3D-Bioprinted Organs-on-Chips for Clinical Application

A special issue of Micromachines (ISSN 2072-666X). This special issue belongs to the section "B:Biology and Biomedicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2020) | Viewed by 25797

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
3D Stem Cell Bioengineering Lab, Incheon National University, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea
Interests: stem cell bioprocess; 3D bioprinted organs-on-chips; extracellular vesicle therapy; tissue engineering and bioreactor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

3D-bioprinting technology has been rapidly advanced in the new era of the fourth industrial revolution. To date, many recent studies have demonstrated preliminary 3D-bioprinting technologies that achieved the layer-by-layer assembly of multiple types of cells and extracellular matrices with highly precise spatial distrubution. Applying computer-aided design technology enabled to manufacture even more complex organs or tissues simulating their own functions. Owing to the capacity to integrate a desired 3D cellular arrangement with tissue-specific functions in a micro-scale, 3D-bioprinting has been proposed as a promising strategy for the fabrication of versatile organs-on-chips. Organ-on-a-chip is a microengineered biomimetic system that presents pathophysiological microenvironments, which can greatly facilitate the development of unprecedented medical devices for drug-screening, precision and personalized medicine, as well as in vitro diagnosis. In this Special Issue, we invite the experts outstanding in the multidisciplinary fields of biomedical engineering to discuss various 3D-bioprinting technologies employed to fabricate organs-on-chips for diverse purposes in clinical application. Technological breakthroughs including the incorporation with mechanical and/or electrical stimulatory modules and cell-laden-microfluidic biosensors are also of interst, which can provide the future perspectives in the field of 3D-bioprinted organs-on-chips.

Prof. Dr. Jae Min Cha
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Micromachines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • 3D-bioprinting
  • Organ-on-a-chip
  • Clinical application
  • Mechanical stimulation
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Microfluidic biosensor
  • Drug screening
  • Precision and personalized medicine
  • In vitro diagnosis

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

21 pages, 10484 KiB  
Article
Bionic Organs: Shear Forces Reduce Pancreatic Islet and Mammalian Cell Viability during the Process of 3D Bioprinting
by Marta Klak, Patrycja Kowalska, Tomasz Dobrzański, Grzegorz Tymicki, Piotr Cywoniuk, Magdalena Gomółka, Katarzyna Kosowska, Tomasz Bryniarski, Andrzej Berman, Agnieszka Dobrzyń, Wojciech Sadowski, Bartosz Górecki and Michał Wszoła
Micromachines 2021, 12(3), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12030304 - 14 Mar 2021
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3410
Abstract
Background: 3D bioprinting is the future of constructing functional organs. Creating a bioactive scaffold with pancreatic islets presents many challenges. The aim of this paper is to assess how the 3D bioprinting process affects islet viability. Methods: The BioX 3D printer (Cellink), 600 [...] Read more.
Background: 3D bioprinting is the future of constructing functional organs. Creating a bioactive scaffold with pancreatic islets presents many challenges. The aim of this paper is to assess how the 3D bioprinting process affects islet viability. Methods: The BioX 3D printer (Cellink), 600 μm inner diameter nozzles, and 3% (w/v) alginate cell carrier solution were used with rat, porcine, and human pancreatic islets. Islets were divided into a control group (culture medium) and 6 experimental groups (each subjected to specific pressure between 15 and 100 kPa). FDA/PI staining was performed to assess the viability of islets. Analogous studies were carried out on α-cells, β-cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. Results: Viability of human pancreatic islets was as follows: 92% for alginate-based control and 94%, 90%, 74%, 48%, 61%, and 59% for 15, 25, 30, 50, 75, and 100 kPa, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between control and 50, 75, and 100 kPa, respectively. Similar observations were made for porcine and rat islets. Conclusions: Optimal pressure during 3D bioprinting with pancreatic islets by the extrusion method should be lower than 30 kPa while using 3% (w/v) alginate as a carrier. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D-Bioprinted Organs-on-Chips for Clinical Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3624 KiB  
Article
Modeling Pharmacokinetic Profiles for Assessment of Anti-Cancer Drug on a Microfluidic System
by Yaqiong Guo, Pengwei Deng, Wenwen Chen and Zhongyu Li
Micromachines 2020, 11(6), 551; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11060551 - 29 May 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2810
Abstract
The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of drug, which include drug absorption and excretion, play an important role in determining the in vivo pharmaceutical activity. However, current in vitro systems that model PK profiles are often limited by the in vivo-like concentration profile of a [...] Read more.
The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of drug, which include drug absorption and excretion, play an important role in determining the in vivo pharmaceutical activity. However, current in vitro systems that model PK profiles are often limited by the in vivo-like concentration profile of a drug. Herein, we present a perfused and multi-layered microfluidic chip system to model the PK profile of anti-cancer drug 5-FU in vitro. The chip device contains two layers of culture channels sandwiched by a porous membrane, which allows for drug exposure and diffusion between the two channels. The integration of upper intestine cells (Caco-2) and bottom targeted cells within the device enables the generation of loading and clearance portions of a PK curve under peristaltic flow. Fluorescein as a test molecule was initially used to generate a concentration-time curve, investigating the effects of parameters of flow rate, administration time, and initial concentration on dynamic drug concentration profiles. Furthermore, anti-cancer drug 5-FU was performed to assess its pharmaceutical activity on target cells (human lung adenocarcinoma cells or human pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells) using different drug administration regimens. A dynamic, in vivo-like 5-FU exposure refers to PK profile regimen, led to generate a lower drug concentration (dynamically fluctuate from 0 to 1 μg/mL affected by absorption) compared to the constant exposure. Moreover, the PK profile regimen alleviates the drug-induced cytotoxicity on target cells. These results demonstrate the feasibility of determining the PK profiles using this microfluidic system with in vivo-like drug administration regimens. This established system may provide a powerful platform for the prediction of drug safety and effectiveness in the pharmaceutical research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D-Bioprinted Organs-on-Chips for Clinical Application)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

23 pages, 5146 KiB  
Review
3D-Bioprinting Strategies Based on In Situ Bone-Healing Mechanism for Vascularized Bone Tissue Engineering
by Ye Lin Park, Kiwon Park and Jae Min Cha
Micromachines 2021, 12(3), 287; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12030287 - 08 Mar 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4412
Abstract
Over the past decades, a number of bone tissue engineering (BTE) approaches have been developed to address substantial challenges in the management of critical size bone defects. Although the majority of BTE strategies developed in the laboratory have been limited due to lack [...] Read more.
Over the past decades, a number of bone tissue engineering (BTE) approaches have been developed to address substantial challenges in the management of critical size bone defects. Although the majority of BTE strategies developed in the laboratory have been limited due to lack of clinical relevance in translation, primary prerequisites for the construction of vascularized functional bone grafts have gained confidence owing to the accumulated knowledge of the osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties of mesenchymal stem cells and bone-relevant biomaterials that reflect bone-healing mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of bone-healing mechanisms focusing on the details that should be embodied in the development of vascularized BTE, and discuss promising strategies based on 3D-bioprinting technologies that efficiently coalesce the abovementioned main features in bone-healing systems, which comprehensively interact during the bone regeneration processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D-Bioprinted Organs-on-Chips for Clinical Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4027 KiB  
Review
Next-Generation Wearable Biosensors Developed with Flexible Bio-Chips
by Dahyun Nam, Jae Min Cha and Kiwon Park
Micromachines 2021, 12(1), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12010064 - 07 Jan 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5135
Abstract
The development of biosensors that measure various biosignals from our body is an indispensable research field for health monitoring. In recent years, as the demand to monitor the health conditions of individuals in real time have increased, wearable-type biosensors have received more attention [...] Read more.
The development of biosensors that measure various biosignals from our body is an indispensable research field for health monitoring. In recent years, as the demand to monitor the health conditions of individuals in real time have increased, wearable-type biosensors have received more attention as an alternative to laboratory equipment. These biosensors have been embedded into smart watches, clothes, and accessories to collect various biosignals in real time. Although wearable biosensors attached to the human body can conveniently collect biosignals, there are reliability issues due to noise generated in data collection. In order for wearable biosensors to be more widely used, the reliability of collected data should be improved. Research on flexible bio-chips in the field of material science and engineering might help develop new types of biosensors that resolve the issues of conventional wearable biosensors. Flexible bio-chips with higher precision can be used to collect various human data in academic research and in our daily lives. In this review, we present various types of conventional biosensors that have been used and discuss associated issues such as noise and inaccuracy. We then introduce recent studies on flexible bio-chips as a solution to these issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D-Bioprinted Organs-on-Chips for Clinical Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 2937 KiB  
Review
Novel Strategies in Artificial Organ Development: What Is the Future of Medicine?
by Marta Klak, Tomasz Bryniarski, Patrycja Kowalska, Magdalena Gomolka, Grzegorz Tymicki, Katarzyna Kosowska, Piotr Cywoniuk, Tomasz Dobrzanski, Pawel Turowski and Michal Wszola
Micromachines 2020, 11(7), 646; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070646 - 30 Jun 2020
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 9391
Abstract
The technology of tissue engineering is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field of science that elevates cell-based research from 2D cultures through organoids to whole bionic organs. 3D bioprinting and organ-on-a-chip approaches through generation of three-dimensional cultures at different scales, applied separately or combined, [...] Read more.
The technology of tissue engineering is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field of science that elevates cell-based research from 2D cultures through organoids to whole bionic organs. 3D bioprinting and organ-on-a-chip approaches through generation of three-dimensional cultures at different scales, applied separately or combined, are widely used in basic studies, drug screening and regenerative medicine. They enable analyses of tissue-like conditions that yield much more reliable results than monolayer cell cultures. Annually, millions of animals worldwide are used for preclinical research. Therefore, the rapid assessment of drug efficacy and toxicity in the early stages of preclinical testing can significantly reduce the number of animals, bringing great ethical and financial benefits. In this review, we describe 3D bioprinting techniques and first examples of printed bionic organs. We also present the possibilities of microfluidic systems, based on the latest reports. We demonstrate the pros and cons of both technologies and indicate their use in the future of medicine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D-Bioprinted Organs-on-Chips for Clinical Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop