jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatments of Early-Stage NSCLC: New Advances and Future Prospective

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Pulmonology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2024) | Viewed by 25032

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
2. Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
Interests: minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery; lung cancer; mediastinal tumors; pleural tumor
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of cancer death with a poor 5-year survival rate, mostly due to the fact that only 20% of NSCLC patients are diagnosed when the disease is still potentially resectable and curable. Thus, the diagnosis of NSCLC in the early stage becomes essential for its therapeutic and prognostic implications.

In the last two decades, with the further implementation of lung cancer screening programs, the detection rate of early-stage NSCLC has greatly increased, with significantly reduced mortality in high-risk individuals. Consequently, the field of thoracic surgery has seen a rapid development of minimally invasive techniques, such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), which have nowadays become the gold-standard procedures for treating early-stage NSCLC cancer.

This Special Issue will include clinically oriented reviews and original papers on current and future diagnostic tools, as well as established and upcoming prevention, diagnosis, and treatments for NSCLC.

Dr. Monica Casiraghi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • non-small-cell lung cancer
  • NSCLC
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • screening
  • diagnosis

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (13 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

4 pages, 205 KiB  
Editorial
Sublobar Resection for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: An Oncologically Valid Procedure?
by Ian Diebels, Marc Dubois and Paul E. Y. Van Schil
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(7), 2674; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072674 - 3 Apr 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1710
Abstract
In the era of minimally invasive surgery, the role of sublobar resection comprising anatomical segmentectomy and wide wedge excision remains controversial [...] Full article

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

13 pages, 269 KiB  
Article
Two-Year Experience of a Center of Excellence for the Comprehensive Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer at a Fourth-Level Hospital in Bogota, Colombia: Observational Case Series Study and Retrospective Analysis
by Luis Gerardo García-Herreros, Enid Ximena Rico-Rivera and Olga Milena García Morales
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6820; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226820 - 13 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1045
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of 56 patients admitted to the Lung Cancer Clinical Care Center (C3) at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (FSFB) between 2 May 2022 and 22 April 2024. The focus was on demographic characteristics, smoking [...] Read more.
Background: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of 56 patients admitted to the Lung Cancer Clinical Care Center (C3) at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (FSFB) between 2 May 2022 and 22 April 2024. The focus was on demographic characteristics, smoking history, comorbidities, lung cancer types, TNM classification, treatment modalities, and outcomes. Methods: This observational case series study reviewed medical records and included patients over 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data were collected and analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, treatment types, biomolecular profiling, and survival rates. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were anonymized. Results: The mean age was 71.8 years with a female predominance (53.6%). A history of smoking was present in 71.4% of patients. Adenocarcinoma was the most common type (75.0%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (19.6%). At admission, the most frequent TNM stages were IA2 (17.9%) and IVA (16.1%). One-year survival was 68.8%, and 94.3% of stage I–IIIA patients underwent PET scans. Biomolecular profiling revealed 69.2% non-mutated EGFR, 90.4% ALK-negative, and various PDL-1 expression levels. Immunotherapy was received by 91.4% of patients, with Alectinib and Osimertinib being common. Grade III–IV pneumonitis occurred in 5.4% of patients. Conclusions: The study’s findings align with existing literature, highlighting significant smoking history, common adenocarcinoma, and substantial use of immunotherapy. Limitations include the observational design, small sample size, and short follow-up period, impacting the generalizability and long-term outcome assessment. Future research should address these limitations and explore longitudinal outcomes and emerging therapies. Full article
11 pages, 1236 KiB  
Article
Mini-Invasive Thoracic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Which Is the Surgeon’s Best Approach for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery?
by Beatrice Trabalza Marinucci, Alessandra Siciliani, Claudio Andreetti, Matteo Tiracorrendo, Fabiana Messa, Giorgia Piccioni, Giulio Maurizi, Antonio D’Andrilli, Cecilia Menna, Anna Maria Ciccone, Camilla Vanni, Giacomo Argento, Erino Angelo Rendina and Mohsen Ibrahim
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6447; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216447 - 28 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 878
Abstract
Objectives: The choice of the best Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) surgical approach is still debated. Surgeons are often faced with the choice between innovation and self-confidence. The present study reports the experience of a high-volume single institute, comparing data of uni-portal, bi-portal and [...] Read more.
Objectives: The choice of the best Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) surgical approach is still debated. Surgeons are often faced with the choice between innovation and self-confidence. The present study reports the experience of a high-volume single institute, comparing data of uni-portal, bi-portal and tri-portal VATS, to find out the safest and most effective mini-invasive approach, leading surgeon’s choice. Methods: Between 2015 and 2022, a total of 210 matched patients underwent VATS lobectomy for early-stage cancer, using uni-portal (fifth intercostal space), bi-portal (seventh space for optic and the fifth), and tri-portal (seventh and the fifth/four) access. Patients were matched for age, BPCO, smoke, comorbidities, lesions (size and staging) to obtain three homogenous groups (A: uni-portal; B: bi-portal; C: tri-portal). The surgeons had comparable expertise. Data were retrospectively collected from institutional database and analyzed. Results: No differences were detected considering time of surgery, length of hospital stay, complications, conversion rate, specific survival, and days of chest tube length of stay. Better results on chest tube removal were described in group A (mean 1.1 days) compared to B (mean 2.6 days) and C (mean 4.7 days); nevertheless, they not statistically significant (p = 0.106). Conclusions: No significant differences among the groups were described, except for the reduction in chest tube permanence in group A. This allows to hypothesize an enhanced recovery after surgery in this group but the different approaches in this series seem to guarantee comparable safety and effectiveness. Considering no superiority of one method above the others, the best suggested approach should be the one for which the surgeon feels more confident. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1421 KiB  
Article
Co-Occurring Driver Genomic Alterations in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Retrospective Analysis
by Ilaria Attili, Riccardo Asnaghi, Davide Vacirca, Riccardo Adorisio, Alessandra Rappa, Alberto Ranghiero, Mariano Lombardi, Carla Corvaja, Valeria Fuorivia, Ambra Carnevale Schianca, Pamela Trillo Aliaga, Gianluca Spitaleri, Ester Del Signore, Juliana Guarize, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Nicola Fusco, Filippo de Marinis and Antonio Passaro
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4476; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154476 - 31 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1871
Abstract
Background: Actionable driver mutations account for 40–50% of NSCLC cases, and their identification clearly affects treatment choices and outcomes. Conversely, non-actionable mutations are genetic alterations that do not currently have established treatment implications. Among co-occurring alterations, the identification of concurrent actionable genomic alterations [...] Read more.
Background: Actionable driver mutations account for 40–50% of NSCLC cases, and their identification clearly affects treatment choices and outcomes. Conversely, non-actionable mutations are genetic alterations that do not currently have established treatment implications. Among co-occurring alterations, the identification of concurrent actionable genomic alterations is a rare event, potentially impacting prognosis and treatment outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the prevalence and patterns of concurrent driver genomic alterations in a large series of NSCLCs to investigate their association with clinicopathological characteristics, to assess the prognosis of patients whose tumor harbors concurrent alterations in the genes of interest and to explore their potential therapeutic implications. Results: Co-occurring driver alterations were identified in 26 out of 1520 patients with at least one gene alteration (1.7%). Within these cases, the incidence of concurrent actionable gene alterations was 39% (0.7% of the overall cohort). Among compound actionable gene mutations, EGFR was the most frequently involved gene (70%). The most frequent association was EGFR mutations with ROS1 rearrangement. Front-line targeted treatments were the preferred approach in patients with compound actionable mutations, with dismal median PFS observed (6 months). Conclusions: Advances in genomic profiling technologies are facilitating the identification of concurrent mutations. In patients with concurrent actionable gene alterations, integrated molecular and clinical data should be used to guide treatment decisions, always considering rebiopsy at the moment of disease progression. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 5319 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Selected Toll-like Receptors in the Pathogenesis and Advancement of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
by Jolanta Smok-Kalwat, Paulina Mertowska, Sebastian Mertowski, Stanisław Góźdź, Izabela Korona-Głowniak, Wojciech Kwaśniewski and Ewelina Grywalska
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(10), 2793; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13102793 - 9 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1646
Abstract
(1) Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a significant global health challenge, contributing to numerous cancer deaths. Despite advances in diagnostics and therapy, identifying reliable biomarkers for prognosis and therapeutic stratification remains difficult. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), crucial for innate immunity, now show potential [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a significant global health challenge, contributing to numerous cancer deaths. Despite advances in diagnostics and therapy, identifying reliable biomarkers for prognosis and therapeutic stratification remains difficult. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), crucial for innate immunity, now show potential as contributors to cancer development and progression. This study aims to investigate the role of TLR expression as potential biomarkers in the development and progression of NSCLC. (2) Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 89 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and 40 healthy volunteers, for whom the prevalence of TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 was assessed on selected subpopulations of T and B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of recruited patients along with the assessment of their serum concentration. (3) Result: Our study showed several significant changes in NSCLC patients at the beginning of the study. This resulted in a 5-year follow-up of changes in selected TLRs in recruited patients. Due to the high mortality rate of NSCLC patients, only 16 patients survived the 5 years. (4) Conclusions: The results suggest that TLRs may constitute real biomarker molecules that may be used for future prognostic purposes in NSCLC. However, further validation through prospective clinical and functional studies is necessary to confirm their clinical utility. These conclusions may lead to better risk stratification and tailored interventions, benefiting NSCLC patients and bringing medicine closer to precision. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2210 KiB  
Article
Enhancing Immune Response in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Impact of the 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine
by Jolanta Smok-Kalwat, Paulina Mertowska, Izabela Korona-Głowniak, Sebastian Mertowski, Paulina Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej, Dominika Bębnowska, Krzysztof Gosik, Andrzej Stepulak, Stanisław Góźdź, Jacek Roliński, Zofia Górecka, Jan Siwiec and Ewelina Grywalska
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1520; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051520 - 6 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1677
Abstract
Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed diseases among all types of lung cancer. Infectious diseases contribute to morbidity and mortality by delaying appropriate anti-cancer therapy in patients with NSCLC. Methods: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness [...] Read more.
Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed diseases among all types of lung cancer. Infectious diseases contribute to morbidity and mortality by delaying appropriate anti-cancer therapy in patients with NSCLC. Methods: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in 288 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients. The analysis of the post-vaccination response was performed after vaccination by assessing the frequency of plasmablasts via flow cytometry and by assessing the concentration of specific anti-pneumococcal antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: The results of the study showed that NSCLC patients responded to the vaccine with an increase in the frequencies of plasmablasts and antibodies but to a lesser extent than healthy controls. The immune system response to PCV13 vaccination was better in patients with lower-stage NSCLC. We found higher antibody levels after vaccination in NSCLC patients who survived 5 years of follow-up. Conclusions: We hope that our research will contribute to increasing patients′ and physicians′ awareness of the importance of including PCV13 vaccinations in the standard of oncological care, which will extend the survival time of patients and improve their quality of life. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 8702 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in Robot-Assisted and Video-Assisted Lobectomies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Giulia Fabbri, Federico Femia, Savvas Lampridis, Eleonora Farinelli, Alessandro Maraschi, Tom Routledge and Andrea Bille
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(20), 6609; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206609 - 19 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1614
Abstract
This study compares long-term outcomes in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); all consecutive patients who underwent RATS or VATS lobectomy for NSCLC between July 2015 and December 2021 in our [...] Read more.
This study compares long-term outcomes in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); all consecutive patients who underwent RATS or VATS lobectomy for NSCLC between July 2015 and December 2021 in our center were enrolled in a single-center prospective study. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence rate. The secondary outcomes were complication rate, length of hospitalization (LOS), duration of chest tubes (LOD), and number of lymph node stations harvested. A total of 619 patients treated with RATS (n = 403) or VATS (n = 216) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in OS between the RATS and VATS groups (3-year OS: 75.9% vs. 82.3%; 5-year OS: 70.5% vs. 68.5%; p = 0.637). There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the RATS and VATS groups (3-year DFS: 92.4% vs. 81.2%; 5-year DFS: 90.3% vs. 77.6%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis according to the pathological stage also demonstrated a significant difference between RATS and VATS groups in DFS in stage I (3-year DFS: 94.4% vs. 88.9%; 5-year DFS: 91.8% vs. 85.2%; p = 0.037) and stage III disease (3-year DFS: 82.4% vs. 51.1%; 5-year DFS: 82.4% vs. 37.7%; p = 0.024). Moreover, in multivariable Cox regression analysis, the surgical approach was significantly associated with DFS, with an HR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.27–0.78, p = 0.004) for RATS compared to VATS. VATS lobectomy was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to RATS (21.8% vs. 6.2%; p < 0.001). LOS and LOD, as well as complication rate and in-hospital and 30-day mortality, were similar among the groups. RATS lobectomy was associated with a higher number of lymph node stations harvested compared to VATS (7 [IQR:2] vs. 5 [IQR:2]; p < 0.001). In conclusion, in our series, RATS lobectomy for lung cancer led to a significantly higher DFS and significantly lower recurrence rate compared to the VATS approach. RATS may allow more extensive nodal dissection, and this could translate into reduced recurrence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4516 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Quality of Life after Robotic, Video-Assisted, and Open Surgery for Lung Cancer
by Nicole Asemota, Alessandro Maraschi, Savvas Lampridis, John Pilling, Juliet King, Corinne Le Reun and Andrea Bille
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(19), 6230; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196230 - 27 Sep 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1725
Abstract
Post-operative quality of life (QOL) has become crucial in choosing operative approaches in thoracic surgery. However, compared to VATS and thoracotomy, QOL results post-RATS are limited. We compared QOL before and after RATS and between RATS, VATS, and thoracotomy. We conducted a retrospective [...] Read more.
Post-operative quality of life (QOL) has become crucial in choosing operative approaches in thoracic surgery. However, compared to VATS and thoracotomy, QOL results post-RATS are limited. We compared QOL before and after RATS and between RATS, VATS, and thoracotomy. We conducted a retrospective review of lung cancer surgical patients from 2015 to 2020. Patients completed validated EORTC QOL questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13). Results were analysed using the EORTC Scoring Guide, with statistical analysis. A total of 47 (94%) pre- and post-RATS questionnaires were returned. Forty-two patients underwent anatomical lung resections. In addition, 80% of patients experienced uncomplicated recovery. All global and functional QOL domains improved post-operatively, as did most symptoms (13/19). Only four symptoms worsened, including dyspnoea (p = 0.017), with two symptoms unchanged. Of the 148 returned questionnaires for all approaches (open-22/VATS-79/RATS-47), over 70% showed a high pre-operative performance status. Most patients underwent anatomical lung resection, with only VATS patients requiring conversion (n = 6). Complications were slightly higher in RATS, with one patient requiring re-intubation. RATS patients demonstrated the highest global and functional QOL. Physical QOL was lowest after thoracotomy (p = 0.002). RATS patients reported the fewest symptoms, including dyspnoea (p = 0.046), fatigue (p < 0.001), and pain (p = 0.264). Overall, RATS results in a significantly better post-operative QOL and should be considered the preferred surgical approach for lung cancer patients. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 873 KiB  
Article
Swiss Pilot Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Study: First Baseline Screening Results
by Lisa Jungblut, Harry Etienne, Caroline Zellweger, Alessandra Matter, Miriam Patella, Thomas Frauenfelder and Isabelle Opitz
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(18), 5771; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185771 - 5 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1577
Abstract
This pilot study conducted in Switzerland aims to assess the implementation, execution, and performance of low-dose CT lung cancer screening (LDCT-LCS). With lung cancer being the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Switzerland, the study seeks to explore the potential impact of screening [...] Read more.
This pilot study conducted in Switzerland aims to assess the implementation, execution, and performance of low-dose CT lung cancer screening (LDCT-LCS). With lung cancer being the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Switzerland, the study seeks to explore the potential impact of screening on reducing mortality rates. However, initiating a lung cancer screening program poses challenges and depends on country-specific factors. This prospective study, initiated in October 2018, enrolled participants meeting the National Lung Cancer Study criteria or a lung cancer risk above 1.5% according to the PLCOm2012 lung cancer risk-model. LDCT scans were assessed using Lung-RADS. Enrollment and follow-up are ongoing. To date, we included 112 participants, with a median age of 62 years (IQR 57–67); 42% were female. The median number of packs smoked each year was 45 (IQR 38–57), and 24% had stopped smoking before enrollment. The mean PLCOm2012 was 3.7% (±2.5%). We diagnosed lung cancer in 3.6% of participants (95%, CI:1.0–12.1%), with various stages, all treated with curative intent. The recall rate for intermediate results (Lung-RADS 3,4a) was 15%. LDCT-LCS in Switzerland, using modified inclusion criteria, is feasible. Further analysis will inform the potential implementation of a comprehensive lung cancer screening program in Switzerland. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 8709 KiB  
Article
Do More with Less? Lobectomy vs. Segmentectomy for Patients with Congenital Pulmonary Malformations
by Beatrice Trabalza Marinucci, Cecilia Menna, Paolo Scanagatta, Silvia Fiorelli, Matteo Tiracorrendo, Giuseppe Naldi, Alessandro Inserra, Francesco Macchini, Erino Angelo Rendina and Mohsen Ibrahim
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(16), 5237; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165237 - 11 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1576
Abstract
Background: Congenital Pulmonary Malformations (CPMs) are rare benign lesions potentially causing infective complications and/or malignant transformation, requiring surgery even when asymptomatic. CPMs are rare in adulthood but potentially detected at any age. There is not a consensus on the correct extent of resection [...] Read more.
Background: Congenital Pulmonary Malformations (CPMs) are rare benign lesions potentially causing infective complications and/or malignant transformation, requiring surgery even when asymptomatic. CPMs are rare in adulthood but potentially detected at any age. There is not a consensus on the correct extent of resection in both adults and paediatrics. This retrospective multicentric study aims to identify the appropriate surgical resection to prevent the recurrence of the related respiratory symptoms. Methods: Between 2010 and 2020, a total of 96 patients (adults and pediatrics) underwent surgery for CPMs in 4 centers. A 2:1 propensity score matching (considering sex and lesion side) was performed, identifying 2 groups: 50 patients underwent lobectomy (group A) and 25 sub-lobar resections (group B). Clinical and histopathological characteristics, early and late complications, and symptom recurrence were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Patients who underwent lobectomy had a statistically significant lower rate of recurrence (4% vs. 24% of group B, p = 0.014) and a lower rate of intraoperative complications (p = 0.014). Logistic regression identified sub-lobar resection (p = 0.040), intra- and post-operative complications (p = 0.105 and 0.022),and associated developed neoplasm (p = 0.062) as possible risk factors for symptom recurrence after surgery. Conclusions: Pulmonary lobectomy seems to be the most effective surgical treatment for CPMs, guaranteeing the stable remission of symptoms and a lower rate of intra- and postoperative complications. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies comparing lobectomy and sub-lobar resections in patients affected by CPMs, considering the low incidence worldwide. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 1263 KiB  
Article
Rate and Predictors of Unforeseen PN1/PN2-Disease in Surgically Treated cN0 NSCLC-Patients with Primary Tumor > 3 cm: Nationwide Results from Italian VATS-Group Database
by Filippo Lococo, Dania Nachira, Marco Chiappetta, Isabella Sperduti, Maria Teresa Congedo, Elisa Meacci, Fausto Leoncini, Rocco Trisolini, Roberto Crisci, Carlo Curcio, Monica Casiraghi, Stefano Margaritora and on the behalf of the Italian VATS Group
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(6), 2345; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062345 - 17 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1948
Abstract
Background. Since no robust data are available on the real rate of unforeseen N1-N2 disease (uN) and the relative predictive factors in clinical-N0 NSCLC with peripheral tumours > 3 cm, the usefulness of performing a (mini)invasive mediastinal staging in this setting is debated. [...] Read more.
Background. Since no robust data are available on the real rate of unforeseen N1-N2 disease (uN) and the relative predictive factors in clinical-N0 NSCLC with peripheral tumours > 3 cm, the usefulness of performing a (mini)invasive mediastinal staging in this setting is debated. Herein, we investigated these issues in a nationwide database. Methods. From 01/2014 to 06/2020, 15,784 thoracoscopic major lung resections were prospectively recorded in the “Italian VATS-Group” database. Among them, 1982 clinical-N0 peripheral solid-type NSCLC > 3 cm were identified, and information was retrospectively reviewed. A mean comparison of more than two groups was made by ANOVA (Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons), while associations between the categorical variables were estimated with a Chi-square test. The multivariate logistic regression model and Kaplan–Meyer method were used to identify the independent predictors of nodal upstaging and survival results, respectively. Results. At pathological staging, 229 patients had N1-involvement (11.6%), and 169 had uN2 disease (8.5%). Independent predictors of uN1 were SUVmax (OR: 1.98; CI 95: 1.44–2.73, p = 0.0001) and tumour-size (OR: 1.52; CI: 1.11–2.10, p = 0.01), while independent predictors of uN2 were age (OR: 0.98; CI 95: 0.96–0.99, p = 0.039), histology (OR: 0.48; CI 95: 0.30–0.78, p = 0.003), SUVmax (OR: 2.07; CI 95: 1.15–3.72, p = 0.015), and the number of resected lymph nodes (OR: 1.03; CI 95: 1.01–1.05, p = 0.002). Conclusions. The unforeseen N1-N2 disease in cN0/NSCLCs > 3 cm undergoing VATS resection is observable in between 12 and 8% of all cases. We have identified predictors that could guide physicians in selecting the best candidate for (mini)invasive mediastinal staging. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 607 KiB  
Article
Surgically Treated pT2aN0M0 (Stage IB) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 20-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study
by Monica Casiraghi, Francesco Petrella, Claudia Bardoni, Shehab Mohamed, Giulia Sedda, Juliana Guarize, Antonio Passaro, Filippo De Marinis, Patrick Maisonneuve and Lorenzo Spaggiari
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(5), 2081; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052081 - 6 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3486
Abstract
Introduction The suitability of adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still under debate considering the cost–benefit ratio between improvement in survival and side effects. We retrospectively evaluated survival and incidence of recurrence in radically resected [...] Read more.
Introduction The suitability of adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still under debate considering the cost–benefit ratio between improvement in survival and side effects. We retrospectively evaluated survival and incidence of recurrence in radically resected stage IB NSCLC, to determine whether AT could significantly improve prognosis. Methods Between 1998 and 2020, 4692 consecutive patients underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for NSCLC. Two hundred nineteen patients were pathological T2aN0M0 (>3 and ≤4 cm) NSCLC 8th TNM. None received preoperative or AT. Overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and the cumulative incidence of relapse were plotted and log-rank or Gray’s tests were used to assess the difference in outcome between groups. Results The most frequent histology was adenocarcinoma (66.7%). Median OS was 146 months. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year OS rates were 79%, 60%, and 47%, whereas the 5-, 10-, and 15-year CSS were 88%, 85%, and 83%, respectively. OS was significantly related to age (p < 0.001) and cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.04), whereas number of LNs removed was an independent prognostic factor of CSS (p = 0.02). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 5-, 10-, and 15-year were 23%, 31%, and 32%, respectively, and significantly related to the number of LNs removed (p = 0.01). Patients with more than 20 LNs removed and clinical stage I had a significantly lower relapse (p = 0.02). Conclusions Excellent CSS, up to 83% at 15-year, and relatively low risk of recurrence for stage IB NSCLC (8th TNM) patients suggested that AT for those patients could be reserved only for very selected high-risk cases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

13 pages, 542 KiB  
Review
Recent Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review
by Jibran Ahmad Khan, Ibrahem Albalkhi, Sarah Garatli and Marcello Migliore
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3354; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113354 - 6 Jun 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2775
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer remains a global health concern, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprising the majority of cases. Early detection of lung cancer has led to an increased number of cases identified in the earlier stages of NSCLC. This required the revaluation [...] Read more.
Introduction: Lung cancer remains a global health concern, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprising the majority of cases. Early detection of lung cancer has led to an increased number of cases identified in the earlier stages of NSCLC. This required the revaluation of the NSCLC treatment approaches for early stage NSCLC. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search using multiple databases to identify relevant studies on treatment modalities for early stage NSCLC. Inclusion criteria prioritized, but were not limited to, clinical trials and meta-analyses on surgical approaches to early stage NSCLC conducted from 2021 onwards. Discussion: Minimally invasive approaches, such as VATS and RATS, along with lung resection techniques, including sublobar resection, have emerged as treatments for early stage NSCLC. Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) have shown prognostic significance, especially when analyzing the consolidation/tumor ratio (CTR). There have also been updates on managing GGOs, including the non-surgical approaches, the extent of lung resection indicated, and the level of lymphadenectomy required. Conclusions: The management of early stage NSCLC requires a further assessment of treatment strategies. This includes understanding the required extent of surgical resection, interpreting the significance of GGOs (specifically GGOs with a high CTR), and evaluating the efficacy of alternative therapies. Customized treatment involving surgical and non-surgical interventions is essential for advancing patient care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop