Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.1
2.4
Journals
Medicina
Special Issues
Clinical Recent Research in Rehabilitation and Preventive Medicine
share announcement

Clinical Recent Research in Rehabilitation and Preventive Medicine

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Sports Medicine and Sports Traumatology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 January 2026 | Viewed by 3822

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Mihai Berteanu

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
Interests: physical and rehabilitation medicine
Dr. Marius Nicolae Popescu

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine-“Elias” Emergency University Hospital, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
Interests: physical and rehabilitation medicine; hollistic rehabilitation; post-stroke rehabilitation; post-stroke spasticity; botulinum toxin injections for spasticity; muskusloskeletal ultrasound; environment and public health
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Prof. Dr. Mădălina-Gabriela Iliescu

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Ovidius University, 900527 Constanța, Romania
Interests: physical and rehabilitation medicine

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to announce a Special Issue entitled “Clinical Recent Research in Rehabilitation and Preventive Medicine”, which will focus on the latest advancements and innovative methodologies in this field. We welcome high-quality original research papers and comprehensive reviews that explore cutting-edge technologies, clinical interventions, and approaches aimed at enhancing rehabilitation outcomes and preventive care in physical and rehabilitation medicine.

Wearable sensor devices (WSDs) are transforming patient monitoring by providing real-time data that inform personalized rehabilitation programs and preventive strategies. Advances in biomechanics and motion analysis are enabling the identification of movement patterns that predispose patients to injuries, facilitating targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Regenerative medicine, particularly the use of stem cells, is offering new treatment possibilities for complex musculoskeletal conditions, significantly enhancing recovery outcomes. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) has emerged as a critical tool in diagnostics and treatment, providing dynamic, real-time imaging, which is essential for precise diagnosis and guided interventions. The integration of AI in ultrasound systems further improves diagnostic accuracy and training efficiency. Additionally, telehealth and remote monitoring are ensuring continuous patient care, extending the reach of physical medicine beyond traditional clinical settings.

This Special Issue aims to compile research that not only advances clinical outcomes, but also shapes the future landscape of rehabilitation medicine and preventive healthcare. Your contributions will be invaluable in showcasing these cutting-edge developments and their practical applications.

Prof. Dr. Mihai Berteanu
Guest Editor

Dr. Marius Nicolae Popescu
Prof. Dr. Mădălina-Gabriela Iliescu
Guest Editor Assistants

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • physical medicine
  • rehabilitation
  • injury prevention
  • wearable sensor devices (WSDs)
  • biomechanics
  • regenerative medicine
  • musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS)
  • AI in medicine
  • telehealth
  • motion analysis

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 684 KiB  
Article
Correlation Between Core Stability and Plantar Pressure Distribution During Double-Leg Stance, Single-Leg Stance, and Squat Positions in Healthy Male Athletes
by Reem Abdullah Babkair, Shibili Nuhmani, Turki Abualait and Qassim Muaidi
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1188; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071188 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 264
Abstract
Background: Core stability is a cornerstone of optimum athletic performance, and its reduction is a risk factor for athletic injuries. Evidence has shown that core impairments can alter lower-limb mechanics through the kinetic chains. Additionally, plantar pressure can be influenced by proximal [...] Read more.
Background: Core stability is a cornerstone of optimum athletic performance, and its reduction is a risk factor for athletic injuries. Evidence has shown that core impairments can alter lower-limb mechanics through the kinetic chains. Additionally, plantar pressure can be influenced by proximal conditions, such as core muscle fatigue. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the correlation between core endurance and plantar pressure distribution (PPD) during double-leg stance, single-leg stance, and single-leg squat positions in healthy male athletes. Methods: A total of 21 healthy male recreational athletes between 19 and 26 years of age volunteered to participate in this correlational study. The McGill core endurance test was used to measure the endurance of their core flexors, extensors, and lateral flexors. The participants’ PPD was evaluated using the Tekscan Mobile Mat pressure measurement system in three positions (double-leg stance, single-leg stance, and single-leg squat) for both the dominant and non-dominant feet. Results: There was a poor and insignificant correlation (p > 0.05) between the core flexors’, extensors’, and side flexors’ endurance and the peak and total PPD in all the tested positions for both the dominant and non-dominant feet. Conclusions: Core muscle endurance is neither a component that affects nor is affected by the PPD in this study population. Thus, the endurance of core flexors, extensors, and side flexors may not be considered in screening, examination, or intervention for the total and peak pressure during double-leg stance, single-leg stance, and single-leg squat positions for both the dominant and non-dominant feet in the study population. Further similar studies are warranted in various sports and during dynamic tasks to better understand the different dimensions of the studied relationship in athletes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Recent Research in Rehabilitation and Preventive Medicine)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 726 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Connections Between Grip Strength, Nutritional Status, Frailty, Depression, and Cognition as Initial Assessment Tools in Geriatric Rehabilitation—A Pilot Study
by Amalia Teodora Vancea Nemirschi, Andreea Alexandra Lupu, Kamer-Ainur Aivaz, Mădălina Gabriela Iliescu, Michel Deriaz, Mircea Marzan and Luiza Spiru
Medicina 2024, 60(12), 1916; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60121916 - 21 Nov 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2127
Abstract
Background and Objective: In the context of the rapidly aging global population, the older adult vulnerability poses a significant challenge for public health systems. Frailty, cognitive and nutritional status, depression, and grip strength are essential parameters for staging the vulnerability of older adults. [...] Read more.
Background and Objective: In the context of the rapidly aging global population, the older adult vulnerability poses a significant challenge for public health systems. Frailty, cognitive and nutritional status, depression, and grip strength are essential parameters for staging the vulnerability of older adults. The objective of this study is to identify a rapid but multidimensional geriatric assessment tool that can enhance the rehabilitation process for older adults, tailored to their specific needs. Materials and Methods: This pilot study examines the relationships between grip strength, nutritional status, frailty, depression, and cognition in a group of 80 older adults with a mean age of 69.6 years, 49 male and 31 female, using standardized geriatric scales and digital grip strength measurements. The study employed a digital dynamometer, a portable and reliable tool that facilitated quick and accurate grip strength measurements. Results: The analysis revealed significant correlations among the parameters. Greater grip strength was associated with better cognitive performance (r = 0.237, p = 0.034) and improved nutritional status (r = 0.267, p = 0.016), while it was inversely related to frailty (r = −0.313, p = 0.005). Nutritional status also played a key role, showing an inverse relationship with frailty (r = −0.333, p = 0.003) and depression levels (r = −0.248, p = 0.027). Furthermore, frailty and depression were strongly interconnected, with those experiencing higher frailty levels also displaying more severe depressive symptoms (r = 0.545, p < 0.001). Marital status was also relevant: married participants exhibited higher grip strength, lower frailty, and fewer depressive symptoms, suggesting that social support positively influences both physical and mental health in older adults. Conclusions: These findings not only emphasize the need for integrated care approaches that simultaneously address physical health, nutrition, and cognitive function, but also provide a foundation for the development of a rapid and multidimensional assessment protocol, which consists of using a digital dynamometer and four geriatric scales. Such a tool could play a crucial role in the early detection of frailty syndrome and guide the implementation of multidisciplinary, tailored therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving the autonomy and improving the quality of life of older adults. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Recent Research in Rehabilitation and Preventive Medicine)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 407 KiB  
Systematic Review
Structural and Psychometric Properties of Neck Pain Questionnaires Through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review
by Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez, Álvaro Jesús Reina-Ruiz, Guadalupe Molina-Torres, Sandra Kamila Trzcińska, Elio Carrasco-Vega, Alena Lochmannová and Alejandro Galán-Mercant
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071254 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 181
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Questionnaires are patient-reported outcome measures that require a validation process to assess their reliability and replicability. Over time, questionnaires have not only focused on a single health condition, such as neck pain, but also expanded their assessment spectrum to [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Questionnaires are patient-reported outcome measures that require a validation process to assess their reliability and replicability. Over time, questionnaires have not only focused on a single health condition, such as neck pain, but also expanded their assessment spectrum to other areas in order to gather additional and relevant information from the patient. The main objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the different structural and psychometric characteristics of neck pain questionnaires. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA recommendations. The search strategy was implemented across various databases (PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINHAL, Trip Medical Database, Scopus) using terms such as neck pain, cervicalgia, cervical pain, questionnaire, survey, index, validity, validation, and reliability. COSMIN criteria were used to identify valid questionnaires for this systematic review based on their psychometric properties. Results: A total of 15 articles were identified in this systematic review, of which 8 assessed the level of disability, while the rest evaluated dizziness in neck pain, anxiety and/or depression, beliefs about fear and avoidance, and perception of scarring and symptoms after neck surgery. The main findings show that neck pain questionnaires exhibit very good values for reliability and internal consistency, along with a high variability for construct validity. Conclusions: This study highlights the good values exhibited by neck pain questionnaires despite their heterogeneity in structural characteristics, demonstrating good values in psychometric properties. Nevertheless, the latter should be further investigated to gather more information. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Recent Research in Rehabilitation and Preventive Medicine)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop