Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
2.0
Journals
Pharmacy
Special Issues
The Burden of Medicines
share announcement

The Burden of Medicines

A special issue of Pharmacy (ISSN 2226-4787).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2019) | Viewed by 21761

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Nadir Kheir

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Interests: social and administrative pharmacy; health outcome research; patient-reported outcomes

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue focuses on the burden of medicines on patients’ lives and the role of pharmacists in helping to reduce that burden.

Drug therapy remains to be the most used intervention to prevent illness, reduce symptoms, and treat disease. Unfortunately, medicines are associated with numerous adverse effects that impact on the quality of life and wellbeing of patients. Non-pharmacological approaches to control disease are preferred over drug treatment, but unfortunately these are sometimes insufficient on their own. Patients on multiple drug therapy (polypharmacy) and those with comorbidities are at high risk of drug-related problems. However, pharmacists could help in reducing the burden of drug therapy through the application of pharmaceutical care (PC). With its patient-centred philosophy of practice, the full application of PC should help patients make the best out of their medicines. Given that patients’ perspectives on issues related to the use of medicines are different from those of health care providers, more attention is now drawn toward assessing the burden of drug therapy from the perspective of the patient. That would provide practitioners with information on what health domains are impacted the most, and what intervention should be made to reduce the negative impact of drug therapy.

We invite you to present your research, reviews, or opinions in relation to the burden of medicines and the role of pharmacy and pharmacists in reducing that burden. If you conducted research focusing on PC, health outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, or any related areas, please consider sharing it with readers through this Special Issue of Pharmacy. We wish to increase awareness about the burden of medicines, strategies to assess that burden, and the role of pharmacists in that effort.

Prof. Dr. Nadir Kheir
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Pharmacy is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • medicines
  • medications
  • burden
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • quality of life

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

9 pages, 196 KiB  
Article
Complexity of Medicine Regimens and Patient Perception of Medicine Burden
by Janet Krska, Sarah A. Corlett and Barbra Katusiime
Pharmacy 2019, 7(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy7010018 - 2 Feb 2019
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3912
Abstract
From the patient perspective, medicine burden is more than the number of medicines, or the complexity of medicine regimens they need to manage. Relationships between the number of medicines, regimen complexity and patient perception of medicine burden are under-researched. This cross-sectional study measured [...] Read more.
From the patient perspective, medicine burden is more than the number of medicines, or the complexity of medicine regimens they need to manage. Relationships between the number of medicines, regimen complexity and patient perception of medicine burden are under-researched. This cross-sectional study measured regimen complexity and determined how this and patient perceived burden are affected by the therapeutic group. Regimen complexity was measured in patients presenting prescriptions to six community pharmacies in South-East England. A sub-sample (166) also completed the Living with Medicines Questionnaire which measures patient perceived burden. The 492 patients were prescribed 2700 medicines (range 1 to 23). Almost half used at least one non-oral formulation. Complexity was correlated strongly with the number of medicines (r = 0.94), number of therapeutic groups (r = 0.84) and number of formulations (r = 0.73). Patients using medicines for skin, eye and respiratory conditions had the highest complexity scores. Increasing the number of medicines, frequency of dosing, number of non-oral formulations and number of different therapeutic groups all increased medicine burden. Although cardiovascular medicines were the most common medicines used by the majority of patients (60%), those for neurological, psychiatric and gastro-intestinal conditions were most strongly associated with high burden. Studies are required to determine medicine burden in different conditions, especially neurological conditions, including chronic pain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of Medicines)
13 pages, 238 KiB  
Article
Polypharmacy and Psychological Distress May Be Associated in African American Adults
by Shervin Assari and Mohsen Bazargan
Pharmacy 2019, 7(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy7010014 - 24 Jan 2019
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4269
Abstract
Background: Compared to Whites, African Americans are at a higher risk of multiple chronic conditions, which places them at a higher risk of polypharmacy. Few national studies, however, have tested whether polypharmacy is associated with psychological distress—the net of socioeconomic status, health status, [...] Read more.
Background: Compared to Whites, African Americans are at a higher risk of multiple chronic conditions, which places them at a higher risk of polypharmacy. Few national studies, however, have tested whether polypharmacy is associated with psychological distress—the net of socioeconomic status, health status, and stress—in African Americans. Aims: In a national sample of African Americans in the US, this study investigated the association between polypharmacy and psychological distress. Methods: The National Survey of American Life (NSAL, 2003) included 3570 African American adults who were 18 years or over. This number was composed of 2299 women and 1271 men. Polypharmacy (using ≥ 5 medications) and hyper-polypharmacy (using ≥ 10 medications) were the independent variables. Psychological distress was the dependent variable. Age, gender, socioeconomic status (education attainment, income, employment, and marital status), health care access (insurance status and usual place of care), and health status (multimorbidity and psychiatric disorders) were the covariates. Linear multivariable regression was applied to perform the data analysis. Results: Both polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy were associated with psychological distress. This association was significant after controlling for all the covariates. Conclusions: African Americans with polypharmacy, particularly those with hyper-polypharmacy, are experiencing higher levels of psychological distress, which itself is a known risk factor for poor adherence to medications. There is a need for a comprehensive evaluation of medications as well as screening for psychopathology in African Americans with multiple medical conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of Medicines)
10 pages, 238 KiB  
Article
Medication-Related Burden among Patients with Chronic Disease Conditions: Perspectives of Patients Attending Non-Communicable Disease Clinics in a Primary Healthcare Setting in Qatar
by Amani Zidan, Ahmed Awaisu, Maguy Saffouh El-Hajj, Samya Ahmad Al-Abdulla, Dianne Candy Rose Figueroa and Nadir Kheir
Pharmacy 2018, 6(3), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6030085 - 13 Aug 2018
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 5583
Abstract
This study aimed to assess perceived medication-related burden among patients with multiple non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and to investigate the association between perceived burden and adherence to medication therapy. Using a cross-sectional study in three primary care clinics in Qatar, medication-related burden was measured [...] Read more.
This study aimed to assess perceived medication-related burden among patients with multiple non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and to investigate the association between perceived burden and adherence to medication therapy. Using a cross-sectional study in three primary care clinics in Qatar, medication-related burden was measured using the Living with Medicines Questionnaire (LMQ) among adults with diabetes, with or without other comorbidities. Adherence was measured using the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS). Two hundred and ninety-three eligible patients participated in the study. The majority of them reported experiencing minimal (66.8%) to moderate (24.1%) medication-related burden. There was a significant positive correlation between the scores of the LMQ (medication-related burden) and ARMS (medication adherence), rs (253) = 0.317, p < 0.0005. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of Medicines)

Review

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 365 KiB  
Review
Current and Potential Roles in Sports Pharmacy: A Systematic Review
by Alison D. Hooper, Joyce M. Cooper, Jennifer Schneider and Therése Kairuz
Pharmacy 2019, 7(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy7010029 - 14 Mar 2019
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 7324
Abstract
(1) Background: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate current and potential roles for pharmacists in sports medicine and to identify key themes in outcomes reported in studies. (2) Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate current and potential roles for pharmacists in sports medicine and to identify key themes in outcomes reported in studies. (2) Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched in January 2019. Peer-reviewed, original research articles were considered for inclusion. Articles published in a language other than English were excluded. Quality appraisal was performed independently by two authors. (3) Results: Findings of 11 eligible articles (10 observational and 1 experimental study design) were grouped into three themes: (i) doping prevention and control, (ii) injury management and first aid, and (iii) educational and curricular needs. Pharmacists were perceived as a good potential source of information about doping and are enthusiastic about counseling athletes, but lack knowledge and confidence in this area. While pharmacists were frequently consulted for advice on managing sprains and strains, their advice was not always guided by current evidence. Pharmacists and pharmacy students recalled limited opportunity for education in sports pharmacy. (4) Conclusion: Pharmacists showed a willingness and an aptitude to counsel athletes. However, lack of knowledge and confidence, and limited educational opportunities, were key barriers. More research is necessary to support pharmacists in this role. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Burden of Medicines)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-4
Back to TopTop