Recent Advances in Bone and Joint Imaging—3rd Edition

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging and Theranostics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 361

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ami, Ibaraki, Japan
Interests: orthopaedic surgery; computer-assisted surgery; computer vision; biomechanics; hand surgery
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Diagnostics, entitled "Recent Advances in Bone and Joint Imaging—3rd Edition", aims to showcase the latest developments in musculoskeletal imaging technologies and their applications in diagnosing and treating bone and joint disorders. Building upon the success of previous editions, this edition focuses on the latest progress in diagnostic imaging for bone and joint disorders, aiming to highlight innovative techniques that enhance the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of musculoskeletal conditions. With the rapid development of imaging technologies—such as high-resolution MRI, advanced CT, functional imaging, and AI-driven analysis—this Special Issue seeks to gather cutting-edge research that improves diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes.

We welcome original research, reviews, and case-based studies addressing recent advances in imaging modalities, image-guided interventions, AI-assisted diagnostics, multimodal imaging integration, and quantitative image analyses related to orthopedic and rheumatologic conditions. Submissions that explore the clinical impact and translational potential of these technologies are especially encouraged.

Dr. Yuichi Yoshii
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • musculoskeletal imaging
  • machine learning
  • bone imaging
  • computed tomography
  • ultrasound imaging

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 4175 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Hybrid Dynamic Stabilization with TLIF Versus Dynamic Stabilization Alone in Degenerative Lumbar Instability
by Uzay Erdogan, Gurkan Berikol, Ibrahim Taha Albas, Mehmet Yigit Akgun, Tunc Oktenoglu, Ozkan Ates and Ali Fahir Ozer
Diagnostics 2025, 15(15), 1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15151887 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 264
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of dynamic rod stabilization with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar instability. Specifically, we evaluated the prognostic value of hybrid systems in reducing [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of dynamic rod stabilization with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar instability. Specifically, we evaluated the prognostic value of hybrid systems in reducing adjacent segment disease (ASD), enhancing fusion rates, and improving functional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients treated between 2019 and 2022. Group 1 (n = 34) underwent dynamic rod stabilization alone, while Group 2 (n = 28) received dynamic stabilization combined with TLIF. Radiological assessments included disk height index (DHI) and fusion rates. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain at baseline, 12, and 24 months. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi® software (version 2.4.1). Results: The hybrid group (dynamic + TLIF) demonstrated significantly higher anterior fusion rates (p < 0.001) and greater improvement in VAS scores for back (p = 0.005) and leg pain (p < 0.001) at 12 months. Although operative time was longer (p = 0.002), there was no significant difference in hospital stay (p = 0.635). No significant differences were observed in ASD development (p = 0.11) or pseudoarthrosis (p = 0.396). The hybrid group maintained better lumbar lordosis and higher adjacent segment DHI. Conclusions: Hybrid dynamic stabilization combined with TLIF provides superior clinical outcomes and fusion rates compared to dynamic stabilization alone, without significantly increasing the risk of ASD. These findings support the use of hybrid constructs as a balanced strategy for treating degenerative lumbar instability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Bone and Joint Imaging—3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop