Informal Science and Mathematics Education and Practice: A Global Perspective

A Special Issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102) belonging to the section "STEM Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 November 2026 | Viewed by 1547

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Simmons School of Education and Human Development, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA
Interests: informal and integrated STEM learning; educator expertise and development; community and strategic STEM initiatives
Simmons School of Education and Human Development, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA
Interests: informal learning; research-practice partnerships; STEM education; generative AI; data science education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Informal science and mathematics education has emerged as a critical site for expanding access to STEM learning worldwide (Bell et al., 2009; Xia et al., 2025). As formal education systems face persistent challenges in serving diverse learners, informal settings—museums, afterschool programs, community space and everyday environments—offer flexible, culturally responsive alternatives that reach beyond traditional classroom walls (Dawson et al., 2017; Milton et al., 2023). Global trends toward lifelong learning, community-engaged scholarship and calls for more equitable STEM pathways have positioned informal education as essential infrastructure for building scientific and mathematical literacy (Ludwig et al., 2024; Xia et al., 2025). Yet questions remain about how these spaces can truly serve all learners, honor multiple ways of knowing and challenge rather than reproduce existing inequities (Marin & Bang, 2018). This moment demands critical examination of informal STEM education as both a promising opportunity and a contested terrain where issues of access, power, knowledge and justice play out across diverse cultural and political contexts.

This Special Issue invites contributions that examine informal science and mathematics education from a global perspective. We seek papers that explore how learning outside of formal classrooms, including museums, afterschool programs, community spaces and everyday environments, supports access, equity and culturally responsive practices. We welcome empirical studies, theoretical insights and practitioner reflections that highlight diverse learners, localized knowledge and innovative pedagogies. Submissions should critically engage with the ways informal settings reimagine science and math learning across cultural, social and political contexts.

Topics of interest for publication include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. Knowledge Ecologies Beyond the Classroom
    1. How does science and mathematics knowledge circulate across diverse informal settings?
    2. What are the relationships between formal, informal and everyday learning contexts?
    3. How do multiple knowledge systems and epistemologies coexist in informal STEM?
  2. Access, Equity and Justice in Informal STEM
    1. How are informal learning opportunities and resources distributed globally?
    2. What structural barriers and enablers shape participation in informal STEM?
    3. In what ways do informal settings address or perpetuate inequities?
  3. Culturally Responsive and Sustaining Practices
    1. How do informal settings honor and build on cultural knowledge?
    2. What pedagogies center diverse learners and communities in informal STEM?
    3. How does cultural specificity shape informal science and mathematics teaching and learning?
  4. Transnational Flows and Mobilities in Informal STEM Education
    1. How do people, ideas and practices move across contexts in informal STEM?
    2. In what ways do informal STEM models travel and transform globally?
    3. What role do international partnerships, networks and collaborations play?
  5. Post/Colonial Perspectives on Informal STEM Spaces
    1. How do historical legacies shape contemporary informal institutions?
    2. What decolonization efforts are emerging in museums, science centers and programs?
    3. How do power dynamics operate in global informal STEM education?
  6. Community-Based and Place-Based Learning
    1. How does localized knowledge inform informal STEM practices?
    2. What role does place play in shaping informal science and mathematics learning?
    3. How do communities exercise ownership and governance of informal learning spaces?
  7. Innovation in Informal STEM Pedagogies
    1. What emerging teaching and facilitation approaches are practitioners developing?
    2. What design principles guide effective informal learning environments?
    3. How is practitioner knowledge generated and shared in informal STEM education?

References

Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.

Dawson, E. (2017). Social justice and out-of-school science learning: Exploring equity in science television, science clubs and maker spaces. Science Education, 101(4), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21288

Ludwig, C. M., Howsmon, R. A., Stromholt, S., Valenzuela, J. J., Calder, R., & Baliga, N. S. (2024). Consequential insights for advancing informal STEM learning and outcomes for students from historically marginalized communities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 351. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02797-w

Marin, A., & Bang, M. (2018). “Look it, this is how you know:” Family forest walks as a context for knowledge-building about the natural world. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1429443

Milton, S., Sager, M. T., & Walkington, C. (2023). Understanding Racially Minoritized Girls’ Perceptions of Their STEM Identities, Abilities, and Sense of Belonging in a Summer Camp. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121183

Xia, X., Bentley, L. R., Fan, X., & Tai, R. (2025). STEM outside of school: A meta-analysis of the effects of informal science education on students' interests and attitudes for STEM. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 1153–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10504-z

Prof. Dr. Anthony Petrosino
Dr. Marc Sager
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • informal learning
  • global education
  • equity
  • STEM
  • science education
  • mathematics education
  • culturally responsive pedagogy
  • community-based learning

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

28 pages, 1776 KB  
Article
Spatial and Epistemic Agency When Engaging with Math Walks at a STEM Residential Camp
by Elizabeth Stringer, Aleshia Hayes and Candace Walkington
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(9), 1423; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16091423 - 2 Sep 2026
Viewed by 293
Abstract
Math walks, where participants explore physical spaces and make connections to mathematics, have been implemented in a wide variety of ways in different learning settings. Math walks connect place-based learning, the development of interest in STEM fields, and opportunities for students to exercise [...] Read more.
Math walks, where participants explore physical spaces and make connections to mathematics, have been implemented in a wide variety of ways in different learning settings. Math walks connect place-based learning, the development of interest in STEM fields, and opportunities for students to exercise agency over their STEM learning. However, many enactments of math walks have been highly structured and directive in both the mathematics they promote and in the physical movements students are permitted to engage in as they walk. In the present exploratory, qualitative-dominant, mixed-methods bounded case study, we examine eight secondary students engaging in math walk activities as they participate in a STEM summer camp. We examine the nature and types of mathematical questions they ask during math walks, the ways in which they describe the spatial and epistemic agency they have during the experience, and their attitudes toward mathematics. We found that student-led math walks expose a consequential design problem: how to facilitate spatial and epistemic agency while retaining enough mathematical coherence to support depth and continued learning. The article enumerates implications for researchers, educators, and learning designers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1187 KB  
Article
Middle School Girls’ Attitudes and Engagement in Generative AI Cybersecurity Summer Camp
by Jiabao Wen, Marc T. Sager, Saki Milton, Tiffani Martin, Rebekah Skeete and Candace Walkington
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(7), 1099; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071099 - 9 Jul 2026
Viewed by 627
Abstract
Informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning settings can provide early and accessible opportunities for students who have been historically underrepresented in computing to engage with cybersecurity concepts and emerging technologies. This one-group pretest-posttest mixed-methods study examined a week-long, GenAI-integrated informal cybersecurity [...] Read more.
Informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning settings can provide early and accessible opportunities for students who have been historically underrepresented in computing to engage with cybersecurity concepts and emerging technologies. This one-group pretest-posttest mixed-methods study examined a week-long, GenAI-integrated informal cybersecurity summer camp for 33 underrepresented and underserved racial and ethnic minority (UUREM) middle school girls. The study investigated pre-post patterns in perceived cybersecurity knowledge, domain-specific self-efficacy, interest, utility value, career aspirations, and selected AI-literacy practices. Quantitative findings showed the strongest support for increases in perceived cybersecurity knowledge and cyber threat identification self-efficacy, both of which remained significant after Holm adjustment for multiple comparisons. Networking and web management self-efficacy showed preliminary unadjusted increases, whereas overall cybersecurity interest, enjoyment and intent to pursue, utility value, career aspirations, and the remaining self-efficacy domains did not show statistically significant differences. Qualitative observations documented activity-specific engagement, collaborative discussion of cybersecurity ideas, and mentor-mediated GenAI practices such as prompt development, output comparison, and script revision. These findings suggest that informal GenAI-integrated cybersecurity programs may support selected aspects of perceived learning and cybersecurity self-efficacy, while highlighting the need for more rigorous designs, validated AI-literacy measures, and longer-term follow-up. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop