Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (12)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = extrasolar planetary systems

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
32 pages, 992 KB  
Article
When the Anomalistic, Draconitic and Sidereal Orbital Periods Do Not Coincide: The Impact of Post-Keplerian Perturbing Accelerations
by Lorenzo Iorio
Time Space 2025, 1(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/timespace1010002 - 5 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2293
Abstract
In a purely Keplerian picture, the anomalistic, draconitic and sidereal orbital periods of a test particle orbiting a massive body coincide with each other. Such degeneracy is removed when post-Keplerian perturbing acceleration enters the equations of motion, yielding generally different corrections to the [...] Read more.
In a purely Keplerian picture, the anomalistic, draconitic and sidereal orbital periods of a test particle orbiting a massive body coincide with each other. Such degeneracy is removed when post-Keplerian perturbing acceleration enters the equations of motion, yielding generally different corrections to the Keplerian period for the three aforementioned characteristic orbital timescales. They are analytically worked out in the case of the accelerations induced by the general relativistic post-Newtonian gravitoelectromagnetic fields and, to the Newtonian level, by the oblateness of the central body. The resulting expressions hold for completely general orbital configurations and spatial orientations of the spin axis of the primary. Astronomical systems characterized by extremely accurate measurements of orbital periods like transiting exoplanets and binary pulsars may offer potentially viable scenarios for measuring such post-Keplerian features of motion, at least in principle. As an example, the sidereal period of the brown dwarf WD1032 + 011 b is currently known with an uncertainty as small as ≃105s, while its predicted post-Newtonian gravitoelectric correction amounts to 0.07s; however, the accuracy with which the Keplerian period can be calculated is just 572 s. For double pulsar PSR J0737–3039, the largest relativistic correction to the anomalistic period amounts to a few tenths of a second, given a measurement error of such a characteristic orbital timescale as small as 106s. On the other hand, the Keplerian term can be currently calculated just to a 9 s accuracy. In principle, measuring at least two of the three characteristic orbital periods for the same system independently would cancel out their common Keplerian component, provided that their difference is taken into account. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2098 KB  
Article
The Lense–Thirring Effect on the Galilean Moons of Jupiter
by Lorenzo Iorio
Universe 2023, 9(7), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9070304 - 23 Jun 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2018
Abstract
The perspectives of detecting the general relativistic gravitomagnetic Lense–Thirring effect on the orbits of the Galilean moons of Jupiter induced by the angular momentum S of the latter are preliminarily investigated. Numerical integrations over one century show that the expected gravitomagnetic signatures of [...] Read more.
The perspectives of detecting the general relativistic gravitomagnetic Lense–Thirring effect on the orbits of the Galilean moons of Jupiter induced by the angular momentum S of the latter are preliminarily investigated. Numerical integrations over one century show that the expected gravitomagnetic signatures of the directly observable right ascension α and declination δ of the satellites are as large as tens of arcseconds for Io, while for Callisto they drop to the ≃0.2arcseconds level. Major competing effects due to the mismodeling in the zonal multipoles J,=2,3,4, of the Jovian non-spherically symmetric gravity field and in the Jupiter’s spin axis k^ should have a limited impact, especially in view of the future improvements in determining such parameters expected after the completion of the ongoing Juno mission in the next few years. On the other hand, the masses of the satellites, responsible of their mutual N-body perturbations, should be known better than now. Such a task should be accomplished with the future JUICE and Clipper missions to the Jovian system. Present-day accuracy in knowing the orbits of the Jovian Galilean satellites is of the order of 10 milliarcseconds, to be likely further improved thanks to the ongoing re-reduction of old photographic plates. This suggests that, in the next future, the Lense–Thirring effect in the main Jovian system of moons might be detectable with dedicated data reductions in which the gravitomagnetic field is explicitly modeled and solved-for. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gravitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 318 KB  
Article
Impact of Lorentz Violation Models on Exoplanets’ Dynamics
by Antonio Gallerati, Matteo Luca Ruggiero and Lorenzo Iorio
Universe 2022, 8(11), 608; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8110608 - 18 Nov 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1870
Abstract
Many exoplanets have been detected by the radial velocity method, according to which the motion of a binary system around its center of mass can produce a periodical variation of the Doppler effect of the light emitted by the host star. These variations [...] Read more.
Many exoplanets have been detected by the radial velocity method, according to which the motion of a binary system around its center of mass can produce a periodical variation of the Doppler effect of the light emitted by the host star. These variations are influenced by both Newtonian and non-Newtonian perturbations to the dominant inverse-square acceleration; accordingly, exoplanetary systems lend themselves to testing theories of gravity alternative to general relativity. In this paper, we consider the impact of the Standard Model Extension (a model that can be used to test all possible Lorentz violations) on the perturbation of radial velocity and suggest that suitable exoplanets’ configurations and improvements in detection techniques may contribute to obtaining new constraints on the model parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gravitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 448 KB  
Article
Frame-Dragging in Extrasolar Circumbinary Planetary Systems
by Lorenzo Iorio
Universe 2022, 8(10), 546; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8100546 - 21 Oct 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2159
Abstract
Extrasolar circumbinary planets are so called because they orbit two stars instead of just one; to date, an increasing number of such planets have been discovered with a variety of techniques. If the orbital frequency of the hosting stellar pair is much higher [...] Read more.
Extrasolar circumbinary planets are so called because they orbit two stars instead of just one; to date, an increasing number of such planets have been discovered with a variety of techniques. If the orbital frequency of the hosting stellar pair is much higher than the planetary one, the tight stellar binary can be considered as a matter ring current generating its own post-Newtonian stationary gravitomagnetic field through its orbital angular momentum. It affects the orbital motion of a relatively distant planet with Lense-Thirring-type precessional effects which, under certain circumstances, may amount to a significant fraction of the static, gravitoelectric ones, analogous to the well known Einstein perihelion precession of Mercury, depending only on the masses of the system’s bodies. Instead, when the gravitomagnetic field is due solely to the spin of each of the central star(s), the Lense-Thirring shifts are several orders of magnitude smaller than the gravitoelectric ones. In view of the growing interest in the scientific community about the detection of general relativistic effects in exoplanets, the perspectives of finding new scenarios for testing such a further manifestation of general relativity might be deemed worth of further investigations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frame-Dragging and Gravitomagnetism)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5837 KB  
Article
Can Asteroid Belts Exist in the Luyten’s System?
by Mattia Galiazzo, Elizabeth A. Silber and Rudolf Dvorak
Universe 2022, 8(3), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8030190 - 19 Mar 2022
Viewed by 3002
Abstract
The extra-solar planetary system Luyten is relatively close (12.3 light years) to our Sun. The Luyten’s red dwarf star is orbited by four planets, two of them Earth-like (in mass) and in 4:1 resonance. Extra-solar systems might contain asteroid belts such as ours. [...] Read more.
The extra-solar planetary system Luyten is relatively close (12.3 light years) to our Sun. The Luyten’s red dwarf star is orbited by four planets, two of them Earth-like (in mass) and in 4:1 resonance. Extra-solar systems might contain asteroid belts such as ours. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether it is possible to have a stable population of minor bodies and compare them to those in our system. The study of extra-solar systems is crucial for understanding the evolution of planetary systems in general. Here, we investigate the stability of two possible asteroid populations in the Luyten’s system: the main asteroid belt between the two inner and two outer planets, and an outer asteroid belt, situated beyond the planets. We also explore the likelihood of observing an asteroid or a dwarf planet in this system. Our study suggests that the existence of asteroid belts is possible, notably the main belt at 0.09–0.53 au from the star and an outer belt (with the inner boundary at 0.85 au and the outer boundary at ∼66,000 au). The average Yarkovsky drift for the Luyten’s main asteroid belt is ∼0.5×104 au/Myr for km-size objects. The Luyten’s system might host extra-solar minor bodies, some of which could be capable of entering our own system. Presently, no asteroids can be detected in the Luyten’s system, not even a Ceres-sized body, because the detection signal using the radial velocity method is at least two orders of magnitude less than that required for discerning such objects. The detection probability of an asteroid in the Luyten belt similar to Ceres is about 1.3%, which is less than the probability of finding Luyten B (∼3%). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Small Bodies in the Solar System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1207 KB  
Article
Iterative Lambert’s Trajectory Optimization for Extrasolar Bodies Interception
by Alicia Herrero, Santiago Moll, José-A. Moraño, David Vázquez and Erika Vega
Aerospace 2021, 8(12), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8120366 - 27 Nov 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3644
Abstract
Interception of extrasolar objects is one of the major current astrophysical objectives since it allows gathering information on the formation and composition of other planetary systems. This paper develops a tool to design optimal orbits for the interception of these bodies considering the [...] Read more.
Interception of extrasolar objects is one of the major current astrophysical objectives since it allows gathering information on the formation and composition of other planetary systems. This paper develops a tool to design optimal orbits for the interception of these bodies considering the effects of different perturbation sources. The optimal trajectory is obtained by solving a Lambert’s problem that gives the required initial impulse. A numerical integration of a perturbed orbital model is calculated. This model considers the perturbations of the joint action of the gravitational potentials of the Solar System planets and the solar radiation pressure. These effects cause a deviation in the orbit that prevents the interception from taking place, so an iterative correction scheme of the initial estimated impulse is presented, capable of modifying the orbit and achieving a successful interception in a more realistic environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aerospace Guidance, Navigation and Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 8614 KB  
Article
Analysis of Tidal Accelerations in the Solar System and in Extrasolar Planetary Systems
by Klaus Paschek, Arthur Roßmann, Michael Hausmann and Georg Hildenbrand
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(18), 8624; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188624 - 16 Sep 2021
Viewed by 3931
Abstract
Volcanism powered by tidal forces inside celestial bodies can provide enough energy to keep important solvents for living systems in the liquid phase. A prerequisite to calculate such tidal interactions and consequences is depending on simulations for tidal accelerations in a multi-body system. [...] Read more.
Volcanism powered by tidal forces inside celestial bodies can provide enough energy to keep important solvents for living systems in the liquid phase. A prerequisite to calculate such tidal interactions and consequences is depending on simulations for tidal accelerations in a multi-body system. Unfortunately, from measurements in many extrasolar planetary systems, only few physical and orbital parameters are well-known enough for investigated celestial bodies. For calculating tidal acceleration vectors under missing most orbital parameter exactly, a simulation method is developed that is only based on a few basic parameters, easily measurable even in extrasolar planetary systems. Such a method as the one presented here allows finding a relation between the tidal acceleration vectors and potential heating inside celestial objects. Using the values and results of our model approach to our solar system as a “gold standard” for feasibility allowed us to classify this heating in relation to different forms of volcanism. This “gold standard” approach gave us a classification measure for the relevance of tidal heating in other extrasolar systems with a reduced availability of exact physical parameters. We help to estimate conditions for the identification of potential candidates for further sophisticated investigations by more complex established methods such as viscoelastic multi-body theories. As a first example, we applied the procedures developed here to the extrasolar planetary system TRAPPIST-1 as an example to check our working hypothesis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 526 KB  
Article
PlanetCARMA: A New Framework for Studying the Microphysics of Planetary Atmospheres
by Erika Barth
Atmosphere 2020, 11(10), 1064; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11101064 - 6 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2956
Abstract
The Community Aerosol and Radiation Model for Atmospheres (CARMA) has been updated to apply to atmospheres of the Solar System outside of Earth. CARMA, as its name suggests, is a coupled aerosol microphysics and radiative transfer model and includes the processes of nucleation, [...] Read more.
The Community Aerosol and Radiation Model for Atmospheres (CARMA) has been updated to apply to atmospheres of the Solar System outside of Earth. CARMA, as its name suggests, is a coupled aerosol microphysics and radiative transfer model and includes the processes of nucleation, condensation, evaporation, coagulation, and vertical transport. Previous model versions have been applied separately to the atmospheres of Solar System bodies and extrasolar planets. The primary advantage to PlanetCARMA is that the core physics routines each reside in their own self-contained modules and can be turned on/off as desired while a separate planet module supplies all the necessary parameters to apply the model run to a particular planet (or planetary body). So a single codebase is used for all planetary studies. PlanetCARMA has also been updated to Fortran 90 modular format. Examples of outer solar system atmosphere applications are shown. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling and Simulation of Planetary Atmospheres)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 541 KB  
Article
Monitoring Jovian Orbital Resonances of a Spacecraft: Classical and Relativistic Effects
by Luis Acedo
Universe 2019, 5(12), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5120222 - 3 Dec 2019
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3437
Abstract
Orbital resonances continue to be one of the most difficult problems in celestial mechanics. They have been studied in connection with the so-called Kirkwood gaps in the asteroid belt for many years. On the other hand, resonant trans-Neptunian objects are also an active [...] Read more.
Orbital resonances continue to be one of the most difficult problems in celestial mechanics. They have been studied in connection with the so-called Kirkwood gaps in the asteroid belt for many years. On the other hand, resonant trans-Neptunian objects are also an active area of research in Solar System dynamics, as are the recently discovered resonances in extrasolar planetary systems. A careful monitoring of the trajectories of these objects is hindered by the small size of asteroids or the large distances of the trans-Neptunian bodies. In this paper, we propose a mission concept, called CHRONOS (after the greek god of time), in which a spacecraft could be sent to with the initial condition of resonance with Jupiter in order to study the future evolution of its trajectory. We show that radio monitoring of these trajectories could allow for a better understanding of the initial stages of the evolution of resonant trajectories and the associated relativistic effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rotation Effects in Relativity)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

34 pages, 1293 KB  
Review
Microlensing Searches for Exoplanets
by Yiannis Tsapras
Geosciences 2018, 8(10), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8100365 - 29 Sep 2018
Cited by 45 | Viewed by 12157
Abstract
Gravitational microlensing finds planets through their gravitational influence on the light coming from a more distant background star. The presence of the planet is then inferred from the tell-tale brightness variations of the background star during the lensing event, even if no light [...] Read more.
Gravitational microlensing finds planets through their gravitational influence on the light coming from a more distant background star. The presence of the planet is then inferred from the tell-tale brightness variations of the background star during the lensing event, even if no light is detectable from the planet or the host foreground star. This review covers fundamental theoretical concepts in microlensing, addresses how observations are performed in practice, the challenges of obtaining accurate measurements, and explains how planets reveal themselves in the data. It concludes with a presentation of the most important findings to-date, a description of the method’s strengths and weaknesses, and a discussion of the future prospects of microlensing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Detection and Characterization of Extrasolar Planets)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 443 KB  
Review
Exoplanets: Past, Present, and Future
by Chien-Hsiu Lee
Galaxies 2018, 6(2), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020051 - 26 Apr 2018
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 8380
Abstract
Our understanding of extra-solar planet systems is highly driven by advances in observations in the past decade. Thanks to high precision spectrographs, we are able to reveal unseen companions to stars with the radial velocity method. High precision photometry from the space, especially [...] Read more.
Our understanding of extra-solar planet systems is highly driven by advances in observations in the past decade. Thanks to high precision spectrographs, we are able to reveal unseen companions to stars with the radial velocity method. High precision photometry from the space, especially with the Kepler mission, enables us to detect planets when they transit their stars and dim the stellar light by merely one percent or smaller. Ultra wide-field, high cadence, continuous monitoring of the Galactic bulge from different sites around the southern hemisphere provides us the opportunity to observe microlensing effects caused by planetary systems from the solar neighborhood, all the way to the Milky Way center. The exquisite AO imaging from ground-based large telescopes, coupled with high-contrast coronagraph, captured the photons directly emitted by planets around other stars. In this article, I present a concise review of the extra-solar planet discoveries, discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the major planetary detection methods, providing an overview of our current understanding of planetary formation and evolution given the tremendous observations delivered by various methods, as well as on-going and planned observation endeavors to provide a clear picture of extra-solar planetary systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synoptic Astronomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 9924 KB  
Review
The Detection and Characterization of Extrasolar Planets
by Ken Rice
Challenges 2014, 5(2), 296-323; https://doi.org/10.3390/challe5020296 - 19 Sep 2014
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 18722
Abstract
We have now confirmed the existence of > 1800 planets orbiting stars other thanthe Sun; known as extrasolar planets or exoplanets. The different methods for detectingsuch planets are sensitive to different regions of parameter space, and so, we are discoveringa wide diversity of [...] Read more.
We have now confirmed the existence of > 1800 planets orbiting stars other thanthe Sun; known as extrasolar planets or exoplanets. The different methods for detectingsuch planets are sensitive to different regions of parameter space, and so, we are discoveringa wide diversity of exoplanets and exoplanetary systems. Characterizing such planets isdifficult, but we are starting to be able to determine something of their internal compositionand are beginning to be able to probe their atmospheres, the first step towards the detectionof bio-signatures and, hence, determining if a planet could be habitable or not. Here, Iwill review how we detect exoplanets, how we characterize exoplanetary systems and theexoplanets themselves, where we stand with respect to potentially habitable planets and howwe are progressing towards being able to actually determine if a planet could host life or not. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges in Astrobiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop