Topic Editors

Prof. Dr. Jonathan Cepeda-Negrete
División de Ciencias de la Vida (DICIVA), Universidad de Guanajuato, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, Carretera Irapuato-Silao km 9 ap 311, Irapuato 36500, Mexico
Prof. Dr. Qianmu Li
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

Machine Learning and Data Mining: Theory and Applications

Abstract submission deadline
31 October 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
31 December 2026
Viewed by
1446

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Recent decades have witnessed a rapid evolution of machine learning (ML) and data mining (DM) techniques, driven by advances in computing power, big data, and artificial intelligence. These technologies have transformed diverse domains such as healthcare, finance, manufacturing, transportation, and smart environments. This Topic aims to gather high-quality contributions that explore both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of ML and DM. We welcome research on emerging algorithms, optimization strategies, and innovative architectures, as well as studies addressing real-world challenges through predictive modeling, pattern recognition, and knowledge discovery. Particular attention will be given to works that integrate ML and DM with cutting-edge paradigms such as deep learning, IoT, cloud computing, and ethical AI.

Prof. Dr. Jonathan Cepeda-Negrete
Prof. Dr. Qianmu Li
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • machine learning
  • data mining
  • artificial intelligence
  • deep learning
  • big data analytics
  • pattern recognition
  • predictive modeling
  • computer vision
  • IoT and smart systems

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Algorithms
algorithms
2.1 4.5 2008 19.2 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Applied Sciences
applsci
2.5 5.5 2011 16 Days CHF 2400 Submit
AppliedMath
appliedmath
0.7 1.1 2021 20.6 Days CHF 1200 Submit
Data
data
2.0 5.0 2016 25 Days CHF 1600 Submit
Information
information
2.9 6.5 2010 20.9 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Symmetry
symmetry
2.2 5.3 2009 15.8 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 1426 KB  
Review
Profiling Decision-Making Styles Under Healthcare Resource Scarcity: An Interdisciplinary Clustering Approach
by Micaela Pinho, Fátima Leal and Isabel Miguel
Information 2026, 17(3), 287; https://doi.org/10.3390/info17030287 - 14 Mar 2026
Viewed by 322
Abstract
Scarcity of healthcare resources requires prioritisation decisions that raise complex ethical, economic, and social challenges. While normative frameworks provide guidance on how such decisions ought to be made, growing evidence suggests that individuals differ substantially in how they approach morally charged allocation choices. [...] Read more.
Scarcity of healthcare resources requires prioritisation decisions that raise complex ethical, economic, and social challenges. While normative frameworks provide guidance on how such decisions ought to be made, growing evidence suggests that individuals differ substantially in how they approach morally charged allocation choices. This study investigates heterogeneity in decision-making styles and support for healthcare prioritisation criteria using an interdisciplinary approach that integrates health economics, social psychology, and computational methods to identify latent decision-making profiles among a sample of adults residing in Portugal. Data were collected from adults residing in Portugal using a structured online questionnaire comprising socio-demographic characteristics, decision-making styles, and preferences elicited through twenty hypothetical healthcare rationing scenarios. The results reveal three meaningful decision-making profiles characterised by different combinations of cognitive styles and ethical prioritisation patterns: analytically oriented decision-makers prioritising health gains; intuitive, context-sensitive decision-makers balancing clinical and social criteria; heuristic-driven decision-makers relying on simpler or less differentiated heuristics. These findings demonstrate that, within this sample, healthcare prioritisation preferences are shaped by systematic variations in decision style rather than a single moral or rational framework. By linking behavioural heterogeneity with ethical decision-making, this study contributes to theoretical debates on healthcare rationing and demonstrates the value of clustering techniques for uncovering latent structures in complex decision data. The results provide insights relevant for the design of decision-support systems and rationing policies, which may be adapted to accommodate heterogeneous decision styles in comparable settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Machine Learning and Data Mining: Theory and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 639 KB  
Article
A Sparse L-Norm Regularized Least Squares Support Vector Regression
by Xiaoyong Liu, Dong Li and Chengbin Zeng
Algorithms 2026, 19(2), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/a19020160 - 18 Feb 2026
Viewed by 354
Abstract
Although Least Squares Support Vector Regression (LSSVR) reduces the hyperparameter space to two, it sacrifices sparsity, causing all training samples to become support vectors and increasing storage costs. In contrast, standard Support Vector Regression (SVR) preserves sparsity but requires tuning three highly coupled [...] Read more.
Although Least Squares Support Vector Regression (LSSVR) reduces the hyperparameter space to two, it sacrifices sparsity, causing all training samples to become support vectors and increasing storage costs. In contrast, standard Support Vector Regression (SVR) preserves sparsity but requires tuning three highly coupled hyperparameters, leading to higher computational burden. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a sparse L-norm regularized least squares SVR framework that incorporates the infinity norm of approximation errors into both the objective function and inequality constraints. The resulting optimization problem minimizes model complexity while controlling the maximum prediction deviation through a single slack variable, thereby transforming the conventional three-hyperparameter SVR tuning task into a two-parameter problem involving only the regularization coefficient and kernel width. This formulation restores sparsity by enabling a compact support vector set, while preserving the stability and convexity advantages of LSSVR. Experiments on both static and dynamic datasets demonstrate that the proposed method consistently achieves higher predictive accuracy and improved robustness compared with standard SVR and LSSVR. These results indicate that the proposed L-norm regularized framework offers a mathematically principled and computationally efficient alternative for sparse, robust, and scalable regression modeling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Machine Learning and Data Mining: Theory and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop