Search Results (46)

Background/Objectives: Endodontic perforation repair requires biomaterials that balance sealing ability with minimal cellular injury. AH Plus (epoxy resin-based) remains widely used despite cytotoxicity concerns. CeraSeal (calcium silicate-based bioceramic) is a potentially more biocompatible alternative. However, comparative data on sealer-induced cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses remain limited. This study compared the cytotoxicity and inflammatory profiles of CeraSeal and AH Plus using in vitro and in vivo approaches. Methods: Human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs) were exposed to sealer extracts (1:4 AH Plus, 1:8 CeraSeal) for 120 h. Cell death was assessed by MTT, Live/Dead, LDH release, and Annexin V/PI flow cytometry. Oxidative stress was quantified via ROS generation (DCFH-DA). In a rat furcation perforation model (n = 8 teeth/group), inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-1β, CD68), osteogenic activity (ALP), and osteoclasts (TRAP) were evaluated. Results: AH Plus was associated with significantly greater necrotic cell death (357.6 ± 47.6% LDH release vs. CeraSeal 128.8 ± 37.5%; p = 0.0079) and reduced hPDLSC viability at all time points (p < 0.0001). ROS generation was comparable between sealers (~32–35%, p > 0.05). In vivo, IL-1β was higher in AH Plus-treated tissues (52.25 vs. 24.88 cells/mm²; p = 0.0002), while TNF-α and CD68 were greater in CeraSeal (p ≤ 0.0011). ALP was higher in AH Plus (median 6.15 vs. 3.68; p = 0.0002), with no difference in TRAP-positive osteoclasts. Morphometric analysis showed superior cellular preservation with CeraSeal (p = 0.0079), while inflammatory infiltration was higher in CeraSeal (p = 0.0002). Conclusions: AH Plus was associated with a necrotic-inflammatory profile with elevated IL-1β and higher ALP expression. CeraSeal demonstrated better cellular preservation, lower LDH release, and a distinct inflammatory signature (higher TNF-α and CD68). These findings establish comparative response profiles for the two sealers and support CeraSeal as a potentially biocompatible alternative, though further mechanistic studies are warranted. Full article

Objectives: To evaluate the physicochemical properties of a novel strontium silicate-based root canal sealer (C-Root SP) in comparison with a calcium silicate-based sealer (TotalFill BC) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus). Methods: Setting time, net mass change (apparent solubility behavior), pH changes, and surface characteristics were assessed based on ISO 6876 and ANSI/ADA Specification No. 57, with minor methodological modifications. Net mass change and pH were evaluated over 28 days. Surface morphology and elemental composition were analyzed after dry and aqueous aging in deionized water using scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Data were analyzed using one-way and repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results: AH Plus exhibited the longest initial and final setting times (10.93 ± 0.65 h and 37.33 ± 0.13 h), whereas TotalFill BC showed the shortest (7.98 ± 0.32 h and 30.18 ± 0.20 h); C-Root SP demonstrated intermediate values (9.35 ± 0.38 h and 32.75 ± 0.57 h) (p < 0.001). C-Root SP exhibited positive net mass change values (indicative of net mass loss), ranging from 5.32 ± 4.72% at 24 h to 6.83 ± 5.55% at 28 days, significantly higher than AH Plus and TotalFill BC (p < 0.001), which showed negative values indicative of apparent mass gain. All sealers demonstrated alkaline conditions, with C-Root SP maintaining the highest apparent pH values throughout the evaluation period (p < 0.001). Surface and compositional changes were observed in the bioceramic sealers following aqueous aging, with increased detectable strontium content in C-Root SP. Conclusions: C-Root SP exhibited physicochemical behavior consistent with a strontium-modified calcium silicate-based sealer, characterized by hydration-driven hydroxyl ion release resulting in apparent alkalinity and ion exchange-associated behavior, and dynamic surface changes consistent with those reported for bioceramic materials. Clinical Significance: Strontium incorporation may influence hydration-mediated physicochemical behavior; however, further in vitro and in vivo studies are required to determine its clinical relevance. Full article

Background/Objectives: Residual EDTA may persist after smear-layer removal and after the application of contact sealers during setting. This in vitro study compared the effect of 1 min of pre-setting surface contact with 17% EDTA (vs. distilled water) on a calcium silicate-based sealer (AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus). Methods: Discs were prepared (N = 108) in a 2 × 2 design (n = 27/group); per group; n = 12 were used for solubility followed by eluate pH using the same specimens/eluates after 24 h immersion in distilled water; n = 12 were used to test Vickers microhardness on an independent set after setting; and n = 3 were used for SEM/EDS. Results: Data were analyzed at α = 0.05 using Kruskal–Wallis tests followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise Mann–Whitney U tests for solubility and eluate pH, and one-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to assess the microhardness. Solubility differed among groups (p < 0.001) and was higher for the bioceramic sealer than for the resin sealer; pre-setting EDTA exposure increased solubility for the AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer (0.86 ± 0.08% to 1.30 ± 0.16%) and decreased solubility for AH Plus (0.34 ± 0.04% to 0.22 ± 0.03%) (p < 0.05). The eluate pH also differed among groups (p = 0.001) and was higher for the bioceramic sealer (≈11.7) than for the resin sealer (≈8.7–9.3), with no within-material differences (p = 0.999 and p = 0.851). Microhardness differed among groups (p < 0.001) and was higher for AH Plus (239.70–246.92 HV) than for AH Plus Bioceramic (131.72–170.83 HV); EDTA reduced microhardness only for the bioceramic sealer (p < 0.001), with no significant change for AH Plus (p = 0.475). Descriptive SEM/EDS findings suggested increased surface irregularities and lower surface Ca for AH Plus Bioceramic after EDTA exposure (12.68 to 7.31 wt%). Conclusions: Pre-setting EDTA contact therefore produced material-dependent changes in early properties and adverse surface-related effects in the calcium silicate-based sealer, supporting thorough chelator removal before obturation. Full article

This study aims to compare the osteogenic potential of premixed hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers (HCSSs) with an epoxy resin-based sealer in human bone marrow-derived stem cells (hBMSCs). Three HCSSs (White Endoseal MTA, One-Fil, EndoSequence BC Sealer) were compared with AH Plus Jet, an epoxy resin-based sealer. Disk-shaped specimens were prepared using sterilized Teflon tubes and immersed in osteogenic medium to create eluates. hBMSCs were cultured in each eluate, and osteogenic potential was assessed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity (n = 6), Alizarin Red-S (ARS) staining (n = 6), quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (n = 3), and Western blot analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 24.0), with significance set at p < 0.05. All experimental groups exhibited higher ALP activity than the control on day 4. ARS staining of HCSSs differed significantly from AH Plus Jet on day 14 (p < 0.05), while White Endoseal MTA exhibited the highest intensity. qPCR revealed that EndoSequence BC Sealer induced the highest SMAD1 expression on day 4, while One-Fil and EndoSequence BC Sealer significantly upregulated RUNX2 expression compared with AH Plus Jet (p < 0.05). Western blotting confirmed that EndoSequence BC Sealer induced the highest RUNX2 protein expression. Collectively, premixed HCSSs promoted superior mineralization and RUNX2 expression compared to conventional resin-based sealer in hBMSCs. Full article

Background/Objectives: The clinical outcome of root canal treatments using calcium silicate-based sealer (CSBS) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the 1-year effect of CSBS in combination with a single-cone obturation technique on periapical lesion (PL) healing evaluated on cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) after single-visit root canal retreatment. Methods: This randomized clinical study involved 50 patients with chronic apical periodontitis and previous root canal treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04072926). The inclusion criteria were previous endodontic treatment, asymptomatic inadequate endodontic treatment, PLs measuring > 5 mm, and percussion and palpation sensitivity. The exclusion criteria were immunocompromised status, pregnancy, periodontally compromised teeth, vertical root fracture, and antibiotic usage in the last month. Single-visit root canal retreatment was performed by the same endodontist. The patients were randomly divided into two groups based on the root canal sealer used: CSBS (BioRoot RCS) and epoxy resin-based sealer (ERBS) (AH Plus). Periapical healing, as the primary outcome measure, was determined according to the reduction in PL volume on CBCT from the preoperative period to the 1-year postoperative period. Results: Pre- and postoperative PL volumes (p > 0.05) were not significantly different between the CSBS and ERBS groups. The success rate (loose criteria) was 82.9% in the ERBS group and 94.7% in CSBS group. Conclusions: Root canal retreatment outcomes of CSBS, including periapical healing, are comparable to those of ERBS at 1 year after the retreatment. Full article

Background/Objectives: We aimed to assess the bond strength of AH Plus Jet (AH) and an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer prototype (K-0189) adhered to three different obturation points. Methods: A total of 120 single-rooted teeth were selected after radiographic analysis, and their root canals were instrumented with ProTaper Next files (PTN) up to size X5. The teeth were randomly assigned to two sealer groups (G) (G1: AH, G2: K-0189, each n = 60) and further divided into three subgroups: (A) ConformFit X5 points (PTN) cold obturation (CO), (B) ProTaper Universal F5 points (PTU) (CO), (C) GuttaCore X5 (GC) warm obturation (WO). After final irrigation (NaOCl 3%, EDTA 17%, NaOCl 3%) and drying, root canals were obturated and stored for 30 days at 37 °C in Simulated Body Fluid (SBF). The specimens were embedded in acrylate and sectioned horizontally; then, push-out bond strength (POBS) analysis was performed. Results: The median POBS values [MPa] were G1A: 2.03; G1B: 2.12; G1C: 3.2; G2A: 1.91; G2B: 2.56; and G2C: 3.36. WO showed significantly higher POBS (p < 0.001 *) than CO. The POBS was not significantly different between the two WO groups (p = 0.508). The POBS of G2B was significantly higher compared to all other CO groups. Conclusions: The epoxy resin sealer prototype demonstrated POBS values comparable to AH Plus when used with WO and PTU points, indicating significantly higher POBS values compared to all other CO points. Full article

The adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin may be influenced both by the chemical composition of the sealer and the final irrigation protocol. The aim of this study was to examine the push-out bond strength of three differently formulated bioceramic sealers to root canal dentin, after different irrigation protocols. Four cavities were prepared in dentine discs obtained from middle thirds of third molars with fused roots. Discs were randomly divided into three groups (n = 8). Group 1: specimens were immersed in 2.5% NaOCl; group 2: in 2.5% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA; and group 3: in a solution of 2.5% NaOCl with 9% etidronic acid (HEDP). The cavities on each disk were filled with four tested sealers: AH Plus Bioceramic, Bio C Angelus, BioRoot RCS, and AH Plus (n = 8 per sealer). The push-out bond strength test was performed after 7 days. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni post hoc test (α = 0.05). Irrigation with NaOCl resulted in significantly lower bond strength values of the sealers in comparison to NaOCl/EDTA and NaOCl/HEDP groups. In the NaOCl and NaOCl/HEDP groups, BioRoot RCS showed similar push-out bond strength compared to AH Plus and significantly higher compared to Bio-C and AH Plus Bioceramic. In the NaOCl/EDTA group, bioceramic sealers achieved a significantly weaker bond strength compared to AH Plus. The bond strength of BioRoot RCS was significantly higher compared to Bio-C and AH Plus Bioceramic. The irrigation protocols and the chemical composition of the sealers significantly influenced their bond strength to dentin. Epoxy resin-based sealer achieved the strongest bond strength, while within bioceramic sealers, the highest values were obtained for BioRoot RCS and the lowest for AH Plus Bioceramic. Full article

This study assessed the biocompatibility and chemical properties of two bioceramic root canal sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer (EBC) and Nishika Canal Sealer BG (NBG), using a sealer extrusion model. Eight-week-old male Wistar rats were used. The mesial root canals of the upper first molars were pulpectomized and overfilled with EBC, NBG, or, as reference, epoxy resin-based AH Plus (AHP). After 28 days, periapical tissue reactions were assessed using microcomputed tomography and histological staining. The elemental composition and chemical composition of the extruded EBC and NBG were analyzed at Day 1 and 28 using an electron probe microanalyzer and micro-Raman spectroscopy. No periapical lesions were observed with the sealer extrusion. Additionally, inflammation around the extruded EBC and NBG was minimal to mild on Day 28, whereas moderate inflammation was found around the extruded AHP. Silicon concentration in the extruded EBC and NBG decreased significantly from Day 1 to 28, with almost no silicon present on Day 28. Furthermore, the extruded EBC and NBG became calcium- and phosphorus-rich, showing a Raman band for hydroxyapatite on Day 28. In conclusion, EBC and NBG demonstrated favorable biocompatibility and the ability to release silicon elements and produce hydroxyapatite when extruded into the periapical tissues. AHP showed moderate periapical tissue irritancy. Full article

Background: Adhesion within endodontic obturation material and root canal walls improves the efficacy of the endodontic treatment by establishing a barrier that inhibits reinfection and entombs residual bacteria. This study evaluates the push-out bond strength (POBS) of calcium silicate sealers compared to an epoxy-resin-based sealer. Methods: A total of 36 extracted mono-radicular teeth were prepared with Pro Taper Ultimate and irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. The specimens were randomly split into three groups (n = 12) according to the endodontic sealer and filling technique used as follows: Ah Plus with the continuous wave condensation technique (CWC), Ah Bioceramic (Ah Bio) with the single-cone technique, and Total Fill Hi-Flow (FKG Hi-Flow) with the CWC technique. The material was allowed to set for 4 weeks, and afterwards, the roots were placed in acrylic resin and sectioned into 1 mm transverse slices. A POBS test was conducted using a universal testing machine, and the mode of bond failure was assessed at 4× magnification using a stereomicroscope. Six specimens from each group were selected for SEM-EDX examination to evaluate dentinal tubule penetration. The data were analysed using analysis of variance and Tukey and Bonferroni post hoc tests. Results: The POBS tests revealed higher values for Ah Plus in comparison to both calcium silicate sealers (p < 0.001), while FKG Hi-Flow showed superior results to Ah Bio (p < 0.001). The cohesive mode of failure was prevalent in all three groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, the resin-based sealer showed higher bond strength and better dentinal tubule penetration than the two calcium silicate sealers tested, while FKG Hi-Flow outperformed AH Bio. Full article

This in vitro study evaluated the sealing ability and microleakage of calcium silicate-based sealers compared to an epoxy resin-based sealer. One hundred twenty-five roots from anterior teeth were chemo-mechanically prepared and divided into four groups: AH Plus (AH), ProRoot MTA (PR), Medcem MTA (MC), and Total Fill BC Sealer/BC-coated gutta-percha (TF); n = 30. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to measure sealer penetration at three horizontal levels in 10 roots per group, while glucose leakage over 30 days was assessed in 20 roots. A lateral compaction technique was used for most groups, except for TF, which employed a single-cone method. Data were analyzed using Python with a Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc test. TF showed significantly greater penetration in the coronal and middle sections, while PR had the least penetration in the apical section. PR exhibited the highest canal circumference penetration, especially compared to MC and TF. Glucose leakage increased over time in all groups, with TF showing the highest permeability after 30 days. Overall, calcium silicate-based sealers PR, MC, and TF performed similarly to the epoxy resin standard AH, with all groups exhibiting decreasing penetration from coronal to apical and increased leakage over time. Full article

Background: Using endodontic sealers with long-term antimicrobial properties can increase the success of endodontic treatment. This study aimed to assess the antimicrobial activity over time of two calcium silicate (CS)-based sealers, AH Plus Bioceramic and BioRoot RCS, and to compare them with an epoxy resin-based sealer, AH Plus Jet, against mature polymicrobial biofilms grown on human radicular dentin. Methods: The antimicrobial activity of the sealers was tested using a direct contact test after 1 and 6 weeks of contact with the biofilms. Cell viability was determined by the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) method and flow cytometry (FC). The results of the ATP test were analyzed using an ANOVA with Welch’s correction, followed by the Games–Howell test. The number of cells with damaged membranes obtained by FC in each period was compared by means of an ANOVA and Duncan’s test. For the comparison between times, a Student’s t-test was used. Results: Globally, after a week of contact, the epoxy resin-based sealer obtained the best results. However, at 6 weeks, the two CSs showed the highest antimicrobial efficacy, with a significant increase in this activity over time. Conclusions: Calcium silicate-based sealers exert long-term antimicrobial activity against endodontic biofilms. Full article

(1) Background: Cementation of glass fiber posts to root canals has been associated with various failures, especially debonding. This narrative review aims to present the contemporary concepts concerning the adhesive cementation of glass fiber post and to discuss the optimal management of these factors. (2) Methods: Electronic search was performed in MEDLINE/Pub Med and Google Scholar using selected keywords examining the parameters post length, surface treatment of glass fiber posts, post space preparation and dentin pretreatment, resin cement selection, adhesive systems and hybrid layer formation, and clinical techniques. (3) Results: The search led to the selection of 44 articles. Epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers are recommended and the use of temporary cement in the root canal should be avoided. The minimum length of a glass fiber post adhesively cemented to a root canal is 5 mm. Irrigating the root canals with chlorhexidine, MTAD, or EDTA (alone or in combination with NaOCl) after post space preparation seems to enhance the bond strength. Silane application on the surface of the post seems to be beneficial. Concerning resin cements and adhesive systems, the results were rather inconclusive. Finally, resin cement should be applied inside the root canal with an elongation tip and photoactivation should be delayed. (4) Conclusions: Contemporary concepts of adhesive cementation of glass fiber posts can indeed improve the bond between glass fiber posts, resin cement, and root canal dentin, however, evidence coming from long-term randomized prospective clinical trials is needed in order to obtain safer conclusions. Full article

Introduction: We compared the effects of heat on the physicochemical properties of recently developed calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBSs), including BioRoot Flow, BioRoot RCS, and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer, with those of the epoxy-resin-based sealer (ERBS) AH Plus. Methods: The flow, film thickness, setting time, and solubility of sealers were evaluated at 37 °C and 100 °C using ISO 6876/2012. Furthermore, pH and calcium ion release were evaluated at these temperatures. In addition, the mass change in sealers at a high temperature was assessed via thermogravimetric analysis. Then, the chemical composition and components of the sealers were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Results: BioRoot Flow, AH Plus Bioceramic, and AH Plus complied with ISO standards in terms of flow and film thickness, both before and after heat application. However, BioRoot RCS exhibited significantly increased film thickness at 100 °C. The setting times of all sealers were significantly reduced at 100 °C. The solubility of CSBS was >3%, exceeding the ISO 6876/2012 standard, both before and after heat exposure. Conversely, the solubility of AH Plus complied with the standard, regardless of the thermal condition. For 4 weeks, CSBS showed a significantly higher pH than AH Plus at both 37 °C and 100 °C. After heat treatment, calcium release decreased in Bioroot RCS and BioRoot Flow, while AH Plus showed no significant differences before and after treatment. However, CSBS consistently exhibited significantly higher calcium release than AH Plus at both temperatures. An FTIR analysis revealed that the chemical composition of the sealers did not change at the high temperature, whereas a thermogravimetric analysis demonstrated a >5% weight reduction in CSBS and a 0.005% weight reduction in AH Plus at 100 °C. Conclusions: BioRoot Flow, AH Plus Bioceramic, and AH Plus possess favorable physicochemical properties, which make them suitable for application under thermal conditions. At a high temperature, BioRoot RCS did not exhibit changes in its chemical composition. However, its film thickness was increased, and pH and solubility were reduced. Therefore, caution is needed when it is applied at high temperatures, such as during the warm obturation technique. Full article

This study aimed to review the considerations for choosing a suitable sealer according to various endodontic scenarios. An electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science was undertaken for the keywords of ‘sealer choosing’, ‘appropriate sealer’, ‘suitable sealer’, ‘sealer for clinical scenario’, and ‘sealer for clinical situations’. However, the literature review revealed a lack of studies with practical clinical recommendations regarding the choice of appropriate endodontic root canal sealers for particular clinical situations of root canal treatment. Therefore, a narrative review was undertaken under the basis of the characteristics of an epoxy resin-based sealer (ERS) versus a calcium silicate-based sealer (CSS). Based on the evidence found through the review, the choice of an appropriate sealer in a variety of clinical scenarios was proposed. An ERS is recommended for one-visit non-vital cases, teeth with periodontal involvement, cracked teeth, and internal root resorption without root perforation. A CSS is recommended for vital or non-vital cases in multiple visits, teeth with internal root resorption with perforation or internal approach for external cervical resorption, teeth with open apices, and teeth with iatrogenic aberrations. Full article

Introduction: The effect of high temperatures on the properties of endodontic sealers during warm compaction of gutta-percha may be a matter of concern. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of heat on the biocompatibility and bioactivity of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow (ESHF; Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA) and AH Plus (AHPS; Dentsply, De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) when implanted into the bone tissue of rat tibias. Methods: Medical-grade silicone tubes containing freshly prepared ESHF or AHPS were heated to 100 °C and then cooled down to 65 °C before being implanted in the tibias of 24 Wistar rats. The outer walls of the tubes served as controls. After 10, 30 and 90 days, the animals were euthanized and the implants and their surrounding tissues were dissected, fixed in formalin, and processed for microscopic evaluation. Results: After 10 days postoperatively, a severe inflammatory reaction without reactionary bone formation was observed in contact with ESHF and AHPS. The severity of the reaction had decreased at the 30-day observation period for both sealers but only ESHF samples showed new bone formation adjacent to the sealer. After 90 days, no inflammatory cells were found in contact with ESHF, while a thin fibrous tissue capsule and complete bone reparation of the surrounding areas were observed in contact with the material. For AH Plus, a fibrous connective tissue containing scarce remaining inflammatory cells could be observed in most of the samples, however, in the absence of new bone formation. No significant differences (p > 0.05) between ESHF and AHPS were found at the 10-day observation period. At the 30 and 90-day, significant differences (p < 0.05) between both materials were observed. The reaction to the controls showed significant differences with ESHF and AHPS for all experimental periods. Significant differences (p < 0.05) for the total effect of time were also found between both sealers (p < 0.05). Conclusions: At the end of the experiment, heated ESHF reacted as a biocompatible/bioactive material and stimulated continued development of new healthy bone. Although AHPS was tolerated well by the surrounding tissues, the sealer did not promote new reparative bone formation. Full article