Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (12,550)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = survival outcomes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 340 KiB  
Article
FLOT Versus CROSS—What Is the Optimal Therapeutic Approach for Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction?
by Martin Leu, Hannes Mahler, Johanna Reinecke, Ute Margarethe König, Leif Hendrik Dröge, Manuel Guhlich, Benjamin Steuber, Marian Grade, Michael Ghadimi, Volker Ellenrieder, Stefan Rieken and Alexander Otto König
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2587; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152587 (registering DOI) - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or cause less toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with locally advanced EAC or AEGJ treated at our tertiary cancer center between January 2015 and March 2023. Patients received either perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (n = 36) or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy following the CROSS protocol (n = 40), followed by surgical resection and standardized follow-up. We compared survival outcomes, toxicity profiles, treatment compliance, and surgical results between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between FLOT and CROSS treatments in five-year loco-regional controls (LRC: 61.5% vs. 68.6%; p = 0.81), progression-free survival (PFS: 33.9% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.82), overall survival (OS: 60.2% vs. 63.4%; p = 0.91), or distant controls (DC: 42.1% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.39). High-grade hematologic toxicities did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Treatment compliance was lower in the FLOT group, with 50% (18/36) not completing all the planned chemotherapy cycles, compared to 17.5% (7/40) in the CROSS group. All the patients in the CROSS group received the full radiotherapy dose. Surgical outcomes and post-surgical tumor status were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Although perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has recently become a standard of care for locally advanced EAC and AEGJ, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy per the CROSS protocol remains a well-tolerated alternative. In appropriately selected patients, both approaches yield comparable oncological outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Treatments of Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 693 KiB  
Article
Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study
by Eishin Kurihara, Satoru Kakizaki, Masashi Ijima, Takeshi Hatanaka, Norio Kubo, Yuhei Suzuki, Hidetoshi Yasuoka, Takashi Hoshino, Atsushi Naganuma, Noriyuki Tani, Yuichi Yamazaki and Toshio Uraoka
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1915; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081915 (registering DOI) - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit of using durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibody, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCD) treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit of using durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibody, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCD) treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of GCD treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer in real-world conditions. Methods: The study subjects were 52 patients with biliary tract cancer who received GCD therapy between January 2023 and May 2024. The observation parameters included the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR), tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results: The cohort included 36 men and 16 women, with a median age of 73.0 years. There were 36 cases of cholangiocarcinoma (distal: 10, perihilar: 19, intrahepatic: 7), 13 cases of gallbladder cancer, and 3 cases of ampullary carcinoma. The stages were locally advanced in 30 cases and metastatic in 22 cases. Biliary drainage was performed in 30 cases. There were 38 cases receiving first-line therapy and 14 cases receiving second-line or later treatments. The median values at the start of GCD therapy were ALB 3.7 g/dL, CRP 0.39 mg/dL, NLR 2.4, PLR 162.5, CEA 4.8 ng/mL, and CA19-9 255.9 U/mL. The mGPS distribution was 0:23 cases, 1:18 cases, and 2:11 cases. The treatment outcomes were ORR 25.0% (CR 2 cases, PR 11 cases), DCR 78.8% (SD 28 cases, PD 10 cases, NE 1 case), median PFS 8.6 months, and median OS 13.9 months. The PLR was suggested to be useful for predicting PFS. A decrease in CEA at six weeks after the start of treatment was a significant predictor of PFS and OS. Gallbladder cancer had a significantly poorer prognosis compared to other cancers. The immune-related adverse events included hypothyroidism in two cases, cholangitis in one case, and colitis in one case. Conclusions: The ORR, DCR, and PFS were comparable to those in the TOPAZ-1 trial. Although limited by its retrospective design and small sample size, this study suggests that GCD therapy is an effective treatment regimen for unresectable biliary tract cancer in real-world clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Anticancer Inhibitors and Targeted Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 885 KiB  
Article
MRI-Based Radiomics for Outcome Stratification in Pediatric Osteosarcoma
by Esther Ngan, Dolores Mullikin, Ashok J. Theruvath, Ananth V. Annapragada, Ketan B. Ghaghada, Andras A. Heczey and Zbigniew A. Starosolski
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2586; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152586 (registering DOI) - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents; the survival rate is as low as 24%. Accurate prediction of clinical outcomes remains a challenge due to tumor heterogeneity and the complexity of pediatric cases. This study [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents; the survival rate is as low as 24%. Accurate prediction of clinical outcomes remains a challenge due to tumor heterogeneity and the complexity of pediatric cases. This study aims to improve predictions of progressive disease, therapy response, relapse, and survival in pediatric OS using MRI-based radiomics and machine learning methods. Methods: Pre-treatment contrast-enhanced coronal T1-weighted MR scans were collected from 63 pediatric OS patients, with an additional nine external cases used for validation. Three strategies were considered for target region segmentation (whole-tumor, tumor sampling, and bone/soft tissue) and used for MRI-based radiomics. These were then combined with clinical features to predict OS clinical outcomes. Results: The mean age of OS patients was 11.8 ± 3.5 years. Most tumors were located in the femur (65%). Osteoblastic subtype was the most common histological classification (79%). The majority of OS patients (79%) did not have evidence of metastasis at diagnosis. Progressive disease occurred in 27% of patients, 59% of patients showed adequate therapy response, 25% experienced relapse after therapy, and 30% died from OS. Classification models based on bone/soft tissue segmentation generally performed the best, with certain clinical features improving performance, especially for therapy response and mortality. The top performing classifier in each outcome achieved 0.94–1.0 validation ROC AUC and 0.63–1.0 testing ROC AUC, while those without radiomic features (RFs) generally performed suboptimally. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the strong predictive capabilities of MRI-based radiomics and multi-region segmentations for predicting clinical outcomes in pediatric OS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Roles of Deep Learning in Cancer Radiotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 551 KiB  
Article
Mortality During In-Hospital Stay and the First 24 h After Decompressive Craniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multi-Center, Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study
by Thomas Kapapa, Martin Petkov, Andrej Pala, Dieter Woischneck, Franziska Schiller, Stefanie Jesuthasan, Frederike Schiller, Hendrik Bracht, Benjamin Mayer and Marcel Oehmichen
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5540; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155540 (registering DOI) - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Objectives: Early death after trauma has been described several times. Little is known about it after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and decompressive craniectomy (DC). The aim of this study was to characterize patients who die after a TBI and DC during their [...] Read more.
Objectives: Early death after trauma has been described several times. Little is known about it after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and decompressive craniectomy (DC). The aim of this study was to characterize patients who die after a TBI and DC during their in-hospital stay. Methods: In a subgroup analysis of a retrospective, multicenter, and observational study, non-survivors from in-hospital stays treated for severe TBI and DC were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used. Results: A total of 223 patients with severe TBI were treated with DC, and there were 65 (29.1%) patients who did not survive. Of these, 22 (33.8%) died within the first 24 h. Non-survivors were older (p = 0.010), and pupillomotor dysfunction and a higher heart rate on admission were more common (p < 0.001). PSM patients for overall survival (41, 18.4%) differed in mean heart rate from the deceased (p = 0.030). In a multivariate model, age (OR: 1.045, p = 0.013, CI95%: 1.010 to 1.082), Quick value (OR: 0.965, p = 0.049, CI95%: 0.931 to 1.000), and heart rate (OR: 1.099, p = 0.030, CI95%: 1.009 to 1.197) were confirmed as predictive factors. Conclusions: Even after DC, known factors, such as chronological age and comorbidities, have a significant influence on mortality. The value of DC in an aging society for a particular severity of TBI should be further assessed on the basis of prospective studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1850 KiB  
Article
Pancreatic Cancer with Liver Oligometastases—Different Patterns of Disease Progression May Suggest Benefits of Surgical Resection
by Nedaa Mahamid, Arielle Jacover, Angam Zabeda, Tamar Beller, Havi Murad, Yoav Elizur, Ron Pery, Rony Eshkenazy, Talia Golan, Ido Nachmany and Niv Pencovich
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5538; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155538 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with liver oligometastases (LOM) presents a therapeutic challenge, with optimal management strategies remaining uncertain. This study evaluates the long-term outcomes, patterns of disease progression, and potential factors influencing prognosis in this patient subset. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PDAC and [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with liver oligometastases (LOM) presents a therapeutic challenge, with optimal management strategies remaining uncertain. This study evaluates the long-term outcomes, patterns of disease progression, and potential factors influencing prognosis in this patient subset. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PDAC and LOM were retrospectively analyzed. Disease progression patterns, causes of death, and predictors of long-term outcomes were assessed. Results: Among 1442 patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC between November 2009 and July 2024, 129 (9%) presented with LOM, defined as ≤3 liver lesions each measuring <2 cm. Patients with LOM had significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared to those with high-burden disease (p = 0.026). The cause of death (local regional disease vs. systemic disease) could be determined in 74 patients (57%), among whom age at diagnosis, history of smoking, and white blood cell (WBC) count differed significantly between groups. However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (p = 0.64). Sixteen patients (22%) died from local complications of the primary tumor, including 6 patients (7%) who showed no evidence of new or progressive metastases. In competing risk and multivariable analysis, a history of smoking remained the only factor significantly associated with death due to local complications. Conclusions: Approximately one in five patients with PDAC-LOM died from local tumor-related complications—some without metastatic progression—highlighting a potential role for surgical intervention. Further multicenter studies are warranted to refine diagnostic criteria and better identify patients who may benefit from surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1870 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Risk Factors for High-Risk Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma
by Yi-Hsiang Chiu, Shu-Ting Wu, Yung-Nien Chen, Wen-Chieh Chen, Lay-San Lim, Yvonne Ee Wern Chiew, Ping-Chen Kuo, Ya-Chen Yang, Shun-Yu Chi and Chen-Kai Chou
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2585; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152585 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is associated with certain features that carry an increased risk of local recurrence, underscoring the importance of preoperative risk assessment. This study investigated the clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk lymph node metastasis (HRLNM) and patient outcomes. HRLNM is [...] Read more.
Background: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is associated with certain features that carry an increased risk of local recurrence, underscoring the importance of preoperative risk assessment. This study investigated the clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk lymph node metastasis (HRLNM) and patient outcomes. HRLNM is defined as ≥5 metastatic lymph nodes and/or lateral neck metastasis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 985 patients with PTMC who underwent thyroidectomy at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2013 to 2022. Results: Among the 985 patients, 100 (10.2%) had lymph node metastasis (LNM), and 27% of these were classified as having HRLNM. Male sex (OR 3.61, p = 0.04) and extranodal extension (OR 3.76, p = 0.043) were independent predictors of HRLNM. Patients with LNM exhibited lower rates of excellent treatment response (75% vs. 87%, p = 0.001), higher recurrence rates (9.0% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.001), and an increased risk of distant metastasis (2.0% vs. 0%). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly shorter in patients with LNM (120.9 vs. 198.6 months, p < 0.001). Although HRLNM showed a trend toward reduced RFS (113.5 vs. 124.6 months, p = 0.177), its impact on long-term survival remains uncertain. Conclusions: Male sex and extranodal extension were significant risk factors for HRLNM in patients with PTMC. These findings highlight the need for individualized risk stratification to guide treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1557 KiB  
Review
Neoadjuvant Therapy or Upfront Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer—To Whom, When, and How?
by Daria Kwaśniewska, Marta Fudalej, Anna Maria Badowska-Kozakiewicz, Aleksandra Czerw and Andrzej Deptała
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2584; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152584 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
The management of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) remains a topic of active debate. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shown clinical benefits in BR-PDAC, especially in increasing resectability and achieving higher rates of margin-negative (R0) resections, [...] Read more.
The management of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) remains a topic of active debate. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shown clinical benefits in BR-PDAC, especially in increasing resectability and achieving higher rates of margin-negative (R0) resections, its role in R-PDAC is less clearly defined. Additionally, the role of immunotherapy in PDAC is still being explored, with ongoing trials investigating new combinations to overcome the tumor’s immune-resistant microenvironment. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the current evidence comparing NAT with upfront surgery in pancreatic cancer management, focusing on randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that assess outcomes in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. The review aims to determine whether NAT offers a significant survival advantage over traditional post-operative strategies and to clarify which clinical scenarios may benefit most from NAT. The literature was identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to March 2025. Article selection adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Our review of existing evidence supports NAT as the standard of care for BR-PDAC. Meanwhile, management of R-PDAC should be tailored individually, guided by risk stratification that considers both clinical parameters and molecular features. Immunotherapy and targeted therapies are still in early research phases, and their further integration as NAT remains controversial. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1614 KiB  
Article
Adverse Pathology After Radical Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life
by Michael Chaloupka, Alexander Buchner, Marc Kidess, Benedikt Ebner, Yannic Volz, Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Stephan Timo Ledderose, Dirk-André Clevert, Julian Marcon, Philipp Weinhold, Christian G. Stief and Maria Apfelbeck
Diagnostics 2025, 15(15), 1969; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15151969 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background and Objective: Adverse pathology to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (upgrading) poses a threat to risk stratification and treatment planning. The impact on sexual function, urinary continence, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. Methods: From 2004 [...] Read more.
Background and Objective: Adverse pathology to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (upgrading) poses a threat to risk stratification and treatment planning. The impact on sexual function, urinary continence, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. Methods: From 2004 to 2024, 4189 patients with preop low-/intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 6 or 7a, PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL) underwent radical prostatectomy at our department and were analyzed. Primary endpoint was HRQOL, erectile function, and urinary continence. Secondary endpoint was rate of salvage therapies and biochemical-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed using “operative time”, “robot-assisted surgery”, “blood loss”, “nerve-sparing surgery”, “age”, and “BMI” to represent comparable surgical approach. Median follow-up was 39 months (Interquartile-range (IQR) 15–60). Key Findings and Limitations: Patients who were upgraded to high-risk PCa showed a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy compared to patients who were not upgraded (21% vs. 7%, p < 0.001; 9% vs. 3%, p = 0.002). Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 68% in the upgrading group vs. 84% in the no-upgrading group (p < 0.001). We saw no difference in patient-reported HRQOL, urinary continence, or erectile function. Multivariable analysis showed that postoperative upgrading was a significant risk for not achieving good overall HRQOL (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.97, p = 0.028) during the follow-up. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Although postoperative upgrading to high-risk PCa leads to worse oncologic outcomes and higher salvage therapy rates, this study indicates that its impact on health-related quality of life is minimal and should not deter a cautious approach to radical prostatectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 406 KiB  
Systematic Review
Advances in Bidirectional Therapy for Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Combined with Systemic Chemotherapy
by Manuela Robella, Marco Vitturini, Andrea Di Giorgio, Matteo Aulicino, Martin Hubner, Emanuele Koumantakis, Felice Borghi, Paolo Catania, Armando Cinquegrana and Paola Berchialla
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2580; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152580 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a common and challenging manifestation of several gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Bidirectional treatment—combining Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with systemic chemotherapy—has emerged as a strategy to enhance locoregional control while maintaining systemic coverage. Objective: This systematic [...] Read more.
Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a common and challenging manifestation of several gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Bidirectional treatment—combining Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with systemic chemotherapy—has emerged as a strategy to enhance locoregional control while maintaining systemic coverage. Objective: This systematic review aimed to analyze the study design, characteristics, and timing of the treatments administered—including the type of systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal agents used in PIPAC, and interval between administrations—as well as the clinical outcomes, safety profile, and overall methodological quality of the available literature on bidirectional treatment for peritoneal metastases. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to April 2025. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bidirectional treatment. Data extraction focused on survival, response assessment (PRGS, PCI), adverse events, systemic and intraperitoneal regimens, treatment interval, and study methodology. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 1015 patients (742 treated with bidirectional therapy) were included. Median overall survival ranged from 2.8 to 19.6 months, with the most favorable outcomes observed in gastric and colorectal cancer cohorts. PRGS improvement after multiple PIPAC cycles was reported in >80% of evaluable cases. High-grade adverse events (CTCAE ≥ 3) occurred in up to 17% of patients in most studies, with only one study reporting treatment-related mortality. However, methodological quality was generally moderate, with considerable heterogeneity in treatment protocols, response criteria, systemic regimens, and toxicity attribution. Conclusions: Bidirectional therapy with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy appears to be a feasible and potentially effective strategy for selected patients with peritoneal metastases. Despite encouraging outcomes, definitive conclusions are limited by the retrospective nature and heterogeneity of available studies. Prospective standardized trials are needed to confirm efficacy, clarify patient selection, and optimize treatment protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 616 KiB  
Article
Surgical Margin Analysis in Osteosarcoma: Impact on Survival and Local Control
by Sebastian Breden, Simone Beischl, Florian Hinterwimmer, Sarah Consalvo, Carolin Knebel, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rainer Burgkart and Ulrich Lenze
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2581; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152581 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The quality of surgical margins has been shown to be a prognostic factor in many sarcoma entities, yet its role in osteosarcoma remains controversial. While previous studies have shown that the outcome was not related to the margin width in bone, the [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The quality of surgical margins has been shown to be a prognostic factor in many sarcoma entities, yet its role in osteosarcoma remains controversial. While previous studies have shown that the outcome was not related to the margin width in bone, the impact of the extraosseous margin width (margin at the soft tissue invasion)—which needs to be close sometimes due to neurovascular structures—needs to be assessed. This study aims to evaluate the influence of soft tissue surgical margins on local recurrence and overall survival in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study including 75 patients treated for high-grade osteosarcoma. All patients underwent standardized neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by complete surgical resection. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the histological margin width of the extraosseous parts: group 1 (<1 mm), group 2 (1–5 mm), and group 3 (≥5 mm). Primary endpoints were local recurrence and overall survival (OS), analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates, log-rank tests, and Cox regression. Results: Local recurrence occurred in seven patients (9%). Although the overall comparison between the three groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.074), a subgroup analysis revealed a significantly higher recurrence rate in patients with margins < 1 mm compared to those with wider margins (p = 0.024). No significant differences in overall survival (OS) were observed between the groups (p = 0.896). Tumor location, metastatic status, and UICC stage were significant predictors for both endpoints in univariate analysis. However, none of these association were confirmed in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Very close surgical margins (<1 mm) may increase the risk of local recurrence in high-grade osteosarcoma; however, they do not appear to affect overall survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Treatment of Osteosarcoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 806 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm: A Clinical and Environmental Hazard
by Bindu Sadanandan and Kavyasree Marabanahalli Yogendraiah
Med. Sci. Forum 2025, 35(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025035005 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
This review explores the biofilm architecture and drug resistance of Enterococcus faecalis in clinical and environmental settings. The biofilm in E. faecalis is a heterogeneous, three-dimensional, mushroom-like or multilayered structure, characteristically forming diplococci or short chains interspersed with water channels for nutrient exchange [...] Read more.
