Long Overdue: Translating Learning Research into Educational Practice

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2024) | Viewed by 3381

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
Interests: learning sciences; evidence-based teaching practices; online learning; educational innovation; technology-enhanced education

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
University Center for Teaching and Learning, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
Interests: faculty development; program architecture and design; course design; educational technology; online learning

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nearly 10 decades of research in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, education, anthropology, and related fields have provided us with a wealth of knowledge about how people learn. This richly multidisciplinary area of scholarship describes, among other things, how social and emotional dynamics shape learning, how metacognitive skills develop, the factors that influence learner motivation, the cultural construction of educational norms, how experts and novices organize knowledge differently, and the need to account for cognitive load in our instruction. Moreover, the research is no longer confined to the technical language of its original disciplines but has been distilled into clear, practical strategies for course design and teaching.  

Yet, to a confounding degree, research-based learning principles have not been translated systematically into teaching practices, particularly in higher education. Misconceptions abound about the practices that do and do not promote learning; ineffective teaching methods continue to be widely used; and new technologies and techniques, when adopted, are often deployed in ways that are inconsistent with what we know about learning. Indeed, in this respect, education is encountering the same translational problems found in medicine and other fields, where valuable research often fails to inform practice or policy to the extent that it should. 

This Special Issue aims to contribute to the literature of educational translation by exploring four questions:

  1. What are the economic, institutional, social, and emotional barriers to implementing learning research and evidence-based practices?
  2. What are the myths and misconceptions (e.g., learning styles, false growth mindset) that hinder progress, and what makes them so challenging to dislodge?
  3. What existing and emerging areas of research (e.g., belonging, psychological safety, multimedia learning, cognitive load theory, expert blind spot) are particularly important for educators to be aware of and draw upon?
  4. How can we use new technologies and modalities (e.g., Generative AI, AR, VR, online, hybrid, self-paced) in ways that foster deep, meaningful, connected learning, and fully utilize the skill and humanity of teachers?

We welcome manuscripts that explore these questions with nuance and insight. All manuscripts must be solidly grounded in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Preference will be given to those that offer intriguing perspectives, rigorous analysis, and creative problem solving. While empirical studies are preferred, systematic reviews and thoughtful commentaries are also welcome.

Prof. Dr. Marie K. Norman
Dr. Michael W. Bridges
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • learning sciences
  • learning research
  • evidence-based teaching
  • myths about learning
  • technology-enhanced learning
  • educational technology
  • barriers and facilitators to implementation
  • emerging learning research

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

29 pages, 359 KiB  
Article
The Four Paradoxes That Stop Practitioners from Using Research to Change Professional Practice and How to Overcome Them
by Riikka Hofmann
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 996; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090996 - 11 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1584
Abstract
This study addresses the puzzle that despite significant policy efforts, research-use in practice remains rare in education even when practitioners are keen. Healthcare has encountered similar problems, and we know little about the nature of the challenges that stop practitioners from developing new [...] Read more.
This study addresses the puzzle that despite significant policy efforts, research-use in practice remains rare in education even when practitioners are keen. Healthcare has encountered similar problems, and we know little about the nature of the challenges that stop practitioners from developing new research-informed practices. The literature on cross-sector research utilisation, professional learning and practice change all highlight the role of practitioner agency, collaboration and sociocultural norms in research-use, but we lack theoretical insights into how these play out in practitioners’ research-use. Moreover, the risks involved are rarely addressed. This study contributes to developing intermediate theory about the mechanisms influencing practitioners’ success at using research to develop new practices in education and healthcare. It develops a novel methodological approach, utilising the dialogic difference-within-similarity method, to enable the analysis and synthesis of findings from five close-to-practice studies of research-use in education and healthcare settings in order to generate conceptual insights into the mechanisms at play when practitioners use research to change practice. It finds that four key mechanisms function in a paradoxical manner to hinder research-use, theorising these as the paradoxes of agency, people, norms and risk. I conclude by proposing a conceptual model for overcoming these paradoxes to facilitate research-use at scale. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Long Overdue: Translating Learning Research into Educational Practice)
18 pages, 2421 KiB  
Article
The “Better Book” Approach to Addressing Equity in Statistics: Centering the Motivational Experiences of Students from Racially Marginalized Backgrounds for Widespread Benefit
by Claudia C. Sutter, Matthew C. Jackson, Karen B. Givvin, James W. Stigler and Ji Y. Son
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 487; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050487 - 2 May 2024
Viewed by 1175
Abstract
Although improving racial equity in critical college courses such as introductory statistics is a laudable goal, making research-based progress toward that aim in a scalable manner remains a challenge. To translate psychological insights to benefit racially marginalized students, we implemented the “Better Book” [...] Read more.
Although improving racial equity in critical college courses such as introductory statistics is a laudable goal, making research-based progress toward that aim in a scalable manner remains a challenge. To translate psychological insights to benefit racially marginalized students, we implemented the “Better Book” approach, where instructors, researchers, and developers work together to improve an online textbook used in introductory statistics. The “Better Book” approach to equity assumes that racially marginalized students are a “canary in the coal mine”, alerting us to systemic issues that can affect a broader array of students. We started by finding places in the textbook where racially marginalized students reported higher perceptions of costs (the effort and time required to learn the content) than non-marginalized students. Then we drew upon suggestions from users to redesign the textbook where gaps in cost perceptions peaked. We then analyzed data from both the original and redesigned versions of the textbook to evaluate the impact on students who were subsequently enrolled in the course. Results showed that perceptions of cost were dramatically reduced in the experience of racially marginalized students but also the redesign resulted in an improved experience for all students. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Long Overdue: Translating Learning Research into Educational Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop