International Medical Education

The use of interpreter services is an important component of medical care. It is critical for medical students to practice this during training. It is known that simulation and role play provide important opportunities for students to practice skills. This scoping review maps the experience that medical students around the world have practicing with interpreter services in a simulated environment. We searched within three major databases (PubMed, ERIC, and SCOPUS) using a wide range of search terms for publications from the past 15 years. This scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Of the 1341 studies initially obtained from search terms, 22 were ultimately found to meet inclusion criteria. There is variability in curricula offered including when in medical school, what other specialties are involved, and how the education is conveyed. Most publications lacked longitudinal follow-up and assessment of learner competence was limited. Review articles, a prevalence study, and proof of concept studies also serve to demonstrate the breadth of publications on this subject. This is an area of important consideration within medical education today. Many studies highlight the relative scarcity of formal programs as well as a lack of consistency. Where programs do exist, the importance of including simulation is highlighted. Full article

This pre–post study aimed to determine whether interprofessional education (IPE) combining online and in-person instruction enhanced medical students’ empathy. The IPE program was conducted during the academic years 2022 and 2023 for medical (n = 240) and other healthcare students. Subjects discussed a case scenario involving a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia, sharing their ideas within their team and with other teams. The medical students’ empathy was assessed before and after the IPE program using the Japanese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Health Professions Students (JSE-HPS). Medical students provided written responses to the question, “What do you think is necessary for the care of patients with cancer, besides medical skills and knowledge?” Empathy-related terms were identified using frequency and co-occurrence analyses. The frequencies before and after the IPE were compared. The median JSE-HPS score rose from 98.0 to 114.0 (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The frequency of words categorized as demonstrating empathy increased from 37.9% to 52.9% after the IPE (p < 0.01, chi-square test). Our hybrid IPE program enhanced medical students’ empathy, which was supported by both quantitative and qualitative methods. Full article

Background: Pathology education requires innovative experimental teaching approaches to enhance clinical competency. This study evaluated the integration of special staining techniques into pathology curricula to improve diagnostic confidence and practical skills. Methods: The reform involved 227 medical students, incorporating acid-fast, PAS, GMS, Congo red, and other special stains into laboratory sessions. Diagnostic confidence was surveyed, and theoretical and practical exam scores were compared with 180 students from a previous grade. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0. Results: Practical exam scores significantly improved (86.0 ± 17.2 vs. 82.2 ± 18.9, p < 0.001), while theoretical scores remained unchanged. Diagnostic confidence strongly correlated with morphological recognition, particularly for acid-fast and fungal stains. Student feedback noted challenges such as staining artifacts. Conclusion: Integrating special staining enhances practical skills and diagnostic confidence, effectively bridging basic and clinical training. Expanding such modules is recommended to advance competency-based medical education. Full article

Background: Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have produced ChatGPT-4o, a multimodal large language model (LLM) capable of processing both text and image inputs. Although ChatGPT has demonstrated usefulness in medical examinations, few studies have evaluated its image analysis performance. Methods: This study compared GPT-4o and GPT-4 using public questions from the 116th–118th Japanese National Medical Licensing Examinations (JNMLE), each consisting of 400 questions. Both models answered in Japanese using simple prompts, including screenshots for image-based questions. Accuracy was analyzed across essential, general, and clinical questions, with statistical comparisons by chi-square tests. Results: GPT-4o consistently outperformed GPT-4, achieving passing scores in all three examinations. In the 118th JNMLE, GPT-4o scored 457 points versus 425 for GPT-4. GPT-4o demonstrated higher accuracy for image-based questions in the 117th and 116th exams, though the difference in the 118th was not significant. For text-based questions, GPT-4o showed superior medical knowledge, clinical reasoning, and ethical response behavior, notably avoiding prohibited options. Conclusion: Overall, GPT-4o exceeded GPT-4 in both text and image domains, suggesting strong potential as a diagnostic aid and educational resource. Its balanced performance across modalities highlights its promise for integration into future medical education and clinical decision support. Full article

Script Concordance Tests (SCTs) assess clinical reasoning under uncertainty. While construction guidelines exist, the feasibility of collaborative development approaches and educators’ real-time experiences remain underreported. This feasibility study explores how medical educators construct SCTs collaboratively and their perceptions of the process. Four UK-based medical educators developed SCTs for prescribing in older adults during a three-hour workshop involving observation with a think-aloud approach, followed by a post-workshop focus group. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, Tuckman’s group development informed observation analysis, and an inductive approach for the focus group. Educators created seven vignettes (30 items) in 127 min, averaging 18 min per vignette. Observation revealed small-team role specification (lead, scribe, challenger) and three themes: content development, quality checks, and team dynamics. The team progressed rapidly through Tuckman’s stages, spending most of the time in the performing stage. Focus group analysis revealed four themes: design features, perceived utility, group dynamics and best-practice recommendations. This study demonstrates the feasibility of collaborative SCT development through structured teamwork. Educators perceived SCTs as practical, as valuing effective team dynamics and clear role distribution. Findings can provide practical insights for institutions implementing SCT development, emphasising practice sessions and appropriately sized collaborative teams. Full article

Traditional assessment methods in dental education, such as written tests and multiple-choice questions, primarily measure theoretical knowledge but inadequately evaluate clinical and interpersonal competencies. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), recognized globally for its validity and reliability, addresses these limitations and is widely adopted in medical curricula; however, its implementation in dental education remains poorly undocumented. This study explored perceptions of OSCE compared to traditional formats within the Clinical and Therapeutic Synthesis Certificate (CTSC) at Toulouse Faculty of Health during its first OSCE-based session in January 2019. Eighty-four fifth-year students and eight faculty assessors completed a validated questionnaire assessing fairness, educational value, and stress levels. Results indicated that OSCE was perceived as covering diverse clinical skills (86%) and offering authentic scenarios (83%). Despite being stressful (76%), OSCE was considered the fairest (60% vs. MCQ 31%, WT 41%; p < 0.001) and most educational (77% vs. MCQ 17%, WT 31%). Eighty-three percent of students recommended its broader use, while assessors unanimously endorsed its fairness and utility. Both groups highlighted its formative potential. These findings support OSCE’s integration into French dental curricula to strengthen competency-based assessment and enhance clinical skill evaluation. Full article

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as the chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT), into health professions education is rapidly accelerating, creating new opportunities for personalized learning and clinical preparation. These tools have demonstrated the potential to enhance learning efficiency and critical thinking. However, concerns regarding reliability, academic integrity, and potential overreliance highlight the need to better understand how healthcare students adopt and perceive these technologies in order to guide their effective and responsible integration into educational frameworks. This nationwide, cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted between February and April 2024 among undergraduate students enrolled in medical, pharmacy, nursing, dental, and allied health programs in Saudi Arabia. An online questionnaire collected data on ChatGPT usage patterns, satisfaction, perceived benefits and risks, and attitudes toward integrating them into the curricula. Among 1044 participants, the prevalence of ChatGPT use was 69.25% (n = 723). Students primarily utilized the tool for content summarization, assignment preparation, and exam-related study. Key motivators included time efficiency and convenience, with improved learning efficiency and reduced study stress identified as major benefits. Conversely, major challenges included subscription costs and difficulties in formulating effective prompts. Furthermore, concerns regarding overreliance and academic misconduct were frequently reported. In conclusion, the adoption of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT among healthcare students in Saudi Arabia was high, driven by its perceived ability to enhance learning efficiency and personalization. To maximize its benefits and minimize risks, institutions should establish clear policies, provide faculty oversight, and integrate AI literacy into the education of health professionals. Full article

Background: Gamification is an innovative pedagogical strategy for improving learning outcomes, motivation, engagement, and knowledge retention. Nevertheless, evidence on the effectiveness of gamification remains heterogeneous. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Searches were performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and grey literature (2010–2025). Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research involving undergraduate nursing students exposed to gamification interventions. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed using RoB-2, ROBINS-I, and JBI tools. Narrative synthesis was adopted due to the heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures. Results: A total of 48 studies were included. Gamification strategies varied widely and included interactive quizzes, gamified flipped classroom models, serious games with explicit game elements, escape rooms, digital badges, and audience-response systems. For learning outcomes, most studies reported improvements in knowledge or performance, particularly when gamification included immediate feedback and repeated practice. While the knowledge retention was evaluated less frequently (12%), it was generally maintained or improved up to 2–4 weeks and across semester assessments. Strong positive trends of motivation and engagement were found across most studies, especially with competitive quizzes, missions, and narrative-based activities. Self-efficacy and satisfaction frequently improved, particularly in gamified simulations and team-based activities. Risk of bias was variable, with many quasi-experimental and descriptive studies limiting causal inference. Evidence certainty ranged from low to moderate according to GRADE criteria. Conclusions: Gamification is a promising educational approach in undergraduate nursing programs. Effects on long-term retention and practical skills remain less clear due to methodological variability and limited follow-up data. Future research focused on standardized outcome measures and longer follow-up intervals is required to consolidate evidence and guide educational policy. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251117719). Full article

(1) Background: Interprofessional supervision is an emerging approach in health professions education that strengthens collaborative practice competencies while maintaining profession-specific expertise. Understanding current evidence regarding supervision models, outcomes, and implementation factors is crucial for advancing this field. (2) Methods: This narrative review analyzed 28 studies, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods studies, and systematic reviews. Studies were analyzed for supervision models, outcome measures, evidence of effectiveness, and implementation factors. (3) Results: Six categories of interprofessional supervision models were identified: clinical practice-based, group supervision, competency-based training, skills training, case-based learning, and mentorship/coaching. Across models, interprofessional supervision consistently enhanced collaborative competencies, professional development, clinical skills, and organizational outcomes. Organizational support, structured curricula, interprofessional leadership, and individual readiness facilitated implementation success. Barriers included limited resources, professional silos, and challenges in curriculum integration. (4) Conclusions: Interprofessional supervision shows consistently positive outcomes across diverse models and settings, though more rigorous research designs and standardized outcome measures are needed. Successful implementation requires systematic attention to multiple factors at multiple levels, from organizational support to individual readiness. Interprofessional supervision is positioned for significant advancement through the application of implementation science frameworks and continued research on optimal model characteristics and implementation strategies. Full article

Background: Simulation-based laparoscopic training increasingly relies on portable, low-cost platforms that support home-based practice, but detailed descriptions of reproducible, do-it-yourself (DIY) trainers and their educational potential remain limited. Methods: We updated a low-budget laparoscopic simulator constructed from an inexpensive plastic container, wood components, a low-cost webcam, and plywood task pads modeled on Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) exercises. We then conducted informal qualitative usability testing in which 10 residents and 5 fellows from general surgery, gynecology, and urology used the simulator at home for one week and completed an eight-item feedback form plus free-text comments on assembly, ergonomics, realism, and educational value. Results: All participants successfully assembled and used the simulator; most described set-up as easy or intuitive, reported adequate image quality and lighting, and considered the platform useful for practicing depth perception, bimanual coordination, and cutting and suturing tasks. Feedback emphasized low cost, portability, and cross-specialty applicability, with only minor suggestions such as adjustable camera height or increased base weight. Conclusions: This DIY laparoscopic simulator could be assembled and used in a home-based setting, and trainees reported favorable usability and perceived educational value. More structured validation studies addressing face, content, and construct validity are needed to define its potential role within contemporary surgical curricula. Full article

This paper examines the 14-year journey of the Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences (MNUMS) in achieving and sustaining international accreditation for its undergraduate medical program. Beginning in 2010, MNUMS undertook a series of institutional reforms that culminated in full accreditation in 2016 and re-accreditation in 2024 by an international agency recognized by the European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). Drawing on institutional self-assessment reports, evaluator feedback, and stakeholder consultations, this case study explores how the accreditation process functioned as a catalyst for educational reform and quality enhancement. The findings reveal major transformations in curriculum design, assessment systems, and institutional governance. MNUMS adopted the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS), introduced outcome-based education and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), expanded its Clinical Skills Center, and implemented a compulsory undergraduate research project. Additionally, the creation of an integrated Bachelor–Master pathway and strengthened international partnerships further advanced the university’s alignment with global medical education standards. This case illustrates how international accreditation can drive systemic improvement in medical education within developing-country contexts. The MNUMS experience highlights the value of sustained institutional commitment, responsiveness to external evaluation, and the strategic use of accreditation as a framework for continuous innovation and global integration. Full article

The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) model is a commonly used interviewing technique at the undergraduate medical education (UME) level for medical school admissions. In this interview, candidates discuss a scenario with their interviewer. While many undergraduate medical institutions have adopted the MMI form of interviewing, it is rarely used in graduate medical education (GME/residency) interviews; no other pathology programs currently employ MMI. We share our experience with the use of MMI for Pathology GME interviews in 2023–2024. 50 interviews for the pathology residency program at Westchester Medical Center (WMC) were performed for the 2023–2024 season and included in this study (100%), with two scenarios on different interview dates. Candidates were scored from 1–5 based on five criteria. Including data from both scenarios, candidates performed well, with average scores above 4 for all categories. We found that most candidates received high scores in the MMI portion; however, the bottom ranked candidates performed very poorly in the MMIs. Traditional faculty scores varied significantly from MMI scores (p < 0.01). MMI scores were high overall and had less discriminatory value during this initial reiteration. Broader MMI implementation may provide more insights for its utilization in pathology resident selection. Full article

Background: Patient safety through root cause analyses and action planning (RCA2) is often taught in healthcare system-specific formats, in ways that are not applicable to interprofessional teams. The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate an interprofessional RCA2 simulation conducted via videoconferencing, where attendees used cause mapping to identify root causes. Methods: Educators from medicine, nursing, and pharmacy schools developed the curriculum. Sessions included residents from graduate medical education programs, senior nursing students, and pharmacy residents. Facilitators provided brief didactics, and the simulation reviewed a safety event, root cause analysis, development of action plans, and a formal debrief session. Google Suite tools were used to create a cause map and action plan. Participants completed the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS), facilitators conducted after-action reviews, and survey responses were used for quality improvement. Results: Most participants found this simulation helpful. There were significant improvements in self-perception of skills in the six ICCAS domains. Participants also noted that learning RCA would be helpful in their future practice. Conclusions: This patient safety simulation in an interprofessional team environment helped participants develop teamwork and an understanding of the RCA2 process. Participants learned to ask clarifying questions and voice concerns, which is essential when identifying root causes. This process serves as a guide for teaching these skills. Future iterations can implement this simulation-based RCA and adapt it for other, diverse populations. Full article

In oncology, traditional H&P templates centered on a single chief complaint often fail to address the longitudinal care needs and emotional complexities of cancer patients, leaving learners unprepared for sensitive conversations such as breaking bad news or discussing treatment goals. To address this, we conducted a literature review of specialty-focused H&P tools in child psychiatry and gynecology and, drawing on our experiences as two first-year medical students in an outpatient oncology clinic, developed an oncology H&P template to guide novice clinicians. The guide incorporates structured prompts for rapport-building; detailed oncologic and family cancer history; functional independence assessments; treatment goals; emotional wellbeing; support networks; and responding to emotion. After initial pilot testing by the two developers under supervisor guidance, the template was distributed to five then ten additional students and disseminated via the ASCO online forum and Twitter. Feedback from ten oncologists and oncology trainees highlighted the template’s value in gathering review of systems, past treatment details, functional status, and cancer history. Our findings suggest that this oncology-tailored tool enhances interview flow, promotes comprehensive data collection, and supports empathetic patient engagement. Integration into routine oncology training is planned, with future adaptations for specific oncological subspecialties and potential use in other medical specialties. Full article

Midwives and nurses are integral to the quality and safety of patient care. However, there is a limited amount of critical discussion and debate about the use of interviews to recruit people to study for these professions. There are some reports of people who are marginalised, minoritised, or racialised, being denied the opportunity to study for a degree in these professions, despite meeting the requisite entry requirements. Therefore, this commentary analyses the contemporary narrative and discussion relating to the role of interviews in recruiting student midwives and nurses. This critical analysis uses the UK as a case study and promulgates an alternative approach that could result in a more diverse workforce and enhance patient safety. It is hoped that the critical analytical approach taken in this paper will inspire those involved in recruitment to midwifery and nursing to consider the efficacy, utility, and equity of recruitment interviews and their impact on who is or is not afforded the opportunity to pursue a career in these professions. Full article

Graduate Medical Education trainees’ wellness has become an important topic in academic medicine. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires oversight, education, and resources, understanding that medical training happens within a complex environment. Patients, personal and psychosocial issues, overlays, administrative demands, and intense oversight at various levels add additional elements of complexity and stress. The demographics of medicine are changing, with a greater proportion of women, minorities, and international medical graduates entering training with different needs and greater expectations. GME trainees constitute a population with unique needs that demand an adaptable and broad approach toward wellbeing and training success. The University of Texas Health San Antonio (UTHSA) created the Wellness Home, a comprehensive and adaptable model inspired by those used in primary care, where support is offered to trainees and training programs. It addresses issues beyond mental health management by including interventions such as coaching, access to medical services, or financial literacy. We present here a detailed description of the program and a rationale for developing this holistic approach in other institutions. Case studies are used to illustrate the complex needs of trainees and the innovative approaches used in their support. Usage data is presented as additional evidence that this model is increasingly and successfully being used. Full article

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a vital skill for healthcare professionals, crucial in life-saving situations. More than 80% of cardiac arrest cases occur out of hospital. As the demand for competent CPR practitioners grows, the effectiveness of training methods becomes increasingly important, especially for undergraduate students preparing to enter the healthcare field. The primary objective of our study is to investigate the effectiveness of simulation-based teaching methods and by integrating innovative technologies, such as the OMNI2 simulator, to enhance practitioners’ performance and to improve the precision and objectivity of CPR instruction. A cohort of 144 undergraduate students from the Nursing School Department of the National Kapodistrian University of Athens participated in an 8 h Basic Life Support Seminar. It consisted of a 5 h theoretical instruction followed by 3 h of practical training using the OMNI2 simulator. Each student was tasked to identify cardiac arrest and to perform two cycles of CPR according to the 2021 guidelines. Metrics, including total session time, cycles performed, compression-to-ventilation ratio, compression depth, compressions and ventilations per minute, full recoil, peak inspiratory pressure, and ventilation duration, were measured and compared against the simulator’s preset targets. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for all outcomes. In conclusion, while simulation-based teaching has conventionally been proven effective for CPR proficiency, real-time data collected in this study reveal a disparity between anticipated and actual performance. Our research underscores the necessity of refining instructional methods to enhance skill acquisition, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes in the future. Full article

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has reshaped medical education and clinical practice. While technological innovation is vital, soft skills are essential for preserving trust, ethical accountability, and humanistic care. This study explores the evolving role of soft skills in medical education in the AI era by examining definitional challenges, pedagogical strategies, and the integration of AI-related literacy. A narrative review methodology synthesized evidence across seven thematic domains, focusing on curricular integration, pedagogical strategies, and assessment approaches in medical education within AI-enabled learning environments. The findings demonstrated that soft skills improve patient adherence, satisfaction, safety, and trust; strengthen physicians’ professional identity, collaboration, and resilience; and enhance system-level outcomes, such as resilience, safety, and public trust. Experiential, reflective, and competency-based pedagogies remain the most effective instructional strategies, while AI-supported tools, including virtual patients, adaptive simulations, large language models (LLMs), and Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems (RAG), offer complementary benefits by enhancing doctor-patient communication, providing real-time personalized feedback, and strengthening clinical reasoning. Soft skills function as an interconnected and synergistic ecosystem that is reinforced by cognitive, affective, humanistic, and ethical mechanisms. Integrating these competencies with AI literacy promotes theoretical clarity, supports programmatic assessment, and fosters responsible innovation, ensuring that technological advancement enhances rather than diminishes the humanistic foundations of medicine. Full article

Residents preparing for pathology board exams frequently use multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from question banks (QBs) like PathDojo and PathPrimer, which can be costly. ChatGPT, a free tool, has been used to generate MCQs for other tests like the SAT. This study compared the quality of pathology MCQs created by ChatGPT versus commercially available study questions for the American Board of Pathology’s (ABPath) certifying exams. A rubric adapted from the National Board of Medical Examiners’ (NBME) question writing guide was validated by two pathologists using commercially available pathology board exam questions. This rubric was then used to evaluate MCQs from commercially available pathology board study books as well as MCQs created by ChatGPT. The results compared the percentage of criteria met between ChatGPT and control MCQs using chi-square analysis with significance set at <0.05. While ChatGPT MCQs were less likely to be accurate compared to commercially available MCQs in four criteria (the best answer choice (82.5% vs. 100%), reflection of current practice (84.6% vs. 100%), error-free explanation (87.9% vs. 100%), and explanation reflecting current practice (87.9% vs. 100%)), the complexity of the ChatGPT-generated questions was higher (78.5% vs. 47.2%). At this time, ChatGPT-generated MCQs should not be used in the same way as commercially available study guides, however there is potential for learned language models (LLM)s to create quality study materials and exam questions with careful monitoring Full article