Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcome for Heart Failure

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiovascular Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 June 2022) | Viewed by 4416

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
2. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
Interests: Heart failure; telemedicine; devices; inotropes; biomarkers

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, CIBERCV, Spain
Interests: Acute coronary síndrome; heart failure; biomarkers; inherited cardiomyopathies; miRNAs

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Interests: cardiac amyloidosis; chronic heart failure; acute heart failure; acute coronary syndromes; aortic stenosis; atrial fibrillation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Heart failure, as we know, is not a single pathological diagnosis, but a clinical syndrome that may be accompanied by signs (pulmonary crackles, peripheral oedema, etc). It is due to a structural and/or functional failure of the heart, which causes elevated intracardiac pressures and/or inadequate cardiac output at rest and/or during exercise. Identifying the cause of this dysfunction is fundamental to apply the most appropriate therapy for our patients. HF can appear secondary to myocardial dysfunction, pathology of the valves, pericardium, and endocardium, and abnormalities of heart rhythm and the treatment will be different in each case. For all these reasons, it is essential to individualize the therapeutic strategies for each patient diagnosed with HF. This present Special Issue aims to contribute to the management of this complex syndrome.

Dr. Javier de Juan
Dr. Luis Miguel Rincon
Dr. Aceña Navarro Alvaro
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Chronic heart failure
  • Acute heart failure
  • Heart failure
  • Personalized therapy
  • Clinical outcome

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

3 pages, 216 KiB  
Editorial
Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcome for Heart Failure
by Alvaro Aceña, Javier de Juan Bagudá and Luis M. Rincón
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4851; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164851 - 18 Aug 2022
Viewed by 1006
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome that results from the structural and/or functional impairment of systolic function or ventricular filling, which in turn causes elevated intracardiac pressure and/or inadequate cardiac output at rest and/or during exercise [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcome for Heart Failure)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

10 pages, 736 KiB  
Article
The Effects of a Therapeutic Strategy Guided by Lung Ultrasound on 6-Month Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure: Results from the EPICC Randomized Controlled Trial
by Juan Torres-Macho, Jose Manuel Cerqueiro-González, Jose Carlos Arévalo-Lorido, Pau Llácer-Iborra, Jose María Cepeda-Rodrigo, Pilar Cubo-Romano, Jose Manuel Casas-Rojo, Raúl Ruiz-Ortega, Luis Manzano-Espinosa, Noel Lorenzo-Villalba and Manuel Méndez-Bailón
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4930; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164930 - 22 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2366
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary congestion (PC) is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and death in patients with heart failure (HF). Lung ultrasound is highly sensitive for detecting PC. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether lung ultrasound-guided therapy improves 6-month outcomes [...] Read more.
Background: Pulmonary congestion (PC) is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and death in patients with heart failure (HF). Lung ultrasound is highly sensitive for detecting PC. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether lung ultrasound-guided therapy improves 6-month outcomes in patients with HF. Methods: A randomized, multicenter, single-blind clinical trial in patients discharged after hospitalization for decompensated HF. Participants were assigned 1:1 to receive treatment guided according to the presence of lung ultrasound signs of congestion (semi-quantitative evaluation of B lines and the presence of pleural effusion) versus standard of care (SOC). The primary endpoint was the combination of cardiovascular death, readmission, or emergency department or day hospital visit due to worsening HF at 6 months. In September 2020, after an interim analysis, patient recruitment was stopped. Results: A total of 79 patients were randomized (mean age 81.2 +/− 9 years) and 41 patients (51.8%) showed a left ventricular ejection fraction >50%. The primary endpoint occurred in 11 patients (29.7%) in the SOC group and in 11 patients (26.1%) in the LUS group (log-rank = 0.83). Regarding nonserious adverse events, no significant differences were found. Conclusions: LUS-guided diuretic therapy after hospital discharge due to ADHF did not show any benefit in survival or a need for intravenous diuretics compared with SOC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcome for Heart Failure)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1170 KiB  
Article
Levosimendan Administration May Provide More Benefit for Survival in Patients with Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Experiencing Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
by Wei-Chieh Lee, Po-Jui Wu, Hsiu-Yu Fang, Yen-Nan Fang, Huang-Chung Chen, Meng-Shen Tong, Pei-Hsun Sung, Chieh-Ho Lee and Wen-Jung Chung
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(14), 3997; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11143997 - 10 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1433
Abstract
Background: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a life-threatening condition with a high mortality rate. Levosimendan is an effective inotropic agent used to maintain cardiac output and a long-lasting effect. However, only few studies have compared the clinical outcomes, after levosimendan therapy, among [...] Read more.
Background: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a life-threatening condition with a high mortality rate. Levosimendan is an effective inotropic agent used to maintain cardiac output and a long-lasting effect. However, only few studies have compared the clinical outcomes, after levosimendan therapy, among etiologies of ADHF. Methods: Between July 2014 and December 2019, 184 patients received levosimendan therapy for ADHF at our hospital. A total of 143 patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), and 41 patients had non-ICM (NICM). Data on comorbidities, echocardiographic findings, laboratory findings, use of mechanical devices, consumption of other inotropic or vasopressor agents, frequency of HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the ICM and NICM groups. Results: Patients with ICM were older with higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus when compared to patients with NICM. Patients with NICM had a poorer left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and higher left ventricular end-systolic volume when compared to patients with ICM. At the 30 day follow-up period, a lower CV mortality (ICM vs. NICM: 20.9% vs. 5.1%; log-rank p = 0.033) and lower all-cause mortality (ICM vs. NICM: 28.7% vs. 9.8%; log-rank p = 0.018) was observed in the NICM patients. A significantly lower all-cause mortality was noted at 180 day (ICM vs. NICM: 39.2% vs. 22.0%; log-rank p = 0.043) and 1 year (ICM vs. NICM: 41.3% vs. 24.4%; log-rank p = 0.046) follow up in the NICM subgroup. NICM (hazard ratio (HR): 0.303, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.108–0.845; p = 0.023) and ECMO use (HR: 2.550, 95% CI: 1.385–4.693; p = 0.003) were significant predictors of 30 day all-cause mortality. Conclusions: In our study on levosimendan use for ADHF patients, better clinical outcomes were noted in the NICM population when compared to the ICM population. In the patients with cardiogenic shock or ventilator use, significantly lower incidence of 30 day mortality presented in the NICM population when compared with the ICM population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Therapy and Clinical Outcome for Heart Failure)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop