Exclusive Papers Collection of Editorial Board Members and Invited Scholars in Osteology

A special issue of Osteology (ISSN 2673-4036).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 9593

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Rome, Italy
Interests: artroscopy; shoulder; knee; ankle; joint
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As the Editor-in-Chief of Osteology, I am honored to introduce the Special Issue titled “Exclusive Papers Collection of Editorial Board Members and Invited Scholars in Osteology”. This Special Issue aims to highlight pioneering research and advancements in osteology, featuring contributions from our editorial board members and distinguished invited scholars.

This collection encompasses cutting-edge studies, rigorous methodologies, and significant findings across various subfields of osteology. The Special Issue includes diverse topics such as bone biology, biomechanics, orthopedic surgery, regenerative medicine, and osteoimmunology. Each paper is published as an open access article, ensuring wide accessibility and dissemination of knowledge.

This Special Issue fosters academic collaboration and serves as a resource for researchers, clinicians, and practitioners.

Prof. Dr. Umile Giuseppe Longo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Osteology is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • osteology
  • bone biology
  • biomechanics
  • orthopedic surgery
  • regenerative medicine
  • osteoimmunology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

9 pages, 591 KiB  
Article
Physiotherapy Intervention on Functional Health in Aging on Functional Capacity, Risk of Falls, Cognitive Function, and Back Pain
by Gustavo Desouzart
Osteology 2025, 5(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology5010010 - 10 Mar 2025
Viewed by 818
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Aging is associated with a progressive decline in biological function due to a complex interplay of physical, psychological, and social factors. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effects of a functional health education program on functional capacity in older [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Aging is associated with a progressive decline in biological function due to a complex interplay of physical, psychological, and social factors. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effects of a functional health education program on functional capacity in older adults. Methods: Twenty participants (mean age: 80.70 ± 5.992 years) were randomized to either an experimental group that received a 12-week exercise program or a control group. The exercise program included aerobic, flexibility, strength, and cognitive components. Outcomes were assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Results: In the population studied, 80% of the older adults indicated some type of back pain. The experimental group results showed a significant reduction in back pain (p = 0.032) and risk of falling (p = 0.013). Additionally, the experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in functional capacity (p = 0.016) and cognitive capacity (p = 0.023). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a specific activity significantly improved participants’ perceived risk of falls, functionality, cognitive function, and reduced back pain complaints in the experimental group. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 252 KiB  
Article
Racial Disparities in Total Ankle Arthroplasty Utilization: A National Database Analysis
by Jason Long, Isabel Shaffrey, Richard Danilkowicz, Jaewhan Kim, Nathan Grimm, Albert Anastasio and Samuel Adams
Osteology 2025, 5(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology5010001 - 27 Dec 2024
Viewed by 873
Abstract
Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is successful at reducing pain and improving patient satisfaction. A paucity of literature exists regarding racial disparities in TAA. The aim of this study was to update the literature, analyze utilization rates, and detect differences in postoperative outcomes [...] Read more.
Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is successful at reducing pain and improving patient satisfaction. A paucity of literature exists regarding racial disparities in TAA. The aim of this study was to update the literature, analyze utilization rates, and detect differences in postoperative outcomes between the racial/ethnic groups. Methods: A retrospective study was performed utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database between the years 2012 and 2018. The postoperative complications were identified as outcomes. Patients were categorized based on race/ethnicity for comparison. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 1164 patients met criteria, 1051 (90.3%) were White, 113 (9.7%) were Non-White, a nearly 10-fold difference in utilization rate. The mean age of White patients undergoing TAA was older than Non-White patients, 63.7 and 55.3 years respectively (p-value < 0.01). Incidence of postoperative complications showed no significant differences based on racial group. Conclusions: Our results found a nearly 10-fold difference in White patients undergoing TAA compared to other racial/ethnic groups. This highlights the continued racial disparities present in TAA. Further efforts are needed to improve the proportion of minority populations who undergo TAA to bridge the current racial disparities present in the field of TAA. Full article
8 pages, 2685 KiB  
Article
Early Weight-Bearing Using Narrow Symmetrical Distal Fibular Plate: Preliminary Results
by Domenico Tigani, Corrado Maria Leonida, Giuseppe Mobilia, Cesare Donadono, Alessandro Ortolani, Giuseppe Melucci and Stefano Stallone
Osteology 2024, 4(3), 151-158; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology4030012 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1328
Abstract
Background: Ankle fractures, comprising about 10% of musculoskeletal injuries, pose a significant healthcare burden with an increasing incidence, particularly among an aging population. This study focuses on isolated Danis-Weber type B fractures. Recent trends lean towards surgical intervention for anatomical restoration and quicker [...] Read more.
Background: Ankle fractures, comprising about 10% of musculoskeletal injuries, pose a significant healthcare burden with an increasing incidence, particularly among an aging population. This study focuses on isolated Danis-Weber type B fractures. Recent trends lean towards surgical intervention for anatomical restoration and quicker recovery, albeit with associated complications. This report aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the NewClip narrow locking plate system with early weight-bearing in treating isolated fibular fractures. Methods: The study includes patients with Danis-Weber type B fractures surgically treated with the NewClip narrow locking plate system. Exclusions involved nondisplaced fractures, open fractures, or those requiring additional fixation. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. Minor complications, including wound swelling, were observed in two cases. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain exhibited a steady decline postoperatively, with almost complete resolution by the third month. At three months, the FAOS demonstrated excellent results, and a final follow-up at twelve months revealed complete osseous healing without complications. Conclusions: The use of this type of plate in treating isolated fibular fractures with early weight-bearing shows promising results in terms of fracture healing, pain resolution, and functional outcomes, warranting further investigation with larger cohorts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

20 pages, 3883 KiB  
Review
A Macroscopic Exploration of the Ideoscape on Exosomes for Bone Regeneration
by Maria Teresa Colangelo, Marco Meleti, Stefano Guizzardi and Carlo Galli
Osteology 2024, 4(4), 159-178; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology4040013 - 8 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1858
Abstract
Background: Exosomes, nanoscale extracellular vesicles, play a crucial role in tissue physiology and regeneration. This study uses infometric techniques to explore the structure of exosome-based tissue and bone regeneration research. Methods: We applied BERTopic, an advanced topic modeling algorithm, to a comprehensive corpus [...] Read more.
Background: Exosomes, nanoscale extracellular vesicles, play a crucial role in tissue physiology and regeneration. This study uses infometric techniques to explore the structure of exosome-based tissue and bone regeneration research. Methods: We applied BERTopic, an advanced topic modeling algorithm, to a comprehensive corpus of the scientific literature on exosomes and tissue regeneration, identifying key themes such as stem cell studies, tissue healing, and regenerative applications, with orthopedics and dentistry emerging as dominant subfields. To further investigate the ‘ideoscape’, i.e., the conceptual landscape that maps how ideas, methods, and themes are interconnected across the field, we extracted significant concepts from abstracts using GPT 3.5 turbo and created knowledge graphs. Results: Our analysis revealed rapid growth in the field of dental stem cell regeneration, which has outpaced other bone regeneration topics by twofold. This analysis highlighted central themes such as periodontal stem cells and their cellular processes—proliferation, migration, and differentiation—along with their clinical applications. Our approach provided a clear visualization of the field’s intellectual structure, showing how emerging topics are interconnected. Our findings offer a comprehensive view of the evolving trends in exosome-based bone regeneration, revealing not only the most active research areas but also gaps and opportunities for further investigation. Conclusions: This study exemplifies the utility of combining topic modeling with knowledge graph creation to map research trends, offering a flexible and largely automated tool for researchers to explore the vast bodies of literature and guide future research directions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

16 pages, 1360 KiB  
Systematic Review
Correlation Between the Severity of Flatfoot and Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review
by Gabriele Giuca, Daniela Alessia Marletta, Biagio Zampogna, Ilaria Sanzarello, Matteo Nanni and Danilo Leonetti
Osteology 2025, 5(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology5020011 - 3 Apr 2025
Viewed by 508
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Flatfoot is a common pediatric foot deformity characterized by a reduced or absent medial longitudinal arch (MLA). The condition can lead to altered gait, pain, and potential long-term morbidity if untreated. Identifying potential risk factors—such as body mass index (BMI), ligamentous [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Flatfoot is a common pediatric foot deformity characterized by a reduced or absent medial longitudinal arch (MLA). The condition can lead to altered gait, pain, and potential long-term morbidity if untreated. Identifying potential risk factors—such as body mass index (BMI), ligamentous or joint instability, shoe choices, and physical activity—is crucial for prevention and management. The objectives are to systematically review and synthesize current evidence on how flatfoot severity correlates with BMI and other risk factors in children and adolescents, and to highlight methodological considerations essential for future research. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched five electronic databases from inception to February 2024. Flatfoot severity was measured by various clinical or radiographic indices. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed the risk of bias. Results: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Children with high BMI had increased odds of flatfoot (pooled Odds Ratio = 2.3, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.6–3.1), with one outlier reporting an OR of 9.08. Heterogeneity (I2 up to 70%) stemmed from varied diagnostic methods. Other factors, including joint instability, shoe choices, and physical activity, showed mixed associations. Conclusions: Elevated BMI strongly correlates with pediatric flatfoot severity, highlighting the importance of proactive weight management and foot assessments. Future standardized, longitudinal studies are needed to clarify causality and refine interventions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5232 KiB  
Systematic Review
Comparative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Abdul-Hadi Kafagi, Abdul-Rhaman Kafagi, Marwan Tahoun, Omar Tariq Al Zareeni, Khaled El Aloul, Mohammad Usman Ahmad and Anand Pillai
Osteology 2025, 5(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology5010003 - 9 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1893
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of open surgery (OS) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques in the correction of symptomatic hallux valgus (HV). Methods: A systematic review of studies up to January 2024 was conducted, identifying all the relevant literature comparing [...] Read more.
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of open surgery (OS) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques in the correction of symptomatic hallux valgus (HV). Methods: A systematic review of studies up to January 2024 was conducted, identifying all the relevant literature comparing OS and MIS for symptomatic HV. Searches were performed across major databases including MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE. A total of 32 studies were included, comprising randomised control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies as well as grey literature. Key outcomes assessed included radiographic measures such as the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), with preoperative and postoperative angles analysed to calculate the power of correction. Secondary outcomes included American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, operative time, hospital stay duration, radiation exposure and complication rates. Both fixed-effect and random-effects models were applied based on the observed heterogeneity in the data. Results: Thirty-two studies with 2423 patients contributed to the summative outcome. Postoperative HVA and IMA were comparable between OS and MIS groups. However, MIS showed a significantly lower DMAA angle (MD = −0.90, CI: −1.55 to −0.25, p = 0.01). In radiographic correction analysis, MIS demonstrated significantly greater DMAA correction (MD = 1.09, CI: 0.43 to 1.75, p = 0.001). The odds of hardware removal were significantly higher with MIS (OR = 2.37, CI: 1.41 to 4.00, p = 0.001). Functional analysis showed that MIS achieved significantly higher postoperative AOFAS scores (MD = 2.52, CI: 0.92 to 4.13, p = 0.002). MIS was associated with a shorter operative (MD = −12.07 min, CI: −17.02 to −7.11, p < 0.00001) and a significantly shorter hospital stay (MD = −0.76, CI: −1.30 to −0.21, p = 0.007). MIS was linked to higher radiation exposure (MD = 51.18, CI: 28.71 to 73.65, p < 0.00001). Conclusions: There is no definitive superiority between MIS and OS for hallux valgus correction. While MIS offers benefits such as improved DMAA correction, higher functional AOFAS scores, shorter operative times and reduced hospital stays, it also carries risks like increased radiation exposure and a higher rate of hardware removal. The decision between MIS and OS should be personalised, taking into account the specific needs and circumstances of each patient. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings as newer MIS techniques continue to emerge and evolve. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4694 KiB  
Technical Note
Arthroscopic Bone Block and Arthroscopic Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation—Technical Note with Tricks and Tips for Conversion and Successful Surgery
by Umile Giuseppe Longo, Gianmarco Marcello, Ara Nazarian, Joseph DeAngelis, Margaux D’Hooghe and Pieter D’Hooghe
Osteology 2024, 4(4), 179-201; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology4040014 - 8 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1571
Abstract
Background: The treatment of patients affected by recurrent anterior shoulder instability has received more attention in the last ten years, focusing on the management of bone loss, which is crucial in predicting postoperative recurrence risk. Recently, various bone grafting techniques and different fixation [...] Read more.
Background: The treatment of patients affected by recurrent anterior shoulder instability has received more attention in the last ten years, focusing on the management of bone loss, which is crucial in predicting postoperative recurrence risk. Recently, various bone grafting techniques and different fixation methods have been developed to preserve native anatomy and reduce complications. Nowadays, glenoid bone reconstruction is usually carried out via the Latarjet procedure or free bone block technique. While the Latarjet procedure has traditionally been considered the best option, the bone block has been demonstrated to be a successful procedure. Even though the indication to perform a free bone block or a Latarjet procedure may be given preoperatively, in cases where the choice between the two procedures is unclear, the decision can be made intraoperatively, given the possibility to switch from one to another. This technical note aims to outline our techniques for the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and the arthroscopic free bone block, as well as discuss the indications, benefits and downsides of each procedure. Technical tips and tricks are provided. Methods: A step-by-step thorough description of bone block and Latarjet procedures is provided, as well as a comparison of advantages and disadvantages of each technique and tips to avoid complications. Respective indications are discussed. Results: Both the procedures have benefits and downsides. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is the most effective in addressing anterior shoulder instability, but is more elaborate, has a shallow learning curve and can have a high complication rate. The bone block technique is an anatomic procedure with a shorter learning curve but has fewer indications. Conclusion: The Latarjet is currently considered the gold standard for glenoid bone grafting. The bone block technique can allegedly be seen as being “in the middle” of the soft tissue repair and Latarjet procedures. Many factors should be considered when choosing the right surgical technique, and treatment plans must be customized for each patient. More studies with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic bone grafting procedures in various subtypes of patients based on bipolar bone loss assessment and individual risk factors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop