Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (4,550)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = survival benefit

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 2609 KiB  
Article
Residual Tumor Resection After Anti-PD-1 Therapy: A Promising Treatment Strategy for Overcoming Immune Evasive Phenotype Induced by Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Gastric Cancer
by Hajime Matsuida, Kosaku Mimura, Shotaro Nakajima, Katsuharu Saito, Sohei Hayashishita, Chiaki Takiguchi, Azuma Nirei, Tomohiro Kikuchi, Hiroyuki Hanayama, Hirokazu Okayama, Motonobu Saito, Tomoyuki Momma, Zenichiro Saze and Koji Kono
Cells 2025, 14(15), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14151212 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Anti-programmed death 1 receptor (PD-1) therapy is a promising treatment strategy for patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. However, its response rate and survival benefits are still limited; an immunological analysis of the residual tumor after anti-PD-1 therapy [...] Read more.
Background: Anti-programmed death 1 receptor (PD-1) therapy is a promising treatment strategy for patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. However, its response rate and survival benefits are still limited; an immunological analysis of the residual tumor after anti-PD-1 therapy would be important. Methods: We evaluated the clinical efficacy of tumor resection (TR) after chemotherapy or anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent G/GEJ cancer and analyzed the immune status of tumor microenvironment (TME) by immunohistochemistry using their surgically resected specimens. Results: Patients treated with TR after anti-PD-1 therapy had significantly longer survival compared to those treated with chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 therapy alone. Expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II on tumor cells was markedly downregulated after anti-PD-1 therapy compared to chemotherapy. Furthermore, the downregulation of HLA class I may be associated with the activation of transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway in the TME. Conclusions: Immune escape from cytotoxic T lymphocytes may be induced in the TME in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent G/GEJ cancer after anti-PD-1 therapy due to the downregulation of HLA class I and MHC class II expression on tumor cells. TR may be a promising treatment strategy for these patients when TR is feasible after anti-PD-1 therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1122 KiB  
Article
Revisiting Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Evidence of Survival Benefit with First-Line Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Regimens
by Sri Saran Manivasagam, Alireza Aminsharifi and Jay D. Raman
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5543; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155543 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy with a rising global incidence. While cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) was historically a cornerstone in the management of metastatic RCC (mRCC), its role has been questioned following pivotal trials such as CARMENA and SURTIME. [...] Read more.
Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy with a rising global incidence. While cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) was historically a cornerstone in the management of metastatic RCC (mRCC), its role has been questioned following pivotal trials such as CARMENA and SURTIME. With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies, the contemporary relevance of CRN coupled with first-line immunotherapy and targeted therapy combination regimens warrants re-evaluation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX research network to identify patients aged 18–90 years diagnosed with mRCC between 2005 and 2024 who received first-line systemic therapies. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on receipt of CRN status within one year of diagnosis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was done to adjust baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to compare five-year overall survival between the groups. Results: Among 5960 eligible patients, 1776 (888 CRN matched to 888 who did not) formed the cohort of analysis. The CRN group demonstrated significantly higher five-year survival (57.7% vs. 45.0%, p < 0.0001) with a hazard ratio of 1.56 (95% CI: 1.33–1.83). Subgroup analyses showed consistent survival benefits across all four NCCN-recommended first-line regimens—Axitinib + Pembrolizumab: 64.0% (CRN) vs. 53.3% (no CRN), p = 0.01; Cabozantinib + Nivolumab: 50.1% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.004; Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab: 37.4% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.012; Nivolumab + Ipilimumab: 56.4% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.005. Conclusions: In the era of modern immunotherapy and targeted agents, CRN remains associated with improved survival in patients with mRCC receiving NCCN-recommended first-line regimens. These findings support the continued evaluation of CRN as a component of multimodal therapy, particularly in patients with favorable risk profiles. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 693 KiB  
Article
Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study
by Eishin Kurihara, Satoru Kakizaki, Masashi Ijima, Takeshi Hatanaka, Norio Kubo, Yuhei Suzuki, Hidetoshi Yasuoka, Takashi Hoshino, Atsushi Naganuma, Noriyuki Tani, Yuichi Yamazaki and Toshio Uraoka
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1915; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081915 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit of using durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibody, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCD) treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit of using durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibody, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCD) treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of GCD treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer in real-world conditions. Methods: The study subjects were 52 patients with biliary tract cancer who received GCD therapy between January 2023 and May 2024. The observation parameters included the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR), tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results: The cohort included 36 men and 16 women, with a median age of 73.0 years. There were 36 cases of cholangiocarcinoma (distal: 10, perihilar: 19, intrahepatic: 7), 13 cases of gallbladder cancer, and 3 cases of ampullary carcinoma. The stages were locally advanced in 30 cases and metastatic in 22 cases. Biliary drainage was performed in 30 cases. There were 38 cases receiving first-line therapy and 14 cases receiving second-line or later treatments. The median values at the start of GCD therapy were ALB 3.7 g/dL, CRP 0.39 mg/dL, NLR 2.4, PLR 162.5, CEA 4.8 ng/mL, and CA19-9 255.9 U/mL. The mGPS distribution was 0:23 cases, 1:18 cases, and 2:11 cases. The treatment outcomes were ORR 25.0% (CR 2 cases, PR 11 cases), DCR 78.8% (SD 28 cases, PD 10 cases, NE 1 case), median PFS 8.6 months, and median OS 13.9 months. The PLR was suggested to be useful for predicting PFS. A decrease in CEA at six weeks after the start of treatment was a significant predictor of PFS and OS. Gallbladder cancer had a significantly poorer prognosis compared to other cancers. The immune-related adverse events included hypothyroidism in two cases, cholangitis in one case, and colitis in one case. Conclusions: The ORR, DCR, and PFS were comparable to those in the TOPAZ-1 trial. Although limited by its retrospective design and small sample size, this study suggests that GCD therapy is an effective treatment regimen for unresectable biliary tract cancer in real-world clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Anticancer Inhibitors and Targeted Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1850 KiB  
Article
Pancreatic Cancer with Liver Oligometastases—Different Patterns of Disease Progression May Suggest Benefits of Surgical Resection
by Nedaa Mahamid, Arielle Jacover, Angam Zabeda, Tamar Beller, Havi Murad, Yoav Elizur, Ron Pery, Rony Eshkenazy, Talia Golan, Ido Nachmany and Niv Pencovich
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5538; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155538 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with liver oligometastases (LOM) presents a therapeutic challenge, with optimal management strategies remaining uncertain. This study evaluates the long-term outcomes, patterns of disease progression, and potential factors influencing prognosis in this patient subset. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PDAC and [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with liver oligometastases (LOM) presents a therapeutic challenge, with optimal management strategies remaining uncertain. This study evaluates the long-term outcomes, patterns of disease progression, and potential factors influencing prognosis in this patient subset. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PDAC and LOM were retrospectively analyzed. Disease progression patterns, causes of death, and predictors of long-term outcomes were assessed. Results: Among 1442 patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC between November 2009 and July 2024, 129 (9%) presented with LOM, defined as ≤3 liver lesions each measuring <2 cm. Patients with LOM had significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared to those with high-burden disease (p = 0.026). The cause of death (local regional disease vs. systemic disease) could be determined in 74 patients (57%), among whom age at diagnosis, history of smoking, and white blood cell (WBC) count differed significantly between groups. However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (p = 0.64). Sixteen patients (22%) died from local complications of the primary tumor, including 6 patients (7%) who showed no evidence of new or progressive metastases. In competing risk and multivariable analysis, a history of smoking remained the only factor significantly associated with death due to local complications. Conclusions: Approximately one in five patients with PDAC-LOM died from local tumor-related complications—some without metastatic progression—highlighting a potential role for surgical intervention. Further multicenter studies are warranted to refine diagnostic criteria and better identify patients who may benefit from surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1557 KiB  
Review
Neoadjuvant Therapy or Upfront Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer—To Whom, When, and How?
by Daria Kwaśniewska, Marta Fudalej, Anna Maria Badowska-Kozakiewicz, Aleksandra Czerw and Andrzej Deptała
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2584; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152584 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
The management of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) remains a topic of active debate. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shown clinical benefits in BR-PDAC, especially in increasing resectability and achieving higher rates of margin-negative (R0) resections, [...] Read more.
The management of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) remains a topic of active debate. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shown clinical benefits in BR-PDAC, especially in increasing resectability and achieving higher rates of margin-negative (R0) resections, its role in R-PDAC is less clearly defined. Additionally, the role of immunotherapy in PDAC is still being explored, with ongoing trials investigating new combinations to overcome the tumor’s immune-resistant microenvironment. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the current evidence comparing NAT with upfront surgery in pancreatic cancer management, focusing on randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that assess outcomes in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. The review aims to determine whether NAT offers a significant survival advantage over traditional post-operative strategies and to clarify which clinical scenarios may benefit most from NAT. The literature was identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to March 2025. Article selection adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Our review of existing evidence supports NAT as the standard of care for BR-PDAC. Meanwhile, management of R-PDAC should be tailored individually, guided by risk stratification that considers both clinical parameters and molecular features. Immunotherapy and targeted therapies are still in early research phases, and their further integration as NAT remains controversial. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 746 KiB  
Review
Prospects and Challenges of Lung Cancer Vaccines
by Zhen Lin, Zegang Chen, Lijiao Pei, Yueyun Chen and Zhenyu Ding
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 836; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080836 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide. Although conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have modestly improved patient survival, their overall efficacy remains limited, and the prognosis is generally poor. In recent years, immunotherapy, particularly immune [...] Read more.
Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide. Although conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have modestly improved patient survival, their overall efficacy remains limited, and the prognosis is generally poor. In recent years, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized cancer treatment. Nevertheless, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, tumor heterogeneity, and immune escape mechanisms significantly restrict the clinical benefit, which falls short of expectations. Within this context, cancer vaccines have emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic strategy. By activating the host immune system to eliminate tumor cells, cancer vaccines offer high specificity, low toxicity, and the potential to induce long-lasting immune memory. These advantages have positioned them as a focal point in cancer immunotherapy research. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of recent clinical advances in lung cancer vaccines, discusses the major challenges impeding their clinical application, and explores potential strategies to overcome these barriers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccination Against Cancer and Chronic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 419 KiB  
Article
Predictive Value of Electrocardiographic Markers Versus Echocardiographic and Clinical Measures for Appropriate ICD Shocks in Heart Failure Patients
by Özkan Bekler, Süleyman Diren Kazan, Hazar Harbalioğlu and Onur Kaypakli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5506; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155506 - 5 Aug 2025
Viewed by 23
Abstract
Background: Despite the survival benefit of ICDs in patients with HFrEF, most recipients do not receive appropriate therapy during follow-up. Existing risk models based on echocardiographic and clinical parameters show limited predictive accuracy for arrhythmic events. This study aimed to assess whether ECG-derived [...] Read more.
Background: Despite the survival benefit of ICDs in patients with HFrEF, most recipients do not receive appropriate therapy during follow-up. Existing risk models based on echocardiographic and clinical parameters show limited predictive accuracy for arrhythmic events. This study aimed to assess whether ECG-derived markers outperform conventional measures in predicting appropriate ICD shocks. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 375 patients with HFrEF who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention at least six months before study enrollment. Twelve-lead surface ECGs were analyzed for a QTc interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, frontal QRS-T angle, and maximum deflection index (MDI). Clinical, echocardiographic, and arrhythmic event data obtained from device interrogations were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify independent predictors of appropriate ICD shocks. Results: Patients who experienced appropriate ICD shocks had significantly higher rates of a complete bundle branch block, digoxin use, QRS duration, QTc, Tp-e/QT ratio, frontal QRS-T angle, MDI, and right-ventricular pacing ratio. Conversely, beta-blocker use was significantly lower in this group. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of appropriate shocks included the patient’s digoxin use (OR = 2.931, p = 0.003), beta-blocker use (OR = 0.275, p = 0.002), frontal QRS-T angle (OR = 1.009, p < 0.001), QTc interval (OR = 1.020, p < 0.001), and Tp-e/QT ratio (OR = 4.882, p = 0.050). The frontal QRS-T angle had a cutoff value of 105.5° for predicting appropriate ICD shocks (sensitivity: 73.6%, specificity: 85.2%, AUC = 0.758, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Electrocardiographic markers, particularly the frontal QRS-T angle, QTc interval, and Tp-e/QT ratio, demonstrated superior predictive power for appropriate ICD shocks compared to conventional echocardiographic and clinical measures. These easily obtainable, non-invasive ECG parameters may improve current risk stratification models and support more individualized ICD implantation strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 513 KiB  
Review
Recent Trends in Surgical Strategies of Early-Stage Gallbladder Cancer: A Narrative Review
by Junseo Choi, Ji Su Kim and Jun Suh Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5483; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155483 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 166
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a lethal malignancy curable only by surgical resection in early stages (Tis, T1, T2). Significant controversy exists regarding the optimal extent of surgery. This review summarizes recent trends and evidence on surgical strategies for Tis, T1, and T2 [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a lethal malignancy curable only by surgical resection in early stages (Tis, T1, T2). Significant controversy exists regarding the optimal extent of surgery. This review summarizes recent trends and evidence on surgical strategies for Tis, T1, and T2 GBC to guide practice and research. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes recent literature on surgical management of Tis, T1a, T1b, and T2 GBC based on American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging. It examines simple vs. extended cholecystectomy (simple cholecystectomy (SC) vs. extended/radical cholecystectomy (EC/RC)), the role of lymphadenectomy (LND) and hepatectomy, and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Results: Simple cholecystectomy is curative for Tis/T1a GBC. For T1b, regional LND is essential for staging/potential benefit, especially examining ≥5–6 nodes. Tumor size is critical; SC alone may suffice for T1b < 1 cm (low lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk), while EC/RC with LND is indicated for ≥1 cm (higher LNM risk). Routine hepatectomy for T1b lacks survival support. For T2 GBC, mandatory regional LND (≥6 nodes) is required for both T2a and T2b substages due to high LNM rates; T2b has higher LNM than T2a. Routine hepatectomy for T2 is debated; evidence suggests no routine benefit for T2a beyond LND, with conflicting findings for T2b. R0 resection is paramount. MIS is feasible for early stages in experienced hands. Conclusions: Management of early GBC is moving towards risk stratification. SC is standard for Tis/T1a. Adequate regional LND is crucial for T1b (especially ≥1 cm) and mandatory for T2 GBC. Routine hepatectomy, particularly for T2b, remains controversial. Tailored surgery prioritizes R0 resection and comprehensive LND, necessitating further standardized research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Trends in Visceral and Gastrointestinal Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 917 KiB  
Article
Deep Learning Treatment Recommendations for Patients Diagnosed with Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Deprivation Treatment
by Chunyang Li, Julia Bohman, Vikas Patil, Richard Mcshinsky, Christina Yong, Zach Burningham, Matthew Samore and Ahmad S. Halwani
BioMedInformatics 2025, 5(3), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics5030042 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 234
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. A subset of patients develops non-metastatic, castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC), for which management requires a personalized consideration for appropriate treatment. However, there is no consensus regarding [...] Read more.
Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. A subset of patients develops non-metastatic, castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC), for which management requires a personalized consideration for appropriate treatment. However, there is no consensus regarding when to switch from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to more aggressive treatments like abiraterone or enzalutamide. Methods: We analyzed 5037 nmCRPC patients and employed a Weibull Time to Event Recurrent Neural Network to identify patients who would benefit from switching from ADT to abiraterone/enzalutamide. We evaluated this model using differential treatment benefits measured by the Kaplan–Meier estimation and milestone probabilities. Results: The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.738 (standard deviation (SD): 0.057) for patients treated with abiraterone/enzalutamide and 0.693 (SD: 0.02) for patients exclusively treated with ADT at the 2-year milestone. The model recommended 14% of ADT patients switch to abiraterone/enzalutamide. Analysis showed a statistically significant absolute improvement using model-recommended treatments in progression-free survival (PFS) of 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23–0.24) at the 2-year milestone (PFS rate increasing from 0.50 to 0.74) with a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.39–0.50). Conclusions: Our model successfully identified nmCRPC patients who would benefit from switching to abiraterone/enzalutamide, demonstrating potential outcome improvements. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2353 KiB  
Article
Seaweeds of the Israeli Mediterranean Sea: Nutritional and Biotechnological Potential Through Seasonal and Species Variation
by Doron Yehoshua Ashkenazi, Félix L. Figueroa, Julia Vega, Shoshana Ben-Valid, Guy Paz, Eitan Salomon, Avigdor Abelson and Álvaro Israel
Mar. Drugs 2025, 23(8), 320; https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080320 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 283
Abstract
Macroalgae (seaweeds) produce unique bioactive metabolites that have enabled their survival for millions of years, offering significant potential for human benefits. In the Israeli Mediterranean Sea, no comprehensive systematic surveys of seaweeds have been published since the 1990s, and their chemical composition remains [...] Read more.
Macroalgae (seaweeds) produce unique bioactive metabolites that have enabled their survival for millions of years, offering significant potential for human benefits. In the Israeli Mediterranean Sea, no comprehensive systematic surveys of seaweeds have been published since the 1990s, and their chemical composition remains largely unexplored. This study presents an extensive survey of intertidal seaweed communities along the shallow Israeli coastline, documenting their spatial, temporal, and biochemical diversity. Of the 320 specimens collected, 55 seaweed species were identified: 29 red (Rhodophyta), 14 brown (Phaeophyceae), and 12 green (Chlorophyta). A significant shift in species abundance was documented, with a single dominant annual bloom occurring during spring, unlike previously reported biannual blooms. Chemical analysis of the dominant species revealed significant seasonal variations in compound levels, with higher protein content in winter and increased antioxidant capacity during spring. Phenolic and natural sunscreen compounds (mycosporine-like amino acids, MAAs) showed no general seasonal trend. These findings highlight the optimal environmental conditions for seaweed growth and underscore their potential for aquaculture and biotechnology. We hypothesize that the ecologically unique conditions of the Israeli Mediterranean Sea may foster resilient seaweed species enriched with distinctive chemical properties, suitable for nutritional, health, pharmaceutical, and nutraceutical applications, particularly as climate-adaptive bioresources. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 328 KiB  
Review
Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Stage IIB/IIC Melanoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions
by Ivana Prkačin, Ana Brkić, Nives Pondeljak, Mislav Mokos, Klara Gaćina and Mirna Šitum
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1894; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081894 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 251
Abstract
Background: Patients with resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma are at high risk of recurrence and distant metastasis, despite surgical treatment. The recent emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to their evaluation in the adjuvant setting for early-stage disease. This [...] Read more.
Background: Patients with resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma are at high risk of recurrence and distant metastasis, despite surgical treatment. The recent emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to their evaluation in the adjuvant setting for early-stage disease. This review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding adjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIB/IIC melanoma, explore emerging strategies, and highlight key challenges and future directions. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and relevant mechanistic and biomarker research on adjuvant therapy in stage IIB/IIC melanoma. Particular focus was placed on pivotal trials evaluating PD-1 inhibitors (KEYNOTE-716 and CheckMate 76K), novel vaccine and targeted therapy trials, mechanisms of resistance, immune-related toxicity, and biomarker development. Results: KEYNOTE-716 and CheckMate 76K demonstrated significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) with pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, compared to placebo. However, no definitive overall survival benefit has yet been shown. Adjuvant immunotherapy is linked to immune-related adverse events, including permanent endocrinopathies. Emerging personalized approaches, such as circulating tumor DNA monitoring and gene expression profiling, may enhance patient selection, but remain investigational. Conclusions: Adjuvant PD-1 blockade offers clear RFS benefits in high-risk stage II melanoma, but optimal patient selection remains challenging, due to uncertain overall survival benefit and toxicity concerns. Future trials should integrate biomarker-driven approaches to refine therapeutic decisions and minimize overtreatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gene and Cell Therapy)
26 pages, 3179 KiB  
Review
Glioblastoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Its Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Innovative Therapeutic Strategies
by Felipe Esparza-Salazar, Renata Murguiondo-Pérez, Gabriela Cano-Herrera, Maria F. Bautista-Gonzalez, Ericka C. Loza-López, Amairani Méndez-Vionet, Ximena A. Van-Tienhoven, Alejandro Chumaceiro-Natera, Emmanuel Simental-Aldaba and Antonio Ibarra
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1882; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081882 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 255
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, profound heterogeneity, and resistance to conventional therapies. This review provides an integrated overview of GBM’s pathophysiology, highlighting key mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, PDGFRA), the tumor microenvironment, [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, profound heterogeneity, and resistance to conventional therapies. This review provides an integrated overview of GBM’s pathophysiology, highlighting key mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, PDGFRA), the tumor microenvironment, microbiome interactions, and molecular dysregulations involving gangliosides and sphingolipids. Current diagnostic strategies, including imaging, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and emerging liquid biopsy techniques, are explored for their role in improving early detection and monitoring. Treatment remains challenging, with standard therapies—surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide—offering limited survival benefits. Innovative therapies are increasingly being explored and implemented, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, dendritic and peptide vaccines, and oncolytic virotherapy. Advances in nanotechnology and personalized medicine, such as individualized multimodal immunotherapy and NanoTherm therapy, are also discussed as strategies to overcome the blood–brain barrier and tumor heterogeneity. Additionally, stem cell-based approaches show promise in targeted drug delivery and immune modulation. Non-conventional strategies such as ketogenic diets and palliative care are also evaluated for their adjunctive potential. While novel therapies hold promise, GBM’s complexity demands continued interdisciplinary research to improve prognosis, treatment response, and patient quality of life. This review underscores the urgent need for personalized, multimodal strategies in combating this devastating malignancy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 2336 KiB  
Review
Omics-Mediated Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer: Moving Towards Precision Oncology
by Yasra Fatima, Kirubel Nigusu Jobre, Enrique Gomez-Gomez, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Antonia Vlahou, Marika Mokou, Harald Mischak, Maria Frantzi and Vera Jankowski
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7475; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157475 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 334
Abstract
Prostate cancer accounts for approximately 1.5 million new diagnoses and 400,000 deaths every year worldwide, and demographic projections indicate a near-doubling of both figures by 2040. Despite existing treatments, 10–20% of patients eventually progress to metastatic castration-resistant disease (mCRPC). The median overall survival [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer accounts for approximately 1.5 million new diagnoses and 400,000 deaths every year worldwide, and demographic projections indicate a near-doubling of both figures by 2040. Despite existing treatments, 10–20% of patients eventually progress to metastatic castration-resistant disease (mCRPC). The median overall survival (OS) after progression to mCPRC drops to 24 months, and efficacy drops severely after each additional line of treatment. Omics platforms have reached advanced levels and enable the acquisition of high-resolution large datasets that can provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying PCa pathology. Genomics, especially DDR (DNA damage response) gene alterations, detected via tissue and/or circulating tumor DNA, efficiently guides therapy in advanced prostate cancer. Given recent developments, we have performed a comprehensive literature search to cover recent research and clinical trial reports (over the last five years) that integrate omics along three converging trajectories in therapeutic development: (i) predicting response to approved agents with demonstrated survival benefits, (ii) stratifying patients to receive therapies in clinical trials, (iii) guiding drug development as part of drug repurposing frameworks. Collectively, this review is intended to serve as a comprehensive resource of recent advancements in omics-guided therapies for advanced prostate cancer, a clinical setting with existing clinical needs and poor outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 909 KiB  
Article
Impact of Preoperative Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization on Patients Undergoing Right or Extended Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Andrea P. Fontana, Nadia Russolillo, Ludovica Maurino, Andrea Marengo, Amedeo Calvo, Andrea Ricotti, Serena Langella, Roberto Lo Tesoriere and Alessandro Ferrero
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2556; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152556 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 425
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Preoperative strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring major hepatectomy remain controversial, particularly in “borderline resectable” cases. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological benefit and perioperative safety of Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients undergoing right or extended right [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Preoperative strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring major hepatectomy remain controversial, particularly in “borderline resectable” cases. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological benefit and perioperative safety of Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients undergoing right or extended right hepatectomy for HCC. Material and Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent right or extended right hepatectomy for HCC at a single tertiary center between January 2013 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on whether they received preoperative TARE or underwent upfront resection. Outcomes analyzed included perioperative morbidity and long-term oncological endpoints. Results: A total of 39 patients were included, of whom 18 received preoperative TARE and 21 underwent upfront surgery. Patients in the TARE group showed significantly greater tumor necrosis at pathology (70% vs. 10%, p = 0.002) and more frequent extended resections. Five-year cancer-specific survival (80.4% vs. 33.5%, p = 0.011), recurrence-free survival (33.8% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.047), and curative-intent disease-free survival (69.3% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.0037) were significantly higher in the TARE group. Overall survival showed a favorable trend. Intraoperative outcomes, postoperative morbidity, and 90-day mortality were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Preoperative TARE is a safe and effective neoadjuvant strategy in selected patients with HCC undergoing major hepatectomy. It may enhance long-term oncological outcomes without increasing surgical risk, supporting its potential role in the management of borderline resectable HCC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 995 KiB  
Case Report
Phytotoxic Effects and Agricultural Potential of Nanofertilizers: A Case Study Using Zeolite, Zinc Oxide, and Titanium Dioxide Under Controlled Conditions
by Ezequiel Zamora-Ledezma, Glenda Leonela Loor Aragundi, Willian Stalyn Guamán Marquines, Michael Anibal Macías Pro, José Vicente García Díaz, Henry Antonio Pacheco Gil, Julián Mauricio Botero Londoño, Mónica Andrea Botero Londoño and Camilo Zamora-Ledezma
J. Xenobiot. 2025, 15(4), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15040123 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 324
Abstract
Nanofertilizers (NFs) and engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are increasingly used in agriculture, yet their environmental safety remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the comparative phytotoxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and clinoptilolite nanoparticles, three commercial nanofertilizers, and potassium dichromate (K [...] Read more.
Nanofertilizers (NFs) and engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are increasingly used in agriculture, yet their environmental safety remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the comparative phytotoxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and clinoptilolite nanoparticles, three commercial nanofertilizers, and potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) using Lactuca sativa seeds under adapted OECD-208 protocol conditions. Seeds were exposed to varying concentrations of each xenobiotic material (0.5–3% for NFs; 10–50% for NPs), with systematic assessment of seedling survival, root and hypocotyl length, dry biomass, germination index (GI), and median effective concentration (EC50) values. Nanofertilizers demonstrated significantly greater phytotoxicity than engineered nanoparticles despite lower application concentrations. The toxicity ranking was established as NF1 > NF3 > NF2 > NM2 > NM1 > NM3, with NF1 being most toxic (EC50 = 1.2%). Nanofertilizers caused 45–78% reductions in root length and 30–65% decreases in dry biomass compared with controls. GI values dropped to ≤70% in NF1 and NF3 treatments, indicating concentration-dependent growth inhibition. While nanofertilizers offer agricultural benefits, their elevated phytotoxicity compared with conventional nanoparticles necessitates rigorous pre-application safety assessment. These findings emphasize the critical need for standardized evaluation protocols incorporating both physiological and ecotoxicological endpoints to ensure safe xenobiotic nanomaterial deployment in agricultural systems. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop