Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (28)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = afterslip

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 27806 KB  
Article
Fault-Parallel Postseismic Afterslip Following the 2020 Mw 6.4 Petrinja–Pokupsko Earthquake from Sentinel-1 SBAS Time Series
by Antonio Banko and Marko Pavasović
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(5), 828; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18050828 - 7 Mar 2026
Viewed by 454
Abstract
The Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake on 29 December 2020 ruptured the Petrinja-Pokupsko fault system in central Croatia, producing widespread coseismic deformation and subsequent postseismic processes. This study examines ground displacements in the Petrinja area from 2019 to 2022 using Sentinel-1 SAR data processed [...] Read more.
The Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake on 29 December 2020 ruptured the Petrinja-Pokupsko fault system in central Croatia, producing widespread coseismic deformation and subsequent postseismic processes. This study examines ground displacements in the Petrinja area from 2019 to 2022 using Sentinel-1 SAR data processed with SBAS time series analysis. Interferometric phase residuals were filtered using temporal coherence masking and RMS cut-off criteria to ensure high-quality displacement estimates. Line-of-sight (LOS) velocity fields were derived separately for ascending and descending tracks, combined into horizontal and vertical components, and rotated into a fault-parallel direction. Fault-parallel velocities were also extracted with pixel-wise coseismic offsets removed to isolate postseismic transients. Pre-event displacements are generally small and often within measurement uncertainties. However, because the 2019–2022 observation window includes the mainshock and concentrated early postseismic motion, robust estimation of long-term interseismic rates (millimeters per year) is not possible from this dataset. Such rates from independent regional GNSS measurements are therefore included solely for tectonic context and visual illustration. A clear surface displacement jump exceeding 20 cm was detected, with opposite signs in ascending and descending geometries, reflecting predominant right-lateral strike-slip motion. Following the removal of the coseismic jump, weighted profile analysis identifies residual transients of up to ±1.5 cm/yr near the fault, consistent with dominant shallow afterslip. Possible contributions from viscoelastic relaxation are noted, as such processes produce broader, longer-timescale deformation patterns that cannot be excluded without extended observations or forward modeling. These geodetic observations quantify the immediate postseismic deformation and provide constraints on near-fault slip patterns following the mainshock. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3651 KB  
Article
Coseismic and Postseismic Deformations of the 2023 Turkey Earthquake Doublet
by Chaoya Liu, Hongru Li, Huili Zhan, Shaojun Wang and Ling Bai
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(21), 3573; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17213573 - 29 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1296
Abstract
On 6 February 2023, an earthquake doublet of Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.5 occurred in southeastern Turkey and caused surface ruptures over 350 km for the eastern Anatolian fault (EAF) and 150 km for the Surgu fault (SF), respectively. Over 3700 Mw > [...] Read more.
On 6 February 2023, an earthquake doublet of Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.5 occurred in southeastern Turkey and caused surface ruptures over 350 km for the eastern Anatolian fault (EAF) and 150 km for the Surgu fault (SF), respectively. Over 3700 Mw > 3.0 aftershocks occurred within 5 months following the earthquake doublet, indicating that postseismic stress adjustment is evident. Here, we utilize InSAR technology to investigate the earthquake doublet in terms of its coseismic and postseismic deformations and to estimate the changes in Coulomb stress. We found that the postseismic surface deformation is consistent with the coseismic rupture, characterized by left-lateral strike-slip movement. The coseismic deformations (>5 m) are concentrated in the central-eastern (Pazarcik and Erkenek) segments in the EAF and the central (Cardak) segment in the SF. Notably, the maximum coseismic slip (up to 10 m) and the largest postseismic slip (∼0.5 m) both occurred on the Cardak segment. Postseismic deformations (>0.05 m) are concentrated in the northeastern Erkenek segment and southwestern Amanos segment of the EAF, as well as the eastern Dogansehir segment of the SF. Compared with the coseismic deformation, the postseismic slip compensated for the insufficient deeper slip of the southwestern Amanos segment of the EAF and the central Cardak segment of the SF. Additionally, the postseismic slip extended the rupture area to both the northeast of the Dogansehir segment along the SF and the epicentral area of the 2020 Mw 6.7 earthquake along the EAF. The postseismic afterslip largely reduced the potential seismic hazard of the seismic gap between the eastern end of the coseismic rupture of the 2023 Mw 7.8 earthquake and the epicentral area of the 2020 Mw 6.7 earthquake, as well as the southwestern Amanos segment of the EAF and the eastern Dogansehir segment of the SF. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 12628 KB  
Article
Physical and Statistical Pattern of the Thiva (Greece) 2020–2022 Seismic Swarm
by Filippos Vallianatos, Eirini Sardeli, Kyriaki Pavlou and Andreas Karakonstantis
Entropy 2025, 27(9), 979; https://doi.org/10.3390/e27090979 - 19 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 772
Abstract
On 2 December 2020, an earthquake with a magnitude of Mw 4.5 occurred near the city of Thiva (Greece). The aftershock sequence, triggered by ruptures on or near the Kallithea fault, continued until January 2021. Seven months later, new seismic activity began [...] Read more.
On 2 December 2020, an earthquake with a magnitude of Mw 4.5 occurred near the city of Thiva (Greece). The aftershock sequence, triggered by ruptures on or near the Kallithea fault, continued until January 2021. Seven months later, new seismic activity began a few kilometers west of the initial events, with the swarm displaying a general trend of spatiotemporal migration toward the east–southeast until the middle of 2022. In order to understand the physical and statistical pattern of the swarm, the seismicity was relocated using HypoDD, and the magnitude of completeness was determined using the frequency–magnitude distribution. In order to define the existence of spatiotemporal seismicity clusters in an objective way, the DBSCAN clustering algorithm was applied to the 2020–2022 Thiva earthquake sequence. The extracted clusters permit the analysis of the spatiotemporal scaling properties of the main clusters using the Non-Extensive Statistical Physics (NESP) approach, providing detailed insights into the nature of the long-term correlation of the seismic swarm. The statistical pattern observed aligns with a Q-exponential distribution, with qD values ranging from 0.7 to 0.8 and qT values from 1.44 to 1.50. Furthermore, the frequency–magnitude distributions were analyzed using the fragment–asperity model proposed within the NESP framework, providing the non-additive entropic parameter (qM). The results suggest that the statistical characteristics of earthquake clusters can be effectively interpreted using NESP, highlighting the complexity and non-additive nature of the spatiotemporal evolution of seismicity. In addition, the analysis of the properties of the seismicity clusters extracted using the DBSCAN algorithm permits the suggestion of possible physical mechanisms that drive the evolution of the two main and larger clusters. For the cluster that activated first and is located in the west–northwest part, an afterslip mechanism activated after the 2 September 2021, M 4.0 events seems to predominately control its evolution, while for the second activated cluster located in the east–southeast part, a normal diffusion mechanism is proposed to describe its migration pattern. Concluding, we can state that in the present work the application of the DBSCAN algorithm to recognize the existence of any possible spatiotemporal clustering of seismicity could be helping to provide detailed insight into the statistical and physical patterns in earthquake swarms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Time Series Analysis in Earthquake Complex Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 17899 KB  
Technical Note
Coseismic Rupture and Postseismic Afterslip of the 2020 Nima Mw 6.4 Earthquake
by Shaojun Wang, Ling Bai and Chaoya Liu
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(8), 1389; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081389 - 14 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1159
Abstract
On 22 July 2020, an Mw 6.4 earthquake occurred in Nima County in the Qiangtang Terrane of the central Tibetan Plateau. This event, caused by normal faulting, remains controversial in terms of its rupture process and causative fault due to the complex tectonics [...] Read more.
On 22 July 2020, an Mw 6.4 earthquake occurred in Nima County in the Qiangtang Terrane of the central Tibetan Plateau. This event, caused by normal faulting, remains controversial in terms of its rupture process and causative fault due to the complex tectonics of the region. In this study, we analyzed the coseismic and postseismic deformation using differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar (D-InSAR). The coseismic slip distribution was independently estimated through InSAR inversion and teleseismic waveform analysis, while the afterslip distribution was inferred from postseismic deformation. Coulomb stress failure analysis was conducted to assess the potential seismic hazard. Our results showed a maximum line-of-sight (LOS) coseismic deformation of about 29 cm away from the satellite, with quasi-vertical subsidence peaking at 35 cm. Four distinct deformation zones were observed in the quasi-east–west direction. Coseismic deformation and slip models based on InSAR and teleseismic data indicate that the Nima earthquake ruptured the West Yibu Chaka fault. The seismogenic fault had a strike of 26°, an eastward dip of 43°, and a rake of −87.28°, with rupture patches at depths of 3–13 km and a maximum slip of 1.1 m. Postseismic deformation showed cumulative LOS displacement of up to 0.05 m. Afterslip was concentrated in the up-dip and down-dip areas of the coseismic rupture zone, reaching a maximum of 0.11 m. Afterslip was also observed along the East Yibu Caka fault. Coulomb stress modeling indicates an increased seismic risk between the Yibu Caka fault and the Jiangai Zangbu fault, highlighting the vulnerability of the region to future seismic activity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3313 KB  
Technical Note
Early Post-Seismic Deformation Revealed After the Wushi (China) Earthquake (Mw = 7.1) Occurred on 22 January 2024
by Xiaoran Lv, Guichun Luo, Lifu Zheng, Bozhi Zhang and Chen Zhang
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(8), 1340; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081340 - 9 Apr 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1394
Abstract
The Mw = 7.1 Wushi earthquake is the second-largest digitally recorded earthquake in the Tianshan seismic zone and provides an opportunity to explore the structural characteristics of the Tianshan seismic zone. In this study, we calculated the early (11-month) post-seismic deformation of the [...] Read more.
The Mw = 7.1 Wushi earthquake is the second-largest digitally recorded earthquake in the Tianshan seismic zone and provides an opportunity to explore the structural characteristics of the Tianshan seismic zone. In this study, we calculated the early (11-month) post-seismic deformation of the Wushi earthquake using Sentine-1 ascending and descending InSAR time series data. We found that the 11-month post-seismic deformation was dominated by afterslip along the up-dip continuation of the coseismic fault. The seismic moment released by the afterslip was Mw = 6.20, with 6.5% of that released by the mainshock. Moreover, we explored four slip models for the Mw = 5.7 aftershock that occurred on 29 January and found that this event primarily ruptured a thrust fault. However, determining the thrust fault type based on the current field investigations and InSAR data remains difficult. Finally, the Coulomb stress changes indicated that both the afterslip and aftershock were promoted by the Wushi earthquake. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 9566 KB  
Article
Scaling Law Analysis and Aftershock Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Three Strongest Earthquakes in the Ionian Sea During the Period 2014–2019
by Kyriaki Pavlou, Georgios Michas and Filippos Vallianatos
Geosciences 2025, 15(3), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15030084 - 1 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1414
Abstract
The observed scaling properties in the three aftershock sequences of the recent strong earthquakes of magnitudes Mw 6.1, Mw 6.4 and Mw 6.7, which occurred in the Ionian island region on the 26 January 2014 (onshore Cephalonia Island), 17 November [...] Read more.
The observed scaling properties in the three aftershock sequences of the recent strong earthquakes of magnitudes Mw 6.1, Mw 6.4 and Mw 6.7, which occurred in the Ionian island region on the 26 January 2014 (onshore Cephalonia Island), 17 November 2015 (Lefkada Island) and 25 October 2018 (offshore Zakynthos Island), respectively, are presented. In the analysis, the frequency–magnitude distributions in terms of the Gutenberg–Richter scaling relationship are studied, along with the temporal evolution of the aftershock sequences, as described by the Omori–Utsu formula. The processing of interevent times distribution, based on non-extensive statistical physics, indicates a system in an anomalous equilibrium with long-range interactions and a cross over behavior from anomalous to normal statistical mechanics for greater interevent times. A discussion of this cross over behavior is given for all aftershock sequences in terms of superstatistics. Moreover, the common value of the Tsallis entropic parameter that was obtained suggests that aftershock sequences are systems with very low degrees of freedom. Finally, a scaling of the migration of the aftershock zones as a function of the logarithm of time is discussed regarding the rate strengthening rheology that governs the evolution of the afterslip process. Our results contribute to the understanding of the spatiotemporal evolution of aftershocks using a first principles approach based on non extensive statistical physics suggesting that this view could describe the process within a universal view. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seismic and Aseismic Deformation in the Brittle Crust)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 13746 KB  
Article
Co-Seismic and Post-Seismic Slip Properties Associated with the 2024 M 7.5 Noto Peninsula, Japan Earthquake Determined by GNSS Observations
by Yunfei Xiang, Ming Qin, Yuanyuan Chen, Yin Xing and Yankai Bian
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4057; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214057 - 31 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2750
Abstract
Based on GNSS observations, the co-seismic and post-seismic slip of the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake and the spatio-temporal pattern of afterslip are investigated in this paper. The co-seismic slip is mainly distributed in the depth range of 2 to 15 km with the [...] Read more.
Based on GNSS observations, the co-seismic and post-seismic slip of the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake and the spatio-temporal pattern of afterslip are investigated in this paper. The co-seismic slip is mainly distributed in the depth range of 2 to 15 km with the maximum value of 5.94 m. Compared with the co-seismic rupture pattern, a shallow afterslip can be observed after the earthquake, and the afterslip patch is formed northeast of the epicenter. The maximum value of afterslip during the post-seismic 180 days is 1.13 m, which is situated at the longitude of 137.53°, latitude of 37.75°, and epth of 5.43 km. The spatio-temporal evolution of afterslip indicates that the fault activity has continued throughout the post-seismic 180 days, and the coverage and magnitude of afterslip have gradually increased. As time goes on, the fault activity tends to weaken, as evidenced by a decrease in slip rate. The daily images of afterslip demonstrate that the fault activity is particularly strong in the early time period following the earthquake. The maximum value of afterslip in the first week accounts for about 18% of that in the post-seismic 180 days, and the maximum slip rate reaches 0.043 m/day. In addition, the Coulomb stress analysis indicates that afterslip and most aftershocks appear in the positive Coulomb stress region, suggesting that co-seismic Coulomb stress changes may be the driving mechanism of afterslip and aftershocks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6644 KB  
Article
Refined Coseismic Slip and Afterslip Distributions of the 2021 Mw 6.1 Yangbi Earthquake Based on GNSS and InSAR Observations
by Zheng Liu, Keliang Zhang, Weijun Gan and Shiming Liang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 3996; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16213996 - 28 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2045
Abstract
On 21 May 2021, an Mw 6.1 earthquake occurred in Yangbi County, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, with the epicenter located in an unmapped blind fault approximately 7 km west of the Weixi-Qiaohou fault (WQF) on the southeastern margin of the Qinghai–Tibetan [...] Read more.
On 21 May 2021, an Mw 6.1 earthquake occurred in Yangbi County, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, with the epicenter located in an unmapped blind fault approximately 7 km west of the Weixi-Qiaohou fault (WQF) on the southeastern margin of the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. While numerous studies have been conducted to map the coseismic slip distribution by using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) and seismic data as well as their combinations, the understanding of deformation characteristics during the postseismic stage remains limited, mostly due to the long revisiting time interval and large uncertainty of most SAR satellites. In this study, we refined coseismic slip and afterslip distributions with nonlinear inversions for both fault geometry and relaxation time. First, we determined the fault geometry and coseismic slip distribution of this earthquake by joint inversion for coseismic offsets in the line-of-sight (LOS) direction of both Sentinel-1A/B ascending and descending track images and GNSS data. Then, the descending track time series of Sentinel-1 were further fitted using nonlinear least squares to extract the coseismic and postseismic deformations. Finally, we obtained the refined coseismic slip and afterslip distributions and investigated the spatiotemporal evolution of fault slip by comparing the afterslip with aftershocks. The refined coseismic moment magnitude, which was of Mw 6.05, was smaller than Mw 6.1 or larger, which was inferred from our joint inversion and previous studies, indicating a significant reduction in early postseismic deformation. In contrast, the afterslip following the mainshock lasted for about six months and was equivalent to a moment release of an Mw 5.8 earthquake. These findings not only offer a novel approach to extracting postseismic deformation from noisy InSAR time series but also provide valuable insights into fault slip mechanisms associated with the Yangbi earthquake, enhancing our understanding of seismic processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monitoring Geohazard from Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 26264 KB  
Article
Coseismic Slip and Downdip Afterslip Associated with the 2021 Maduo Earthquake Revealed by Sentinel-1 A/B Data
by Yang He, Zhen Tian, Lina Su, Hongwu Feng, Wenhua Yan and Yongqi Zhang
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(15), 6771; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156771 - 2 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1732
Abstract
On 22 May 2021, an earthquake (98.3° E and 34.59° N) struck Maduo town in Qinghai province, occurring along a relatively obscure secondary fault within the block. We utilized 105 archived Sentinel-1A/B acquisitions to investigate the coseismic deformation and the evolution of postseismic [...] Read more.
On 22 May 2021, an earthquake (98.3° E and 34.59° N) struck Maduo town in Qinghai province, occurring along a relatively obscure secondary fault within the block. We utilized 105 archived Sentinel-1A/B acquisitions to investigate the coseismic deformation and the evolution of postseismic displacements in both the temporal and spatial domains, as well as the associated dynamic mechanisms of the 2021 Maduo earthquake. The interference fringes and coseismic deformation revealed that the primary feature of this event was the rupture along a left-lateral strike-slip fault. The released seismic moment was close to 1.88 × 1020 N·m, which is equivalent to an Mw 7.45 event. Simultaneously, the maximum coseismic slip reached approximately 4 m along the fault plane. The evolution of postseismic displacements in both the temporal and spatial domains over 450 days following the mainshock was further analyzed to explore the underlying physical mechanisms. Generally, the patterns of coseismic slip and afterslip were similar, although the postseismic displacements decayed rapidly over time. The modeled afterslip downdip of the coseismic rupture (at depths of 15–40 km) effectively explains the postseismic deformation, with a released moment estimated at 4.57 × 1019 N·m (corresponding to Mw 7.04). Additionally, we found that regions with high coseismic slip tend to exhibit weak seismicity, and that afterslip and aftershocks are likely driven by each other. Finally, we estimated the Coulomb Failure Stress changes (ΔCFS) triggered by both coseismic rupture and aseismic slip resulting from this event. The co- and postseismic ΔCFS show similar patterns, but the magnitude of the postseismic ΔCFS is much lower (0.01 MPa). We found that ΔCFS notably increased on the Yushu segment of the Garze-Yushu-Xianshuihe Fault (GYXF), as well as the Maqin–Maqu and Tuosuo Lake sections of the East Kunlun Fault (EKF). Therefore, we infer that these fault segments may have a higher potential seismic risk and should be carefully monitored in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Approaches for Earthquake and Land Subsidence Prediction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 75890 KB  
Article
Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation Mechanism Following the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake: Insights from Satellite Radar Interferometry and GPS
by Chuanzeng Shu, Zhiguo Meng, Qiong Wu, Wei Xiong, Lijia He, Xiaoping Zhang and Dan Xu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(8), 1399; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081399 - 16 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2398
Abstract
Exploring the deformation mechanism of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake is crucial for better understanding the seismic hazard of the faults with low strain rates inside the Bayan Har block. This study leverages deformation information derived from Sentient-1 A/B images and GPS [...] Read more.
Exploring the deformation mechanism of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake is crucial for better understanding the seismic hazard of the faults with low strain rates inside the Bayan Har block. This study leverages deformation information derived from Sentient-1 A/B images and GPS data to investigate in detail the co- and postseismic deformation mechanisms using multiple methods. The main results are as follows. First, the postseismic InSAR time series robustly identified the reactivation of the Changmahe fault, indicating the impact of the Maduo event on surrounding active faults. Second, the joint inversion of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar and GPS revealed that (1) there was a complementary and partially overlapping relationship between the coseismic slip and postseismic afterslip of the main rupture; and (2) the Changmahe fault exhibited thrust compression dislocation in the early stage and experienced a sustained compressive effect from afterslip in the one year after the mainshock. Third, modeling the processes of viscoelastic relaxation and poroelastic rebound revealed that the postseismic deformation was probably caused by a combination of afterslip (near-field) and viscoelastic relaxation (near and far field). Fourth, the stress changes driven by the Maduo event revealed that the seismic gaps inside the Maqin-Maqu segment and the Kunlun Pass-Jiangcuo fault will be potential seismic risks in the future. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 10709 KB  
Article
Insights into Very Early Afterslip Associated with the 2021 M 8.2 Chignik, Alaska Earthquake Using Subdaily GNSS Solutions
by Yunfei Xiang, Yankai Bian, Jie Liu and Yin Xing
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(23), 5469; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15235469 - 23 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1862
Abstract
Based on subdaily kinematic GNSS solutions, the fault slip properties during the very early postseismic phase after the 2021 M 8.2 Chignik earthquake are investigated in this paper. The very early postseismic deformations captured by near-field GNSS sites can be well depicted by [...] Read more.
Based on subdaily kinematic GNSS solutions, the fault slip properties during the very early postseismic phase after the 2021 M 8.2 Chignik earthquake are investigated in this paper. The very early postseismic deformations captured by near-field GNSS sites can be well depicted by the power model. The comparison of afterslip determined by daily and subdaily GNSS solutions suggests that neglecting very early afterslip can result in the underestimation of postseismic slip. Compared with coseismic slip, the cumulative afterslip of the first 24 h is mainly focused in the southeast of the hypocenter, and the shallow updip afterslip appears after this earthquake. The spatio-temporal evolution of the afterslip reveals that the patch of afterslip is immediately generated after the earthquake, and then the postseismic slip gradually grows along the afterslip patch. The magnitude of the afterslip patch varies remarkably within the 24 h following the earthquake, especially in the first several hours. Meanwhile, the spatio-temporal patterns of aftershocks and afterslip exhibit strong similarity during the first 24 h, suggesting that very early afterslip may be a possible driving factor of aftershocks. Moreover, most of the afterslip patches and aftershocks occurring immediately after this earthquake are situated in the area covered by positive Coulomb Stress Change (CSC), which implies that the immediate afterslip and aftershock activities can be influenced by the coseismic CSC. The following afterslip process further releases coseismic CSC and then influences the spatio-temporal variations of aftershock activities. Thus, the afterslip may be a possible triggering mechanism of very early aftershocks for this earthquake, alongside the effects of the CSC generated by coseismic rupture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Earth Observation and Geosciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 112625 KB  
Article
Insight into the 1 December 2016 Mw 6.2 Juliaca Earthquake, Southern Peru, by InSAR Observations and Field Investigation
by Qingfeng Hu, Weiwei Jia, Jiuyuan Yang and Yanling Zhao
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(17), 4341; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174341 - 3 Sep 2023
Viewed by 2725
Abstract
On 1 December 2016, an Mw 6.2 earthquake characterized by normal faulting occurred in the highlands of the central Andes in southern Peru, marking the region’s largest shallow event. The occurrence of the earthquake provides a significant chance to gain insight into the [...] Read more.
On 1 December 2016, an Mw 6.2 earthquake characterized by normal faulting occurred in the highlands of the central Andes in southern Peru, marking the region’s largest shallow event. The occurrence of the earthquake provides a significant chance to gain insight into the regional tectonic deformation and the seismogenic mechanism of the shallow normal-faulting earthquake, as well as the regional potential seismic risk. Here, we first utilize Sentinel-1A interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data to extract the coseismic and postseismic deformation associated with this earthquake and then determine the detailed coseismic slip and postseismic afterslip distribution of this event. Coseismic modeling results indicate that the coseismic rupture is mainly characterized by normal faulting with some dextral strike-slip components. Most coseismic slip is confined to a depth range of 2–12 km, indicating an obvious slip deficit area in the shallow fault part. Further postseismic modeling reveals that the majority of afterslip is concentrated at depths of 0 to 5.4 km. The relatively shallow postseismic afterslip makes up for the coseismic slip deficit area to some extent. Through a joint analysis of the inversions, seismic data, and regional geology and geomorphology, we infer that the occurrence of this 2016 normal-faulting event is a result of regional gravitational collapse. In addition, we investigate the relationship between the 2016 earthquake and great historical earthquakes near the subduction zone of the central Andes and find that the 2016 event is likely promoted in advance by these events through our calculations of the coseismic and postseismic Coulomb stress changes. Finally, we should pay more attention to the nearby Falla Huaytacucho-Condoroma fault and the western segment of the Vilcanota Fault because of their relatively high stress loading. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Earthquake, Tectonics and Seismic Hazards)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 23140 KB  
Article
Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation of the 2020 Mw 6.4 Petrinja Earthquake (Croatia) Revealed by InSAR
by Sen Zhu, Yangmao Wen, Xiaodong Gong and Jingbin Liu
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(10), 2617; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102617 - 18 May 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2913
Abstract
The largest earthquake (Mw 6.4) in northwestern Croatia ruptured the faults near the city of Petrinja on 29 December 2020, at 11:19 UTC. The epicenter was located ~3 km southwest of Petrinja, ~40 km southeast of Zagreb, the capital of the Republic of [...] Read more.
The largest earthquake (Mw 6.4) in northwestern Croatia ruptured the faults near the city of Petrinja on 29 December 2020, at 11:19 UTC. The epicenter was located ~3 km southwest of Petrinja, ~40 km southeast of Zagreb, the capital of the Republic of Croatia. Here we investigated the geometric and kinematic properties of the 2020 Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake using a joint inversion of ascending and descending interferograms from three tracks of Sentinel-1 Single-Look Complex (SLC) images. The coseismic and early postseismic surface displacements associated with the Petrinja earthquake were imaged using standard DInSAR and SBAS time-series InSAR methods, respectively. The distributed slip model was inverted based on the ground surface displacements with maximum slip patch in 5 km depth. The early postseismic deformation occurred on the northwestern extent of coseismic slip, and it cannot be well modeled by the coseismic model. We thus suggested that the postseismic deformation was caused by a combined effect of the postseismic afterslips and aftershocks occurring in this area. Based on the inverted slip model, we calculated the Coulomb stress change in the region, and found a good correlation between positive Coulomb failure stress ∆CFS and the distribution of aftershocks. Based on these results, we identified which faults are more active, and then better estimated the seismic hazards in the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 30433 KB  
Communication
Spatiotemporal Distribution of Afterslip following the 2014 Yutian Mw 6.9 Earthquake Using COSMO-SkyMed and Sentinel-1 InSAR Data
by Zhanhong Huang, Lei Xie, Lei Zhao and Wenbin Xu
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(9), 2258; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092258 - 25 Apr 2023
Viewed by 2242
Abstract
Spatiotemporal distribution of early afterslip is essential for seismic hazard evaluation and determination of fault friction properties. In this study, we used early post-seismic COSMO-SkyMed (19 February 2014–08 April 2014) and long-term Sentinel-1 (16 October 2014–17 June 2020) observations from multiple platforms over [...] Read more.
Spatiotemporal distribution of early afterslip is essential for seismic hazard evaluation and determination of fault friction properties. In this study, we used early post-seismic COSMO-SkyMed (19 February 2014–08 April 2014) and long-term Sentinel-1 (16 October 2014–17 June 2020) observations from multiple platforms over different periods to create a rate decay model driven by post-seismic afterslip. The combined observations provide full coverage of the post-seismic deformation following the 2014 Yutian Mw 6.9 earthquake that occurred at the southwestern end of the Altyn Tagh Fault. The observation and modeling results showed that post-seismic deformation was characterized by left-lateral strike-slip movement with minor normal slip, which was consistent with that of co-seismic rupture. The maximum early afterslip (7–55 days) was as large as approximately 0.09 m with a depth of 7 km in the west of co-seismic rupture, and the maximum long-term afterslip was about 0.24 m. The simulated post-seismic deformation caused by poroelastic rebound and viscoelastic relaxation suggests that the afterslip mechanism controls the post-seismic deformation. The coupling pattern of the aftershock and afterslip indicates that the aftershock was mainly caused by the afterslip. The post-seismic spatiotemporal features of the 2014 Yutian earthquake have significant implications for analyzing seismic hazards at the southwestern end of the Altyn Tagh Fault. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monitoring Subtle Ground Deformation of Geohazards from Space)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 6746 KB  
Article
Co- and Postseismic Deformation of the 2020 Mw 6.3 Nima (Tibet, China) Earthquake Revealed by InSAR Observations
by Miaomiao Zhang, Zhenhong Li, Chen Yu, Zhenjiang Liu, Xuesong Zhang, Jiatong Wang, Jing Yang, Bingquan Han and Jianbing Peng
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(21), 5390; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215390 - 27 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2919
Abstract
On 22 July 2020, an Mw 6.3 earthquake occurred in Nima County, central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. We used the synthetic aperture radar interferometry (InSAR) technique with Sentinel-1 images to retrieve the line of sight (LOS) coseismic deformation fields which indicate that the maximum [...] Read more.
On 22 July 2020, an Mw 6.3 earthquake occurred in Nima County, central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. We used the synthetic aperture radar interferometry (InSAR) technique with Sentinel-1 images to retrieve the line of sight (LOS) coseismic deformation fields which indicate that the maximum surface displacement reached ~30 cm. We then processed a series of interferograms spanning one year after the Nima earthquake with the Small Baseline Subset Interferometric SAR (SBAS-InSAR) technique. The maximum cumulative postseismic LOS surface displacement reached ~8 cm and approximately followed a logarithmic function over time. The inversion of the fault geometry and co- and afterslip distribution shows that the epicenter location was (33.18°N, 86.88°E) at a depth of 7.4 km, and the causative fault had an N29.1°E strike and 50.2° dip. The most coseismic slip was concentrated at depths between 3 to 12 km with a peak value of 2.0 m at 7.4 km, whilst most afterslips were concentrated at depths between 0 to 12 km with a peak value of 0.2 m at 5 km. The postseismic moment energy was about 5.04 × 1017 N∙m 308 days after the event, which was approximately 13.8% of the coseismic moment energy. By analyzing the contribution of afterslip and poroelastic rebound to postseismic deformation, it was concluded that afterslip was the main early postseismic deformation mechanism. Future attention should be paid to the northern segment of the West Yibug Caka fault and East Yibug Caka fault. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop