jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Current Advances in Aortic Valve Stenosis

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2025 | Viewed by 4251

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Interventional Cardiologist and THV Program, Athens Medical Center, 15125 Athens, Greece
Interests: interventional cardiology; coronary artery disease; valvulopathies and structural heart diseases

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The prevalence of aortic stenosis (AS) in the community is an issue of great interest. It is expected that the burden of AS will increase because of the ageing population, and the prevalence will have doubled by 2050. The development of 3/4D reconstruction imaging assessments has bought about further possibilities with a high diagnostic ability. The progress of a minimally invasive and transcutaneous management approach in the era of structural heart diseases is remarkable. Various vavulopathies (such as aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation or tricuspid valve regurgitation, etc.), which were previously untreatable due to high surgical risk, can now be treated. Based on the results of well-organized randomized control trials, transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVI) has shown itself to be comparable to surgery results in terms of outcome and mortality, and, as a consequence, the therapeutic indications of TAVI have expanded from high and inoperable risk patients to intermediate and even lately to lower risk patients. However, despite technological progress being made and increased operator expertise, there are still issues that remain to be discussed. In this Special Issue, we invite authors to submit papers focused on the clinical advancements of AS in terms of long-term management.

Dr. Antonios Halapas
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • valvular heart diseases
  • aortic stenosis
  • prevention
  • diagnosis
  • management

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

16 pages, 714 KiB  
Article
The Role of a Nurse in a Programme for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Impact on Outcomes and Patient Experience
by Miryam González-Cebrian, Marta Alonso-Fernández-Gatta, Ángel Víctor Hernández Martos, Sara Alonso Meléndez, Rosa Carreño Sánchez, Elena Olaya González Egido, Beatriz de Tapia Majado, Elena Calvo, Ignacio Cruz-González and Pedro L. Sánchez
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3944; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113944 - 3 Jun 2025
Viewed by 602
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Multidisciplinary TAVI programs are focused on improving patient-centred care. We compared outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) within a multidisciplinary programme including a nurse with those of patients in the standard programme. Methods: This single-centre observational retrospective study [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Multidisciplinary TAVI programs are focused on improving patient-centred care. We compared outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) within a multidisciplinary programme including a nurse with those of patients in the standard programme. Methods: This single-centre observational retrospective study includes patients with severe aortic valve disease and a TAVI indication, with the goal of comparing a nurse programme with standard practice. In the TAVI nursing programme, the nurse has several key roles: patient and family education, comprehensive assessment and procedure planification, patient and family accompaniment, complications detection during admission and follow-up, and patient experience evaluation in the post-procedure period. Results: 154 patients were included: 87 in the nurse programme and 67 in standard practice groups, respectively. Men comprised 52.6%, with an average age of 81 years. Both groups achieved high procedure success without differences in mortality during admission and follow-up (median 13.4 months). The nurse programme group showed better functional class more frequently and had significantly fewer emergency department visits (11.8% vs. 31.3%) and less frequency of readmission (1.2% vs. 23.4%). The TAVI nurse group reported significantly higher overall satisfaction with the process (9.8 vs. 8.9 scores), with the information received and the nurse treatment being the best rated items. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary programme for patients undergoing TAVI, coordinated by nurses and based on comprehensive attention that places the patients at the centre of the process, is feasible and shows high patient satisfaction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Aortic Valve Stenosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 206 KiB  
Article
Does Intra-Annular Valve Design Equal Intra-Annular Valve Design? Comparison of Two Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prostheses
by Clemens Eckel, Fadi Al-Rashid, Sophie Bargon, Judith Schlüter, Dagmar Sötemann, Albrecht Elsässer, Johannes Blumenstein, Helge Möllmann and Christina Grothusen
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 1824; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061824 - 8 Mar 2025
Viewed by 728
Abstract
Background: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) has been demonstrated to affect the outcome of both surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients. Supra-annular transcatheter valves (SAV) appear to offer a superior solution to intra-annular valves (IAV) in this regard. However, data on the [...] Read more.
Background: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) has been demonstrated to affect the outcome of both surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients. Supra-annular transcatheter valves (SAV) appear to offer a superior solution to intra-annular valves (IAV) in this regard. However, data on the comparison of the intra-annular self-expanding (SE) NAVITOR and the intra-annular balloon-expandable (BE) Sapien 3 Ultra in small annuli are limited. Methods: A total of 179 patients with severe native aortic valve stenosis were treated with either the SE NAVITOR (SEV; n = 104) or the BE Sapien 3 Ultra (BEV; n = 75) between March 2019 and June 2024. We compared the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of the cohort according to the implanted prostheses. BMI-adjusted PPM was defined in accordance with the VARC-3 recommendations. Results: The device success at 30 days was superior in patients treated with the NAVITOR prosthesis (94.2% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001), mainly driven by a higher rate of elevated gradients in the BEV group. The post-procedural mean gradient (8.0 mmHg vs. 13.0 mmHg, p < 0.001) as well as the rate of moderate to severe prosthesis patient mismatch (12.2% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.002) was higher in BEV recipients while the rate of more than moderate paravalvular leakage (PVL) or Valve in Valve (VinV) due to PVL (1.0% vs. 1.3%, p = 1.000) was similar between both groups. Pacemaker implantations were numerically more common after SEV (18.4% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.110). There was a trend towards higher thirty-day all-cause mortality among patients treated with SAV (3.8% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.401). Conclusion: The NAVITOR system may offer a more favorable hemodynamic profile compared to the Sapien 3 Ultra device in patients with small aortic annuli. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Aortic Valve Stenosis)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 753 KiB  
Review
Diagnostic Challenges in the Management of Aortic Valve Stenosis and the Role of Imaging: A Narrative Review
by Dimitrios Karelas, Evangelos Tatsis, Dimitrios Oikonomidis and Constantinos Hristou Papadopoulos
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(4), 1231; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041231 - 13 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1002
Abstract
Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a prevalent and progressive valvular disease that poses significant diagnostic challenges, particularly in low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) states. Accurate assessment of AS severity is crucial for timely intervention and improved clinical outcomes. This narrative review critically evaluates the limitations [...] Read more.
Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a prevalent and progressive valvular disease that poses significant diagnostic challenges, particularly in low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) states. Accurate assessment of AS severity is crucial for timely intervention and improved clinical outcomes. This narrative review critically evaluates the limitations of conventional echocardiographic techniques and explores the role of multimodal imaging—including advanced echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)—in enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Special emphasis is placed on the unique challenges of LF-LG AS, where standard Doppler-derived assessments may misclassify disease severity, necessitating a more integrative diagnostic approach. By addressing these key diagnostic uncertainties and proposing a multimodal framework for improved assessment, this review provides a comprehensive update on best practices in AS evaluation, with the goal of optimizing clinical decision making and patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Aortic Valve Stenosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1043 KiB  
Review
Aortic Stenosis Prevention: Is a New Cardiovascular Disease Paradigm Coming of Age?
by Antonios Halapas and Dennis V. Cokkinos
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 903; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030903 - 29 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1342
Abstract
Calcific aortic stenosis (CAS) is currently recognized as the third most frequent cardiovascular disorder in persons aged above 60 years, after atherosclerotic disease and hypertension, and together with its precursor aortic sclerosis it has been found in more than 30% of elderly individuals. [...] Read more.
Calcific aortic stenosis (CAS) is currently recognized as the third most frequent cardiovascular disorder in persons aged above 60 years, after atherosclerotic disease and hypertension, and together with its precursor aortic sclerosis it has been found in more than 30% of elderly individuals. CAS is an active multifactorial process characterized by a progressive fibro-calcific remodeling and thickening of the AV leaflets caused by hemodynamic flow factors, genetic factors, lipoprotein deposition, oxidation, chronic inflammation, immunomodulators, and finally osteoblastic transformation of cardiac. Herein a comprehensive state-of-the-art paper is presented regarding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of CAS and the potential preventive strategies as an alternative to surgical and interventional treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Aortic Valve Stenosis)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop