jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Clinical Updates in Heart Failure: Innovations in Diagnosis, Therapy and Management

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 August 2026 | Viewed by 1202

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medical and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy
Interests: heart failure pathophysiology; advanced heart failure; cardiovascular imaging; hemodynamics and congestion assessment; guideline-directed medical therapy; digital health and remote HF care

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Heart failure (HF) remains one of the most challenging cardiovascular conditions, with rising prevalence and persistently high clinical impact worldwide. Rapid advances in diagnostics, imaging, therapeutics, and digital health are offering unique opportunities to refine risk stratification, improve decongestion strategies, and personalize HF management across the disease spectrum.

This Special Issue, Clinical Updates in Heart Failure: Innovations in Diagnosis, Therapy and Management, aims to highlight innovative developments in HF care. We welcome original research and review articles focused on novel diagnostic tools, emerging pharmacological and device-based therapies, congestion and hemodynamic assessment, and cardiorenal interactions.

Topics of interest include the following

  • Diagnostic innovations and HF phenotyping;
  • GDMT optimization and therapeutic sequencing;
  • HFpEF, HFmrEF and right ventricular dysfunction therapies;
  • Imaging advances and congestion assessment;
  • Cardiorenal syndrome and comorbidity management;
  • Digital health personalized care.

We warmly invite your contributions to this Special Issue.

Dr. Paolo Severino
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • heart failure
  • HFrEF therapy
  • HFpEF phenotyping
  • right ventricular dysfunction
  • renal congestion assessment
  • diuretic resistance
  • NT-proBNP dynamics
  • cardiac imaging
  • post-discharge management

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 1434 KB  
Article
Prognostic Role of Immunonutritional Indices in Elderly Patients with HFpEF: Long-Term Follow-Up of the CONUT, PNI, and CALLy Scores
by Andrea Sonaglioni, Chiara Lonati, Andrea Donzelli, Federico Napoli, Gian Luigi Nicolosi, Massimo Baravelli, Michele Lombardo and Sergio Harari
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3245; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093245 - 24 Apr 2026
Viewed by 122
Abstract
Background: Malnutrition and systemic inflammation are increasingly recognized as important determinants of prognosis in patients with heart failure. Several immunonutritional indices, including the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, and the C-reactive protein–albumin–lymphocyte (CALLy) index, have been proposed as [...] Read more.
Background: Malnutrition and systemic inflammation are increasingly recognized as important determinants of prognosis in patients with heart failure. Several immunonutritional indices, including the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, and the C-reactive protein–albumin–lymphocyte (CALLy) index, have been proposed as markers of nutritional and inflammatory status. However, their prognostic value in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains incompletely defined. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of these immunonutritional indices in elderly patients with HFpEF over a long-term follow-up period. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 200 elderly patients hospitalized with HFpEF (mean age 86.6 ± 6.5 years). Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters were collected at admission. Nutritional status was assessed using PNI, CONUT score, and CALLy index. Patients were followed for mortality during long-term follow-up. Survival analyses were performed using Cox regression models, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and Kaplan–Meier analysis. Median follow-up was 3.8 years (IQR 2.1–5.9). Results: During follow-up, 123 patients (61.5%) died, while 77 patients (38.5%) were alive at the end of observation. In univariate analysis, PNI, CONUT score, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) ratio were significantly associated with mortality. In multivariate analysis, the CONUT score, LVEF, and the TAPSE/sPAP ratio remained independent predictors of mortality. ROC analysis showed strong prognostic performance for the TAPSE/sPAP ratio (AUC 0.932), CONUT score (AUC 0.925), and LVEF (AUC 0.897). Optimal cut-off values for mortality prediction were CONUT ≥ 6, LVEF ≥ 65%, and TAPSE/sPAP ≤ 0.55 mm/mmHg. Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed significantly reduced survival among patients with higher CONUT scores, higher LVEF, and an impaired TAPSE/sPAP ratio. Conclusions: In elderly patients with HFpEF, nutritional status and cardiopulmonary functional parameters are important determinants of long-term prognosis. The CONUT score emerged as the most informative immunonutritional index, while echocardiographic parameters reflecting ventricular function and right ventricular–pulmonary arterial coupling provided additional prognostic information. Integrating nutritional assessment with echocardiographic evaluation may improve risk stratification in elderly patients with HFpEF. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2299 KB  
Article
Uric Acid Variability Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Heart Failure
by Viana Copeland, Shir Elimeleh, Assi Milwidsky, Noam Makmal, Ranel Loutati, Boris Fishman, Yishay Wasserstrum, Moti Zwilling, Elad Maor and Ehud Grossman
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(6), 2330; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062330 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 408
Abstract
Aims: Elevated uric acid (UA) levels correlate with worse heart failure (HF) outcomes, but past studies used single UA measurements. The effect of intra-individual UA fluctuations, beyond mean levels, is unclear. This study assesses the relationship between serum UA variability and adverse clinical [...] Read more.
Aims: Elevated uric acid (UA) levels correlate with worse heart failure (HF) outcomes, but past studies used single UA measurements. The effect of intra-individual UA fluctuations, beyond mean levels, is unclear. This study assesses the relationship between serum UA variability and adverse clinical outcomes in HF patients. Methods: We analyzed 18,115 HF patients from the SHEBAHEART registry (2009–2025) with at least three UA measurements within three years of diagnosis. UA variability was quantified as the mean deviation (MD) from each patient’s average UA level and divided into quartiles: Q1 (≤−0.69 mg/dL), Q2–Q3 (>−0.69 and <1.53 mg/dL, reference), and Q4 (≥1.53 mg/dL). All-cause mortality was the primary outcome and HF hospitalization was secondary. Cox regression, propensity score matching, and subgroup analyses were used. Results: Over a median follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR 1.6–7.7), 36% of patients were hospitalized for HF and 65.5% died. UA variability showed a graded association with outcomes. Low variability (Q1) was linked to reduced mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.75–0.83) and HF hospitalization (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.90), while high variability (Q4) increased mortality (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.51–1.69) and hospitalization risk (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10–1.25) (all p < 0.001). These associations remained after propensity score matching and across HF subgroups. Conclusions: UA variability is a robust, independent predictor of mortality and HF hospitalization. Serial UA monitoring may enhance risk stratification in HF management. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 250 KB  
Article
Differences in Scalp Hair Trace Element Concentrations in Patients with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) Compared with Controls: A Hypothesis-Generating Study
by Tomasz Urbanowicz, Anetta Hanć, Zofia Kasperowicz, Oliwier Adamczak, Ievgen Spasanenko, Katarzyna Gabriel, Andrzej Tykarski, Zbigniew Krasiński and Beata Krasińska
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(5), 2029; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15052029 - 6 Mar 2026
Viewed by 412
Abstract
Background: The pathophysiology of HFpEF is complex and characterized by systemic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and endothelial dysfunction. Trace element involvement in redox balance, mitochondrial function, and calcium signaling is postulated. This cross-sectional analysis aimed to investigate possible differences in hair scalp trace element [...] Read more.
Background: The pathophysiology of HFpEF is complex and characterized by systemic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and endothelial dysfunction. Trace element involvement in redox balance, mitochondrial function, and calcium signaling is postulated. This cross-sectional analysis aimed to investigate possible differences in hair scalp trace element concentrations in patients with HFpEF and controls. Material and methods: Fifty-eight consecutive patients were enrolled (HFpEF n = 37; controls n = 21). HFpEF diagnosis was established using the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm by two independent cardiologists blinded to hair analysis results. Scalp hair samples were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Results: HFpEF patients demonstrated higher hair concentrations of magnesium (17.8 (7.3–47.5) vs. 14.0 (6.7–29.0) µg/g, p = 0.037), copper (57.24 (33.87–84.76) vs. 12.96 (9.85–26.02) µg/g, p < 0.001), calcium (322 (106–1330) vs. 145 (74–672) µg/g, p = 0.006), and lead (0.257 (0.164–0.563) vs. 0.159 (0.079–0.283) µg/g, p = 0.03). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, HFpEF was associated with differences in selected scalp hair trace element concentrations. The interaction between magnesium, calcium, copper, and lead were noted, with higher concentrations in HFpEF phenotypes. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in larger cohorts incorporating serum/urine measurements and exposure assessment. Full article
Back to TopTop