Search Results (191)

Background: Durvalumab consolidation following radiochemotherapy is now the standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT offers valuable insights not just for staging but also for tumor characterization via radiomics, which can potentially predict histology, immunophenotype, and prognosis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT scans from stage IIIA–IIIB NSCLC patients treated at the Clinical Centre, University of Pécs. All biopsy samples were classified histologically (squamous vs. adenocarcinoma) and tested for PD-L1. Lung tumors were segmented using MEDISO InterViewTM FUSION software (version 3.12.002.0000). with an SUVmax threshold of four. Imaging features were extracted and compared based on histology, PD-L1 status, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)-based prognosis groups. Statistical analyses were performed with Jamovi (v2.6.44), using Shapiro–Wilk, t-test/ANOVA, Mann–Whitney/Kruskal–Wallis, or Chi-square tests as appropriate. Results: Fifty-six patients were included (38 PD-L1-positive, 18 -negative). Among PD-L1-positive cases, poor versus good NLR prognosis groups differed in maximum diameter (p = 0.046), short-zone emphasis (p = 0.026), and zone-length non-uniformity (p = 0.027). Focusing on PD-L1-positive squamous carcinoma, maximum diameter, metabolic tumor volume, busyness, and coarseness showed significant differences (all p < 0.05). SUVmax, mean SUV, SUVpeak, and complexity were higher in squamous than in adenocarcinoma subtypes. PD-L1-positive and -negative squamous tumors differed in zone percentage (p = 0.039) and long-zone high gray-level emphasis (p = 0.024), while no significant differences were observed among adenocarcinomas. Conclusions: [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT radiomics showed potential for differentiating NSCLC histological subtypes and for identifying PD-L1-associated imaging patterns in squamous cell carcinoma. In addition, certain metabolic features were associated with NLR-based prognostic groups in PD-L1-positive patients. Full article

Background: Durvalumab combined with gemcitabine–cisplatin (GC) has become the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following the TOPAZ-1 trial. However, real-world effectiveness, safety, and prognostic determinants, particularly in underrepresented populations, remain insufficiently defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world outcomes of first-line durvalumab plus chemotherapy and identify independent prognostic factors in patients with advanced BTC. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with unresectable or metastatic BTC treated with first-line durvalumab plus chemotherapy across 21 tertiary oncology centers in Türkiye. Clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, biomarker data, and treatment details were collected. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: A total of 78 patients were analyzed; 53.8% were male, and the median age was 62 years. Primary tumor sites were intrahepatic (55.1%), extrahepatic (30.8%), and gallbladder (14.1%). After a median follow-up of 12.58 months, median OS was 11.59 months and median PFS was 6.80 months. The ORR was 50.6%, including complete and partial responses in 2.7% and 47.9% of patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.4% of patients, with grade 3–4 events in 37.2%. Immune-related adverse events were observed in 19.2%, including one case of grade 3 pneumonitis. No patient permanently discontinued durvalumab due to toxicity, and no durvalumab-related mortality occurred. In multivariable analysis, ECOG performance status 2 (HR 3.43; 95% CI 1.33–8.80) and ALBI grade 2–3 (HR 2.54; 95% CI 1.24–5.19) independently predicted worse OS, while ECOG performance status 2 also predicted shorter PFS (HR 5.91; 95% CI 2.30–15.17). Conclusions: In this multicenter real-world Turkish cohort, first-line durvalumab plus chemotherapy showed effectiveness and tolerability comparable to clinical trial data. Baseline ECOG performance status and ALBI grade were independent prognostic factors, supporting their use for risk stratification in advanced biliary tract cancer. Full article

Background: Durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor used as consolidation therapy after chemoradiation in unresectable stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), can induce immune-related adverse events, among which immune-mediated pneumonitis represents one of the most severe. Differentiating checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) from infectious pneumonia is challenging due to overlapping clinical and radiologic findings. Case presentation: We describe a 67-year-old woman with stage III lung adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and durvalumab, who presented with progressive dyspnea and extensive bilateral ground-glass opacities on CT imaging. Laboratory tests revealed leukopenia and elevated inflammatory markers. Despite broad-spectrum antibiotic and antiviral therapy, her condition worsened, requiring high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. Multiplex molecular testing on sputum identified human metapneumovirus (HMPV), while blood cultures and urinary antigens for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila were negative. A pulmonology consultation raised suspicion for severe durvalumab-induced pneumonitis exacerbated by viral infection. High-dose methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) followed by a four-week taper led to gradual clinical and radiologic resolution. Durvalumab was permanently discontinued. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of HMPV-associated pneumonitis in a patient receiving durvalumab. This case highlights the potential synergistic interplay between viral infection and immune checkpoint blockade, resulting in severe lung injury. Comprehensive microbiologic evaluation, including molecular diagnostics, is essential to guide therapy and distinguish infectious from immune-mediated causes. Conclusions: Early recognition of mixed infectious and immune-mediated pneumonitis, and timely corticosteroid therapy are critical to achieving favorable outcomes and preventing irreversible pulmonary damage. Full article

Alopecia is a multifactorial disorder in which immune, endocrine, metabolic, and microbial systems converge within the follicular microenvironment. In alopecia areata (AA), loss of immune privilege, together with interferon-γ- and interleukin-15-driven activation of the JAK/STAT cascade, promotes cytotoxic infiltration, whereas selective inhibitors, including baricitinib, ritlecitinib, and durvalumab, restore immune balance and permit anagen reentry. In androgenetic alopecia (AGA), excess dihydrotestosterone and androgen receptor signaling increase DKK1 and prostaglandin D2, suppress Wnt and β-catenin activity, and drive follicular miniaturization. Combination approaches utilizing low-dose oral minoxidil, platelet-rich plasma, exosome formulations, and low-level light therapy enhance vascularization, improve mitochondrial function, and reactivate metabolism, collectively supporting sustained regrowth. Elucidation of intracellular axes such as JAK/STAT, Wnt/BMP, AMPK/mTOR, and mitochondrial redox regulation provides a mechanistic basis for rational, multimodal intervention. Advances in stem cell organoids, biomaterial scaffolds, and exosome-based therapeutics extend treatment from suppression toward structural follicle reconstruction. Recognition of microbiome and mitochondria crosstalk underscores the need to maintain microbial homeostasis and redox stability for durable regeneration. This review synthesizes molecular and preclinical advances in AA and AGA, outlining intersecting signaling networks and regenerative interfaces that define a framework for precision and sustained follicular regeneration. Full article

Background: As demonstrated by the PACIFIC trial, biomarker-driven patient selection is crucial. While treatment based on programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and mutational status have become routine, tests for biomarkers available from pretherapeutic blood samples are currently a topic of scientific interest. Methods: This analysis was conducted on patients from the ALLSTAR RWD study, which is a nationwide, prospective registry for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage III. Patients were amenable if they had a full routine pre-treatment blood sample, from which the following biomarkers were extracted: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), derived monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (dMLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. The intention was to find a cutoff for each of these biomarkers to predict locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: MLR and dMLR demonstrated their predictive potential with cutoff values of 0.665 and 0.945, respectively. Stratifying the whole cohort by means of these cutoffs demonstrated significantly better locoregional control for patients below the threshold, both in the whole cohort (N = 175; 55.7% vs. 75.5%; p-value = 0.018) and in the Durvalumab subgroup (N = 106; 57.5% vs. 77.3%; p-value = 0.030). Similar findings were observed for PFS in the whole cohort (N = 175; 20.5% vs. 56.1%; p-value p < 0.001) and in the Durvalumab subgroup (N = 106; 31.2% vs. 64.6%, p-value < 0.001). dMLR could also significantly predict PFS (N = 173; 17.4% vs. 56.3%; p-value < 0.001), which was corroborated in the Durvalumab subgroup (N = 108; 23.1% vs. 64.1%; p-value = 0.003). Conclusions: This explorative analysis demonstrates the predictive potential of MLR and dMLR for LRC and PFS. These blood biomarkers can be readily integrated into clinical routines since they are easily available. Full article

Objectives: To evaluate the prognosis and costs of gemcitabine + cisplatin + S-1 (GCS) versus gemcitabine + cisplatin + durvalumab (GCD), the standard of care for advanced cholangiocarcinoma, in a prospective observational study. Methods: We enrolled 52 patients who received GCS as first-line treatment from April 2020 to April 2024 and 44 patients who received GCD from March 2023 to April 2024. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were examined. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups, and OS, PFS and ORR were then analysed in the matched cohorts. Drug costs were compared until the end of treatment. Results: OS was not significantly different between GCS and GCD at 18.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.3–21.9) (p = 0.0935) versus 12.2 months (95% CI: 7.5–16). PFS was 10.2 months (95% CI: 6.5–13.8) versus 6.2 months (95% CI: 3.2–8.8) for GCS versus GCD, respectively (p = 0.0151). The ORR was also higher for GCS (36.5%) than for GCD (15.9%) (p = 0.0234). Twenty-seven patients were included in the PSM analysis, which showed no significant differences in OS or ORR, and better PFS for GCS (9.3 months, 95% CI: 7.4–21.1 versus 4.8 months, 95% CI: 2.7–8.8; p = 0.007). The cost of GCS versus GCD was $6350 (95% CI: 2300–9800) versus $97,200 (95% CI: 69,400–138,800) by treatment end (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: GCS was significantly less expensive than GCD and showed comparable OS and better PFS. Full article

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment by providing durable survival gains, but understanding their effects on patient health-related quality of life (HRQL) is critical. Methods: We performed a narrative review of cross-sectional surveys, early-phase trials, and large-scale phase II and III randomized controlled clinical trials assessing FDA-approved ICIs, including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, with emphasis on patient-reported HRQL. Validated HRQL instruments were summarized, and for pivotal trials, the positioning of HRQL outcomes as primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoints was taken from original protocols or primary manuscripts. Results: ICIs generally preserved or improved HRQL in patients with various malignancies compared with chemotherapy, targeted therapies, or observation. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors maintained global health and function and delayed symptom progression in patients with lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Regimens combining CTLA-4 blockade and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition (e.g., nivolumab + ipilimumab, durvalumab + tremelimumab) are associated with HRQL outcomes similar or superior to those of targeted therapies. Overall, most immune-related adverse effects were short-term and did not diminish HRQL benefits. Conclusions: ICIs extend survival while preserving, and often enhancing, patient HRQL. These medications represent a shift in oncology, offering not just longer life but also better daily well-being. Continued long-term patient-reported outcome monitoring is essential to guide survivorship care in the immunotherapy era. Full article

Introduction: The incidence of NSCLC increases with age, with a median of approximately 70 years at diagnosis. Historically, treatment strategies for locally advanced cancers have been developed predominantly in younger populations, often excluding elderly patients who may present with multiple comorbidities, severely impaired lung function, or decreased performance status, leading to a lack of age-relevant clinical data. Therefore, we performed a subanalysis of real-world data from the ALLSTAR study to investigate the impact of durvalumab and the radiation regimen (sequential versus concurrent) on clinical outcome in elderly patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Methods: We included a total of 171 patients in this subanalysis. All patients were diagnosed with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Patients were divided into two age groups, ≥70 (41%) and <70 years (59%). All of them received curative chemoradiotherapy with (66%) or without (34%) durvalumab. Results: Patients were followed up for a median time of 25.1 months (range: 3.3–52.1). In the elderly group, patients who did not receive durvalumab consolidation had a median PFS of 17 months (95%-CI: 12.4—not reached) and a higher risk of progression (HR = 2.2; 95%-CI: 1–4.6) than those treated with durvalumab, which had a median PFS of 37 months (95%-CI: 24.5—not reached). This difference was statistically significant (log rank p = 0.026). Moreover, the Cox model yielded a hazard ratio suggesting a higher risk of locoregional (HR = 3.8; 95%-CI: 1.28–11.48; log rank p-value =0.01) as well as local recurrence (HR = 5.5: 95%-CI: 1.67–18.1: p-value =0.002) in patients who received sequential chemoradiotherapy compared to those with concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the same age group. In an exploratory analysis based on a Mann–Whitney U test, we did not find significant difference in toxicity between the two age groups. Conclusions: Durvalumab was associated with prolonged progression-free survival, while concomitant radiotherapy showed a trend towards improvement in locoregional and local control in patients aged ≥70. There was no significant difference in treatment toxicity found in the exploratory Mann–Whitney U analysis between the two age groups. Full article

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a prevalent form of cancer with a poor prognosis and requires systemic therapies for most advanced cases. In this review, we summarize considerations for selecting treatment options for HCC, particularly with regard to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Traditional chemotherapy has been surpassed by molecular-targeted therapies and ICIs, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death-1 (PD-1), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, which enhance the immune response against tumors. The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines recommend atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) and tremelimumab/durvalumab (Dur/Tre) as first-line treatments for unresectable HCC, along with alternatives, such as sorafenib and lenvatinib. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab have demonstrated superior efficacy but require the monitoring of bleeding risk and adverse events, such as proteinuria. Tremelimumab and durvalumab offer alternatives for patients at high risk of anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF)-related complications. In cases where ICIs are contraindicated, lenvatinib and sorafenib serve as additional options, with lenvatinib demonstrating longer progression free survival (PFS) in clinical trials. It is important to consider that each treatment has specific side effects or contraindications, and the choice of medication should be based not only on the therapeutic efficacy of the drug, but also on the patient’s health status, liver function, and tumor characteristics. Full article

