Role of Endoscopy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging and Theranostics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021)

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal cancer. Despite significant advancement in cancer treatment, the mortality rate of PC is nearly identical to the incidence rates. Early detection of tumors or its precursor lesions with dysplasia may be the most effective approach to improve survival. Screening strategies should include identification of the population at high risk of developing PC, and an intense application of screening tools with adequate sensitivity to detect PC at an early curable stage. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) seem to be the most valuable endoscopic modalities for PC screening, diagnosis, and palliative treatments. EUS has an additional advantage over MRI by being able to obtain tissue samples during the same examination. Several questions remain unanswered at this time regarding the age to begin screening, frequency of screening, management of asymptomatic pancreatic lesions detected on screening, timing of resection, and extent of surgery and impact of screening on survival. Novel techniques such as needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) and digital cholangioscopy along with biomarkers may be helpful to improve PC diagnosis and treatments. Further studies will hopefully lead to the development of strategies combining endoscopic tools with other technological/biological advancements that will be cost-effective and have an impact on survival.

The aim of this Special Issue is to collect new data and evidence on the advancements and the role of endoscopy in PC patients.

Keywords

  • Survival
  • Tumor
  • EUS
  • ERCP
  • Progression
  • FNA
  • FNB

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 457 KiB  
Article
Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Standard Fine-Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses: A Propensity Score Analysis
by Antonio Facciorusso, Christian Cotsoglou, Andrea Chierici, Ruxandra Mare, Stefano Francesco Crinò and Nicola Muscatiello
Diagnostics 2020, 10(10), 792; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100792 - 06 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1866
Abstract
Background: Whether endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) contrast-enhanced fine-needle aspiration (CH-EUS-FNA) determines superior results in comparison to standard EUS-FNA in tissue acquisition of pancreatic masses remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare these two techniques on a series of patients with solid [...] Read more.
Background: Whether endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) contrast-enhanced fine-needle aspiration (CH-EUS-FNA) determines superior results in comparison to standard EUS-FNA in tissue acquisition of pancreatic masses remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare these two techniques on a series of patients with solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: 362 patients underwent EUS-FNA (2008–2019), after the propensity score matching of two groups were compared; 103 treated with CH-EUS-FNA (group 1) and 103 with standard EUS-FNA (group 2). The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and sample adequacy. Results: Diagnostic sensitivity was 87.6% in group 1 and 80% in group 2 (p = 0.18). The negative predictive value was 56% in group 1 and 41.5% in group 2 (p = 0.06). The specificity and positive predictive values were 100% for both groups. Diagnostic accuracy was 89.3% and 82.5%, respectively (p = 0.40). Sample adequacy was 94.1% in group 1 and 91.2% in group 2 (p = 0.42). The rate of adequate core histologic samples was 33% and 28.1%, respectively (p = 0.44), and the number of needle passes to obtain adequate samples were 2.4 ± 0.6 and 2.7 ± 0.8, respectively (p = 0.76). These findings were confirmed in subgroup analyses, conducted according to lesion size and contrast enhancement pattern. Conclusions: CH-EUS-FNA does not appear to be superior to standard EUS-FNA in patients with pancreatic masses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Endoscopy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop