Trends and Prospects: Comparative Studies in Doctoral Education—a Look into How Doctoral Programs Navigate Legislative Landmines

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2025) | Viewed by 2190

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Interests: educational leadership; policy studies; comparative and international education

E-Mail
Guest Editor
College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
Interests: crisis leadership; attending to the experiences, leadership, and priorities of principals during school disruptions

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

I am excited to announce a new Special Issue in the Journal of Education Sciences. This Special Issue aims to explore the current social political environment in which we find ourselves operating. Legislative policies vary per state; however, most can agree that the current political environment, as experienced by university professors and administration, is unstable and uncertain. This uncertainty forces professors and university administration professionals to grapple with and attempt to make sense of continuing their missions of teaching relevant subject matters amid the chaos. This environment is chaotic as students consider how to continue their fields of study when they include issues of race, equity, and sometimes even history. Students are renegotiating their dissertation topics and questioning the choice they made years ago to study areas that are now restricted.

Academic freedom is on the line now more than ever before. This Special Issue examines the experiences and impact of restrictive legislation in doctoral programs. We aim to collect articles spanning the entire country as well as doctoral program areas so that we can better understand how the social and political landscape impacts the experiences of doctoral students, university faculty, and university administration professionals.

Possible topics to be included are as follows:

  1. Academic freedom: for whom?
  2. The role and future of DEI at the university and in doctoral programs.
  3. How does the exclusion of CRT impact doctoral dissertations?
  4. How does the exclusion of CRT impact teaching?
  5. Affirmative action: does race matter in higher decision making?

This Special Issue is significant and timely. It will contribute meaningfully to the conversations on issues that are currently shaping the reality that university students, faculty and administration professionals across the country must contend with.

Dr. Lisa Bass
Dr. Mario Jackson
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • doctoral programs
  • academic freedom
  • equity/DEI

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

13 pages, 226 KB  
Communication
Navigating Academic Freedom and Student Concerns in Doctoral Education at Hispanic-Serving Institutions: A Faculty Perspective
by John C. Chick
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1324; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101324 - 7 Oct 2025
Viewed by 412
Abstract
This short communication examines the intersection of academic freedom concerns and doctoral student experiences at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) during a period of increasing legislative restrictions on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Drawing from faculty observations during doctoral residency weeks at one HSI [...] Read more.
This short communication examines the intersection of academic freedom concerns and doctoral student experiences at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) during a period of increasing legislative restrictions on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Drawing from faculty observations during doctoral residency weeks at one HSI educational leadership program, this piece explores how doctoral students navigate dissertation topic selection in an environment where diversity-related research may be perceived as entering legal or political “gray areas.” The communication contextualizes these observations within the broader landscape of academic freedom challenges facing higher education, particularly at institutions serving predominantly minoritized populations. Recent data reveals that 91% of faculty across the United States believe academic freedom is under threat, with particularly acute challenges facing institutions designated as Hispanic-Serving Institutions. These observations reveal a fundamental disconnect between educational practitioners pursuing doctoral degrees and policymakers, where research-based inclusive practices designed to benefit all students are misperceived as politically controversial. These observations suggest that doctoral students at HSIs face unique pressures as they balance their commitment to addressing educational equity issues with concerns about professional and academic risks in an increasingly restrictive policy environment. Full article

Other

Jump to: Research

22 pages, 355 KB  
Essay
Politicizing the Department of Education in the War Against DEI: Theorizing Implications for the Principal Preparation Landscape
by Mario M. Jackson and Bolumani Sondah
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1270; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101270 - 23 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 674
Abstract
This essay theorizes implications of mounting political efforts to dismantle the Department of Education (DoE) as part of the anti–Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) movement, with particular attention to consequences for principal preparation programs. While overlooked, federal policies have played a critical albeit [...] Read more.
This essay theorizes implications of mounting political efforts to dismantle the Department of Education (DoE) as part of the anti–Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) movement, with particular attention to consequences for principal preparation programs. While overlooked, federal policies have played a critical albeit complex role in shaping the principal preparation landscape. This essay challenges prevailing narratives that characterize federal impact on preparation programs as minimal, offering a more nuanced account of how federal policies support the development of high-quality and equity-oriented school leaders. This essay identifies three primary areas of federal influence: prioritizing high-needs schools, encouraging the adoption of innovative and evidence-based practices, and facilitating national understanding of the principal preparation landscape. These dimensions are used to theorize consequences of defunding or dismantling the DoE for educational leadership preparation. In addition to implications for policymakers and lobbyists ahead of the impending congressional vote about the DoE’s future, implications are offered for future research and federal policies to improve and expand the scope of influence over preparation programs. Full article
Back to TopTop