Exclusive Papers Collection of Editorial Board Members and Invited Scholars in Osteology

A special issue of Osteology (ISSN 2673-4036).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 2708

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Rome, Italy
Interests: artroscopy; shoulder; knee; ankle; joint
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As the Editor-in-Chief of Osteology, I am honored to introduce the Special Issue titled “Exclusive Papers Collection of Editorial Board Members and Invited Scholars in Osteology”. This Special Issue aims to highlight pioneering research and advancements in osteology, featuring contributions from our editorial board members and distinguished invited scholars.

This collection encompasses cutting-edge studies, rigorous methodologies, and significant findings across various subfields of osteology. The Special Issue includes diverse topics such as bone biology, biomechanics, orthopedic surgery, regenerative medicine, and osteoimmunology. Each paper is published as an open access article, ensuring wide accessibility and dissemination of knowledge.

This Special Issue fosters academic collaboration and serves as a resource for researchers, clinicians, and practitioners.

Prof. Dr. Umile Giuseppe Longo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Osteology is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • osteology
  • bone biology
  • biomechanics
  • orthopedic surgery
  • regenerative medicine
  • osteoimmunology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

8 pages, 2685 KiB  
Article
Early Weight-Bearing Using Narrow Symmetrical Distal Fibular Plate: Preliminary Results
by Domenico Tigani, Corrado Maria Leonida, Giuseppe Mobilia, Cesare Donadono, Alessandro Ortolani, Giuseppe Melucci and Stefano Stallone
Osteology 2024, 4(3), 151-158; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology4030012 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 760
Abstract
Background: Ankle fractures, comprising about 10% of musculoskeletal injuries, pose a significant healthcare burden with an increasing incidence, particularly among an aging population. This study focuses on isolated Danis-Weber type B fractures. Recent trends lean towards surgical intervention for anatomical restoration and quicker [...] Read more.
Background: Ankle fractures, comprising about 10% of musculoskeletal injuries, pose a significant healthcare burden with an increasing incidence, particularly among an aging population. This study focuses on isolated Danis-Weber type B fractures. Recent trends lean towards surgical intervention for anatomical restoration and quicker recovery, albeit with associated complications. This report aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the NewClip narrow locking plate system with early weight-bearing in treating isolated fibular fractures. Methods: The study includes patients with Danis-Weber type B fractures surgically treated with the NewClip narrow locking plate system. Exclusions involved nondisplaced fractures, open fractures, or those requiring additional fixation. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. Minor complications, including wound swelling, were observed in two cases. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain exhibited a steady decline postoperatively, with almost complete resolution by the third month. At three months, the FAOS demonstrated excellent results, and a final follow-up at twelve months revealed complete osseous healing without complications. Conclusions: The use of this type of plate in treating isolated fibular fractures with early weight-bearing shows promising results in terms of fracture healing, pain resolution, and functional outcomes, warranting further investigation with larger cohorts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

20 pages, 3883 KiB  
Review
A Macroscopic Exploration of the Ideoscape on Exosomes for Bone Regeneration
by Maria Teresa Colangelo, Marco Meleti, Stefano Guizzardi and Carlo Galli
Osteology 2024, 4(4), 159-178; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology4040013 - 8 Oct 2024
Viewed by 999
Abstract
Background: Exosomes, nanoscale extracellular vesicles, play a crucial role in tissue physiology and regeneration. This study uses infometric techniques to explore the structure of exosome-based tissue and bone regeneration research. Methods: We applied BERTopic, an advanced topic modeling algorithm, to a comprehensive corpus [...] Read more.
Background: Exosomes, nanoscale extracellular vesicles, play a crucial role in tissue physiology and regeneration. This study uses infometric techniques to explore the structure of exosome-based tissue and bone regeneration research. Methods: We applied BERTopic, an advanced topic modeling algorithm, to a comprehensive corpus of the scientific literature on exosomes and tissue regeneration, identifying key themes such as stem cell studies, tissue healing, and regenerative applications, with orthopedics and dentistry emerging as dominant subfields. To further investigate the ‘ideoscape’, i.e., the conceptual landscape that maps how ideas, methods, and themes are interconnected across the field, we extracted significant concepts from abstracts using GPT 3.5 turbo and created knowledge graphs. Results: Our analysis revealed rapid growth in the field of dental stem cell regeneration, which has outpaced other bone regeneration topics by twofold. This analysis highlighted central themes such as periodontal stem cells and their cellular processes—proliferation, migration, and differentiation—along with their clinical applications. Our approach provided a clear visualization of the field’s intellectual structure, showing how emerging topics are interconnected. Our findings offer a comprehensive view of the evolving trends in exosome-based bone regeneration, revealing not only the most active research areas but also gaps and opportunities for further investigation. Conclusions: This study exemplifies the utility of combining topic modeling with knowledge graph creation to map research trends, offering a flexible and largely automated tool for researchers to explore the vast bodies of literature and guide future research directions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

23 pages, 4694 KiB  
Technical Note
Arthroscopic Bone Block and Arthroscopic Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation—Technical Note with Tricks and Tips for Conversion and Successful Surgery
by Umile Giuseppe Longo, Gianmarco Marcello, Ara Nazarian, Joseph DeAngelis, Margaux D’Hooghe and Pieter D’Hooghe
Osteology 2024, 4(4), 179-201; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology4040014 - 8 Nov 2024
Viewed by 601
Abstract
Background: The treatment of patients affected by recurrent anterior shoulder instability has received more attention in the last ten years, focusing on the management of bone loss, which is crucial in predicting postoperative recurrence risk. Recently, various bone grafting techniques and different fixation [...] Read more.
Background: The treatment of patients affected by recurrent anterior shoulder instability has received more attention in the last ten years, focusing on the management of bone loss, which is crucial in predicting postoperative recurrence risk. Recently, various bone grafting techniques and different fixation methods have been developed to preserve native anatomy and reduce complications. Nowadays, glenoid bone reconstruction is usually carried out via the Latarjet procedure or free bone block technique. While the Latarjet procedure has traditionally been considered the best option, the bone block has been demonstrated to be a successful procedure. Even though the indication to perform a free bone block or a Latarjet procedure may be given preoperatively, in cases where the choice between the two procedures is unclear, the decision can be made intraoperatively, given the possibility to switch from one to another. This technical note aims to outline our techniques for the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and the arthroscopic free bone block, as well as discuss the indications, benefits and downsides of each procedure. Technical tips and tricks are provided. Methods: A step-by-step thorough description of bone block and Latarjet procedures is provided, as well as a comparison of advantages and disadvantages of each technique and tips to avoid complications. Respective indications are discussed. Results: Both the procedures have benefits and downsides. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is the most effective in addressing anterior shoulder instability, but is more elaborate, has a shallow learning curve and can have a high complication rate. The bone block technique is an anatomic procedure with a shorter learning curve but has fewer indications. Conclusion: The Latarjet is currently considered the gold standard for glenoid bone grafting. The bone block technique can allegedly be seen as being “in the middle” of the soft tissue repair and Latarjet procedures. Many factors should be considered when choosing the right surgical technique, and treatment plans must be customized for each patient. More studies with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic bone grafting procedures in various subtypes of patients based on bipolar bone loss assessment and individual risk factors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop