sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Educational Psychology for Student Well-Being and Sustainable Development

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2025) | Viewed by 5044

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Plant and Soil Sciences Department, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA
Interests: science education; sustainable systems for grain crop production
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

A lack of school belonging can impact students’ engagement in their own classes and may well impede their acquisition of key literacies (language, mathematics, and science). Students with differences to the majority/favored group(s) within a school may be particularly vulnerable to such a sense of institutional mismatch; furthermore, a lower SES, being more rural, and public schools may also impact belongingness (1). Efforts to enhance school belonging/well-being may range widely in their effectiveness and sustainability. This Special Issue is intended to bring together a series of thoughtful articles around ways to enhance the belongingness of students in an efficacious and enduring manner.

School belongingness/well-being is related to school engagement (2) and achievement (1,3), has been assessed in several ways (4,5), and can be a concern for students perceived (by themselves or others) as members of an “out-group”. This Special Issue aims to surface approaches toward the enhancement of school belonging that can be both effective and sustainable. The scope of this anticipated compilation of articles encompasses a variety of related psychosocial constructs, including school bonding (6); academic hardiness (7); academic buoyancy (8); happiness (9); thriving/positive psychosocial development (10); flourishing (11); life satisfaction/eudaemonia (12); and bullying (13,14). Furthermore, additional foci could include multiple aspects of students’ vulnerabilities; for example, academically at-risk groups (15); immigrant/migrant status (16); grade retention (14); refugees (17); family separation (18); and self-handicapping/learned helplessness (19). Of course, we anticipate analysis of the comparative values of diverse belongingness promotion strategies, such as school climate modification via the prioritization of mental health alongside academics (20); building authoritative contexts (6); extracurricular participation/teacher support/parent engagement/cultural change (15); the promotion of cooperative over competitive climates (1); multiculturalism over assimilationism (5); or mastery approaches to learning (21). We anticipate that this collection of research works around school belonging will help school leaders, particularly those in resource-poor contexts, implement strategies toward enhanced school belonging.

References

  1. OECD. 2020. Sense of belonging at school. In PISA 2018 results (Volume III: What school life means for students’ lives), OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/d69dc209-en.
  2. Fredricks, J.A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.-T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. 2018. Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419.
  3. Cockerill, T. 2019. Pupils attending a shared placement between a school and alternative provision: Is a sense of school belonging the key to success? Educational & Child Psychology, 36(2), 23-28.
  4. Arslan, G., Asajarani, F., Bakhtiari, S., & Hajkhodadadi, F. 2022. School belonging in adolescents: Psychometirc properties of the School Belongingness Scale in Iranian students. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 32, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2020.7.
  5. Celeste, L., Baysu, G., Phalet, K., Meeussen, L., & Kende, J. 2019. Can school diversity policies reduce belonging and achievement gaps between minority and majority youth? Multiculturalism, colorblindness, and assimilationism assessed. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(11), 1603-1618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219838577.
  6. Keppens, G., & Spruyt, B. 2019. The school as a socialization context: Understanding the influence of school bonding and an authoritative school climate on class skipping. Youth and Society, 51(8), 1145-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17722305.
  7. Abdollahi, A., & Noltemeyer, A. 2018. Academic hardiness: Mediator between sense of belonging to school and academic achievement? The Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 345-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1261075.
  8. Bostwick, K.C.P., Martin, A.J., Collie, R.J., Burns, E.C., Hare, N., Cox, S., Flesken, A., & McCarthy, I. 2022. Academic buoyancy in high school: A cross-lagged multilevel modeling approach exploring reciprocal effects with perceived school support, motivation, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000753.
  9. Kirkcaldy, B., Furnham, A., & Siefen, G. 2004. The relationship between health efficacy, educational attainment, and well-being among 30 nations. European Psychologist, 9(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.2.107.
  10. Burns, E.C., Collie, R.J., Van Bergen, P., & Martin, A.J. 2022. Intrapersonal and interpersonal psychosocial adjustment resources and achievement: A multilevel latent profile analysis of students and schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000726.
  11. Datu, J.A.D., Labarda, C.E., & Salanga, M.G.C. 2020. Flourishing is associated with achievement goal orientations and academic delay of gratification in a collectivist context. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 1171-1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00122-w.
  12. Heffner, A.L., & Antaramian, S.P. 2016. The role of life satisfaction in predicting student engagement and achievement. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1681-1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9665-1.
  13. Li, L., Chen, X., & Li, H. 2020. Bullying victimization, school belonging, academic engagement and achievement in adolescents in rural China: A serial mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 104946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104946.
  14. Lian, Q., Yu, C., Tu, Z., Deng, M., Wang, T., Su, Q, & Zuo, X. 2021. Grade repetition and bullying victimization in adolescents: A global cross-sectional study of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) data from 2018.PLOS Medicine 18(11), e1003846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003846.
  15. Hughes, J.N., Im, M.H., &Allee, P.J. 2015. Effect of school belonging trajectories in grades 6-8 on achievement: Gender and ethnic differences. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 493-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.08.001.
  16. Ho, N.K., Schweitzer, R., & Khawaja, N. 2017. Academic achievement among recently arrived Chinese adolescent migrants: The role of social support, school belonging, and acculturativestress.Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools,27(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2016.4.
  17. Sobitan, T.2022. Understanding the experiences of school belonging amongst secondary school students with refugee backgrounds (UK). Educational Psychology in Practice, 38(3), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2084042.
  18. Wang, S., &Mao, Y. 2018. The effect of boarding on campuson left-behind children’s sense ofschool belonging and academic achievement: Chinese evidence from propensity score matchinganalysis.Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(3), 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1470965.
  19. Määttä, S., Nurmi, J.-E., & Stattin, H.2007. Achievement orientations, school adjustment, and well-being: A longitudinal study.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(4), 789-812.
  20. Allen, K.-A., Kern, M.L., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Waters, L. 2017. School values: A comparison ofacademic motivation, mental health promotion, and school belongingwith student achievement.The Educational andDevelopmental Psychologist, 34(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2017.5.
  21. Zhou, J., Huebner, E.S., & Tian, L. 2020. Longitudinal associations and mechanisms betweenachievement goals andsubjective well-being in schoolin Chinese adolescents.School Mental Health, 12, 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09356-8.

Prof. Dr. Larry J. Grabau
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • student belonging
  • student well-being
  • school bonding

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 298 KB  
Article
The Hidden Cost of Misaligned Admissions on University Dropout: Implications for Institutional Sustainability, Human Capital, and Socio-Educational Stratification
by Fernanda Muñoz-Muñoz, Jorge Maluenda-Albornoz, Felipe Moraga-Villablanca and Jorge Diaz-Ramirez
Sustainability 2026, 18(7), 3466; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073466 - 2 Apr 2026
Viewed by 319
Abstract
College dropout is a global challenge due to its high prevalence and its consequences for individuals, institutions, and society, particularly in terms of institutional sustainability, inefficient use of public resources, and human capital loss. This issue is especially salient in engineering, where first-year [...] Read more.
College dropout is a global challenge due to its high prevalence and its consequences for individuals, institutions, and society, particularly in terms of institutional sustainability, inefficient use of public resources, and human capital loss. This issue is especially salient in engineering, where first-year dropout rates remain high. This study examines factors associated with first-year dropout among engineering students at a Chilean public university, framing dropout as a sustainability challenge for higher education systems. The analysis combines administrative records (n=825) with survey data on psychosocial variables (n=417). Results show that admission to a first-choice program and early performance are strongly associated with persistence, highlighting admission alignment and early university experience as factors contributing to the sustainable use of institutional resources. Despite equivalent academic performance across genders, a marked discrepancy emerged between students’ high self-reported confidence and limited implementation of learning strategies. Cluster analysis identified a clear performance gradient across socio-educational profiles, with students combining high academic capital, low socioeconomic vulnerability, and first-choice admission showing the most favorable outcomes. These findings underscore the relevance of admission preference, trajectories, and socio-educational context for first-year persistence, with implications for institutional sustainability and the consolidation of human capital in engineering education. Full article
15 pages, 534 KB  
Article
Clustering Motivational Profiles: How Perceived Value, Cost, and Self-Efficacy Shape Students’ Regulatory Strategies
by Jorge Maluenda-Albornoz, Matías Zamorano-Veragua, Felipe Moraga-Villablanca and Jorge Díaz-Ramírez
Sustainability 2026, 18(7), 3463; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073463 - 2 Apr 2026
Viewed by 463
Abstract
This study investigates the interplay between university students’ motivational beliefs and their regulatory strategies when facing challenging academic tasks. Drawing on the Expectancy–Value–Cost (EVC) model, the research characterizes distinct motivational profiles based on perceived self-efficacy, task value, and perceived cost. A quantitative study [...] Read more.
This study investigates the interplay between university students’ motivational beliefs and their regulatory strategies when facing challenging academic tasks. Drawing on the Expectancy–Value–Cost (EVC) model, the research characterizes distinct motivational profiles based on perceived self-efficacy, task value, and perceived cost. A quantitative study was conducted with a sample of 1184 Chilean university students across various disciplines, including Engineering, Health Sciences, and Social Sciences. Participants identified a recent challenging task and completed a battery of validated instruments, including the Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale (BroMS) and scales for perceived cost, self-efficacy, and task value. Using Machine Learning techniques, specifically the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm, the analysis identified four distinct student profiles (Agentic Mindset, Alienated Mindset, Paralyzed Mindset, Growth Mindset). These clusters were evaluated based on statistical indices (R2, AIC, BIC, and Silhouette) and theoretical coherence. Subsequent ANOVA and post hoc analyses (Holm correction) revealed significant differences among these profiles in their reported levels of motivational regulation and willpower. The findings suggest that students with high self-efficacy and task value combined with manageable perceived costs employ more effective motivational regulation strategies. Conversely, profiles characterized by high perceived cost and low self-efficacy show diminished regulatory capacity. This research contributes to understanding how personal and task-related perceptions interact to shape volitional control in demanding academic environments, offering insights for targeted interventions to support academic persistence and success. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 626 KB  
Article
Passion for Studying and Its Relationships with Academic Burnout and Mental Health: Longitudinal Insights into Sustainable Students’ Functioning
by Karolina Mudło-Głagolska and Paweł Larionow
Sustainability 2025, 17(21), 9852; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219852 - 4 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2891
Abstract
Passion for studying represents a crucial motivational resource in students’ academic functioning, yet its role remains complex. Based on Vallerand’s dualistic model of passion, this paper examines how harmonious and obsessive study passion relate to students’ well-being, academic burnout, and dropout intentions. Across [...] Read more.
Passion for studying represents a crucial motivational resource in students’ academic functioning, yet its role remains complex. Based on Vallerand’s dualistic model of passion, this paper examines how harmonious and obsessive study passion relate to students’ well-being, academic burnout, and dropout intentions. Across three complementary studies, we employed a multi-method approach combining cross-sectional correlational analyses (N = 142), longitudinal structural equation modeling (N = 100), and Bayesian psychological network analysis (N = 132). The results consistently indicated that harmonious passion was positively associated with well-being and negatively with burnout, psychological distress, and dropout intentions. Longitudinal findings confirmed its predictive role, showing that harmonious passion at the beginning of the semester protected against exhaustion and disengagement later on. In contrast, obsessive passion demonstrated weaker and less consistent associations, functioning mainly through links with anxiety in the network structure. Together, these findings suggest that harmonious passion acts as a central protective factor in students’ academic and emotional adjustment, whereas obsessive passion may represent a potential risk under certain conditions. By identifying the motivational and emotional mechanisms that sustain students’ well-being and engagement, this study contributes to the goals of sustainable education, emphasizing the creation of learning environments that support development of harmonious passion for studying, with its beneficial effects for long-term mental health. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop