Clinical Treatment of Refractory Full Thickness Macular Hole (FTMH)

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Ophthalmology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 24 July 2025 | Viewed by 430

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology of University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Interests: ophthalmology; myopia; eyes; ERM; cataract; retinal diseases; retina; macular degeneration; cataract surgery; lon-gitudinal studies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling and gas tamponade have been proposed by some scholars for treating primary full thickness macular hole (FTMH). They reported closure rates superior to 50%. Improving vitreoretinal surgical techniques, understanding pathological mechanisms of FTMH better and introducing intraoperative adjuvant agents allows surgeons to obtain better results, exceeding 90% FTMH closure rates. The greatest advancement in FTMH surgery was reached with the introduction of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Currently, PPV with ILM peeling is the gold standard treatment for FTMH. Despite the macular hole closure rate being very high, a refractory FTMH may occur.

Refractory FTMH is a generic definition that includes both a “reopened FTMH”, an FTMH occurring after surgically induced closure, and “unclosed or persistent FTMH”, an FTMH that does not close at the end of surgery.

A FTMH refractory to PPV and ILM peeling is a challenge for surgeons, and several of the proposed surgical techniques have been studied in the ongoing search for the best treatment. An enlargement of ILM peeling demonstrated that ILM has to be removed up to the vascular arcades. Light silicone oil (SO), heavy SO and blood derivatives (as whole blood (WB) or autologous platelet concentrate (APC)) have been widely used, alone or combined with other procedures.

Some scholars proposed to place an autologous tissue graft into or over a FTMH, such as autologous free ILM flap transplantation (free ILM flap), lens capsular flap (LCF) harvested from the anterior or posterior capsule, autologous retinal graft (ARG), and human amniotic membrane (hAM). The rationale for using one of these tissue grafts is based on their potential induction of cell proliferation, potential role as a scaffold for the subsequent regeneration of the retinal layers (ILM, LCF and hAM) or even ARG and potential functional activation by contact with the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) or the edges of FTMH. Using the originally proposed surgical techniques, different surgical variants have been implemented via the use of adjuvant agents for facilitating the positioning of the tissue graft and reducing the risk of postoperative graft dislodgement. Surgical techniques that are completely different from the previously cited perifoveal relaxing retinotomy, arcuate temporal retinotomy and macular hole hydrodissection (MHH) techniques are worthy of stand-alone status. These techniques are based on the rationale of making the retina more elastic for inducing FTMH closure.

This Special Issue will collect research on the surgical techniques currently in use for the treatment of refractory FTMH and provide information on the surgical variants, the results obtained and the complications to better understand which is the best and most standardizable approach for this macular pathology.

Dr. Rino Frisina
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • refractory full thickness macular hole
  • pars plana vittectomy
  • internal limiting membrane
  • peeling
  • tamponade
  • flap

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 2192 KiB  
Article
Combined Surgically Induced Macular Detachment and Autologous Internal Limiting Membrane Transplantation for Refractory Full Thickness Macular Hole
by Rino Frisina, Laura Di Leo, Ilenia Gallo Afflitto, Andrea Vulpetti, Lorenzo Motta and Gabriella De Salvo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 2123; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062123 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 268
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To propose a combined surgery of surgically induced macular detachment (MD) and autologous internal limiting membrane (ILM) transplantation to treat refractory full thickness macular holes (FTMHs). Methods: A series of patients affected by refractory FTMHs underwent a combined surgery. The [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To propose a combined surgery of surgically induced macular detachment (MD) and autologous internal limiting membrane (ILM) transplantation to treat refractory full thickness macular holes (FTMHs). Methods: A series of patients affected by refractory FTMHs underwent a combined surgery. The following demographic and clinical data were collected: age, gender, eye, lens status, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The tomographic pre- and post-operative parameters were the following: pre-operative FTMH diameter, refractory FTMH morphology (flat/with cuff), FTMH closure, foveal profile (regular/flat/inverted), flap displacement, and outer retinal layers restoration. Results: The study included a total of 14 pseudophakic eyes (14 patients). In all of the patients, surgical FTMH closure was reached. The mean BCVA improved after surgery from 1.1 ± 0.14 to 0.48 ± 03 logMAR (p < 0.0001). Statistical analysis demonstrated that the larger the FTMH, the poorer the post-operative gain in BCVA (p −0.5). The post-operative regular foveal profile was obtained in 50% of the eyes with a mean post-operative BCVA of 0.3 logMAR. A negative correlation between the time interval from diagnosis to surgery and post-operative BCVA gain was highlighted (p −0.8). Conclusions: The proposed combined surgical technique led to encouraging anatomical and functional results. Surgically induced MD increased the elasticity of the retina, and the free flap isolated the macular hole from the vitreous chamber favoring its closure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Treatment of Refractory Full Thickness Macular Hole (FTMH))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop