remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advanced SAR/InSAR Techniques in Understanding and Monitoring Geohazards

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292). This special issue belongs to the section "Earth Observation for Emergency Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 4528

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Interests: space geodesy; InSAR; earthquake cycle deformation; natural hazards

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
2. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
Interests: geodynamics; geodesy; earthquake cycle; viscoelastic process

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Earth Science and Engineering (ErSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
Interests: InSAR; 3D deformation; strain model; earthquake; landslides

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
Interests: space geodesy; earthquake; fault damage zone; deep learning

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Interests: ground deformation; tectonics; volcanology; GNSS; SAR

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) has revolutionized the way we observe and quantify Earth's surface deformations. Over the past decades, such technologies have emerged as indispensable tools in geophysics, enabling precise, large-scale measurements of ground movements with high spatial and temporal resolutions. Their impact spans across numerous scientific and applied fields, providing critical insights into hazard processes such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides, glacier dynamics, underground fluid shifts, and even sea-level variations and tsunami-induced deformations.

The rapid advancement of SAR technology has been further fuelled by the proliferation of satellite missions, including government-funded platforms, such as Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2, and an ever-growing number of commercial satellites. This unprecedented availability of SAR data, coupled with the continuous refinement of InSAR processing techniques, offers a unique opportunity to deepen our understanding of natural hazard processes across varying spatial and temporal scales.

This Special Issue aims to capture and showcase the latest developments in SAR/InSAR methodologies and their transformative applications in hazard science. We encourage contributions that highlight recent innovations in SAR and InSAR data processing, including error correction strategies that integrate state-of-the-art techniques such as deep learning, as well as methodologies designed to handle the increasing volumes of SAR data. Submissions are also encouraged that explore the application of SAR/InSAR in conjunction with other geophysical datasets, such as GNSS and seismic observations, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of hazard mechanisms.

Additionally, this Special Issue seeks to explore how SAR/InSAR techniques contribute to the broader goals of natural disaster risk assessment, vulnerability analysis, and disaster risk reduction. We welcome contributions that address hazard assessments across diverse geophysical processes, employing both classical approaches and modern, integrated frameworks. This includes case studies that utilize remote sensing technologies in innovative ways to improve risk assessment and management strategies for multi-hazard environments.

Key topics for this Special Issue include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. Development of novel algorithms to mitigate SAR/InSAR errors, with an emphasis on emerging technologies such as machine learning and artificial intelligence;
  2. Advanced processing methodologies for managing and interpreting large-scale SAR data, including approaches to enhance computational efficiency;
  3. Application of SAR/InSAR in natural hazard studies, such as earthquake rupture process, volcanic activity assessment, landslide monitoring, and glacial dynamics analysis;
  4. Integration of SAR/InSAR data with complementary geophysical datasets—such as GNSS, seismic, multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal data—to enhance hazard monitoring and prediction;
  5. Disaster risk reduction, including vulnerability and capacity analysis, as well as resilience-building efforts in hazard-prone regions.

By highlighting these diverse topics, this Special Issue aims to foster a deeper understanding of the role of SAR/InSAR in hazard processes and risk management. We invite contributions that not only push the boundaries of SAR/InSAR technology but also offer practical insights into how these tools can be applied to real-world hazard scenarios, contributing to the advancement of disaster risk science.

Dr. Zhangfeng Ma
Dr. Haipeng Luo
Dr. Jihong Liu
Dr. Chenglong Li
Dr. Yosuke Aoki
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • SAR/InSAR
  • space geodesy
  • earthquake
  • landslides
  • volcano
  • multiple source data integration
  • natural hazards
  • geological disasters
  • risk assessment

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

19 pages, 32077 KiB  
Article
Present-Day Tectonic Deformation Characteristics of the Northeastern Pamir Margin Constrained by InSAR and GPS Observations
by Junjie Zhang, Xiaogang Song, Donglin Wu and Xinjian Shan
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4771; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244771 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 805
Abstract
The Pamir is located on the northwestern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, which is an area of intense continental deformation and part of the famous India–Himalaya collision zone. The dominant structural deformation in the eastern Pamir is characterized by a 250 km long [...] Read more.
The Pamir is located on the northwestern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, which is an area of intense continental deformation and part of the famous India–Himalaya collision zone. The dominant structural deformation in the eastern Pamir is characterized by a 250 km long east–west extensional fault system, known as the Kongur Shan extensional system (KSES), which has developed a series of faults with different orientations and characteristics, resulting in highly complex structural deformation and lacking sufficient geodetic constraints. We collected Sentinel-1 SAR data from December 2016 to March 2023, obtained high-resolution ascending and descending LOS velocities and 3D deformation fields, and combined them with GPS data to constrain the current motion characteristics of the northeastern Pamirs for the first time. Based on the two-dimensional screw dislocation model and using the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inversion method, the kinematic parameters of the fault were calculated, revealing the fault kinematic characteristics in this region. Our results demonstrate that the present-day deformation of the KSES is dominated by nearly E–W extension, with maximum extensional motion concentrated in its central segment, reaching peak extension rates of ~7.59 mm/yr corresponding to the Kongur Shan. The right-lateral Muji fault at the northern end exhibits equivalent rates of extensional motion with a relatively shallow locking depth. The strike-slip rate along the Muji fault gradually increases from west to east, ranging approximately between 4 and 6 mm/yr, significantly influenced by the eastern normal fault. The Tahman fault (TKF) at the southernmost end of the KSES shows an extension rate of ~1.5 mm/yr accompanied by minor strike-slip motion. The Kashi anticline is approaching stability, while the Mushi anticline along the eastern Pamir frontal thrust (PFT) remains active with continuous uplift at ~2 mm/yr, indicating that deformation along the Tarim Basin–Tian Shan boundary has propagated southward from the South Tian Shan thrust (STST). Overall, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of integrated InSAR and GPS data in constraining contemporary deformation patterns along the northeastern Pamir margin, contributing to our understanding of the region’s tectonic characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

21 pages, 1850 KiB  
Review
Deep Learning for Automatic Detection of Volcanic and Earthquake-Related InSAR Deformation
by Xu Liu, Yingfeng Zhang, Xinjian Shan, Zhenjie Wang, Wenyu Gong and Guohong Zhang
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(4), 686; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040686 - 18 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1161
Abstract
Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) technology plays a crucial role in monitoring surface deformation and has become widely used in volcanic and earthquake research. With the rapid advancement of satellite technology, InSAR now generates vast volumes of deformation data. Deep learning has revolutionized [...] Read more.
Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) technology plays a crucial role in monitoring surface deformation and has become widely used in volcanic and earthquake research. With the rapid advancement of satellite technology, InSAR now generates vast volumes of deformation data. Deep learning has revolutionized data analysis, offering exceptional capabilities for processing large datasets. Leveraging these advancements, automatic detection of volcanic and earthquake deformation from extensive InSAR datasets has emerged as a major research focus. In this paper, we first introduce several representative deep learning architectures commonly used in InSAR data analysis, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), and Transformer networks. Each architecture offers unique advantages for addressing the challenges of InSAR data. We then systematically review recent progress in the automatic detection and identification of volcanic and earthquake deformation signals from InSAR images using deep learning techniques. This review highlights two key aspects: the design of network architectures and the methodologies for constructing datasets. Finally, we discuss the challenges in automatic detection and propose potential solutions. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current applications of deep learning for extracting InSAR deformation features, with a particular focus on earthquake and volcanic monitoring. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

15 pages, 17899 KiB  
Technical Note
Coseismic Rupture and Postseismic Afterslip of the 2020 Nima Mw 6.4 Earthquake
by Shaojun Wang, Ling Bai and Chaoya Liu
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(8), 1389; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081389 - 14 Apr 2025
Viewed by 229
Abstract
On 22 July 2020, an Mw 6.4 earthquake occurred in Nima County in the Qiangtang Terrane of the central Tibetan Plateau. This event, caused by normal faulting, remains controversial in terms of its rupture process and causative fault due to the complex tectonics [...] Read more.
On 22 July 2020, an Mw 6.4 earthquake occurred in Nima County in the Qiangtang Terrane of the central Tibetan Plateau. This event, caused by normal faulting, remains controversial in terms of its rupture process and causative fault due to the complex tectonics of the region. In this study, we analyzed the coseismic and postseismic deformation using differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar (D-InSAR). The coseismic slip distribution was independently estimated through InSAR inversion and teleseismic waveform analysis, while the afterslip distribution was inferred from postseismic deformation. Coulomb stress failure analysis was conducted to assess the potential seismic hazard. Our results showed a maximum line-of-sight (LOS) coseismic deformation of about 29 cm away from the satellite, with quasi-vertical subsidence peaking at 35 cm. Four distinct deformation zones were observed in the quasi-east–west direction. Coseismic deformation and slip models based on InSAR and teleseismic data indicate that the Nima earthquake ruptured the West Yibu Chaka fault. The seismogenic fault had a strike of 26°, an eastward dip of 43°, and a rake of −87.28°, with rupture patches at depths of 3–13 km and a maximum slip of 1.1 m. Postseismic deformation showed cumulative LOS displacement of up to 0.05 m. Afterslip was concentrated in the up-dip and down-dip areas of the coseismic rupture zone, reaching a maximum of 0.11 m. Afterslip was also observed along the East Yibu Caka fault. Coulomb stress modeling indicates an increased seismic risk between the Yibu Caka fault and the Jiangai Zangbu fault, highlighting the vulnerability of the region to future seismic activity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 7714 KiB  
Technical Note
Geodetic Observations and Seismogenic Structures of the 2025 Mw 7.0 Dingri Earthquake: The Largest Normal Faulting Event in the Southern Tibet Rift
by Qingyi Liu, Jun Hua, Yingfeng Zhang, Wenyu Gong, Jianfei Zang, Guohong Zhang and Hongyi Li
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(6), 1096; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17061096 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 665
Abstract
The Mw 7.0 Dingri earthquake, which occurred on 7 January 2025, occurred at the southern end of the Xainza-Dinggyê Fault Zone within the South Tibet Rift (STR) system, in the Dengmecuo graben. It is the largest normal-faulting event in the region recorded by [...] Read more.
The Mw 7.0 Dingri earthquake, which occurred on 7 January 2025, occurred at the southern end of the Xainza-Dinggyê Fault Zone within the South Tibet Rift (STR) system, in the Dengmecuo graben. It is the largest normal-faulting event in the region recorded by modern instruments. Using Sentinel-1A and Lutan SAR data combined with strong-motion records, we derived the coseismic surface deformation and slip distribution. InSAR interferograms and displacement vectors confirm a typical normal-faulting pattern. The slip model, based on an elastic half-space assumption, identifies the Dengmecuo Fault as the source fault, with an average strike of ~187° and a dip of ~55°. The rupture was concentrated within the upper 10 km, with a maximum slip of 4–5 m at ~5 km depth, extending to the surface with ~3 m vertical displacement. Partial rupture (≤2 m) in the southern segment (5–10 km depth) did not reach the surface, likely due to lacustrine deposits or possible post-seismic stress release. The rupture bottom intersects the fault plane of the South Tibet Detachment System (STDS), suggesting a restraining effect on coseismic rupture propagation. Considering stress transfer along the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT), we propose that the 2025 Dingri earthquake is closely associated with stress transfer following the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in the lower Himalayas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 32385 KiB  
Technical Note
Aftershock Spatiotemporal Activity and Coseismic Slip Model of the 2022 Mw 6.7 Luding Earthquake: Fault Geometry Structures and Complex Rupture Characteristics
by Qibo Hu, Hongwei Liang, Hongyi Li, Xinjian Shan and Guohong Zhang
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010070 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 910
Abstract
On 5 September 2022, the moment magnitude (Mw) 6.7 Luding earthquake struck in the Xianshuihe Fault system on the eastern edge of the Tibet Plateau, illuminating the seismic gap in the Moxi segment. The fault system geometry and rupture process of this earthquake [...] Read more.
On 5 September 2022, the moment magnitude (Mw) 6.7 Luding earthquake struck in the Xianshuihe Fault system on the eastern edge of the Tibet Plateau, illuminating the seismic gap in the Moxi segment. The fault system geometry and rupture process of this earthquake are relatively complex. To better understand the underlying driving mechanisms, this study first uses the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) technique to obtain static surface displacements, which are then combined with Global Positioning System (GPS) data to invert the coseismic slip distribution. A machine learning approach is applied to extract a high-quality aftershock catalog from the original seismic waveform data, enabling the analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of aftershock activity. The catalog is subsequently used for fault fitting to determine a reliable fault geometry. The coseismic slip is dominated by left-lateral strike-slip motion, distributed within a depth range of 0–15 km, with a maximum fault slip > 2 m. The relocated catalog contains 15,571 events. Aftershock activity is divided into four main seismic clusters, with two smaller clusters located to the north and south and four interval zones in between. The geometry of the five faults is fitted, revealing the complexity of the Xianshuihe Fault system. Additionally, the Luding earthquake did not fully rupture the Moxi segment. The unruptured areas to the north of the mainshock, as well as regions to the south near the Anninghe Fault, pose a potential seismic hazard. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop