Recent Advances in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Malignancies

A special issue of Current Oncology (ISSN 1718-7729).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2023) | Viewed by 1864

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Interests: bone metastases; stereotactic body radiation therapy; radiation oncology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Bone is among the most common metastatic sites in cancer patients, and the spine is the most involved region for bony metastases. Spinal metastases are often painful, and patients are at high risk of vertebral fracture and neurological disabilities.

Bone metastases are classified as lytic (destructive), sclerotic (bone forming), or mixed, depending on the bone remodeling mechanisms. Lytic metastases are caused by the stimulation of osteoclasts via tumor cells in the bone microenvironment, which result in bone matrix destruction. On the other hand, sclerotic lesions are the result of osteoblast stimulation and uncontrolled new bone formation. Osteolytic metastases are mostly associated with lung, breast, thyroid, colorectal, and renal cancer. Osteoblastic lesions predominantly have prostate and breast cancer as the primary origin.

The treatments of such lesions consist of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), or a combination of these modalities. Conventional RT is the cornerstone for the palliative management of spinal metastases; however, it is unable to apply an ablative dose to the affected vertebra due to technical limitations and, therefore, the local control (LC) remains poor. The life expectancy and overall survival of cancer patients have shown significant improvement in recent years. This is in part due to innovative surgical skills, advanced RT techniques, and novel systemic therapies such as immunotherapy. As these patients live longer, there is an increasing need to achieve a better LC and improve the quality of life (QOL).  In recent years, SBRT has become a preferred method for treating spinal metastases, especially in patients with few metastases (oligometastatic) and radio-resistant tumors, and good performance status. SBRT delivers high-radiation doses in few fractions to a relatively small target volume, while respecting the organs at risk (OARs) constraints. Numerous retrospective and some prospective studies have shown excellent LC after spine SBRT. Besides LC, pain relief is another important goal of SBRT for spinal metastasis. We can hypothesize that excellent LC might result in better pain response after SBRT, which has been previously shown in two prospective randomized trials. However, three other prospective randomized studies showed negative results for pain relief after SBRT, as compared to conventional RT with a palliative dose.

As spine SBRT requires highly precise planning, pre-SBRT imaging is essential in order to delineate target volumes and OARs. According to the literature, MRI is currently the best imaging modality available in the detection of spine metastases and is recommended for pre-SBRT planning by the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium, as well as the SPINO group. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI in diagnosing bone metastases and differentiating them from benign and inflammatory lesions are very high.

Following SBRT and—especially in patients who still present with oligo-metastatic/progressive disease—radiological response assessment is crucial to ensure that patients are managed correctly. This management is a spectrum, from an observation in the case of a locally controlled tumor or pseudo-progression to active salvage therapy in the case of evidence of tumor persistence/recurrence being found.

Response assessment after SBRT or radiosurgery is a highly challenging topic in different organs, as we are already aware from intracranial malignancies. For spinal metastases, there are some further aspects to consider in the interpretation of radiological changes after SBRT, including pseudo-progression, vertebral compression fracture (VCF), epidural progression, changes in bone density depending on the nature of metastasis, and altered vascularization.

VCF is the most important complication after spinal SBRT. A review from Faruqi et al. showed a crude VCF rate of 13.9%, with lytic lesion, baseline VCF, and higher dose per fraction as relevant risk factors in multivariate analysis. In this regard, several studies have demonstrated the clinical usefulness of multimodal MRI, including functional sequences. While CT provides information on bone density and fracture margins, MRI is the modality of choice, including multiple distinguishing parameters to characterize the nature of a fracture. 

In view of the information presented above, we aim to produce a Special Issue for the Current Oncology journal with the following title: “Recent Advances in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Malignancies”. As such, we invite authors interested in this field to contribute to the Special Issue. Submissions on the following topics are especially welcomed:

  • modern techniques for spine SBRT;
  • different target volume delineations;
  • different SBRT dose and fractionation;
  • response assessment using different imaging modalities (PET/CT, MRI, CT, etc.).

Dr. Hossein Hemmatazad
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Current Oncology is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • spinal metastases
  • Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
  • dose and fractionation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 699 KiB  
Article
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Metastases—Findings from an Australian Population-Based Study
by Wee Loon Ong, Roger L. Milne, Farshad Foroudi and Jeremy L. Millar
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(8), 7777-7788; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080564 - 21 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1580
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastases and the associated factors in Australia. Methods: The Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Dataset, which captures all episodes of radiotherapy delivered in the state of Victoria, was accessed to evaluate the [...] Read more.
Background: To evaluate the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastases and the associated factors in Australia. Methods: The Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Dataset, which captures all episodes of radiotherapy delivered in the state of Victoria, was accessed to evaluate the patterns and trends of SBRT for spine metastases. The primary outcome was SBRT use and associated factors. Results: There were 6244 patients who received 8861 courses of radiotherapy for spine metastases between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 277 (3%) courses were SBRT, which increased from 0.4% in 2012 to 5% in 2017 (P-trend < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of SBRT use in patients with prostate cancer (6%) and melanoma (4%) compared to other cancers (2–3%) (p < 0.001). Patients from the highest socioeconomic quintiles (5%) were more likely to be treated with SBRT compared to patients from the lowest socioeconomic quintiles (3%) (p < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of SBRT use in private radiotherapy centres (6%) compared to public radiotherapy centres (1%) (p < 0.001). No spine SBRT was delivered in regional centres. In multivariate analyses, the year of treatment, age, primary cancers and radiotherapy centres were independently associated with SBRT use. Conclusion: This is the first Australian population-based study quantifying the increasing use of spine SBRT; however, the overall use of spine SBRT remains low. We anticipate an ongoing increase in spine SBRT, as spine SBRT gradually becomes the standard-of-care treatment for painful spine metastases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop