Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (670)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 8237 KiB  
Review
CAR Cell-Derived Exosomes in Cancer Therapy: Biogenesis, Engineering Strategies and Antitumor Mechanisms
by Chaohua Si, Yuanyuan Li, Yunwen Wang, Jianen Gao and Xu Ma
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(16), 7890; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167890 - 15 Aug 2025
Viewed by 8
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cell therapy, encompassing CAR T, CAR NK, and CAR macrophage cells, demonstrates high efficacy in tumor treatment, conferring durable and effective responses, notably in hematologic malignancies. However, challenges persist in the manufacture of CAR cells, and treatment is associated [...] Read more.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cell therapy, encompassing CAR T, CAR NK, and CAR macrophage cells, demonstrates high efficacy in tumor treatment, conferring durable and effective responses, notably in hematologic malignancies. However, challenges persist in the manufacture of CAR cells, and treatment is associated with serious adverse events, notably cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a potentially life-threatening complication. Owing to the inherent properties of exosomes, CAR cell-derived exosomes offer distinct advantages in cancer therapeutics. CAR cells-derived exosomes retain the inherent tumor-killing function of the parent cells while also exhibiting key practical advantages, including wide availability, safety, and ease of storage and transport. Furthermore, CAR cell-derived exosomes can be combined with other tumor therapies; this combinatorial approach significantly enhances efficacy while reducing side effects. To accelerate the clinical translation of CAR cell-derived exosomes in tumor therapy, this paper reviews their biogenesis, engineering strategies, antitumor mechanisms and clinical evidence, including case studies of combination therapies with other antitumor modalities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 1654 KiB  
Review
Glioblastoma: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches
by Anatevka Ribeiro, Gianna Fote, Alexander Himstead, Michelle Zheng, Emma Elliott, Sara Mae Smith, Jerry Lou and Carlen A. Yuen
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1963; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081963 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 385
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Despite the current standard of care therapy, including maximal surgical resection, chemoradiation, and tumor-treating fields, prognosis remains poor. Therapeutic failure is driven by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, poor drug penetration across [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Despite the current standard of care therapy, including maximal surgical resection, chemoradiation, and tumor-treating fields, prognosis remains poor. Therapeutic failure is driven by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, poor drug penetration across the blood–brain barrier, and robust resistance mechanisms. Epigenetic alterations further compound treatment resistance by enhancing DNA repair and promoting survival pathways. Molecular profiling has identified key prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Gene expression analyses have delineated GBM subtypes, each with distinct molecular features and therapeutic vulnerabilities that hinder successful clinical translation. This review integrates the pathophysiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic landscape of GBM to inform of future strategies for improved patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glioblastoma: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 912 KiB  
Review
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Immunotherapy for Autoimmune Rheumatic Disorders: Where Are We Now?
by Panagiota Anyfanti, Paschalis Evangelidis, Nikolaos Kotsiou, Anna Papakonstantinou, Ioannis Eftychidis, Ioanna Sakellari, Theodoros Dimitroulas and Eleni Gavriilaki
Cells 2025, 14(16), 1242; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14161242 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 474
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy has changed the landscape of B cell hematological malignancies’ management, while it has recently shown promising results in the treatment of refractory autoimmune rheumatic disorders (ARDs). Targeting B cell antigens such as CD19 and BCMA, CAR-T [...] Read more.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy has changed the landscape of B cell hematological malignancies’ management, while it has recently shown promising results in the treatment of refractory autoimmune rheumatic disorders (ARDs). Targeting B cell antigens such as CD19 and BCMA, CAR-T cell therapy can induce sustained remission by the elimination of autoreactive B cell populations resistant to the standard of care treatment options. Clinical data from case reports and small case series demonstrate profound clinical responses in ARDs, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). Treatment outcomes include reduced disease activity, normalization of serologic markers, improved organ function, and drug-free remission, even after B cell reconstitution. Additionally, toxicities, primarily limited to mild cytokine release syndrome (CRS), were generally manageable with supportive care. Encouraging preliminary results have led to the development of several ongoing clinical trials investigating CAR-T cell therapy across multiple ARDs and patient populations, including pediatric patients. This review summarizes the current clinical experience and provides a comprehensive overview of ongoing clinical trials exploring CAR-T cell immunotherapy for ARDs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic and Cellular Basis of Autoimmune Diseases)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

34 pages, 1602 KiB  
Review
Can We Use CAR-T Cells to Overcome Immunosuppression in Solid Tumours?
by Julia Gwadera, Maksymilian Grajewski, Hanna Chowaniec, Kasper Gucia, Jagoda Michoń, Zofia Mikulicz, Małgorzata Knast, Patrycja Pujanek, Amelia Tołkacz, Aleksander Murawa and Paula Dobosz
Biology 2025, 14(8), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14081035 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 689
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy has revolutionised haematological cancer treatment. However, its application in solid tumours remains significantly limited by the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), poor antigen specificity, and physical barriers to infiltration. This review explores a compelling question: can CAR-T cells be [...] Read more.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy has revolutionised haematological cancer treatment. However, its application in solid tumours remains significantly limited by the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), poor antigen specificity, and physical barriers to infiltration. This review explores a compelling question: can CAR-T cells be adapted to overcome immunosuppression in solid tumours effectively? We provide an in-depth analysis of the immunological, metabolic, and structural challenges posed by the TME and critically evaluate emerging engineering strategies designed to enhance CAR-T cells’ persistence, targeting, and function. These include metabolic reprogramming, hypoxia-responsive constructs, checkpoint-resistant designs, and innovative delivery techniques such as locoregional administration and nanotechnology-assisted targeting. We highlight promising preclinical and early clinical studies demonstrating that armoured CAR-T cells secreting cytokines like interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18 can reprogram the TME, restoring antitumour immunity. Moreover, we examine synergistic combination therapies that integrate CAR-T cells with immune checkpoint inhibitors, radiotherapy, oncolytic viruses, and epigenetic modulators. Special attention is given to personalised strategies, such as bispecific targeting and precision delivery to tumour-associated vasculature or stromal elements, which are showing encouraging results in overcoming resistance mechanisms. This review aims not only to synthesise current advancements but also to ignite optimism in the potential of CAR-T-cell therapy to breach the immunological fortress of solid tumours. As we enter a new era of synthetic immunology, this evolving landscape offers hope for durable remissions and novel treatment paradigms. For clinicians, researchers, and biotech innovators, this paper provides a roadmap toward transforming a therapeutic dream into clinical reality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 419 KiB  
Article
Serum Immunoglobulin Changes in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with CAR T-Cell Therapy
by Alexa Burger, Ulrike Bacher, Michele Hoffmann, Katja Seipel, Christof Schild, Inna Shaforostova and Thomas Pabst
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(8), 640; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47080640 - 9 Aug 2025
Viewed by 261
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), with high response rates of 80–95%. Serum immunoglobulin changes have been observed throughout conventional multiple myeloma treatment, including after immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and [...] Read more.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), with high response rates of 80–95%. Serum immunoglobulin changes have been observed throughout conventional multiple myeloma treatment, including after immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and autologous stem cell transplantation. However, the clinical significance of new abnormal protein bands (APBs) following CAR T-cell therapy is largely unexplored. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive multiple myeloma (MM) patients who received CAR T-cell therapy at the University Hospital Bern between May 2021 and February 2024. Serum paraprotein (M-protein) patterns were assessed using immuno-fixation electrophoresis (IFE) before and after CAR T-cell treatment. Patients were grouped based on serum immunoglobulin changes. Among 46 patients, 9 (19.6%) developed new APBs following CAR T-cell therapy. No significant differences in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) were observed between patients with and without APBs. Immunoglobulin changes occurred in both relapsed and non-relapsed patients, suggesting that the appearance of new APBs does not indicate disease progression. This observation aligns with previous reports of paraprotein changes following conventional MM therapies. This report suggests that new APBs following CAR T-cell therapy are a relatively common finding but do not correlate with inferior clinical outcomes. Our results highlight the need for larger, multi-center studies to further investigate this phenomenon in MM patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiple Myeloma: From Molecular Mechanism to Diagnosis and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1155 KiB  
Perspective
Historically Based Perspective on the Immunotherapy of Type 1 Diabetes: Where We Have Been, Where We Are, and Where We May Go
by Eugenio Cavalli, Giuseppe Rosario Pietro Nicoletti and Ferdinando Nicoletti
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(16), 5621; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165621 - 8 Aug 2025
Viewed by 446
Abstract
Systematic Background/Objectives: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune condition in which pancreatic β-cells are selectively destroyed, predominantly by autoreactive T lymphocytes. Despite decades of research, the achievement of durable immune tolerance remains elusive. This review presents a historically grounded and forward-looking [...] Read more.
Systematic Background/Objectives: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune condition in which pancreatic β-cells are selectively destroyed, predominantly by autoreactive T lymphocytes. Despite decades of research, the achievement of durable immune tolerance remains elusive. This review presents a historically grounded and forward-looking perspective on the evolution of immunotherapy in T1DM, from early immunosuppressive interventions to advanced precision-based cellular approaches. Specifically, we focus on systemic immunosuppressants (e.g., corticosteroids, cyclosporine), monoclonal antibodies (e.g., anti-CD3, anti-IL-1, anti-TNF), regulatory cell-based approaches (e.g., Tregs, CAR-Tregs, MDSCs), and β-cell replacement strategies using stem cell-derived islets. Methods: We analyzed major clinical and translational milestones in immunotherapy for T1DM, with particular attention to the transition from broad immunosuppression to targeted modulation of immune pathways. Emerging data on cell-based therapies, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven stratification, and personalized intervention timing have been incorporated to provide a comprehensive overview of current and future directions. Results: Initial therapies such as corticosteroids and cyclosporine offered proof-of-concept for immune modulation, yet suffered from relapse and toxicity. The introduction of monoclonal antibodies (e.g., teplizumab) marked a shift toward immune-specific intervention, particularly in stage 2 preclinical T1DM. More recent approaches include low-dose IL-2, checkpoint modulation, and antigen-specific tolerance strategies. Cellular therapies such as Treg adoptive transfer, chimeric antigen receptor Tregs (CAR-Tregs), and stem cell-derived islet replacements (e.g., VX-880) have shown promise in preserving β-cell function and modulating autoimmunity. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), although still preclinical, represent a complementary avenue for immune tolerance induction. Concurrently, AI-based models are emerging as tools to stratify risk and personalize immunotherapeutic timing, enhancing trial design and outcome prediction. Conclusions: In conclusion, the historical progression from broad immunosuppression to precision-driven strategies underscores the importance of stage-specific, mechanism-based interventions in T1DM. The convergence of targeted biologics, regenerative cell therapies, and β-cell replacement approaches, supported by AI-enabled patient stratification, offers a realistic path toward durable immune tolerance and functional β-cell preservation. Continued integration of these modalities, coupled with rigorous long-term evaluation, will be essential to transform these scientific advances into sustained clinical benefit. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1169 KiB  
Review
Bispecific Antibodies—A New Hope for Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
by Romeo Gabriel Mihaila and Samuel B. Todor
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5534; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155534 - 6 Aug 2025
Viewed by 703
Abstract
T-cell-engaging antibodies are a promising new type of treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which has changed the prognosis and evolution of these patients in clinical trials. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) bind to two different targets (B and [...] Read more.
T-cell-engaging antibodies are a promising new type of treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which has changed the prognosis and evolution of these patients in clinical trials. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) bind to two different targets (B and T lymphocytes) at the same time and in this way mimic the action of CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) T-cells. They are the T-cell-engaging antibodies most used in practice and are a solution for patients who do not respond to second- or later-line therapies, including chemoimmunotherapy, followed by salvage chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. They are a therapeutic option for patients who are ineligible for CAR T-cell therapy and are also active in those with prior exposure to CAR T-cell treatment. A remarkable advantage of BsAbs is their rapid availability, even if the disease progresses rapidly, unlike CAR T-cell treatment, and they avoid the practical and financial challenges raised by autologous CAR T-cell therapies. CAR-T has been proven to have better efficacy compared to BsAbs, but cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity have appeared significantly more frequently in patients treated with CAR T-cells. The possibility of combining BsAbs with chemotherapy and their administration for relapses or as a frontline therapy is being studied to increase their efficacy. BsAbs are a life-saving therapy for many patients with diffuse large B-cell malignant non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) who have a poor prognosis with classical therapies, but are not without adverse effects and require careful monitoring. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunotherapy of Hematological Malignancies: The State of the Art)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1027 KiB  
Review
Chimeric Antigen Receptor Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases: Current Advances and Future Perspectives
by Maria Kourti, Paschalis Evangelidis, Emmanuel Roilides and Elias Iosifidis
Pathogens 2025, 14(8), 774; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14080774 - 5 Aug 2025
Viewed by 341
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell hematological malignancies. There is emerging evidence that CAR-engineered cells—not only T cells, but also natural killers and macrophages—might have a crucial role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders and [...] Read more.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell hematological malignancies. There is emerging evidence that CAR-engineered cells—not only T cells, but also natural killers and macrophages—might have a crucial role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders and solid tumors. Moreover, given the burden of chronic infectious diseases, the mortality and morbidity of infections in immunocompromised individuals, and the development of multidrug-resistant pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and mycobacteria, a need for novel and personalized therapeutics in this field is emerging. To this end, the development of CAR cells for the management of chronic infections has been reported. In this literature review, we summarize the ongoing clinical and pre-clinical data about CAR cell products in the field of infectious diseases. Currently, clinical studies on CAR immunotherapy for infections mainly concern human immunodeficiency virus infection treatment, and data regarding other infections largely originate from preclinical in vitro and in vivo models. In the era of personalized medicine, effective and safe therapies for the management of chronic infections and infectious complications in immunocompromised patients are crucial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacterial Resistance and Novel Therapeutic Approaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 1877 KiB  
Review
Unconventional Immunotherapies in Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges
by Meshael Alturki, Abdullah A. Alshehri, Ahmad M. Aldossary, Mohannad M. Fallatah, Fahad A. Almughem, Nojoud Al Fayez, Majed A. Majrashi, Ibrahim A. Alradwan, Mohammad Alkhrayef, Mohammad N. Alomary and Essam A. Tawfik
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(8), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081154 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 661
Abstract
Conventional immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, has revolutionized cancer therapy over the past decade. Yet, the efficacy of these therapies is limited by tumor resistance, antigen escape mechanisms, poor persistence, and T-cell exhaustion, particularly in the treatment [...] Read more.
Conventional immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, has revolutionized cancer therapy over the past decade. Yet, the efficacy of these therapies is limited by tumor resistance, antigen escape mechanisms, poor persistence, and T-cell exhaustion, particularly in the treatment of solid tumors. The emergence of unconventional immunotherapies offers novel opportunities by leveraging diverse immune cell subsets and synthetic biologics. This review explores various immunotherapy platforms, including gamma delta T cells, invariant natural killer T cells, mucosal-associated invariant T cells, engineered regulatory T cells, and universal CAR platforms. Additionally, it expands on biologics, including bispecific and multispecific antibodies, cytokine fusions, agonists, and oncolytic viruses, showcasing their potential for modular engineering and off-the-shelf applicability. Distinct features of unconventional platforms include independence from the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), tissue-homing capabilities, stress ligand sensing, and the ability to bridge adaptive and innate immunity. Their compatibility with engineering approaches highlights their potential as scalable, efficient, and cost-effective therapies. To overcome translational challenges such as functional heterogeneity, immune exhaustion, tumor microenvironment-mediated suppression, and limited persistence, novel strategies will be discussed, including metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming, immune cloaking, gene editing, and the utilization of artificial intelligence for patient stratification. Ultimately, unconventional immunotherapies extend the therapeutic horizon of cancer immunotherapy by breaking barriers in solid tumor treatment and increasing accessibility. Continued investments in research for mechanistic insights and scalable manufacturing are key to unlocking their full clinical potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biopharmaceuticals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 8798 KiB  
Article
Identification of Common Cancer Antigens Useful for Specific Immunotherapies to Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases
by Jun Kataoka, Kazumasa Takenouchi, Toshihiro Suzuki, Kazunobu Ohnuki, Yuichiro Tsukada, Naoto Gotohda, Masaaki Ito and Tetsuya Nakatsura
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7402; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157402 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 399
Abstract
Stage IV colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and liver metastases are prone to recurrence, even after resection. This study aimed to identify common cancer antigens, using immunohistochemical staining, as promising targets for antigen-specific immunotherapies in colorectal cancer. We analyzed expression levels and [...] Read more.
Stage IV colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and liver metastases are prone to recurrence, even after resection. This study aimed to identify common cancer antigens, using immunohistochemical staining, as promising targets for antigen-specific immunotherapies in colorectal cancer. We analyzed expression levels and intracellular localization of seven common cancer antigens, CLDN1, EphB4, LAT1, FOXM1, HSP105α, ROBO1, and SPARC, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I via immunohistochemical staining of 85 surgical specimens from primaries and liver metastases. Staining intensity and positive staining were scored to evaluate antigen expression. In 25 primaries, seven cancer antigens were expressed in 88–96% of cases, while HLA class I was expressed on the cell membrane in 80.0% of cases. In 60 liver metastases, FOXM1 and SPARC expression were approximately half that observed in the primaries. Other antigens and HLA class I were highly expressed in both. Most of the primaries and liver metastases may benefit from chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy targeting CLDN1, EphB4, and LAT1. Cases with high HLA class I expression may be suitable for vaccine-based and T cell receptor-T cell therapy targeting CLDN1, EphB4, LAT1, FOXM1, HSP105α, ROBO1, and SPARC for primaries and targeting antigens, excluding FOXM1 and SPARC, for liver metastases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 446 KiB  
Article
Clinical Impact of CTLA-4 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism in DLBCL Patients Treated with CAR-T Cell Therapy
by Katja Seipel, Inna Shaforostova, Henning Nilius, Ulrike Bacher and Thomas Pabst
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(8), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080425 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 490
Abstract
FMC63-CAR T cell therapy targeting CD19 protein on malignant B-cells is effective in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL), with complete response rates of 43–54%. Common germline variants of the immune-checkpoint regulator CTLA-4 may elicit different responses to [...] Read more.
FMC63-CAR T cell therapy targeting CD19 protein on malignant B-cells is effective in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL), with complete response rates of 43–54%. Common germline variants of the immune-checkpoint regulator CTLA-4 may elicit different responses to CAR-T cell therapy. The CTLA4 gene single-nucleotide polymorphism rs231775 coding threonine or alanine at amino acid position 17 of the CTLA-4 protein was prevalent in 55% of the studied DLBCL patients. In a retrospective comparative analysis of clinical outcome, there were significant differences in CTLA4 A17hom vs. T17Ahet and T17hom carriers with four-year progression-free survival at 77%, 59%, and 30% (p = 0.019), four-year overall survival was 79%, 41%, and 33% (p = 0.049), the relapse rates were 20%, 37%, and 56% (p = 0.025), and the death rates 20%, 54%, and 52% (p = 0.049). Conclusions: CTLA4 rs231775 polymorphism may impact the treatment outcome in FMC63-anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, with an association of the CTLA4 minor allele A17 to favorable treatment outcome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Therapy)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 691 KiB  
Review
Engineering Innate Immunity: Recent Advances and Future Directions for CAR-NK and CAR–Macrophage Therapies in Solid Tumors
by Behzad Amoozgar, Ayrton Bangolo, Charlene Mansour, Daniel Elias, Abdifitah Mohamed, Danielle C. Thor, Syed Usman Ehsanullah, Hadrian Hoang-Vu Tran, Izage Kianifar Aguilar and Simcha Weissman
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2397; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142397 - 19 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 861
Abstract
Adoptive cell therapies have transformed the treatment landscape for hematologic malignancies. Yet, translation to solid tumors remains constrained by antigen heterogeneity, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and poor persistence of conventional CAR-T cells. In response, innate immune cell platforms, particularly chimeric antigen receptor–engineered [...] Read more.
Adoptive cell therapies have transformed the treatment landscape for hematologic malignancies. Yet, translation to solid tumors remains constrained by antigen heterogeneity, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and poor persistence of conventional CAR-T cells. In response, innate immune cell platforms, particularly chimeric antigen receptor–engineered natural killer (CAR-NK) cells and chimeric antigen receptor–macrophages (CAR-MΦ), have emerged as promising alternatives. This review summarizes recent advances in the design and application of CAR-NK and CAR-MΦ therapies for solid tumors. We highlight key innovations, including the use of lineage-specific intracellular signaling domains (e.g., DAP12, 2B4, FcRγ), novel effector constructs (e.g., NKG7-overexpressing CARs, TME-responsive CARs), and scalable induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived platforms. Preclinical data support enhanced antitumor activity through mechanisms such as major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-unrestricted cytotoxicity, phagocytosis, trogocytosis, cytokine secretion, and cross-talk with adaptive immunity. Early-phase clinical studies (e.g., CT-0508) demonstrate feasibility and TME remodeling with CAR-MΦ. However, persistent challenges remain, including transient in vivo survival, manufacturing complexity, and risks of off-target inflammation. Emerging combinatorial strategies, such as dual-effector regimens (CAR-NK+ CAR-MΦ), cytokine-modulated cross-support, and bispecific or logic-gated CARs, may overcome these barriers and provide more durable, tumor-selective responses. Taken together, CAR-NK and CAR-MΦ platforms are poised to expand the reach of engineered cell therapy into the solid tumor domain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Therapy in Solid Cancers: Current and Future Landscape)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1544 KiB  
Review
Resistance Mechanisms to BCMA Targeting Bispecific Antibodies and CAR T-Cell Therapies in Multiple Myeloma
by Brandon Tedder and Manisha Bhutani
Cells 2025, 14(14), 1077; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14141077 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1079
Abstract
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapies including both chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), have revolutionized the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), offering both deep and durable responses, even in heavily pretreated patients. Despite these advances, most patients [...] Read more.
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapies including both chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), have revolutionized the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), offering both deep and durable responses, even in heavily pretreated patients. Despite these advances, most patients ultimately experience relapse. This is likely related to the development of resistance mechanisms that limit the long-term efficacy and durability of BCMA-targeted approaches. In this review, we examine the current landscape of BCMA-directed therapies, including Idecabtagene Vileucel, Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel, Teclistamab, and Elranatamab and explore the multifactorial mechanisms driving resistance. These mechanisms include tumor-intrinsic factors, host-related and tumor-extrinsic factors, and factors related to the tumor-microenvironment itself. We outline emerging strategies to overcome resistance, such as dual-targeting therapies, γ-secretase inhibitors, immune-checkpoint blockade, armored CAR T constructs, and novel combination regimens. Additionally, we discuss the role of therapy sequencing, emphasizing how prior exposure to BsAbs or CAR T-cell therapies may influence the efficacy of subsequent treatments. A deeper understanding of resistance biology, supported by integrated immune and genomic profiling, is essential to optimizing therapeutic durability and ultimately improve patient outcomes for patients with MM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Therapy of Myeloma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1280 KiB  
Review
Defibrotide for Protecting Against and Managing Endothelial Injury in Hematologic Malignancies and COVID-19
by Edward Richardson, Clifton C. Mo, Eleonora Calabretta, Francesco Corrado, Mehmet H. Kocoglu, Rebecca M. Baron, Jean Marie Connors, Massimo Iacobelli, Lee-Jen Wei, Emily J. Benjamin, Aaron P. Rapoport, Maribel Díaz-Ricart, Antonio José Martínez-Mellado, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Paul G. Richardson and José M. Moraleda
Biomolecules 2025, 15(7), 1004; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15071004 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 997
Abstract
Defibrotide, which is approved for treating hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), exhibits pleiotropic anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and fibrinolytic properties, conferring broad endothelial protective effects. Given these mechanisms, defibrotide has potential utility in various conditions involving endothelial injury or activation. In this review [...] Read more.
Defibrotide, which is approved for treating hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), exhibits pleiotropic anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and fibrinolytic properties, conferring broad endothelial protective effects. Given these mechanisms, defibrotide has potential utility in various conditions involving endothelial injury or activation. In this review we outline the endothelial-protective mechanisms of defibrotide and comprehensively summarize current evidence supporting its applications in hematologic malignancies, including the prevention and treatment of hepatic VOD/SOS, graft-versus-host disease, and transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Additionally, we discuss its role in mitigating key toxicities linked to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). We also explore emerging evidence on defibrotide’s potential in SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated endotheliopathies, including acute COVID-19 and post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (“long-COVID”), and the endothelial protective activity of defibrotide in these settings. Finally, we highlight potential future applications of defibrotide in hematologic malignancies and viral infections, emphasizing its multimodal mechanism of action. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 348 KiB  
Review
Venous Thromboembolic Events in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Narrative Review
by Cosmo Fowler and Stephen M. Pastores
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4926; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144926 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 634
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a significant complication of cancer immunotherapy, with emerging evidence suggesting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms compared to traditional chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. This narrative review examines the epidemiology and pathogenesis of VTE in patients receiving immunotherapies for cancer including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), [...] Read more.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a significant complication of cancer immunotherapy, with emerging evidence suggesting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms compared to traditional chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. This narrative review examines the epidemiology and pathogenesis of VTE in patients receiving immunotherapies for cancer including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), among others. Real-world studies demonstrate a wide range of VTE incidence rates in ICI recipients, with potential mechanisms including exacerbated underlying interleukin-8-mediated inflammatory pathways and consequent neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. CAR T-cell therapy is associated with unique hemostatic challenges, including concurrent thrombotic and bleeding risks related to cytokine release syndrome. Current risk assessment tools show limited predictive utility in patients receiving immunotherapies for cancer, highlighting the need for novel stratification models. Future research priorities include developing immunotherapy-specific risk prediction tools, elucidating mechanistic pathways linking immune activation to thrombosis, and establishing evidence-based and tailored thromboprophylaxis strategies. As cancer immunotherapy continues to evolve, understanding and mitigating thrombotic complications remains crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thrombosis: Latest Advances and Prospects)
Back to TopTop