This review explores the biofilm architecture and drug resistance of Enterococcus faecalis in clinical and environmental settings. The biofilm in E. faecalis is a heterogeneous, three-dimensional, mushroom-like or multilayered structure, characteristically forming diplococci or short chains interspersed with water channels for nutrient exchange and waste removal. Exopolysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and extracellular DNA create a protective matrix. Persister cells within the biofilm contribute to antibiotic resistance and survival. The heterogeneous architecture of the E. faecalis biofilm contains both dense clusters and loosely packed regions that vary in thickness, ranging from 10 to 100 µm, depending on the environmental conditions. The pathogenicity of the E. faecalis biofilm is mediated through complex interactions between genes and virulence factors such as DNA release, cytolysin, pili, secreted antigen A, and microbial surface components that recognize adhesive matrix molecules, often involving a key protein called enterococcal surface protein (Esp). Clinically, it is implicated in a range of nosocomial infections, including urinary tract infections, endocarditis, and surgical wound infections. The biofilm serves as a nidus for bacterial dissemination and as a reservoir for antimicrobial resistance. The effectiveness of first-line antibiotics (ampicillin, vancomycin, and aminoglycosides) is diminished due to reduced penetration, altered metabolism, increased tolerance, and intrinsic and acquired resistance. Alternative strategies for biofilm disruption, such as combination therapy (ampicillin with aminoglycosides), as well as newer approaches, including antimicrobial peptides, quorum-sensing inhibitors, and biofilm-disrupting agents (DNase or dispersin B), are also being explored to improve treatment outcomes. Environmentally, E. faecalis biofilms contribute to contamination in water systems, food production facilities, and healthcare environments. They persist in harsh conditions, facilitating the spread of multidrug-resistant strains and increasing the risk of transmission to humans and animals. Therefore, understanding the biofilm architecture and drug resistance is essential for developing effective strategies to mitigate their clinical and environmental impact. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Antibiotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4092 KiB  
Article
Ribosome Biogenesis Underpins Tumor Progression: A Comprehensive Signature for Survival and Immunotherapy Response Prediction
by Amr R. Elhamamsy, Salma M. Aly, Rajeev S. Samant and Lalita A. Shevde
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2576; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152576 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: RiBi is integral to cell proliferation, and its dysregulation is increasingly recognized as a hallmark of aggressive cancers. We sought to develop and validate a composite “PanRibo-515 score” reflecting RiBi activity across multiple tumor types, assess its prognostic significance, and explore [...] Read more.
Background: RiBi is integral to cell proliferation, and its dysregulation is increasingly recognized as a hallmark of aggressive cancers. We sought to develop and validate a composite “PanRibo-515 score” reflecting RiBi activity across multiple tumor types, assess its prognostic significance, and explore its relationship with immune checkpoint therapy outcomes. Methods: We curated 515 RiBi–associated genes (PanRibo-515) and used a LASSO regression-based strategy on a training dataset (GSE202203) to select the prognostically most relevant subset of 68 genes (OncoRibo-68). Directionality (positive or negative impact on survival) was assigned based on the sign of the LASSO coefficients. We integrated a forward selection approach to identify a refined subset of genes for computing the OncoRibo-68 score. For validation, patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were stratified into high or low OncoRibo-68 score groups for survival analyses. Additional validation for immunotherapy response was conducted using bioinformatic platforms used for immunotherapy response analysis. Results: A higher OncoRibo-68 score consistently correlated with poorer overall and progression-free survival across multiple cancers. Elevated OncoRibo-68 score was linked to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, but interestingly to increased response to checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusions: Our findings highlight RiBi as an important determinant of tumor aggressiveness and identify the OncoRibo-68 score as a promising biomarker for risk stratification and therapy selection. Future research may evaluate whether targeting RiBi pathways could enhance treatment efficacy, particularly in combination with immunotherapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 688 KiB  
Review
The Evolving Treatment Landscape for the Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patient: From Quad Regimens to T-Cell Engagers and CAR-T
by Matthew James Rees and Hang Quach
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2579; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152579 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is predominantly a disease of the elderly. In recent years, a surge of highly effective plasma cell therapies has revolutionized the care of elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients, for whom frailty and age-related competing causes of mortality determine management. Traditionally, [...] Read more.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is predominantly a disease of the elderly. In recent years, a surge of highly effective plasma cell therapies has revolutionized the care of elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients, for whom frailty and age-related competing causes of mortality determine management. Traditionally, the treatment of newly diagnosed elderly patients has centered on doublet or triplet combinations composed of immunomodulators (IMIDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and corticosteroids producing median progression-free survival (PFS) rates between 34 and 62 months. However, recently, a series of large phase III clinical trials examining quadruplet regimens of PIs, IMIDs, corticosteroids, and anti-CD38 mAbs have shown exceptional outcomes, with median PFS exceeding 60 months, albeit with higher rates of peripheral neuropathy (≥Grade 2: 27% vs. 10%) when PIs and IMIDs are combined, and infections (≥Grade 3: 40% vs. 29–41%) with the addition of anti-CD38mAbs. The development of T-cell redirecting therapies including T-cell engagers (TCEs) and CAR-T cells has further expanded the therapeutic arsenal. TCEs have shown exceptional activity in relapsed disease and are being explored in the newly diagnosed setting with promising early results. However, concerns remain regarding the logistical challenges of step-up dosing, which often necessitates inpatient admission, the infectious risks, and the financial burden associated with TCEs in elderly patients. CAR-T, the most potent commercially available therapy for MM, offers the potential of a ‘one and done’ approach. However, its application to elderly patients has been tempered by significant concerns of cytokine release syndrome, early and delayed neurological toxicity, and its overall tolerability in frail patients. Robust data in frail patients are still needed. How CAR-T and TCEs will be sequenced among the growing therapeutic armamentarium for elderly MM patients remains to be determined. This review explores the safety, efficacy, cost, and logistical barriers associated with the above treatments in elderly MM patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 534 KiB  
Review
Evolving Treatment Paradigms in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Expert Narrative Review
by Vineet Talwar, Kaushal Kalra, Akhil Kapoor, P. S. Dattatreya, Amit Joshi, Krishna Chaitanya, M. V. Chandrakanth, Atul Batra, Krishna Prasad, Nikhil Haridas and Nilesh Lokeshwar
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(8), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080437 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
The treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has transformed significantly with the advent of triplet therapy involving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), docetaxel, and androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs). While clinical guidelines increasingly support early intensification, real-world practice remains challenged by patient [...] Read more.
The treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has transformed significantly with the advent of triplet therapy involving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), docetaxel, and androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs). While clinical guidelines increasingly support early intensification, real-world practice remains challenged by patient heterogeneity, evolving evidence, and limited consensus on treatment sequencing. This narrative review integrates evidence from landmark trials, clinical guidelines, and expert insights from oncologists managing mHSPC in India. Findings affirm that triplet therapy, particularly with darolutamide, improves survival in high-volume disease and underscores the need for personalized treatment based on disease burden, comorbidities, and genomic profiles. The review also highlights gaps in real-world data, sequencing strategies, and biomarker-driven therapy, reinforcing the need for precision medicine and locally relevant evidence to guide treatment. Ultimately, optimizing mHSPC management requires harmonizing guideline-based approaches with individualized, real-world decision making to improve patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 531 KiB  
Article
Impact of Depression and/or Anxiety on Mortality in Women with Gynecologic Cancers: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study
by Yung-Taek Ouh, Eun-Yeob Kim, Nam Kyeong Kim, Nak-Woo Lee and Kyung-Jin Min
Healthcare 2025, 13(15), 1904; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151904 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of depression and anxiety disorders on mortality in women diagnosed with gynecologic cancers, utilizing nationwide retrospective cohort data. Methods: Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database, covering women diagnosed with cervical, endometrial, [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of depression and anxiety disorders on mortality in women diagnosed with gynecologic cancers, utilizing nationwide retrospective cohort data. Methods: Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database, covering women diagnosed with cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancers between 2007 and 2014, were analyzed. Women diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders within one year after cancer diagnosis were identified and compared with a control group comprising patients with gynecologic cancers who did not develop either disorder during the same post-diagnosis period. Mortality was evaluated as the primary outcome. Results: Of 85,327 women analyzed, 784 (0.9%) were diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders. Patients with depression or anxiety exhibited significantly higher mortality (38.4% vs. 29.9%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that depression significantly increased mortality risk (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27–1.66), whereas anxiety alone showed no significant effect (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.74–1.27). Combined depression and anxiety showed the highest mortality risk (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.31–1.65). Conclusions: Depression and anxiety disorders are significant predictors of increased mortality in women with gynecologic cancers, emphasizing the necessity for integrated mental health assessment and interventions in oncologic care to improve both survival and quality of life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Health Informatics and Big Data)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop