Search Results (305)

The management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has evolved dramatically over the past century, transitioning from external bracing and in situ fusion to complex, technology-driven surgical interventions. This review traces the historical development of spinal deformity correction and highlights contemporary enabling technologies that are redefining the surgical landscape. Advances in stereoradiographic imaging now allow for precise, low-dose three-dimensional assessment of spinopelvic parameters and segmental bone density, facilitating individualized surgical planning. Robotic assistance and intraoperative navigation improve the accuracy and safety of instrumentation, while patient-specific rods and interbody implants enhance biomechanical conformity and alignment precision. Machine learning and predictive modeling tools have emerged as valuable adjuncts for risk stratification, surgical planning, and outcome forecasting. Minimally invasive deformity correction strategies, including anterior column realignment and circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS), have demonstrated equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes to traditional open surgery with reduced perioperative morbidity in select patients. Despite these advancements, complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis and failure remain prevalent. Adjunctive strategies—including ligamentous tethering, modified proximal fixation, and vertebral cement augmentation—offer promising preventive potential. Collectively, these innovations signal a paradigm shift toward precision spine surgery, characterized by data-informed decision-making, individualized construct design, and improved patient-centered outcomes in spinal deformity care. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pathological vertebral fragility (path-VF) increases the risk of osteoporotic fractures and pedicle screw loosening (PSL) after posterior instrumented spinal fusion (PISF). While WHO body mass index (BMI) categories broadly identify risks related to underweight and obesity, fixed thresholds may inadequately reflect vertebral fragility risks among elderly patients, especially within the normal-weight range. This study investigates whether current BMI classifications sufficiently capture the risk of path-VF in older adults. Methods: This retrospective study included 225 patients who underwent kyphoplasty or PISF (2022–2023). Path-VF was defined by non-tumorous fractures, screw reinforcement, or PSL within six months without prior reinforcement. Patients were grouped into the path-VF (n = 94) and control (n = 131) groups. HU and BMI values, BMI-related ORs, and age trends were analysed, and a logistic regression was performed. Results: Mean HU values were significantly lower in the path-VF group (71.37 ± 30.50) than in controls (130.35 ± 52.53, p < 0.001). Path-VF females (26.26 ± 5.38) had a lower BMI than the control females (29.33 ± 5.98, p = 0.002); no difference was found in males. Normal-weight females showed a borderline risk for path-VF (OR 2.03, p = 0.0495). Obesity (OR_male 0.31/OR_female 0.37) and being male and overweight (OR 0.21) were protective (all p < 0.05). BMI declined with age in path-VF males (p = 0.001) but increased in the controls (p = 0.023). A logistic regression identified a BMI < 22.5 kg/m² and age > 67.5 years as significant risk thresholds. Notably, 20.2% of path-VF patients over 67.5 had a normal weight, suggesting a potentially overlooked subgroup. Conclusions: The current WHO lower limit for normal BMI (18.5 kg/m²) may underestimate the risk of path-VF in patients older than 67.5 years, potentially overlooking 24.7% of cases. The results offer a new approach for clinicians to interpret BMI values at the lower end of the normal range (<22.5 kg/m²) with caution in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery. Full article

Background: Traumatic fractures of the cervical spine pose significant challenges in management, particularly in young patients, where preserving mobility is crucial. Patient Characteristics: A 30-year-old woman presented with a C3 lateral mass and pedicle fracture following a motor vehicle collision. Initial conservative management with a rigid cervical collar for three months failed to reduce the diastasis, and the debilitating neck pain worsened. Preoperative imaging confirmed fracture instability without spinal cord compression. Intervention and Outcome: Preoperative screw trajectory planning was conducted with the My Spine MC system (Medacta), and fine-tuning was achieved on a 3D-printed model of the vertebra. A posterior midline approach was employed to expose the C3 vertebra, and a Herbert screw was inserted under fluoroscopic guidance. Imaging at three months demonstrated significant fracture reduction and early bone fusion. The patient achieved substantial improvement in functional mobility without complications. Conclusion: Herbert screw fixation holds potential as a less-invasive alternative to conventional posterior stabilization for selected cervical fractures. This technical note provides the reader with the required information to support surgical planning and execution. Full article

Background: Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) is a surgical procedure aimed at addressing a range of pathological conditions affecting the structure and function of the spine. Patient-Specific Interbody Cages (PSICs) are an emerging technology that are used in LIF; however, there is a lack of clinical outcome data, making it difficult to assess the potential risks, benefits, and value of PSICs. The purpose of this present study is to contribute data to the field on this new emerging technology. The aims were to investigate Quality of Life (QoL), pain, and the complications of PSICs in LIF. To provide a comparative cohort, we performed a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes of conventional fusion techniques. Methods: This study reports on a multi-surgeon, multi-centre clinical trial of patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease, necessitating discectomy and fusion. All patients underwent LIF procedures with 3D-printed PSICs. Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and QoL (EQ-5D) scores were collected pre-operatively and at 6m, 12m, and 24m post-operatively. For comparative purposes, we performed a systematic review of the VAS scores from traditional LIF cages and analysed the Australian Spine Registry QoL data. Results: The literature search yielded 4272 publications. The studies were subdivided into four groups based on the interbody device type. All the groups demonstrated improvements in the VAS (for back pain) scores post-operatively. In total, 78 patients (109 instrumented levels) underwent LIF procedures with 3DP PSICs. There were three reoperations (3.8%) and no revisions of any PSIC. The mean VAS scores improved significantly (p < 0.01) from 7.85 (1.50 SD) pre-operatively to 2.03 (2.13 SD) at 24 months post-operatively. The mean QoL index scores improved significantly (p < 0.01) from a pre-operative 0.257 (0.332 SD) to 0.815 (0.208 SD) at 24 months. Conclusions: The systematic review indicated that device fixation to the interbody space was associated with lower VAS scores. The results from the investigational cohort suggest that PSICs may represent a new progression in implant design for spinal fusion, with an associated clinical benefit for LIF. Full article

Background: The atlanto-axial segment is highly mobile and, therefore, prone to instability in the setting of inflammatory disease, infection, tumor or trauma. While minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have gained acceptance in the thoracolumbar spine due to their advantages over traditional approaches, their use at the atlanto-axial segment is controversial due to the surgical risk associated with its complex anatomy. To evaluate the current evidence on MIS atlanto-axial fixation, we carried out a systematic review of the literature and compared the reported results with those of open procedures. Methods: This systematic review follows PRISMA-DTA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in November 2023 across PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and clinicaltrials.gov using specific keywords related to minimally invasive atlanto-axial fixation. Data regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, surgical techniques, and outcomes were extracted from included studies. Results: This systematic review included 13 articles reporting on the results of surgery in 305 patients, in whom a total of 683 screws were inserted through a posterior MIS approach. N = 162 screws were inserted using the Harms–Goel technique, while N = 521 were placed using the Magerl technique. N = 40 screws were inserted using navigation guidance, while N = 643 were introduced with fluoroscopy assistance. Eight screws were misplaced. A Vertebral Artery (VA) injury was reported in three patients. With a mean value of 26.2 ± 15.3 months, the rate of fusion ranged between 80% and 100%. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of MIS for posterior atlanto-axial fixation, which was achieved using Magerl transarticular screws in a large majority of cases. Despite technical challenges, MIS approaches appear to achieve satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with complication rates similar to those of open techniques. Future studies may help refine the indications for MIS and identify those cases better suited for open approaches. Full article

Background/Objectives: Spinoplastic surgery is an emerging multidisciplinary field developed to address and reduce the complication of pseudoarthrosis following complex spinal reconstructions. While the number of spinal fusion procedures continues to rise every year, fusion failure rates remain as high as 40%. Although pseudoarthrosis may not always manifest clinically, it remains a leading cause of persistent pain and need for subsequent revision surgeries. The multidisciplinary collaboration between spine and plastic surgeons in spinoplastic surgery has therefore emerged as a proactive strategy aimed at preventing complications, particularly in patients identified as high-risk for pseudoarthrosis. As the patient population expands and spinoplastic surgery continues to evolve, refining patient selection criteria becomes essential for achieving optimal surgical outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in spinoplastic surgery, highlighting current indications, surgical techniques, recent case reports, and strategies for identifying suitable candidates. Methods: We performed a narrative review of English language literature through April 2025. Spinoplastic case reports and case series published within the last 20 years were included in the review. Results: Indications for use of a spinoplastic approach clustered into prior fusion failure, extensive oncologic resection, severe spinal deformity, procedures requiring extensive spinal involvement, and/or patients at risk for impaired bone healing. Succesful radiographic union and improvement of symptoms were widely reported across all 9 case reports/series. Conclusions: Although evidence is presently limited, spinoplastic surgery appears to achieve high bone graft fusion rates with acceptable morbidity and functional improvement in a carefully selected group of high-risk spinal reconstruction patients. Still, larger prospective studies are warranted to refine patient selection and validate functional benefit. Full article

Retrospective Cohort Study. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to (1) compare post-operative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between non-diabetic (non-DM) and diabetic (DM) patients undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ADCF), (2) characterize the clinical trajectory, and (3) compare the rate of post-operative complications. Methods: A total of 261 non-DM and 52 DM patients were included. Patient demographics, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Patient-Recorded Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were collected up to one year after operation. Maximum medical improvement (MMI) was defined as the timepoint where more than 90% of the cohort achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in survey scores. Post-operative complications were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. Results: Non-DM patients achieve MMI significantly more quickly than DM patients (non-DM: 6 months; DM: 1 year, p < 0.010). No difference in ∆NDI (non-DM: 24.9; DM: 23.0; p = 0.824) or ∆PROMIS-Physical Function (non-DM: 7.1; DM: 9.1; p = 0.373) was found between the two cohorts. In diabetic patients undergoing single-level fusion ACDF, a pre-operative HbA1c of ≥7.3% demonstrates 100% sensitivity and 25% specificity in detecting failure to achieve 1-year PROMIS MCID (AUC = 0.833, p = 0.009). There was no association between diabetic status and post-operative complication rate. Conclusions: Diabetic patients may demonstrate a slower rate of achieving maximum medical improvement despite equal subjective and clinical outcomes. Pre-operative HbA1c ≥ 7.3% demonstrates a significant correlation with worse subjective outcomes following single-level ACDF. Full article

Background: Lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly considered for anterior column reconstruction and restoring segmental lordosis in degenerative, infectious, or deformity conditions. Reports about using LLIF with expandable interbody spacers for spine trauma are scarce. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, we reviewed all patients treated by an expandable LLIF interbody spacer (ELSA^® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc) for trauma indication at our spine center between September 2018 and January 2024. The primary outcome measures were fusion rate at 12 months, change in segmental sagittal Cobb angle, and clinical outcome according to the MacNab criteria. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and complications. Results: We identified n = 21 patients with a mean age of 48.3 (standard deviation (SD) 15.7), 47.6% were female. LLIF was mostly performed at T11/12 (n = 4; 19.1%) and T12/L1 (n = 10; 47.5%). Indications were AO Spine type A2 (n = 4, 19.1%), A3 (n = 14; 66.7%) or A4 fractures (n = 3; 14.3%) with ligamentous (B2-type) in eight (38.1%) and hyperextension (B3-type) injury in one patient (4.8%). Surgery included the release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in four cases (19.1%). Intraoperative AEs were noted in n = 1 (4.8%), postoperative AEs in n = 3 (14.3%) at discharge, n = 4 (19.1%) at three, and n = 2 (9.5%) at twelve months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.3° at twelve months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in n = 15 (71.4%; four missing) at 12 months. The fusion rate at the LLIF level was 100% at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: LLIF with expandable interbody spacers for spine trauma (off-label use) is safe, promotes solid fusion (100% fusion rate at 12 months), and enables correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle (mean improvement of 12°), with good or excellent clinical outcomes in most patients (71.4%). Full article

The accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in pediatric scoliosis correction surgery using augmented reality technology in combination with a conventional navigation system was evaluated, and its usefulness was verified. A retrospective study of patients who underwent mixed reality technology-assisted posterior scoliosis correction and fixation was conducted. In total, 361 pedicle screws inserted with a mixed reality technology-assisted navigation system were analyzed; 25 pedicle screws (6.9%) showed Rao Classification Grade 1 deviation, whereas 0.83% showed Rao Classification Grade 2.3 deviation, which is a clinical deviation. In terms of the relationship between the rotation of the vertebral body and the deviation of the pedicle screw, the pedicle screw tended to deviate more easily when it was necessary to insert the pedicle screw in a more strongly oblique position due to the rotation of the vertebral body. The results suggest that the pedicle screw insertion accuracy with augmented reality technology may be superior to that with conventional navigation alone in scoliosis correction and fusion surgery for scoliosis in children. This system is expected to become a standard support tool for spine surgery and will contribute to improving the success rate of surgery and reducing the burden on the surgeon. Full article

Objective: The aim of this study is to present the initiation of robotic-guided (RG) spine surgery into routine clinical care at a single center with the use of intraoperative CT (iCT) automatic registration-based navigation. The workflow included iCT with automatic registration, fusion with preoperative imaging, verification of preplanned screw trajectories, RG introduction of K-wires, and the insertion of pedicle screws (PSs), followed by a control iCT scan. Methods: All patients who underwent RG implantation of pedicle screws using the Cirq^® robotic arm (BrainLab, Munich, Germany) in the thoracolumbar spine at our department were included in the study. The accuracy of the pedicles screws was assessed using the Gertzbein–Robbins scale (GRS). Results: In total, 108 patients (60 female, mean age 68.7 ± 11.4 years) in 109 surgeries underwent RG PS placement. Indications included degenerative spinal disorders (n = 30 patients), spondylodiscitis (n = 24), tumor (n = 33), and fracture (n = 22), with a mean follow-up period of 7.7 ± 9 months. Thirty-seven cases (33.9%) were performed percutaneously, and all others were performed openly. Thirty-three operations were performed on the thoracic spine, forty-four on the lumbar and lumbosacral spine, thirty on the thoracolumbar, one on the cervicothoracic spine, and one on the thoracolumbosacral spine. The screws were inserted using a fluoroscopic (first 12 operations) or navigated technique (latter operations). The mean operation time was 228.8 ± 106 min, and the mean robotic time was 31.5 ± 18.4 min. The mean time per K-wire was 5.35 ± 3.98 min. The operation time was lower in the percutaneous group, while the robot time did not differ between the two groups. Robot time and the time per K-wire improved over time. Out of 688 screws, 592 were GRS A screws (86.1%), 54 B (7.8%), 22 C (3.2%), 12 D (1.7%), and 8 E (1.2%). Seven screws were revised intraoperatively, and after revision, all were GRS A. E screws were either revised or removed. In the case of D screws, screws located at the end of the construct were revised, while so-called in-out-in screws in the middle of the construct were not revised. Conclusions: Brainlab’s Cirq^® Robotic Alignment Module feature enables placement of pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine with high accuracy. A learning curve is shown through improvements in robotic time and time per K-wire. Full article

Background/Objectives: While anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-established treatment for degenerative lumbar spine pathology, the timing and pace of postoperative recovery remain poorly defined. Understanding these temporal trends is clinically important for setting patient expectations and optimizing postoperative care. Methods: This retrospective single-institution study evaluated functional recovery in patients undergoing primary, single-level stand-alone (SA) ALIF, or with percutaneous posterior instrumentation (PI). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and the SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), were assessed preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID), global rating change (GRC), and return-to-activity milestones were also analyzed. Results: A total of 143 patients were included (90 SA; 53 PI). PROMs showed significant improvement through 1 year. VAS-back improved by 2 weeks, while ODI and SF12 PCS initially worsened but improved after 6 weeks. By 6 months, over half of the cohort achieved MCID, with continued gains through 1 year. Most patients returned to driving and work, and over 90% discontinued narcotics. Recovery trajectories were comparable between groups, despite early delays in the instrumented cohort. Conclusions: These findings provide time-specific recovery benchmarks that can guide surgical decision-making, patient education, and expectations around functional milestones. Full article

The traditional bilateral pedicle screw system has been used for the treatment of various lumbar spine conditions including advanced degenerative disc disease. However, there is an ongoing need to develop more effective and less invasive techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the traditional bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS) with the novel reverse transdiscal screw system (RTSS) for lumbar disc degenerative disease. A 3D solid lumbar L1–L5 spine model was developed and validated based on a human CT scan. Fusions were simulated at L3–L4. The first scenario comprised a transforaminal lumbar interbody cage in combination with the bilateral pedicle screw-rod system (BPSS-TLIF). In the second scenario, the same TLIF cage was combined with reverse L3–L4 transdiscal screws (RTSS-TLIF). Testing parameters included range of motion (ROM) in three orthogonal axes, hardware (cage and screw) stress, and shear load resistance. The ROM of the surgical model was reduced by approximately 90% compared to the intact model at the fused level. The RTSS model demonstrated less ROM compared to the BPSS model at the fused level for all loading conditions. Overall, the RTSS model exhibited lower stress on both screws and cage compared with the BPSS model in all biomechanical testing conditions. The RTSS model also exhibited higher anterior and posterior shear load resistance than the BPSS model. In conclusion, the RTSS model proved superior to the BPSS model in all respects. These findings indicate that the RTSS could serve as a feasible option for patients undergoing lumbar fusion, especially for adjacent segment disease, potentially enhancing surgical outcomes for disc degeneration. Full article

Background/Objectives: Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) remains a debated approach in spinal surgery, with limited published evidence supporting its efficacy without supplemental fixation. This prospective study presents the institutional case series on single-level L3-L4 stand-alone LLIF, using next-generation 3D-printed titanium cages, as treatment for degenerative disc disease (DDD). Methods: A cohort of 49 patients with symptomatic DDD, unresponsive to conservative therapy, underwent stand-alone LLIF at L3-L4 (neither posterior pedicle screws nor lateral plating). Clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI) and radiological parameters (disc height, segmental/lumbar lordosis) were collected preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months. Repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was adopted for statistical analysis. Results: Significant improvements were observed in pain and disability scores at all time points, with the mean VAS score decreasing from 6.53 to 0.29, and ODI from 27.6% to 3.84% at one year (p < 0.001). Radiographic analysis confirmed durable increases in disc height and segmental lordosis. Solid fusion was achieved in 97.9% of cases. No patient required posterior revision; transient neurological symptoms were mild and self-limiting. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that stand-alone LLIF at L3-L4 is safe and effective in achieving stable fusion and clinical–radiological improvement. These results challenge the necessity of supplemental fixation and support the broader adoption of a less invasive fusion paradigm. Full article

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly employed surgical technique for managing lumbar degenerative disease and spinal instability. While it offers advantages over posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), traditional TLIF often involves prolonged recovery and morbidity due to muscle retraction. To improve outcomes, several alternative techniques have emerged, including minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF), trans-Kambin percutaneous TLIF (PE-TLIF), and transfacet TLIF (TF-TLIF). Each approach presents distinct anatomical and technical advantages, yet no standardized framework exists to guide their selection based on individual patient anatomy. In this study, we review the evolution of TLIF techniques and propose a novel algorithm that integrates patient-specific imaging, anatomical variability, and segmentation data to guide surgical decision-making. By analyzing the surgical corridors, indications, and limitations of each approach, and presenting representative clinical cases, we demonstrate how this algorithm can be applied in practice. For instance, TF-TLIF may be optimal in patients requiring direct decompression without major deformity, while PE-TLIF may be appropriate for those with Kambin’s triangles measuring ≥ 9 mm, allowing for indirect decompression. This tailored framework aims to optimize outcomes and reduce complications. Further prospective validation and incorporation of AI-driven segmentation tools are needed to support broader clinical implementation. Full article

This study proposes a novel expandable spinal cage to maximize the effectiveness of spinal fusion surgery in the treatment of lumbar disk disorders and aims to verify its mechanical stability through finite element method (FEM) analysis and mechanical testing. To address the limitations of existing cages, which do not provide sufficient height and angle expansion and have constraints in independently adjusting height and angle with continuous fine-tuning, this study introduces a new linkage mechanism. This design enables precise spinal alignment restoration tailored to the individual anatomical characteristics of patients, even in minimally invasive surgical environments, distinguishing itself from traditional rack-and-pinion or wedge-based designs. The results of FEM analysis and static load testing demonstrated a high correlation between the predicted yield locations in FEM analysis and actual test results. Furthermore, the compression and compression–shear load tests confirmed that the proposed cage achieved an ultimate load exceeding the lowest fifth percentile of FDA-approved products, meeting clinical requirements. The proposed expandable spinal cage offers significant improvements over existing products and has the potential to evolve into a safer and more effective spinal fusion device through further dynamic fatigue testing and clinical studies to assess long-term durability and practical applicability. Full article