You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .

Nitrogen

Nitrogen is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on the whole field of nitrogen research published quarterly online by MDPI.

Quartile Ranking JCR - Q3 (Environmental Sciences)

All Articles (322)

This study evaluated the effects of applying fecal sludge-based co-compost (CC) integrated with chemical fertilizers on soil nutrient status, organic carbon (OC) storage, and economic returns in paddy soils. Ten integrated nutrient management (INM) treatments were tested, i.e., BRRI recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), CC 5.0 t ha−1, RDF + CC 2.0 t ha−1, RDF + CC 1.5 t ha−1, RDF + CC 1.0 t ha−1, RDF + CC 0.5 t ha−1, 75% RDF + CC 2.0 t ha−1, 75% RDF + CC 1.5 t ha−1, 75% RDF + CC 1.0 t ha−1, and 75% RDF + CC 0.5 t ha−1. Two rice varieties were cultivated over two consecutive seasons—winter rice (boro) and monsoon rice (aman)—in the experimental field. Soil samples (0–15 cm) were collected before and after the seasons and fractionated into labile particulate organic matter (>53 µm) and stable mineral-associated organic matter (<53 µm). Bulk soils and CC were analyzed for OC, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sulfur (S), and heavy metals, while the fractions were analyzed for OC and N. Across both seasons, 75% RDF combined with 2.0 t ha−1 or 1.5 t ha−1 of CC consistently showed the highest OC, total N, and soil C stock, with moderate P, K, and S levels. Sole RDF produced the lowest OC and N. Among fractions, stable OC was the highest in the 75% RDF + 2.0 t ha−1 CC treatment, statistically similar to 75% RDF + 1.5 t ha−1 CC, and the lowest under RDF alone. Economically, sole RDF yielded the highest profit, while full RDF + CC achieved competitive returns. Reduced RDF + CC treatments (75% RDF + 1.5 or 2.0 t ha−1 CC) offered slightly lower returns but improved soil sustainability indicators. Overall, applying 75% RDF + 1.5 t ha−1 CC provided the most cost-effective balance of nutrient enrichment, soil C stock, and profitability. This CC-based INM approach reduces chemical fertilizer dependency, enhances soil health, and promotes sustainable waste management, supporting environmentally resilient rice production.

7 January 2026

Location map of the study area.

Sustainable nitrogen (N) management is critical for enhancing wheat production in the water-limited environment of China’s Loess Plateau. This study investigated the effects of four N rates (0, 120, 180, and 240 kg N ha−1) and two sowing methods, furrow sowing (FS) and drill sowing (DS), on wheat yield, grain quality, and water-use efficiency (WUE). Results indicated that N application significantly improved all metrics. The optimal N rate for yield was 180 kg N ha−1 (N180), producing yields equivalent to the higher 240 kg N ha−1 rate (N240). Compared to the N0 control, the N240 treatment under FS in 2022–23 increased grain yield by 25.4% and WUE by 11.9%, while under DS it increased yield by 23.6% and WUE by 11.1%. However, in the following year (2023–24), the greatest benefits under FS came from N180, which increased yield by 19.3% and WUE by 11.5% over the control. Higher N rates markedly elevated grain quality: N240 resulted in the highest steamed bread score and concentration of volatile compounds. Nitrogen application also intensified soil water use, particularly before anthesis. In 2022–23, the highest N240 reduced soil water at maturity by 16.6% (FS) and 15.9% (DS) and increased total water consumption by up to 7.8% compared to N0. Yield was strongly correlated with soil water depletion in the 0–200 cm layer during the reproductive period. While N240 optimized quality, the N180 rate combined with improved sowing methods (FS or DS) provided the best balance, drill sowing was crucial agronomic practice for enhancing nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE), achieving high yield, superior WUE, and acceptable quality. We therefore recommend an N rate of 180 kg ha−1 with improved sowing as a sustainable practice for dryland wheat production on the Loess Plateau.

6 January 2026

The experiment site Wenxi, Shanxi Province from 2022 to 2024. Note: FP, fallow period; SS–JS: sowing stage to jointing stage; JS–AS: jointing stage to anthesis stage; AS–MS: anthesis stage to maturity.

Influence of Nitrogen Sources on Physiological Processes and Morphological Development of Yellow Passion Fruit Seedlings

  • Gilmara da Silva Rangel,
  • Thais de Souza Pastor and
  • Vinicius Rodrigues Ferreira
  • + 5 authors

Nitrogen is the nutrient most required by plants and plays a central role in agricultural productivity due to its involvement in essential nutrients. This study evaluated the effects of different nitrogen sources on the physiological and morphological development of yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) seedlings. The experiment followed a randomized block design with six treatments (water, urea, ammonium sulfate, potassium nitrate, calcium nitrate, and magnesium nitrate), six replicates per treatment, and two plants per plot. An equal amount of nitrogen was supplied to all treatments, while the urea treatment excluded the additional macronutrients present in the other fertilizers (S, K, Ca, and Mg), allowing us to assess whether the benefits were exclusively attributable to the nitrogen source. The results indicated that ammonium sulfate and calcium nitrate promoted better root system development, while ammonium sulfate also improved shoot growth and physiological characteristics. Multivariate analysis revealed that CP1 explained most of the variability between treatments, highlighting the contribution of these sources compared to the control. Overall, fertilization with ammonium sulfate produced the best results, indicating that it is a more efficient nitrogen source for seedling development.

5 January 2026

Score plot of the principal component analysis (PC1 vs. PC2 vs. PC3) for the different treatments: water (T1—blue triangles), ammonium sulfate (T3—red squares), and magnesium nitrate (T6—green circles). Urea, potassium nitrate and calcium nitrate (T2, T4, and T5, respectively) were marked with asterisks.

Water deficit is a major constraint limiting the growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). A pot experiment was conducted under controlled conditions to evaluate the effect of inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae BIHB 1148 (strain F14) and Pseudomonas alkylphenolica PF9 (strain L13) on faba bean drought resilience. Two irrigation regimes were applied: well-watered (80% of field capacity) versus water-stressed (40% of field capacity). Strain F14 was used to ensure effective biological nitrogen fixation, while strain L13 was applied in co-inoculation to evaluate its biostimulatory effects. The control plants received nitrogen in its chemical form. Results indicated that water deficit significantly (p < 0.001) reduced plant growth, nodulation, and photosynthesis-related parameters, and increased hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, which are key markers of oxidative stress. However, co-inoculation with strains F14 and L13 significantly enhanced shoot and root biomass, as well as most agro-morphological traits. It also stimulated (p < 0.05) the antioxidant activities of superoxide dismutase (3-fold), guaiacol peroxidase (12%), and catalase (104%), and increased proline content (119%), which led to lower levels of MDA (54% decrease) and H2O2 (55% decrease), improved membrane stability, water status, and enhanced photosynthesis. Overall, co-inoculation of faba bean with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae BIHB 1148 and Pseudomonas alkylphenolica PF9 offers a promising and sustainable approach to improve plant resilience under water deficit.

1 January 2026

Morphological responses of faba bean plants (Vicia faba L.) inoculated with rhizobia (F14) alone or with Rhizobium (F14) + PGPR (L13) co-inoculation: (a) Water-stress conditions. (b) Well-watered conditions (control). (c) Comparison between the two irrigation conditions, illustrating the mitigating effect of microbial treatments on water-stress symptoms.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Nitrogen - ISSN 2504-3129