The Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Various Pathologies

A Special Issue of Life (ISSN 2075-1729) belonging to the section "Microbiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2026 | Viewed by 9153

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Interests: (bio)inorganic chemistry; anticancer research; metabolic disorders; drug discovery
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The gut microbiome is composed of a vast community of microorganisms that reside in the digestive tract, specifically the large intestine. This microbial ecosystem contains bacteria, viruses, fungi, and other microbes that, together, influence various physiological processes. The gut microbiota is made up of six major phyla of bacteria: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes, and Fusobacteria. Each individual will have a different microbiota composition depending on factors such as their age, diet, stress level, and frequency of antibiotic use, along with various environmental factors.

The intestinal flora plays a crucial role in maintaining optimal health, as it is involved in processes such as the digestion and absorption of nutrients, numerous metabolic processes, the support of immune function, and maintaining mental health.

The diversity of the microbiome is indicated by the variety of microorganisms that it contains. In general, a high diversity of microbiota is an indicator of a healthy intestinal flora. A decrease in physiological diversity can be a manifestation of dysbiosis and is frequently associated with an increase in potentially pathogenic bacterial species and the appearance of associated pathologies, such as metabolic, cardiovascular, dermatological, autoimmune, and inflammatory diseases; digestive, neurological and psychiatric disorders; recurrent infections; and cancer.

Currently, there are a number of laboratory tests and analyses that help in assessing the health of the intestinal flora, providing valuable information with regard to health status, and aiding the diagnosis and treatment of associated diseases.

This Special Issue will include original research articles, case reports, and review papers investigating biochemical, genetic, and epigenetic biomarkers related to the risk of developing dysbiosis, in order to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms behind it. We will consider in silico and experimental in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical studies with the potential to improve the management (prevention, diagnosis, and treatment) of dysbiosis.

Prof. Dr. Roxana Liana Lucaciu
Prof. Dr. Lucia Maria Procopciuc
Prof. Dr. Adriana Corina Hangan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Life is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • metabolic diseases (obesity, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, etc.)
  • cardiovascular diseases (atherosclerosis, hypertension, etc.)
  • dermatological diseases (acne, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea)
  • autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, etc.)
  • digestive disorders (irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease: Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, lactose intolerance and other food intolerances, gastritis, helicobacter pylori infections, etc.)
  • neurological and psychiatric disorders (Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, depression, anxiety, autism)
  • recurrent infections and low immunity
  • cancer (colorectal, gastric, esophageal, hepatic, pancreatic, breast, pulmonary, etc.)
  • biochemical, genetic and epigenetic biomarkers
  • computational analysis

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 1988 KB  
Article
Gut Modulators Alter BDNF/Cortisol Axis in Severe Obesity: Additional Secondary Outcomes from a Triple-Blind Randomized Trial
by Dayanne da Silva Borges, Ricardo Fernandes, Barbara Beatriz Philippi Martins, Scheila Iria Kraus, Erasmo Benicio Santos de Moraes Trindade and Adair Roberto Soares Santos
Life 2026, 16(6), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16060924 - 31 May 2026
Viewed by 589
Abstract
The role of the gut–brain axis is crucial in maintaining homeostasis and regulating neural, hormonal, and immunological activity. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prebiotics or synbiotics on serum markers related to emotional disorders in individuals with morbid obesity in a [...] Read more.
The role of the gut–brain axis is crucial in maintaining homeostasis and regulating neural, hormonal, and immunological activity. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prebiotics or synbiotics on serum markers related to emotional disorders in individuals with morbid obesity in a triple-blind, randomized trial. The sample consisted of 22 subjects (16 women and 6 men) with a mean age of 41.8 ± 8.5 years and a mean BMI of 47.7 ± 6.8 kg/m2. Serum BDNF concentrations decreased significantly after 30 days of prebiotic supplementation (p = 0.017). Serum cortisol concentrations increased in all groups between the evaluated time points, with the increase being statistically significant in the synbiotic-supplemented group (p = 0.028). Serum TNF-α concentrations increased significantly after 30 days of prebiotic supplementation when compared to the group’s baseline (p = 0.035); however, this variation did not produce a significant difference between the groups evaluated after 30 days of supplementation. The results suggest that a chronic, low-grade inflammatory state may be related to the neuroendocrine changes present in emotional disorders, but the absence of significant results in the primary outcomes is possibly due to severe underpowering. Findings from additional secondary outcomes are hypothesis-generating only, requiring confirmation in adequately powered trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Various Pathologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 964 KB  
Article
Periodontitis Severity and Subgingival Microbiome Variation in Postmenopausal Women: A Stratified Case–Control Study
by Irina-Georgeta Sufaru, Stefan-Lucian Burlea, Maria-Alexandra Martu, Sorina Mihaela Solomon, Maria-Georgeta Laza, Liliana Pasarin, Elena-Odette Luca and Ioana Martu
Life 2026, 16(4), 637; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16040637 - 10 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1039
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to determine whether osteoporosis is associated with differences in the subgingival microbiome of postmenopausal women, stratified by periodontitis stage. Methods: In this observational, stratified case–control study, 166 postmenopausal women were assigned to six strata defined by bone status (osteoporosis [...] Read more.
Background: This study aimed to determine whether osteoporosis is associated with differences in the subgingival microbiome of postmenopausal women, stratified by periodontitis stage. Methods: In this observational, stratified case–control study, 166 postmenopausal women were assigned to six strata defined by bone status (osteoporosis vs. normal BMD) and periodontal category (no periodontitis, Stage I–II, Stage III–IV). Standardized pooled subgingival samples were profiled by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Community structure was evaluated using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and tested with PERMANOVA (9999 permutations) and prespecified contrasts comparing osteoporosis versus normal BMD within each periodontal category (Holm adjustment). Alpha diversity (Shannon) was assessed using two-way ANOVA. Results: Periodontal category was strongly associated with community structure (PERMANOVA R2 = 0.514, pseudo-F = 86.681, p < 0.0001), whereas bone status (R2 = 0.004, p = 0.178) and the bone status × periodontal category interaction (R2 = 0.007, p = 0.294) were not. None of the three prespecified within-category contrasts reached significance after Holm adjustment. Shannon diversity differed by periodontal category (p = 1.93 × 10−24) but not by bone status (p = 0.200), with similar distributions between osteoporosis and normal BMD within each periodontal category. Conclusions: In postmenopausal women, periodontitis severity dominates variation in the subgingival microbiome, and osteoporosis does not confer an additional community-level or taxonomic signature when periodontal status is held constant. Longitudinal and multi-omic studies incorporating host-response biomarkers and therapy exposures are warranted to clarify whether osteoporosis influences periodontal susceptibility and progression primarily through host-mediated mechanisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Various Pathologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

45 pages, 2572 KB  
Review
The Maternal Microbiome in Pregnancy: From Physiological Changes to Dysbiosis and Obstetrical Complications—Therapeutic Perspectives
by Lucia Maria Procopciuc, Gabriela Valentina Caracostea, Adriana Corina Hangan and Roxana Liana Lucaciu
Life 2026, 16(6), 1033; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16061033 - 21 Jun 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1062
Abstract
During pregnancy, hormonal, metabolic, and immunological changes influence the composition and function of maternal microbial communities. Increasing evidence suggests that the maternal microbiota—particularly in the vaginal, gut, and oral environments—plays a significant role in maintaining pregnancy homeostasis and supporting fetal development. In healthy [...] Read more.
During pregnancy, hormonal, metabolic, and immunological changes influence the composition and function of maternal microbial communities. Increasing evidence suggests that the maternal microbiota—particularly in the vaginal, gut, and oral environments—plays a significant role in maintaining pregnancy homeostasis and supporting fetal development. In healthy pregnancies, the vaginal microbiota is typically dominated by Lactobacillus species, which help maintain a low vaginal pH and protect against ascending infections. However, disruption of this balance (vaginal dysbiosis) has been associated with obstetrical complications such as intrauterine infection and preterm birth. Similarly, the maternal gut microbiota undergoes trimester-specific changes that contribute to metabolic adaptations required for fetal growth, while alterations in microbial composition have been linked to metabolic disorders including gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. Changes in oral microbiota and periodontal disease have also been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes through systemic inflammatory pathways and potential microbial translocation to the placenta. Recent advances in sequencing technologies have improved the understanding of host–microbiome interactions in pregnancy, although the existence of a placental microbiome remains controversial. Overall, maternal microbiota plays an important role in pregnancy physiology, and its dysregulation may contribute to obstetrical complications. Understanding these mechanisms may facilitate the development of microbiome-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in maternal–fetal medicine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Various Pathologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1427 KB  
Review
Heavy Metal-Driven Oral Dysbiosis: Salivary Toxicometallomics at the Host–Microbiome Interface Across Pathologies
by Claudia Florina Bogdan-Andreescu, Emin Cadar, Lucia Bubulac, Irina Anca Eremia, Viorica Tudor, Cristina-Crenguţa Albu, Iuliana-Raluca Gheorghe, Arsenie Dan Spînu, Andreea Mariana Bănăţeanu and Dan Alexandru Slăvescu
Life 2026, 16(6), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16060920 - 29 May 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 747
Abstract
Microbiome dysbiosis has become recognized as an important interface connecting environmental exposures to chronic inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Although prior research has largely considered heavy metals as biomarkers of exposure and toxicity, their function as ecological modulators of host-associated microbial communities remains underexplored. [...] Read more.
Microbiome dysbiosis has become recognized as an important interface connecting environmental exposures to chronic inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Although prior research has largely considered heavy metals as biomarkers of exposure and toxicity, their function as ecological modulators of host-associated microbial communities remains underexplored. The oral cavity is a distinct exposome–microbiome interface where environmental, behavioral, and intraoral metal sources converge and interact with structured biofilms and mucosal immunity. This review adopts an ecological systems perspective, interpreting chronic low-dose exposure to metals such as cadmium, lead, mercury, nickel, chromium, arsenic, and aluminum as a sustained selective force on oral microbial networks. A resilience–threshold model is proposed in which cumulative metal pressure progressively diminishes microbial community stability, alters network topology, and drives transitions toward persistent dysbiosis. These modifications are further reinforced by oxidative–inflammatory feedback loops at the host–microbiome interface, facilitating a self-sustaining ecological imbalance. Sketching on insights from microbial ecology, environmental toxicology, and host response biology, this review presents a framework that links metallomic patterns to microbial restructuring, redox imbalance, immune activation, and regulatory adaptation. The analysis emphasizes ecological perturbations from stable dysbiotic states and identifies key methodological limitations that currently restrict causal inference. By conceptualizing heavy metals as active ecological drivers rather than passive exposure indicators, this work establishes a foundation for understanding microbiome-mediated disease susceptibility within an exposome-informed systems biology framework. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Various Pathologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

26 pages, 1479 KB  
Review
Microbiome-Associated Drug Response Variability in Heart Failure Treatment
by Andrea Rab, Annamária Magdás and Attila Frigy
Life 2026, 16(5), 823; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16050823 - 15 May 2026
Viewed by 1335
Abstract
Gut microbiome composition influences cardiovascular drug efficacy and safety, yet its integration into heart failure (HF) management remains underexplored. Alterations in intestinal microbial communities have been linked to atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and hypertension through multiple mechanisms. Dysbiosis disrupts the balance [...] Read more.
Gut microbiome composition influences cardiovascular drug efficacy and safety, yet its integration into heart failure (HF) management remains underexplored. Alterations in intestinal microbial communities have been linked to atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and hypertension through multiple mechanisms. Dysbiosis disrupts the balance between commensal and pathogenic bacterial species, impairing gut barrier function and activating inflammatory pathways. The altered microbial ecosystem modulates the production of key metabolites—such as trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and secondary bile acids (BAs)—that directly impact cardiovascular function. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on bidirectional interaction between heart failure pharmacotherapy and gut microbiome composition. Commonly used drugs in heart failure management show microbiome-dependent pharmacokinetics. Digoxin undergoes bacterial inactivation by Eggerthella lenta, while angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers demonstrate enhanced efficacy with specific Firmicutes populations. Conversely, certain probiotic strains attenuate drug-induced gut barrier injury and restore gut homeostasis. Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors exhibit beneficial microbiome-modulating effects beyond their primary cardiovascular actions. These findings underscore the potential for microbiome-informed precision medicine in heart failure. However, significant methodological challenges must be addressed, including lack of standardization in microbiome profiling, small sample sizes, and limited longitudinal data. Future research should focus on identifying specific microbial signatures that predict drug response, developing targeted probiotic interventions, and conducting prospective clinical trials to validate pharmacomicrobiomics approaches in heart failure management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Various Pathologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 1815 KB  
Review
Boron as a Molecular Architect of Host–Microbiome Symbiosis: Implications for Dysbiosis and Aging-Related Pathologies
by George Dan Mogoşanu, Andrei Biţă, Ion Romulus Scorei, Mihai Ioan Pop, Ilie Robert Dinu and Dan Ionuţ Gheonea
Life 2026, 16(5), 750; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16050750 - 1 May 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 888
Abstract
Boron (B) is increasingly recognized as more than a trace dietary element, emerging as a context-dependent organizer of molecular interactions at the host–microbiome interface. B exhibits reversible covalent chemistry driven by Lewis’ acidity and selective affinity for cis-diol-rich biomolecules, enabling dynamic complexation [...] Read more.
Boron (B) is increasingly recognized as more than a trace dietary element, emerging as a context-dependent organizer of molecular interactions at the host–microbiome interface. B exhibits reversible covalent chemistry driven by Lewis’ acidity and selective affinity for cis-diol-rich biomolecules, enabling dynamic complexation with polyols, glycans, and phenolic ligands that dominate the intestinal mucus environment and shape microbial ecology. We synthesize evidence supporting an architecture-based framework in which B modulates biological function by conditioning the physicochemical context of microbial communication rather than acting as a single-pathway effector. Central to this model is spatial bioavailability, distinguishing plasma-accessible boron from microbiota-accessible boron (MAB), species that persist in the lumen and mucus layer long enough to influence interface-level processes. We propose that insufficient or altered MAB availability may contribute to dysbiosis (DYS) by destabilizing quorum-associated coordination, signal persistence, and mucosal microstructure, thereby promoting barrier dysfunction and inflammaging. Particular attention is given to B-mediated symbiotaxis, a hypothesis-driven concept describing how B-containing molecular assemblies may bias microbial communities toward cooperative, barrier-supportive configurations and reduce ecological volatility. We identify key knowledge gaps and experimental priorities (speciation-aware measurements, signal-centric readouts) necessary to determine when, where, and how B-mediated molecular architecture may counteract DYS and support healthspan. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Various Pathologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 870 KB  
Review
Revisiting Rosacea Through the Skin–Gut–Brain Axis: A Neuroimmune Perspective
by Elvira Lazić Mosler, Marina Vekić Mužević, Dalibor Karlović, Marko Tarle and Marina Raguž
Life 2026, 16(2), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020347 - 18 Feb 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2538
Abstract
Rosacea is increasingly recognized as a complex inflammatory disorder extending beyond isolated cutaneous pathology, involving dysregulated interactions between the skin, gastrointestinal system, and central nervous system. The skin–gut–brain axis has emerged as a relevant conceptual framework for understanding this multifactorial disease, integrating gut [...] Read more.
Rosacea is increasingly recognized as a complex inflammatory disorder extending beyond isolated cutaneous pathology, involving dysregulated interactions between the skin, gastrointestinal system, and central nervous system. The skin–gut–brain axis has emerged as a relevant conceptual framework for understanding this multifactorial disease, integrating gut microbiota dysbiosis, neuroimmune signaling, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, and stress-related mechanisms. The aim of this narrative hypothesis-driven overview is to reframe rosacea as a neuroimmune disorder in which central nervous system involvement plays an active regulatory role, rather than as a purely peripheral or dermatological condition. We synthesize the mechanistically relevant evidence linking gastrointestinal inflammation and microbial imbalance with neurogenic inflammation, mast cell activation, sebaceous gland dysfunction, and aberrant innate immune responses in the skin, with particular emphasis on neurovascular and trigeminal pathways. A key novelty of this perspective lies in highlighting brain-centered mechanisms, including central sensitization, autonomic dysregulation, and stress-related neural modulation, as integral components of the skin–gut–brain axis in rosacea. By integrating peripheral and central processes, we propose rosacea as a model condition for studying neuroimmune dysregulation across interconnected regulatory systems. Finally, we discuss the clinical and translational implications of this framework and outline future research directions, focusing on autonomic regulation, patient stratification, and personalized, multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Various Pathologies)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop