Molecular and Therapeutic Landscapes in Colorectal Carcinoma

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2020) | Viewed by 7103

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 8, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Interests: genetic and epigenetic aberrations in colorectal carcinoma; MAP infection in IBD and IBS in humans; ultrasonography in Crohn’s disease stadiation; microbiota manipulation in IBD
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Via P. Manzella 4, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Interests: cancer transcriptome; cancer genetics and epigenetics; cancer metabolism; colorectal carcinoma; “triple negative” breast cancer; clear cell renal carcinoma; precision medicine
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. A high number of patients with CRC have already metastases at diagnosis, and metastatic CRC is mainly an incurable disease.

CRC is considered a heterogeneous multifactorial disease showing drastically different prognosis and response to treatment, indicating the relevance to understand specific pathways abnormalities to improve diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic strategies. The opportunity to identify specific biomarkers and to detect unambiguous molecular targets, associated to early signs of cancer, will be instrumental to develop new targeted therapies and to reduce mortality for CRC. Although, different critical genes and pathways have been related to pathogenesis of CRC, for many of these genomic alterations the prognostic and predictive roles are not known and do not influence treatment decision in the metastatic conditions. Recently, the identification of K-RAS and more recently of NRAS gene mutations is a widely accepted molecular test in the clinical treatment decisions for mCRC. BRAF V600E mutation has been approved as prognostic biomarker for identifying a cohort of patients who will have a more aggressive clinical outcome. Moreover, a relationship between MSI-high and an impressive response to immune checkpoint blockade with anti-PD1 therapy in mCRC patients has been established.

Consequently, a better understanding of the available data, a further investigation of the molecular mechanisms responsible for CRC pathogenesis, is vital in order to improve its prevention, clinical outcome, and therapy.

We invite you and your colleagues to submit your articles reporting on this topic. Original research articles or reviews aiming on the biochemical and molecular aspects associated with pathogenesis of the human CRC; identification of circulating/tissue biomarkers in early diagnosis and management of CRC patient; translational to clinical research on the innovative approaches for individualized therapy.

Prof. Dr. Antonio M Scanu
Prof. Dr. Maria Rosaria De Miglio
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Clinical, pathological, oncologic, and surgical features
  • Landscapes in immunologic and tailored therapies
  • Prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers
  • Microbiota in pathogenesis
  • Epigenetic and genetic aberrations related to resistance to anticancer therapy
  • Role of staminal cells in biology and cancer therapy
  • New drug and pharmacological approaches in cancer therapy
  • News in pathology

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 1446 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Value and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Patients with Stage II and III Colorectal Carcinoma—A Single-Center Study
by Tijana Denčić, Miljan Krstić, Aleksandar Petrović, Maja Jovičić-Milentijević, Goran Radenković, Marko Jović, Nikola Živković, Sonja Šalinger-Martinović, Branko Branković and Simona Stojanović
Medicina 2020, 56(12), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56120676 - 8 Dec 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1365
Abstract
Background and objectives: Deficient mismatch repair (MMR) status is associated with good prognosis but poor therapeutic response to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. However, there are some opposed arguments considering therapeutic outcomes in patients with evidenced MMR deficiency in colorectal cancer. [...] Read more.
Background and objectives: Deficient mismatch repair (MMR) status is associated with good prognosis but poor therapeutic response to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. However, there are some opposed arguments considering therapeutic outcomes in patients with evidenced MMR deficiency in colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was the investigation of prognostic value and immunohistochemical analysis of the MMR-deficiency tumors. Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 104 patients with resected stage II and III colorectal cancer samples from the period 2018–2019. Results: The tumors with deficient MMR status were significantly associated with age up to 50 years and right-sided localization (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period of 22.43 ± 6.66 months, 21 patients (20.2%) died, whereas 14 patients (13.5%) had relapses. The loss of mutL homologue 1/postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (MLH1/PMS2) expression, compared to proficient MMR tumors, was associated with shorter disease-free survival in patients with lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.05), perineural invasion (p < 0.01), stage III (p < 0.05) and high-grade tumor (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This retrospective pilot study of a single-center cohort of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer highlights the clinical importance of using immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis as a guide for diagnostic algorithm in a country with limited resources, but with a high prevalence of colorectal carcinoma in the young patients. MMR-deficiency tumors compared with proficient MMR colorectal cancer was not shown to be a significant predictor of disease-free and overall survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Therapeutic Landscapes in Colorectal Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 906 KiB  
Article
Preliminary Results of an Exercise Program After Laparoscopic Resective Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Non-Metastatic Adenocarcinoma: A Pilot Study of a Randomized Control Trial
by Gabriele Mascherini, Maria Novella Ringressi, Jorge Castizo-Olier, Georgian Badicu, Alfredo Irurtia, Laura Stefani, Giorgio Galanti and Antonio Taddei
Medicina 2020, 56(2), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56020078 - 14 Feb 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2858
Abstract
Background and objectives: Performing physical exercise after a colorectal cancer diagnosis is associated with lower mortality related to the tumor itself. In order to improve physical recovery after elective surgery, there are no specific exercise protocols after discharge from the hospital. The purpose [...] Read more.
Background and objectives: Performing physical exercise after a colorectal cancer diagnosis is associated with lower mortality related to the tumor itself. In order to improve physical recovery after elective surgery, there are no specific exercise protocols after discharge from the hospital. The purpose of this study is to show the preliminary results of an exercise program after colorectal cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Six patients with non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma addressed to respective laparoscopic were randomly assigned to a mixed supervised/home-based exercise program for six months and compared to a control group without exercise. To assess the effectiveness of the program, functional and body composition parameters were evaluated. Results: Three months after surgery, the exercise group increased flexibility (p <0.01, ES = 0.33), strength of lower limbs (p <0.01, ES = 0.42) and aerobic capacity (p <0.01, ES = 0.28). After surgery, the six patients experienced a significant reduction in body mass index (BMI) and free fat mass. More specifically, fat mass reached the lowest values, with a concomitant increase in cell mass after six months (p <0.01, ES = 0.33). This did not occur in the control group. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer treatment induces a reduction in physical function, particularly during the first six months after treatment. A mixed exercise approach appears promising in countering this process after colorectal cancer surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Therapeutic Landscapes in Colorectal Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1449 KiB  
Article
Selected Oxidative Stress Markers in Colorectal Cancer Patients in Relation to Primary Tumor Location—A Preliminary Research
by Karolina Janion, Elżbieta Szczepańska, Ewa Nowakowska-Zajdel, Joanna Strzelczyk and Angelika Copija
Medicina 2020, 56(2), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56020047 - 21 Jan 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 2417
Abstract
Background and objectives: Ample evidence indicates that oxidative stress, including complex lipid peroxidation processes, may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. The goal of this study was to evaluate selected oxidative stress markers in patients with colorectal cancer depending [...] Read more.
Background and objectives: Ample evidence indicates that oxidative stress, including complex lipid peroxidation processes, may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. The goal of this study was to evaluate selected oxidative stress markers in patients with colorectal cancer depending on some clinical features, with particular attention paid to the location of the primary tumor. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on a group of 66 patients with colorectal cancer. The study consisted of two stages. The first stage involved the analysis of medical records; the second consisted of determining selected oxidative stress markers by measuring malondialdehyde as well as total oxidant and antioxidant status. Results: Of all patients, 43 (65.15%) had colon cancer, of whom 30 (69.77%) had a tumor on the left side and 13 (30.23%) had a tumor on the right side of the colon. Of all the patients, 23 (34.85%) had rectal cancer. The mean total oxidant and antioxidant status was 809.76 (SD ± 392.65) µmol/L and 253.19 (233.33–310.66) µmol/L, respectively. The mean malondialdehyde serum level was 2478.04 (SD ± 1397.05) ng/mL. The mean malondialdehyde serum concentration in patients with primary tumors located on the right side was higher in a statistically significant way compared with the remaining patients. Conclusions: It was demonstrated that the intensity of lipid peroxidation processes is correlated with the development of colorectal cancer, particularly on the right side. The results should be interpreted rather cautiously due to certain limitations of the study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Therapeutic Landscapes in Colorectal Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop