E-Mail Alert

Add your e-mail address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal:

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Special Issue "Dealing with Environmental Conflicts"

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Use of the Environment and Resources".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2019.

Special Issue Editors

Guest Editor
Prof. Dr. Ioan-Cristian Iojă

Center for Environmental Researches and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Website | E-Mail
Interests: environmental geography; urban ecology; environmental conflict
Guest Editor
Prof. Dr. Jürgen H. Breuste

Chair Urban and Landscape Ecology, Department of Geography and Geology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, A 5020 Salzburg, Austria
Website | E-Mail
Phone: 0043 662 8044 745241
Interests: urban ecology; urban nature protection; urban ecosystem management; urban ecosystem services; urban biodiversity
Guest Editor
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mihai Razvan Nita

Center for Environmental Researches and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Website | E-Mail
Interests: Nature-based solutions; green infrastructures; ecosystem services assessment; urban and territorial planning; environmental conflicts

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The journal Sustainability, an international, cross-disciplinary, scholarly, and open access journal of environmental, cultural, economic, and social sustainability of human beings invites your submission for a Special Issue on “Dealing with Environmental Conflicts”.

Conflict seems to be an inevitable part of our society, which can be addressed from a social, political, economic, psychological or environmental perspective. The resolution of conflict is an important step toward achieving sustainability in our society.

Although they have many similarities with social and political conflicts, environmental conflicts have specific features, related with triggering events, progress, consequences, involvement of the stakeholders, management or resolution processes. Political settings (e.g., Sustainability Development Goals and other international environmental agreements), new societal ambitions (e.g., nature-based solutions, urban protected areas), environmental threats (environmental pollution, invasive species, climate change, environmental risks) and others (e.g., public participation in decision making process) increase the potential to have contradiction between different groups at global, regional, and local level.

This Special Issue calls for contributions that address how we can better understand environmental conflict management and resolution. Contributors have to consider the global, regional, and local scale related with environmental conflicts, and they are welcome to examine the drivers and/or propose concrete solutions for their resolution.

Of particular interest are papers that (i) point out the conflictual dimension of different new societal projects (e.g., natural protected areas, green infrastructure); (ii) present local and regional experience related with environmental conflicts, (iii) propose different innovative methods to understand environmental conflicts; (iv) demonstrate solutions that are scalable, transferable, and/or can be tailored to specific local or issue-dependent needs in their implementation, and (v) provide a better understanding of social and economic dimension of environmental conflicts.

Papers are expected to represent sustainability research across a wide range of disciplines, as well as inter- and transdisciplinary studies. While innovative ideas and strategies are welcome, authors are encouraged to consider their feasibility in light of the current broader background.

The Special Issue will be connected with the 10th anniversary of Society for Urban Ecology -SURE conference The Challenging Urban Nature and Nature's Role in Urban Challenges, which will take place in 5–8 September 2019 at the University of Bucharest (Romania) (https://ccmesi.ro/?page_id=1216). The conference proposes the following topics related with the Special Issue: Challenges for nature-based solutions applications in our cities; planning for eco, smart, resilient, and sustainable cities; and the great green divide—conflicts involving green and protected areas.

References:

  • Andrew, J. S. (2001). Examining the Claims of Environmental ADR Evidence from Waste Management Conflicts in Ontario and Massachusetts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(2), 166–183.
  • Andrew, J. S. (2003). Potential application of mediation to land use conflicts in small-scale mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(2), 117–130.
  • Asah, S. T., Bengston, D. N., Wendt, K., & Nelson, K. C. (2012). Diagnostic reframing of intractable environmental problems: Case of a contested multiparty public land-use conflict. Journal of Environmental Management, 108, 108-119.
  • Bean, M., Fisher, L., & Eng, M. (2007). Assessment in Environmental and Public Policy Conflict Resolution: Emerging Theory, Patterns of Practice, and a Conceptual Framework. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24(4), 447-468.
  • Beck, J. A. C. (2004). Defining and evaluating success in environmental conflict resolution. In T. P. d'Estree & B. B. G. Colby (Eds.), Braving the currents: Evaluating Environmental Conflict Resolution in the River Basins of the American West (pp. 16-54). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Bloodworth, A. J., Scott, P. W., & McEvoy, F. M. (2009). Digging the backyard: Mining and quarrying in the UK and their impact on future land use. Land Use Policy, 26(1), S317–S325.
  • Bouwma, I. M. R., van Apeldoorn, R., & Kamphorst, D. A. (2010). Current practices in solving multiple use issues of Natura 2000 sites: Conflict management strategies and participatory approaches Alterra. Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196-208.
  • Buijs, A., & Lawrence, A. (2013). Emotional conflicts in rational forestry: Towards a research agenda for understanding emotions in environmental conflicts. Forest Policy and Economics, 33(0), 104-111.
  • Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach. Connecticut: Praeger.
  • Davodeau, H. (2008). Des conflits révélateurs de la territorialisation du projet de paysage. Exemples ligériens. In T. Kirat & A. Torre (Eds.), Territoires de conflits, analyses des mutations de l'occupation de l'espace: L'Harmattan.
  • Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(3), 288-300.
  • Diehk, P. F., & Gleditsch, N. P. (Eds.). (2001). Environmental Conflict. Oxford: Westview.
  • Dziedzicki, J. M. (2001). Gestion des conflits d'amenagement de l'espace: quelle place pour les processus de mediation? Teza de doctorat in Amenagement de l'espace et urbanisme, Universite Francois Rabelais, Tours, Franta.
  • Emerson, K., Orr, P., Keyes, D., & McKnight, K. (2009). Environmental Conflict Resolution: Evaluating Performance Outcomes and Contributing Factors. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27(1), 27-64.
  • Fontan, J. M., Hamel, P., & Morin, R. (2012). Ville et conflicts. Action collective, justice sociale et enjeux environnementaux. Laval: Presses de l'Universite de Laval.
  • Freudenburg, W., & Pastror, S. (1992). NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 39-61.
  • Glasl, F. (1999). Konfliktmanagement. Ein Handbuch für Führungskräfte, Beraterinnen und Berater. Bern/Stuttgart.
  • Gresch, P., & Smith, B. (1985). Managing Spatial Conflict: The Planning System in Switzerland. Progress in Planning, 23, 155-251.
  • Halamish-Leshem, R., & Amit-Cohen, I. (2013). Mediation agreement to resolve an environmental conflict and its social implications: the case of Wadi Zalmon (Israel National Park). GeoJournal, 78(2), 373-387.
  • Havel, J. J. (1986). Land use conflicts. In B. Dell, A. I. M. Hopkins & B. B. Lamont (Eds.), Resilience in Mediterranean-type Ecosystems. Dordrecht: Dr W. Junk Publishers.
  • Hilson, G. (2002). An overview of land use conflicts in mining communities. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 65-73.
  • Ioja, I. C., Niță, M. R., Vânău, G. O., Onose, D. A., & Gavrilidis, A. A. (2014). Using multi-criteria analysis for the identification of spatial land-use conflicts in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area. Ecological Indicators, 42, 112-121.
  • Jeffers, J. N. R. (1999). Conflict analysis and resolution. In M. Walkey, I. R. Swingland & S. Russell (Eds.), Integrated Protected Area Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Jelšovská, K. (2011). Environmental Conflict Analysis. In G. Meško, D. Dimitrijević & C. B. Fields (Eds.), Understanding and Managing Threats to the Environment in South Eastern Europe (Vol. 2, pp. 365-377): Springer Netherlands.
  • Jurin, R., Roush, D., & Danter, J. (2010). Managing Conflicts Environmental Communication. Skills and Principles for Natural Resource Managers, Scientists, and Engineers. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Kennedy, J., & Vining, J. (2007). Natural resources conflicts: Why do emotions matter? Natural resources conflicts and the role of manager's emotions. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 24(4), 23-50.
  • Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (Eds.). (2013). Environmental conflict and the media. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Lewin, J. E., Strutton, D., & Paswan, A. K. (2011). Conflicting Stakeholder Interests and Natural Gas: A Macromarketing Perspective. Journal of Macromarketing.
  • Månsson, A. (2014). Energy, conflict and war: Towards a conceptual framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 4, 106-116.
  • Maser, C., & Pollio, C. A. (2012). Resolving environmental conflicts: CRC Press.
  • Mason, S., & Spillman, K. (2002). Environmental Conflicts and Regional Conflict Management Welfare Economics and Sustainable Development (Vol. II).
  • Melé, P. (2012). Pour une géographie des conflits urbains de proximité en Amérique Latine. Géocarrefour, 87(1).
  • Sidaway, R. (2005). Resolving environmental disputes: from conflict to consensus. London: Earthscan.
  • Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999). The consensus building handbook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Susskind, L., & Ozawa, C. (1986). Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector. The American Behavioral Scientist, 27(2), 255-279.
  • Timmermans, J. S., & Beroggi, G. E. G. (2000). Conflict resolution in sustainable infrastructure management. Safety Science, 35, 175-192.
  • Torre, A. (2010). Conflits environnementaux et territoires. In B. Zuindeau (Ed.), Développement durable et territoire (pp. 518): Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
  • Torre, A., Aznar, O., Bonin, M., Caron, A., Chia, E., Galman, M., Lefranc, C., Melot, R., Guerin, M., Jeanneaux, P., Kirat, T., Paoli, J. C., Salazar, M. I., & Thinon, P. (2006). Conflits et tensions autour des usages de l’espace dans les territoires ruraux et périurbains. Le cas de six zones géographiques françaises. Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine, 3, 411-450.
  • Torre, A., Melot, R., Magsi, H., Bossuet, L., Cadoret, A., Caron, A., Darly, S., Jeanneaux, P., Kirat, T., Pham, H. V., & Kolokouris, O. (2014). Identifying and measuring land-use and proximity conflicts: methods and identification. SpringerPlus, 3, 85.
  • Troja, M. (2003). Resolving Environmental Conflicts. Mediation and Negotiation as Institutional Capacities for Social Learning. In H. Breit, A. Engels, T. Moss & M. Troja (Eds.), How Institutions Change (pp. 233-267): VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Tudor, C. A., Ioja, I. C., Patru-Stupariu, I., Nita, M. R., & Hersperger, A. M. (2014). How successful is the resolution of land-use conflicts? A comparison of cases from Switzerland and Romania Applied Geography, 47, 125–136.
  • von der Dunk, A., Grêt-Regamey, A., Dalang, T., & Hersperger, A. (2011). Defining a typology of peri-urban land-use conflicts –A case study from Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(2), 149-156.
  • Weeks, D. (1992). The Eight Essential Steps to Conflict Resolution.
  • Wehrmann, B. (2008). Land Conflicts. A practical guide to dealing with land disputes. In UN-HABITAT (Ed.). Eschborn.

Prof. Dr. Ioan-Cristian Iojă
Prof. Dr. Jurgen Breuste
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mihai Razvan Nita
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Environmental conflicts
  • Conflict resolution
  • Nature based-solutions
  • Sustainability

Published Papers

This special issue is now open for submission.
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top