nutrients-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Addressing Muscle Mass and Strength Loss: Nutritional Insights and Strategies

A special issue of Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Nutrition".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 5 April 2026 | Viewed by 8672

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Internal Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, Brazil
Interests: malnutrition; nutrition risk assessment; in-hospital patient care; sarcopenia; cachexia
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Hospitalization can reduce muscle mass and function, compromising functional capacity and recovery, especially in older people. Individuals who are bedridden due to situations such as stroke, hip fracture, cancer, trauma, critical illness, or any other injury that leads to hospital admission can develop an inflammatory process that can lead to reduced appetite, immobility in bed, insulin resistance, and other conditions that further leads to the poor nutritional status and muscle decline. In these cases, the loss of muscle mass is closely involved with reduced functional capacity, increased length of hospital stays, and mortality. In addition, outpatients who suffer from chronic disease, such as osteoporosis, heart failure, cirrhosis, COPD, and rheumatoid arthritis, are also at risk for muscle mass and functional decline.

Studies involving supplementation with specific or combined nutrients and physical exercise are being conducted to find ways to mitigate this loss and avoid its complications. Furthermore, research into serum biomarkers of inflammation, muscle degradation, and synthesis is promising in understanding the mechanisms involved in this muscle loss so that more specific and efficient strategies can be applied to hospitalized or outpatient individuals, both for exacerbated chronic diseases and acute diseases and events. However, there are already gaps in how to effectively reduce the burden of nutritional conditions during in-hospital stays or throughout chronic disease. This Special Issue aims to publish research that provides insights and strategies for mitigating muscle mass and strength loss during hospitalization or during the treatment of chronic diseases. Your contributions to this Special Issue are greatly appreciated.

Prof. Dr. Paula Schmidt Azevedo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Nutrients is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • in-hospital patient care
  • diet
  • malnutrition
  • nutritional supplements
  • frailty
  • lifestyle interventions
  • physical activity
  • muscle loss
  • muscle mass

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

15 pages, 2886 KB  
Article
Influence of CReatine Supplementation on mUScle Mass and Strength After Stroke (ICaRUS Stroke Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Juli T. Souza, Marcos F. Minicucci, Natália C. Ferreira, Bertha F. Polegato, Marina P. Okoshi, Gabriel P. Modolo, Filipe W. Leal-Pereira, Bethan E. Phillips, Philip J. Atherton, Kenneth Smith, Daniel J. Wilkinson, Adam L. Gordon, Suzana E. Tanni, Vladimir E. Costa, Maria F. Fernandes, Silméia G. Bazan, Leonardo M. Zornoff, Sérgio R. Paiva, Rodrigo Bazan and Paula S. Azevedo
Nutrients 2024, 16(23), 4148; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16234148 - 29 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5598
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The acute phase of stroke is marked by inflammation and mobility changes that can compromise nutritional status. This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of creatine supplementation for older people during seven days of hospitalization for stroke compared [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The acute phase of stroke is marked by inflammation and mobility changes that can compromise nutritional status. This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of creatine supplementation for older people during seven days of hospitalization for stroke compared to usual care. Method: The primary outcome measures were changes in functional capacity, strength, muscle mass, and muscle degradation. The secondary outcomes were changes in serum biomarkers related to inflammation, fibrosis, anabolism, and muscle synthesis. In addition, a follow-up 90 days after the stroke verified functional capacity, strength, quality of life, and mortality. Following admission for an acute stroke, participants received either creatine (10 g) or a visually identical placebo (10 g) orally twice daily. Both groups received supplementation with protein to achieve the goal of 1.5 g of protein/kg of body weight/day and underwent daily mobility training during seven days of hospitalization. Results: Thirty older people were included in two similar groups concerning baseline attributes (15—treatment/15—placebo). Conclusions: Creatine supplementation did not influence functional capacity, strength, or muscle mass during the first 7 days or outcomes 90 days after stroke. There were no serious adverse events associated with creatine supplementation. However, it decreased progranulin levels, raising a new possibility of creatine action. This finding needs further exploration to understand the biological significance of creatine–progranulin interaction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

23 pages, 2886 KB  
Review
Assessment of Sarcopenia in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis—A Literature Review
by Dorotea Bozic, Bisera Mamic, Iva Peric, Ivona Bozic, Ivan Zaja, Tomislav Ivanovic, Ana Gugic Ratkovic and Ivica Grgurevic
Nutrients 2025, 17(16), 2589; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17162589 - 9 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1536
Abstract
Sarcopenia refers to a disorder involving the gradual and overall reduction in skeletal muscle mass and physical capability. It occurs in over one-third of individuals with liver cirrhosis and serves as an independent predictor of increased mortality risk. Assessment of sarcopenia is necessary [...] Read more.
Sarcopenia refers to a disorder involving the gradual and overall reduction in skeletal muscle mass and physical capability. It occurs in over one-third of individuals with liver cirrhosis and serves as an independent predictor of increased mortality risk. Assessment of sarcopenia is necessary in all patients with liver cirrhosis, as recommended by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). The evaluation of muscle mass can be performed using several validated methods such as the multislice computed tomography (MSCT), abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), or muscle ultrasound. Assessment of muscle function encompasses measurements of both muscle strength and physical performance. Sarcopenia has a significant negative impact on the course of the disease, quality of life and outcomes of patients with liver cirrhosis. Considering the global healthcare impact and the significant influence on the course of disease, characteristics of simplicity, swiftness, safety, availability, reproducibility, and diagnostic accuracy are certainly the key factors to consider when choosing the proper diagnostic method for nutritional assessment. The aim of this review is to analyze the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying muscle mass loss in patients with liver cirrhosis, as well as to assess strengths and limitations of the methods currently in use to diagnose sarcopenia. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

15 pages, 983 KB  
Systematic Review
The Effects of Protein Nutrition on Muscle Function in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Mohamed A. Mohamed, Brett Doleman, Bethan E. Phillips and John P Williams
Nutrients 2025, 17(16), 2613; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17162613 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1060
Abstract
Background: owing to altered protein metabolism during critical illness, skeletal muscles are utilised as a source of protein, with subsequent debilitating effects on both muscle structure and function. Protein nutrition has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in critically unwell patients; however, the [...] Read more.
Background: owing to altered protein metabolism during critical illness, skeletal muscles are utilised as a source of protein, with subsequent debilitating effects on both muscle structure and function. Protein nutrition has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in critically unwell patients; however, the impact on muscle function is less established. Therefore, the aim of this review was to systematically determine the effect of protein dose on skeletal muscle strength in critically ill patients. Methods: we searched five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, and PubMed) and clinical trial registers for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pregnant, adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), which assessed the impact of different doses of protein nutrition on muscle strength. Studies investigating only muscle structure or with co-interventions were excluded. Six RCTs were eligible for inclusion, and five were suitable for meta-analysis. Results: there was a significant difference in skeletal muscle strength with higher versus lower protein intakes, with a mean difference of 2.36 kg (95% CI: 0.37–4.35). The mean difference in protein dose was 0.46 g/kg/d (95% CI: 0.29–0.64). Inconsistency was evident across the included studies, with risk of bias ranging from moderate to high. Conclusion: muscle strength of ICU patients does appear to be affected by different protein doses. However, trials focusing on muscle function are limited by number and quality, highlighting a clear need for future work. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop