Skip to Content

Pharmacoepidemiology

Pharmacoepidemiology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on high-quality epidemiological, clinical research across the fields of clinical pharmacology and epidemiology, published quarterly online by MDPI.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (134)

  • Article
  • Open Access

Background/Objectives: Social media has become a major source of health information worldwide; however, how users appraise the credibility of online health information and verify its reliability may be associated with medication-related decision-making. This study examined the associations of perceived credibility of health information encountered on social media and information-verification behavior with self-medication among adult social media users. As a secondary exploratory objective, we examined self-reported negative perceived effects following health-related decisions influenced by social media information. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between August 2025 and February 2026 among 1935 adult social media users. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, perceived credibility, information-verification behavior, health-related decisions influenced by social media, and reported perceived effects. Descriptive and bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were performed, with penalized logistic regression used as a sensitivity analysis. Results: Healthcare professionals (59.9%) and the citation of reliable sources (44.1%) were the characteristics most frequently associated with perceived credibility. Although participants generally reported moderate perceived credibility of health information encountered on social media, 54.9% reported inconsistent information-verification practices. High perceived credibility was associated with higher odds of inconsistent information-verification behavior compared with low or moderate perceived credibility (OR = 2.77; 95% CI: 2.26–3.38; p < 0.001). Self-medication influenced by social media information was reported by 32.2% of participants. After multivariable adjustment, inconsistent information-verification behavior showed the strongest association with self-medication (aOR = 14.80; 95% CI: 10.07–21.73; p < 0.001). Participants reporting low or moderate perceived credibility had lower odds of self-medication than those reporting high perceived credibility (aOR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.26–0.49; p < 0.001). Secondary exploratory analyses restricted to participants reporting a social media-influenced health decision (n = 1556) also identified associations between reported negative perceived effects, self-medication, and information-verification behavior. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the retrospective self-report and sequential structure of the questionnaire items. Conclusions: Overall, perceived credibility and information-verification behavior emerged as related, but distinct dimensions of digital health-information appraisal associated with medication-related decision-making. These findings highlight the importance of digital health literacy strategies that promote critical appraisal and systematic verification of online health information before it is incorporated into medication-related decisions.

Pharmacoepidemiology

20 September 2026

Conceptual framework of the associations among perceived credibility, information-verification behavior, self-medication, and reported negative perceived effects following health-related decisions influenced by social media information.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Background: Bacterial skin infections frequently require systemic antibiotic therapy, and adherence to clinical guidelines is important for optimizing treatment outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship. This study evaluated systemic pharmacotherapy for bacterial skin infections, guideline adherence, and factors associated with treatment outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 300 patients treated in a regional hospital in Kosovo between January 2025 and August 2026. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and pharmacotherapeutic data were obtained from medical records. Guideline adherence and clinical outcomes were evaluated, and Firth penalized multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with guideline non-adherence and unfavorable clinical outcomes. Results: Guideline-adherent pharmacotherapy was documented in 269 patients (89.7%), while 266 (88.7%) achieved a favorable clinical outcome. Guideline non-adherence was independently associated with younger age (AOR 0.89 per year; 95% CI 0.83–0.95; p < 0.001), female sex (AOR 2.44; 95% CI 1.05–5.98; p = 0.038), higher CRP (AOR 1.23 per 10 mg/L increase; 95% CI 1.11–1.38; p < 0.001), and antibiotic modification (AOR 3.29; 95% CI 1.37–7.89; p = 0.008). Unfavorable clinical outcomes were independently associated with male sex (AOR 4.37; 95% CI 1.84–11.40; p < 0.001), higher CRP (AOR 1.22 per 10 mg/L increase; 95% CI 1.09–1.37; p < 0.001), intravenous administration (AOR 3.06; 95% CI 1.29–7.63; p = 0.011), and guideline non-adherence (AOR 3.12; 95% CI 1.16–8.23; p = 0.025). Conclusions: Guideline adherence and favorable clinical outcomes were high. Nevertheless, non-adherence remained independently associated with unfavorable outcomes, while higher CRP was associated with both study outcomes. These findings support continued optimization of systemic antibiotic pharmacotherapy and antimicrobial stewardship in dermatological practice.

Pharmacoepidemiology

22 September 2026

  • Article
  • Open Access

The Burden of Disease of Medication Errors: Analysis in ADR Caused Emergency Visits

  • Justyna Wozniak,
  • Katja S. Just and
  • Julia C. Stingl
  • + 8 authors

Background: Medication errors (MEs) are an important cause of preventable harm but remain insufficiently quantified in emergency care. This study assessed the frequency, characteristics, and clinical impact of MEs among adverse drug reaction (ADR)–related emergency department (ED) admissions in Germany. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study across six EDs between 2015 and 2021 (n = 7967). ADRs and MEs were classified using standard causality (World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC)) and preventability criteria (Schumock). Patient, medicine, symptom, and outcome characteristics were compared between ADRs caused by MEs and ADRs without documented MEs. Regression models assessed factors associated with ME involvement among ADR cases and length of hospital stay. Results: 20.1% of ADR-related cases involved an ME. Clinical presentation, symptom burden, triage severity, and discharge outcomes were similar between groups. MEs clustered around commonly used chronic medications, including pantoprazole, torasemide, metoprolol, ramipril, phenprocoumon, and ibuprofen. Schumock analysis showed preventability as primarily linked to dosing errors (30%), non-adherence (28%), contraindications (26%), and monitoring (20%). Medicine-specific symptom clusters mirrored expected pharmacological effects but were not specific to ME involvement. Multimorbidity was associated with slightly lower odds of ME attribution, although the estimate was borderline (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71–1.00); no robust associations were identified for the other patient-level characteristics examined. Adjusted length of hospital stay was slightly longer in cases involving MEs (+4.8%; p = 0.025), corresponding to an adjusted difference of 0.33 days. Conclusions: MEs were identified in a substantial proportion of ADR-related ED admissions. Most MEs arose from routine prescribing and monitoring processes involving commonly used medicines, suggesting that preventive efforts should focus on upstream safeguards, including medication reviews, electronic prescribing support, pharmacist involvement, and adherence support, rather than detection at emergency presentation.

Pharmacoepidemiology

19 September 2026

  • Article
  • Open Access

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the rate of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and provide cardioprotective benefits beyond glycemic control. However, evidence regarding their effects on kidney disease progression in advanced CKD patients remains limited. Objectives: To determine the proportion of patients who developed adverse renal outcomes (AROs) and identify factors associated with AROs among patients with advanced CKD following SGLT2 inhibitor initiation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary-care hospital in Thailand. Patients with advanced CKD who initiated SGLT2 inhibitor therapy between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2025 were included. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Factors associated with AROs were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: A total of 132 patients were included for analysis. All patients received empagliflozin. Most patients were aged ≥60 years (77.27%), and 53.79% were female. During the follow-up period, 24.2% of patients experienced AROs. Multivariable analysis identified CKD stage 5 (aHR = 4.02, 95% CI: 1.92–8.44, p < 0.001) and concomitant use of low-dose aspirin (aHR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.05–5.26, p = 0.038) as factors independently associated with an increased risk of AROs. Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of patients with advanced CKD experienced an ARO, following empagliflozin initiation. CKD stage 5 and concomitant low-dose aspirin use were independently associated with AROs. Patients with these characteristics may warrant closer monitoring of renal function, particularly in those with more advanced disease during empagliflozin therapy.

Pharmacoepidemiology

17 September 2026

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

XFacebookLinkedIn
Pharmacoepidemiology - ISSN 2813-0618