Objective: We aimed to provide real-world insights into the management of non-small cell lung cancer stage III (NSCLC-SIII) in Spain. Methods: The GOECP-SEOR group conducted an observational, retrospective, multicenter study in which data from patients diagnosed with NSCLC-SIII treated in Spanish radiotherapy departments (RTDs) were collected. Results: A total of 1505 NSCLC-SIII patients from 35 RTDs from 2018 to 2021 were recruited. A total of 871 patients (57.9%) received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), and 390 patients (25.91%) received maintenance durvalumab. The immunotherapy (IT) was well tolerated, with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 0–2 toxicity observed in 85% of the patients (295 patients). The median overall survival (OS) was 26 months (95% CI 9.4-Not Reached NR). There was a statistically significant difference when patients were stratified by IT, with a median OS of 40 months (95% CI 22.1-NR) in the IT maintenance cohort compared with 19.4 months (95% CI 7.1–58.1) in the non-IT cohort. Differences were also noted in progression-free survival (PFS), with a median PFS of 20.8 months (95% CI 9.6-NR) in the IT cohort versus 8.4 months (95% CI 3.1–25.1) in the non-IT cohort. These differences remained significant according to the multivariate model (OS: HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.36–0.56], p < 0.001; PFS: HR 0.5 [95% CI 0.42–0.59], p < 0.001). Conclusions: The management of NSCLC-SIII patients can vary, leading to differences in treatment outcomes. The treatment of lung cancer in NSCLC-SIII patients in RTDs across Spain aligns with international guidelines and expert recommendations. Full article

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) remains a significant therapeutic challenge due to its rising incidence and a five-year survival rate of only 16% in cases of metastases or advanced disease when using classical therapy methods. For this reason, more effective methods of treatment are still sought, which currently focus on immunotherapy with the use of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (ICI), which is the subject of our article. Methods: Articles published in the databases: Pubmed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov in the years 2019–2024 were analyzed. Results: ICIs can be used in monotherapy as well as in combination therapy, but it is the latter option that significantly prolongs the median PFS, especially the combination of ICI with PARP inhibitors. Among the available ICIs, pembrolizumab stands out with a large advantage in clinical trials, which is characterized by the lowest mortality resulting from therapy and a small number of grade 3 adverse events. Other inhibitors such as atezolizumab, dostarlimab, durvalumab, nivolumab and avelumab also demonstrate high clinical efficacy, as they prolong median PFS compared to the control group, but more studies are needed in much larger study groups to assess their safety and efficacy in different age groups. Conclusions: Future studies should focus on the efficacy of ICIs in younger groups of patients with EC, as well as on drugs from this group that are used less frequently in clinical trials than pembrolizumab, which would allow for a thorough comparison of the efficacy of drugs with each other and the selection of the drug individually to the patient’s needs. Full article

Introduction: Current treatments for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not sufficiently personalized, resulting in suboptimal outcomes and high mortality rates. The Developing Circulating and Imaging Biomarkers Towards Personalized Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer (VIGILANCE) study employs innovative health technologies to collect a range of clinical data and features. This includes longitudinal analyses of cell-free and circulating tumor DNA from blood samples and radiomic features extracted from standard-of-care imaging. Additionally, patient-reported outcome measures will be collected to capture patients’ symptoms and quality of life. This will provide invaluable insight into the patient experience during and after radiotherapy. We aim to evaluate whether the data, including patient-reported outcomes, can serve as biomarkers to refine treatment strategies, improve post-treatment follow-up and provide patients with realistic outcome predictions. Key endpoints include the following: (1) assessing whether baseline ctDNA status and its early on-treatment dynamics can identify patients with radioresistant disease who could benefit from treatment intensification; (2) determining whether post-radiotherapy ctDNA clearance can predict benefit from consolidation durvalumab, potentially sparing ctDNA-negative patients from unnecessary immunotherapy; and (3) developing integrated models combining novel ctDNA and radiomic biomarkers to distinguish between radiation fibrosis and tumor recurrence and to predict survival. We adopt a pragmatic approach by recruiting patients receiving standard-of-care treatments in a real-world setting. In addition, most of the clinical data is already routinely collected in our center, except for the blood tests for cell-free and circulating tumor DNA analysis. Methods and analysis: This is a single-center, prospective, exploratory, longitudinal, follow-up study, recruiting patients with stage III NSCLC undergoing standard-of-care curative-intent radiotherapy (with or without systemic therapy). Data collection spans from baseline to during radiotherapy and is extended up to 1 year following radiotherapy. The longitudinal analysis aims to describe and characterize dynamic changes in the collected features and assess their utility as prognostic and response biomarkers. Trial registration number: NCT06086574. Full article

Background/Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent a significant breakthrough in cancer management, but they can cause adverse effects such as immune-mediated colitis (IMC). The standard first-line treatment is corticosteroids, and second-line treatment is infliximab or vedolizumab. However, a proportion of immune-mediated colitis (IMC) cases are refractory to immunosuppressive treatment, which has led to the exploration of novel approaches such as fecal microbiota transplantation. Methods: We present two patients who both developed grade III IMC following application of durvalumab and pembrolizumab, respectively. Both patients were refractory to corticosteroid therapy, while the first one also showed no improvement to infliximab. We performed two separate applications of FMT on both patients, from different donors, as a rescue treatment. Results: After unsuccessful immunosuppressive treatment and following rescue FMT, both patients demonstrated a rapid and sustained improvement in inflammatory markers, clinical symptoms, quality-of-life scores, and colonoscopy findings, without additional immunosuppressive treatment. Conclusions: FMT appears to be safe and a potentially effective treatment option for patients with refractory IMC both as second- and third-line therapy options. Continued efforts toward rigorous donor screening, use of standardized biobanks, and standardizing FMT protocols will further enhance safety and reproducibility. Full article

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a biliary tract cancer that accounts for approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. CCA is a “silent” disease that remains undetected for a long period of time, often presenting at an advanced stage with minimal treatment options and a poor prognosis. Advanced CCA remains largely inoperable, and combination gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients affected by this disease. There is a desperate need for new therapeutic alternatives, and extensive research is ongoing to address this gap. Targeted therapies represent a rapidly expanding area of cancer treatment and are currently under active investigation in CCA. The FDA has approved the targeted therapies ivosidenib, pemigatinib, infigratinib, and futibatinib, as well as the immunotherapy durvalumab, for patients with CCA in recent years. Several other therapeutic strategies are still under investigation, targeting molecular pathways including p53/MDM2, JAK/STAT, KRAS, HER2, VEGFR, PDGFR, MET, ALK, MAPK, PI3K/AKT, BRAF, and DNA damage repair signaling. While several promising advancements have been made, further research is required to improve outcomes for patients with CCA. This review provides an up-to-date, comprehensive overview of currently approved targeted therapies in CCA, as well as those under investigation. Full article

Background/Objectives: Systemic immunotherapy, previously used mainly for advanced urothelial carcinoma, now plays an important role in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), either alone or combined with intravesical BCG instillations. Methods: We conducted a collaborative, comprehensive review to summarize the key evidence and future perspectives on therapeutic intensification strategies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in NMIBC. A total of 51 references published between 2000 and 2025 were included. Results: Four phase II studies evaluated pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and cetrelimab as monotherapy in 28 to 132 BCG-unresponsive NMIBC patients. They reported complete response rates ranging from 12% to 43% after 3 to 12 months of treatment, with a durable response rate ranging from 49% to 57.4% at 12 months. To improve these results, a phase II trial launched this year tests a new systemic combination targeting both the PD-1/PD-L1 axis and the emerging HLA-E/NKG2A pathway. Regarding BCG-naïve high-risk (HR) NMIBC, four phase III studies are evaluating BCG instillations combined with systemic immunotherapy: sasanlimab (CREST), durvalumab (POTOMAC), atezolizumab (ALBAN), and pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-676), with significant results reported for the CREST and POTOMAC trials. The key challenge remains selecting patients most likely to benefit from this combination therapy while avoiding overtreatment. Identifying predictive biomarkers of tumor aggressiveness and response to immunotherapy also represents a major future challenge. Conclusions: Therapeutic intensification using systemic immunotherapy applies to both BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, with a new target pathway (HLA-E/NKG2A), and BCG-naïve HR NMIBC, where the combination of BCG instillations and immunotherapy represents a major breakthrough. Full article