Skip to Content

Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction

Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction (CMTR) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that covers all types of research in surgery of the head, face and jaw, published quarterly online and a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). It is the official journal of the AO Craniomaxillofacial Surgery (AO CMF). Foundation members receive discounts on the article processing charges. 
  • Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
  • High Visibility: indexed within ESCI (Web of Science), PubMed, PMC, Embase, and other databases.
  • Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 28.6 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 6.5 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2026).
  • Recognition of Reviewers: Reviewers whose reports are timely and of high quality receive an APC discount voucher for a future publication in an MDPI journal. Become a reviewer.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (889)

  • Article
  • Open Access

(1) Background: The main intraoral incisions used in the operative management of mandibular fractures are gingival margin incisions and buccal sulcus incisions. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare postoperative outcomes between incision types and guide future operative protocols. (2) Methods: Data was collected from Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham, a level I major trauma centre. BlueSpier was used to identify mandibular fracture patients operated on between January 2023 and January 2025. Digital health records were used to obtain patient demographics and postoperative outcomes. Primary outcome measures were postoperative infection and wound dehiscence. Secondary outcome measures were return to theatre and new numbness or paraesthesia. (3) Results: In this cohort, 138 patients underwent operative management for a mandibular fracture through an intraoral incision; 60 patients had a gingival margin incision and 78 patients had a buccal sulcus incision. No statistically significant difference was found between the gingival margin and buccal sulcus incision groups for the primary and secondary outcome measures. (4) Conclusions: Incision choice is dependent on mandibular fracture location and surgeon preference. Both incisions were used by most of the operating surgeons. This study was not designed as an equivalence or non-inferiority study. Further larger-scale studies are needed to identify superior outcomes of one approach.

Intra-operative photograph showing a buccal sulcus incision for mandibular fracture access.
  • Conference Report
  • Open Access

FACE AHEAD 2026 Abstract Report

  • Yiu Yan Leung,
  • Mohamed Abdelazeem and
  • Gregorio Sánchez-Aniceto
  • + 3 authors

Welcome to FACE AHEAD 2026

  • Article
  • Open Access

Purpose: Facial expressions and aesthetics are vital for communication, self-expression, and social interaction. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of localization and size of facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) on changes in perceived pre- and postoperative health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Methods: This retrospective study included patients who had undergone surgery for facial cSCC. Size, localization and stage were assessed. Pre- and postoperative HR-QoL were evaluated using the Skindex-29. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, the X2 Test, Wilcoxon Test, and repeated-measures ANOVA, were performed to analyze demographic data, tumor characteristics, and changes in HR-QoL. Results: Forty patients (mean age of 78.5 years) were included. Postoperatively, significant improvements were observed in the overall, emotional, and symptomatic HR-QoL. Tumor dimensions had an impact on presurgical emotional distress. For tumor sizes from 6 to 15 mm, significant release in symptom burden and improvement in general HR-QoL were observed. While women experienced notable improvement only in emotional distress, men also exhibited improvement in symptoms, and overall HR-QoL. All age groups showed improvements in emotional distress, symptoms and overall HR-QoL. No significant differences were found in terms of age or localization. Conclusions: This study suggests that sex, tumor localization, and tumor size may interact in influencing postoperative HR-QoL outcomes in patients with cSCC. While surgical treatment by experienced specialists was associated with an overall improvement in HR-QoL following successful tumor eradication, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size. The results indicate that surgery remains an important first-line treatment option, particularly for medium-sized tumors. In this cohort, TNM classification was not associated with postoperative HR-QoL changes; however, interpretation is limited by the predominance of early-stage tumors. Further studies with larger patient populations are required to confirm these observations and to better elucidate the relationship between clinical staging and HR-QoL outcomes.

  • Editorial
  • Open Access

We are delighted to present this Special Issue on Innovations in Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Reconstruction, which collects a broad range of contemporary research and emerging technologies shaping the future of reconstructive surgery and improving patient care [...]

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

XFacebookLinkedIn
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. - ISSN 1943-3883