jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Current Clinical Treatments and Challenges for Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2025) | Viewed by 1089

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Cardiothoracic Intensive Care, Cardiothoracic Department, ASST Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy
Interests: cardiogenic shock; mechanical circulatory support; ventricular assist devices; right ventricular dysfunction; veno-arterial ECMO; veno-venous ECMO; cardiac anesthesia; ARDS
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University, 94100 Enna, Italy
2. Centro Cuore GB Morgagni, 95125 Catania, Italy
Interests: cardiogenic shock; advanced heart failure; mechanical circulatory support; ventricular assist devices; biocompatibility; right ventricular dysfunction; veno-arterial ECMO; veno-venous ECMO; ARDS
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Background: Heart failure and cardiogenic shock continue to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with a wide spectrum of etiologies and each patient presenting with peculiar characteristics. While current therapies for chronic heart failure are numerous and supported by strong and growing bodies of evidence, the best treatment strategy for patiens suffering from cardiogenic shock remains to be defined. Importantly, the intersection between the acute phase and the opportunity to start guideline-directed medical therapy has not yet been reported. Inotropes are often use in clinical practice, but no impact on outcomes has been demonstrated. Moreover, their cardiocirculatory effects, when prolonged, may be deleterious. By contrast, early MCS may reduce the need of inotropes/vasopressors; however, the best available evidence on the medical treatment of heart failure is not acknowledged in cardiogenic shock. MCS use has risen dramatically, with Impella CP having recently been shown to be superior to standard therapy, but catecholamine use is still very widespread. Goals: The aim of this work is to focus on contemporary drug management in the clinical scenario of cardiogenic shock, acknowledging the evidence from RCTs and leveraging that on GDMT to further improve the outcomes of patients with severe heart failure. We also aim to provide information on the potential for native heart recovery and its associated benefits, as well as discuss the new frontiers of heart replacement with a totally artificial heart and its role in very sick patients.

Information to Authors: Led by an interdisciplinary team of experts, this Special Issue is open for submissions of original articles, reviews, and viewpoints focused on MCS and cardiogenic shock, with a specific focus on patients with heart failure. The areas of interest include but are not limited to the following: (1) hemodynamic adaptations after MCS; (2) identification of biventricular failure; (3) PCI strategies in MCS-supported patients with CS; and (4) perioperative optimization of high-risk patient candidates for heart replacement therapies.

Dr. Andrea Montisci
Prof. Dr. Federico Pappalardo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cardiogenic shock
  • heart failure
  • mechanical circulatory support
  • Impella
  • veno-arterial ECMO
  • unloading
  • heart failure
  • heart transplant
  • artificial heart
  • left ventricular assist devices

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

21 pages, 942 KB  
Review
One Enzyme, Many Faces: The Expanding Role of DPP3 in Cardiovascular and Critical Care
by Georgios E. Zakynthinos, Nikolaos K. Kokkinos, Ioanna G. Tzima, Ilias E. Dimeas, Ioannis Gialamas, Andreas Gerostathis, Ourania Katsarou, Aikaterini Tsatsaragkou, Konstantinos Kalogeras, Evangelos Oikonomou and Gerasimos Siasos
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(21), 7459; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217459 - 22 Oct 2025
Viewed by 661
Abstract
Dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3) is a zinc-dependent aminopeptidase that is found in several places and is thought to be a cytosolic enzyme that helps break down peptides. Recent studies, however, have revealed its extensive therapeutic relevance upon release into circulation, functioning not only [...] Read more.
Dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3) is a zinc-dependent aminopeptidase that is found in several places and is thought to be a cytosolic enzyme that helps break down peptides. Recent studies, however, have revealed its extensive therapeutic relevance upon release into circulation, functioning not only as a biomarker for cellular injury but also as an active modulator of cardiovascular homeostasis and critical disease. High levels of circulating DPP3 (cDPP3) have been linked to the causes of cardiogenic shock, septic shock, acute coronary syndromes, heart failure, and serious viral diseases like COVID-19. Its enzymatic breakdown of angiotensin II disrupts vascular tone and myocardial contractility, leading to hemodynamic instability and multi-organ failure. In numerous cohorts, cDPP3 levels reliably correspond with disease severity, acute renal damage, and death, but dynamic trajectories yield superior predictive information relative to single assessments. In addition to risk stratification, translational studies utilizing rodent and porcine models illustrate that antibody-mediated inhibition of cDPP3 with the humanized monoclonal antibody Procizumab reinstates cardiac function, stabilizes renal perfusion, diminishes oxidative stress and inflammation, and enhances survival. First-in-human experiences in patients with refractory septic cardiomyopathy have further emphasized its therapeutic promise. DPP3 is a good example of a biomarker and a mediator in cardiovascular and critical care. Its growing clinical and translational profile makes cDPP3 a strong predictor of bad outcomes and a prospective target for treatment. Ongoing clinical trials using Procizumab will determine if neutralizing cDPP3 can lead to enhanced outcomes in individuals with cardiogenic and septic shock. This review outlines the physiological mechanisms, clinical implications, and emerging therapeutic potential of DPP3 in cardiovascular and critical care. Ongoing trials with Procizumab will clarify whether neutralizing cDPP3 can improve outcomes in patients with cardiogenic and septic shock. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop