Interventional Radiology and Imaging in Cancer Diagnosis

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 October 2026 | Viewed by 3579

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 17 Smoluchowskiego St., 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland
Interests: genitourinary imaging; diagnostic imaging in oncology; in-bore and fusion-guided prostate biopsy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, 17 Smoluchowskiego Street, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
Interests: computed tomography; urogenital radiology; abdominal radiology; interventional radiology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Imaging and interventional radiology have taken on an increasingly critical role in oncology in recent years, with advances in diagnostic imaging, image-guided biopsies, and minimally invasive therapeutic procedures transforming the way cancer is detected, staged, and treated.

This Special Issue of Medicina aims to highlight the latest developments and innovations in cancer imaging and interventional radiology, including their impact on early diagnosis, personalized treatment planning, and improved patient outcomes.

We welcome submissions that explore a broad spectrum of topics, including, but not limited to, the following:

  • Novel imaging techniques in cancer detection and staging;
  • Image-guided biopsies and minimally invasive oncologic interventions;
  • Functional and molecular imaging in oncology;
  • The role of radiology in multidisciplinary cancer care;
  • Technological advances in oncologic imaging;
  • Radiologic–pathologic correlation in tumor diagnosis;
  • Interventional radiology in palliative cancer care.

We welcome original research, clinical studies, retrospective and prospective analyses, literature reviews, and opinion papers, and both clinical and experimental contributions are encouraged.

The goal of this Special Issue is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date resource for clinicians, researchers, and radiologists involved in the diagnosis and management of cancer using imaging and interventional radiology.

We look forward to your valuable contributions to this Special Issue.

Dr. Katarzyna Skrobisz
Guest Editor Assistant

Prof. Dr. Michal Studniarek
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • oncologic imaging
  • image-guided biopsy
  • advanced MRI techniques
  • genitourinary imaging
  • active surveillance imaging
  • minimally invasive biopsy
  • radiology in surgical planning
  • radiologic–pathologic correlation
  • clinical radiology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 1786 KB  
Article
Possible Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prediction of Prostate Cancer Grade Group Upgrading: Insights from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy
by Anna Żurowska, Katarzyna Skrobisz, Marek Sowa, Rafał Pęksa, Damian Panas, Małgorzata Grzywińska, Marcin Matuszewski and Edyta Szurowska
Medicina 2026, 62(4), 750; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62040750 - 14 Apr 2026
Viewed by 458
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, with 1,466,680 new cases and 396,792 deaths reported in 2022. Accurate preoperative grading is critical, as the grade assessed on biopsy cores may be underestimated compared to radical [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, with 1,466,680 new cases and 396,792 deaths reported in 2022. Accurate preoperative grading is critical, as the grade assessed on biopsy cores may be underestimated compared to radical prostatectomy specimens. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of quantitative diffusion parameters derived by the standard monoexponential model (ADC—apparent diffusion coefficient) and kurtosis model (Dapp—apparent diffusion coefficient corrected for non-Gausion behavior and K-kurtosis) to predict Gleason Grade Group (GG) upgrading from transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy to radical prostatectomy within each GG. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 128 patients with prostate cancer who underwent systematic TRUS biopsies and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at 3T before prostatectomies between 2017 and 2021. Mean values of quantitative diffusion parameters (ADC, Dapp, K) were compared between upgraded and non-upgraded cohorts within each Grade Group obtained at biopsy. Results: Significant differences in ADC and K values were found between upgraded and non-upgraded lesions in GG1 and GG2 cohorts at biopsy, with lower ADCs and higher K values indicating a higher likelihood of upgrading. In GG1, ADC demonstrated an AUC of 0.762 (p < 0.05) and K an AUC of 0.846 (p < 0.05). In GG2, ADC showed an AUC of 0.814 (p < 0.001) and K an AUC of 0.755 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in GG3 and GG4 cohorts. Conclusions: Quantitative diffusion parameters—particularly ADC and kurtosis (K)—demonstrated significant predictive value for Grade Group upgrading in patients with biopsy-proven GG1 (AUC: K = 0.846, ADC = 0.762) and GG2 (AUC: ADC = 0.814, K = 0.755, D = 0.810) prostate cancer. These findings suggest that incorporating quantitative DWI parameters into preoperative assessments may improve risk stratification and support clinical decision-making, particularly regarding the selection of patients for active surveillance. Validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Radiology and Imaging in Cancer Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1773 KB  
Article
Comparison of Different Classification Systems for Müllerian Duct Anomalies: A Retrospective Observational MRI Study
by Laura D’hoore, Eva Decroos, Pieter Julien Luc De Visschere, Ottavia Battaglia and Tjalina Hamerlynck
Medicina 2026, 62(3), 592; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030592 - 21 Mar 2026
Viewed by 719
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Müllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) are congenital malformations of the female genital tract for which several classification systems have been proposed. The objective of this study is to estimate the interrater reliability of the American Fertility Society (AFS), European Society [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Müllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) are congenital malformations of the female genital tract for which several classification systems have been proposed. The objective of this study is to estimate the interrater reliability of the American Fertility Society (AFS), European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESHRE/ESGE), American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME) classification systems for Müllerian duct anomalies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital and included 71 patients aged up to 45 years who were assessed for a Müllerian duct anomaly between January 2000 and April 2023. Pelvic MRI images were independently evaluated by four readers, followed by a consensus meeting. The primary outcome was interrater reliability (Krippendorff’s α), and the secondary outcomes were the proportions of indeterminate and unclassifiable cases after consensus meeting. Results: The interrater reliability for MDA diagnosis was very low for all the classification systems (AFS α 0.63, 95% CI [0.57, 0.67]; ASRM α 0.46, 95% CI [0.41, 0.52]; ESHRE/ESGE α 0.33, 95% CI [0.29, 0.38]; CUME α 0.57, 95% CI [0.45, 0.72]). After consensus meeting, the ESHRE/ESGE system had more indeterminate cases (9.9%) and the ASRM system had more unclassifiable cases (20.6%). Conclusions: All the classification systems for Müllerian duct anomalies had a very low interrater reliability, with more indeterminate cases in the ESHRE/ESGE system and more unclassifiable cases in the ASRM system. We present our recommendations for the improvement of each classification system. The ultimate goal of future research should be the development of a single uniform system integrating the best features of these systems and with clinically relevant cut-off values, considering patients’ reproductive outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Radiology and Imaging in Cancer Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 4034 KB  
Article
MRI Diffusion Imaging as an Additional Biomarker for Monitoring Chemotherapy Efficacy in Tumors
by Małgorzata Grzywińska, Anna Sobolewska, Małgorzata Krawczyk, Ewa Wierzchosławska and Dominik Świętoń
Medicina 2026, 62(1), 173; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010173 - 15 Jan 2026
Viewed by 564
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Soft tissue sarcomas account for approximately 7% of all malignant tumors in the pediatric population. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements may provide early functional biomarkers of treatment response by reflecting changes in tumor cellularity. This [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Soft tissue sarcomas account for approximately 7% of all malignant tumors in the pediatric population. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements may provide early functional biomarkers of treatment response by reflecting changes in tumor cellularity. This study evaluated whether ADC-derived parameters can serve as quantitative biomarkers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 14 patients aged ≤18 years with histopathologically confirmed rhabdomyosarcoma who underwent MRI before treatment and after three cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients were initially identified; eleven were excluded due to imaging artifacts or absence of baseline examination. ADC maps were generated on 1.5T and 3T scanners. Regions of interest were placed over the entire lesion and areas with the lowest ADC signal. Relative ADC (rADC) was calculated by normalizing tumor ADC to adjacent healthy muscle. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-treatment values. Results: At baseline, 13/14 patients (93%) demonstrated diffusion restriction. Mean ADC increased from 1.11 × 10−3 mm2/s (SD ± 0.48) at baseline to 1.63 × 10−3 mm2/s (SD ± 0.67) after treatment. The paired t-test for rADC yielded t = −3.089 (p = 0.0086, 95% CI: −0.79 to −0.14), indicating a statistically significant change. There was a significant difference between the ADC values of the entire lesion and the areas with the lowest signal in tumors with a heterogenic structure, t = 2.862, p = 0.013. Conclusions: ADC and rADC increased significantly after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma, suggesting potential utility as early functional biomarkers of treatment response. These preliminary findings require validation in larger multicenter prospective studies with correlation to histopathological response and clinical outcomes before clinical implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Radiology and Imaging in Cancer Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 2918 KB  
Review
Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon (Optilume®) for Bladder Neck Stenosis and Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis: A Narrative Review
by Tomasz Ufniarski, Mikołaj Frankiewicz, Maja Frankiewicz and Marcin Matuszewski
Medicina 2026, 62(5), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050898 - 6 May 2026
Viewed by 277
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Bladder neck stenosis (BNS) and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) are challenging complications following prostate surgery and radiation therapy, with recurrence rates reaching 30–60% after conventional endoscopic management. The Optilume® paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) has emerged as a novel [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Bladder neck stenosis (BNS) and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) are challenging complications following prostate surgery and radiation therapy, with recurrence rates reaching 30–60% after conventional endoscopic management. The Optilume® paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) has emerged as a novel minimally invasive treatment combining mechanical dilation with local anti-fibrotic drug delivery. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on Optilume DCB specifically for BNS and VUAS. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search identified eight relevant publications (2024–2026), including randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case series addressing Optilume DCB for posterior urethral stenoses. Results: Across the reviewed studies, freedom from reintervention for BNS ranged from 77.5% to 100% at 12 months, while VUAS outcomes were more variable (40–81%). A comparative study of 141 patients demonstrated significantly improved recurrence-free survival with DCB versus standard endoscopic treatment (HR 0.40, p = 0.021). Radiation-induced posterior urethral stenosis showed 81.1% freedom from repeat intervention. Complications were predominantly minor (Clavien-Dindo grade I), with no de novo incontinence attributable to the device. Conclusions: Optilume DCB represents a promising minimally invasive option for BNS and VUAS, particularly in patients with recurrent disease or those unsuitable for reconstructive surgery. BNS appears to respond more favorably than VUAS, likely reflecting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Prior radiation therapy remains a negative prognostic factor. Prospective randomized trials with longer follow-up are needed to define the role of DCB in posterior urethral stenosis management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Radiology and Imaging in Cancer Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 5206 KB  
Review
CEUS in Atypical Renal Cystic Masses: How, When and Why
by Michele Bertolotto, Irene Campo, Alessandra Oliva, Antonio Granata and Vito Cantisani
Medicina 2026, 62(4), 721; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62040721 - 9 Apr 2026
Viewed by 412
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cysts are the most common kidney lesions identified in patients undergoing abdominal imaging, with ultrasound (US) typically serving as the initial diagnostic tool. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has emerged as a highly effective modality for the evaluation of cystic renal lesions, particularly [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cysts are the most common kidney lesions identified in patients undergoing abdominal imaging, with ultrasound (US) typically serving as the initial diagnostic tool. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has emerged as a highly effective modality for the evaluation of cystic renal lesions, particularly when conventional B-mode ultrasound (US) or CE-CT are inconclusive. While simple renal cysts are readily characterised on US, cystic renal lesions require further assessment. Methods: The Bosniak classification, originally developed for CE-CT, remains the cornerstone for categorising cystic renal lesions, guiding management from surveillance to surgical intervention. Recent efforts to standardise CEUS-specific imaging parameters and adapt the Bosniak criteria aim to improve interobserver agreement, reduce subjectivity, and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Results: CEUS offers superior sensitivity for detecting slow blood flow and minimal vascularity within septa, wall or solid components, often outperforming CE-CT in real-time vascular assessment. However, the high sensitivity of CEUS can reveal additional septa or subtle enhancement, potentially leading to lesion overscoring, if the different sensitivity of CEUS and CT/MRI for detecting enhancement is not taken into account. CEUS also plays a crucial role in the follow-up of non-surgical cystic lesions, providing a radiation-free and cost-effective alternative for long-term monitoring. Certain scenarios, such as post-interventional changes, traumatic cystic rupture, or infected cysts, fall outside the scope of the Bosniak system and require careful clinical correlation. Conclusions: By integrating CEUS into the diagnostic pathway, sonologists can achieve accurate lesion characterisation, optimise patient management, and minimise unnecessary invasive procedures, reinforcing CEUS as an essential tool in the evaluation and follow-up of complex renal cystic masses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Radiology and Imaging in Cancer Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 751 KB  
Review
Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Bladder Cancer: The Role of [18F]FDG and Non-FDG Radiotracers
by Hanna Falińska, Ewa Witkowska-Patena, Karolina Krzyżanowska and Mirosław Dziuk
Medicina 2026, 62(4), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62040703 - 7 Apr 2026
Viewed by 554
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Bladder cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the urinary tract and poses a significant clinical challenge due to its biological heterogeneity and high rates of recurrence and progression. Urothelial carcinoma represents the predominant histological subtype, ranging [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Bladder cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the urinary tract and poses a significant clinical challenge due to its biological heterogeneity and high rates of recurrence and progression. Urothelial carcinoma represents the predominant histological subtype, ranging from non-muscle-invasive disease with relatively favorable outcomes to aggressive muscle-invasive and metastatic forms associated with poor prognosis. Accurate diagnosis, staging, prognostic stratification, and assessment of treatment response are therefore essential for optimal patient management. The objective of this review is to summarize and critically evaluate the current evidence on the role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in bladder cancer, with particular emphasis on [18F]FDG PET/CT and non-FDG radiotracers. Materials and Methods: A narrative review of the available literature was performed, focusing on clinical studies, review articles, and guideline documents addressing the use of PET/CT in bladder cancer. The literature search included articles published between 2000 and 2025, while earlier landmark studies were selectively included if considered historically important for understanding the development of PET/CT imaging in bladder cancer. The initial search yielded over 500 records; after screening titles and abstracts, more than 100 articles were selected for full-text evaluation. The analyzed evidence encompasses the clinical applications of [18F]FDG PET/CT and alternative radiotracers, including choline-, acetate-, methionine-, and sodium fluoride-based tracers, and fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI), across different stages of disease and clinical settings. Results: Conventional imaging modalities, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, provide important anatomical information but remain limited in the evaluation of lymph node involvement, early metastatic disease, treatment response, and disease recurrence. Despite limitations related to physiological urinary excretion, [18F]FDG PET/CT has demonstrated clinical value in selected scenarios, particularly for staging, prognostic assessment, detection of recurrence, and response evaluation. To overcome FDG-related constraints, several non-FDG radiotracers have been investigated. Among these, FAPI PET/CT has emerged as a promising modality due to its ability to target the tumor stroma, potentially improving lesion detectability and tumor-to-background contrast. Conclusions: This review summarizes and critically evaluates current evidence on the role of PET/CT in bladder cancer, with a focus on [18F]FDG PET/CT and non-FDG radiotracers. The discussed studies highlight their applications in primary diagnosis, staging, prognostic assessment, detection of recurrence, and evaluation of treatment response, as well as their respective advantages and limitations. Furthermore, potential future directions for PET/CT imaging in clinical practice are outlined, emphasizing the need for further research to clarify the optimal use of established and emerging radiotracers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Radiology and Imaging in Cancer Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop