adaptation of regulations
  • innovation and technology adoption
  • long-term integration
  • measuring and monitoring
  • risk management
  • continuous improvement

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Economies
economies
2.1 4.7 2013 23.1 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Systems
systems
3.1 4.1 2013 20.1 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Urban Science
urbansci
2.9 3.7 2017 21.6 Days CHF 1800 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
40 pages, 4057 KB  
Article
A Sustainable Workforce Scheduling System for County-Level Logistics Centers Under Uncertain Demand: Integrating Human-Centered Objectives and Change Management Perspectives
by Yixuan Wu, Yuhan Gong, Zhenheng Hu, Yiwen Gao and Junchi Ma
Systems 2026, 14(3), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030295 - 10 Mar 2026
Viewed by 343
Abstract
For logistics facilities at the county level, workforce scheduling is a basic operational concern. Although these facilities are developing rapidly, they still mostly rely on human and semi-automated work. Significant differences in employee productivity and skill levels, along with regular changes in demand, [...] Read more.
For logistics facilities at the county level, workforce scheduling is a basic operational concern. Although these facilities are developing rapidly, they still mostly rely on human and semi-automated work. Significant differences in employee productivity and skill levels, along with regular changes in demand, exacerbate this challenge. This study proposes a sustainability-oriented dual-objective optimization model to coordinate operational cost control with employee well-being enhancement. To address this issue, we designed an improved Genetic Algorithm that combines heuristic initialization with specialized repair operators, forming a systematic optimization framework. The effectiveness of the proposed system design and algorithm has been validated through real-world case studies. Experimental results demonstrate that this model not only achieves a balance between cost and employee satisfaction under uncertain demand conditions but also provides county-level logistics centers with sustainable scheduling solutions adaptable to business changes. Management recommendations based on the experimental results are proposed, such as implementing differentiated scheduling strategies, easing restrictions on maximum working hour variations, establishing a progressive optimization mechanism, and optimizing staffing and employee structure in accordance with corporate characteristics. This study provides scientific decision support for county-level logistics systems to achieve sustainable operations and human resource management transformation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 338 KB  
Article
Climate Risk Perception and Firms’ Energy Productivity: Evidence from China
by Jue Wang, Cong Nie and Shanyue Jin
Systems 2026, 14(3), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030238 - 26 Feb 2026
Viewed by 260
Abstract
Whether firms translate climate risk perception into energy-related operational productivity remains unclear. Panel data on non-financial Chinese firms (2012–2023) are used to examine the association between climate risk perception (CRP) and energy productivity (EE). Firm-level CRP is constructed from management discussion and analysis [...] Read more.
Whether firms translate climate risk perception into energy-related operational productivity remains unclear. Panel data on non-financial Chinese firms (2012–2023) are used to examine the association between climate risk perception (CRP) and energy productivity (EE). Firm-level CRP is constructed from management discussion and analysis (MD&A) sections using a term frequency–inverse document frequency (TF–IDF)-weighted, Word2Vec-expanded climate-risk lexicon. Energy productivity (EE) is measured as the natural logarithm of operating revenue per total energy consumption unit converted into tons of coal equivalent, capturing the economic value generated per energy input unit. Two-way fixed-effects models with firm-level clustered standard errors show a positive CRP–EE association. Digital transformation, proxied by an annual report text-based index across five digital technology domains, partially mediates this association, which is stronger when analyst coverage is higher and weaker when financing constraints are more severe. The results are robust to an alternative CRP proxy based on raw keyword frequency, dynamic specifications, and an instrumental-variable approach exploiting province-year extreme-weather exposure (share of days meeting extreme temperature or precipitation thresholds), using leave-one-province-out aggregation as the instrument and systematic heterogeneity across state ownership, pollution intensity, and high-tech status. This study extends CRP research from disclosure-oriented to energy-productivity outcomes, and highlights how digital capabilities, information scrutiny, and financial friction shape climate-aware energy productivity improvements. Full article
23 pages, 310 KB  
Article
The Impact of Green Taxation on Climate Change Mitigation Under Fiscal Decentralization: Evidence from China
by Tong Zhang, Li Zhao and Chong Li
Economies 2025, 13(9), 265; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13090265 - 10 Sep 2025
Viewed by 906
Abstract
Against the backdrop of China’s “dual-carbon” goals, the complex interplay between fiscal decentralization and green taxation presents significant challenges for climate governance. This study examines the impact of green taxation on carbon emissions within the context of fiscal decentralization, with a particular focus [...] Read more.
Against the backdrop of China’s “dual-carbon” goals, the complex interplay between fiscal decentralization and green taxation presents significant challenges for climate governance. This study examines the impact of green taxation on carbon emissions within the context of fiscal decentralization, with a particular focus on spatial spillover effects and multidimensional indicators of fiscal decentralization. Drawing on panel data from 30 Chinese provinces between 2007 and 2022, we apply spatial Durbin and moderating effect models to examine these relationships. Our findings reveal a counterintuitive positive association between green taxation and carbon emissions, indicating the presence of a “green paradox.” Furthermore, the three dimensions of fiscal decentralization—revenue decentralization, expenditure decentralization, and fiscal autonomy—demonstrate heterogeneous relationships with carbon emissions, including inverted U-shaped, U-shaped, and linear patterns, respectively. The interaction effects between green taxation and fiscal decentralization also exhibit notable spatial spillover effects and emission reduction potential. The contribution of this study lies in its integrated analysis of multidimensional fiscal decentralization, spatial econometric methods, and underlying mechanisms, thereby addressing underexplored dimensions of China’s environmental fiscal policy. These findings not only provide policy insights for China but also offer valuable references for other developing and transitional economies striving to align fiscal and environmental governance. Full article
Back to TopTop