Translating Breast Cancer Diversity into Clinical Application

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2020) | Viewed by 13727

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
Interests: breast cancer; systemic treatment; clinical trials; liquid biopsy; circulating tumor cells

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
Interests: breast cancer; lung cancer; immuno oncology; translational research; systemic treatment; clinical trials

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Our knowledge of breast cancer biology has increased dramatically in recent decades. The subtyping based on messenger RNA expression as well as the formation of breast cancer clusters by genomic changes has significantly influenced this development. These days, breast cancer is understood as a heterogeneous group of diseases with a distinct tumor biology, different prognosis and different responses to therapy. Despite this progress in deciphering tumor biology, treatment decisions are commonly based on immunohistochemical detection of hormone receptor and HER2 expression. For this special issue “Translating breast cancer diversity into clinical application” we would like to invite researches from all over the world, to publish their work (originally research but also reviews) in regard to this topic.

Prof. Dr. Marija Balić
Dr. Gabriel Rinnerthaler
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • systemic treatment
  • clinical application

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 3299 KiB  
Article
Hormone Receptor-Status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape
by Seokhyun Yoon, Hye Sung Won, Keunsoo Kang, Kexin Qiu, Woong June Park and Yoon Ho Ko
Cancers 2020, 12(5), 1165; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051165 - 05 May 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3197
Abstract
The cost of next-generation sequencing technologies is rapidly declining, making RNA-seq-based gene expression profiling (GEP) an affordable technique for predicting receptor expression status and intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer patients. Based on the expression levels of co-expressed genes, GEP-based receptor-status prediction can classify [...] Read more.
The cost of next-generation sequencing technologies is rapidly declining, making RNA-seq-based gene expression profiling (GEP) an affordable technique for predicting receptor expression status and intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer patients. Based on the expression levels of co-expressed genes, GEP-based receptor-status prediction can classify clinical subtypes more accurately than can immunohistochemistry (IHC). Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA BRCA) and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) datasets, we identified common predictor genes found in both datasets and performed receptor-status prediction based on these genes. By assessing the survival outcomes of patients classified using GEP- or IHC-based receptor status, we compared the prognostic value of the two methods. We found that GEP-based HR prediction provided higher concordance with the intrinsic subtypes and a stronger association with treatment outcomes than did IHC-based hormone receptor (HR) status. GEP-based prediction improved the identification of patients who could benefit from hormone therapy, even in patients with non-luminal breast cancer. We also confirmed that non-matching subgroup classification affected the survival of breast cancer patients and that this could be largely overcome by GEP-based receptor-status prediction. In conclusion, GEP-based prediction provides more reliable classification of HR status, improving therapeutic decision making for breast cancer patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Translating Breast Cancer Diversity into Clinical Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2634 KiB  
Article
Tumor-Infiltrating CD8 T Cells Predict Clinical Breast Cancer Outcomes in Young Women
by Yong Won Jin and Pingzhao Hu
Cancers 2020, 12(5), 1076; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051076 - 26 Apr 2020
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 3949
Abstract
Young women with breast cancer have disproportionately poor clinical outcomes compared to their older counterparts. The underlying biological differences behind this age-dependent disparity are still unknown and warrant investigation. Recently, the tumor immune landscape has received much attention for its prognostic value and [...] Read more.
Young women with breast cancer have disproportionately poor clinical outcomes compared to their older counterparts. The underlying biological differences behind this age-dependent disparity are still unknown and warrant investigation. Recently, the tumor immune landscape has received much attention for its prognostic value and therapeutic targets. The differential tumor immune landscape between age groups in breast cancer has not yet been characterized, and may contribute to the age-related differences in clinical outcomes. Computational deconvolution was used to quantify abundance of immune cell types from bulk transcriptome profiles of breast cancer patients from two independent datasets. No significant differences in immune cell composition that were consistent in the two cohorts were found between the young and old age groups. Regardless of absence of significant differences, the higher tumor infiltration of several immune cell types, such as CD8+ T and CD4+ T cells, was associated with better clinical outcomes in the young but not in the old age group. Mutational signatures analysis showed signatures previously not found in breast cancer to be associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels in the young age group, whereas in the old group, all significant signatures were those previously found in breast cancer. Pathway analysis revealed different gene sets associated with TIL levels for each age group from the two cohorts. Overall, our results show trends towards better clinical outcomes for high TIL levels, especially CD8+ T cells, but only in the young age group. Furthermore, our work suggests that the underlying biological differences may involve multiple levels of tumor physiology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Translating Breast Cancer Diversity into Clinical Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 1296 KiB  
Review
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Clinical Management Perspectives and Potential Consequences of Infection
by Justin M. Brown, Marie-Claire D. Wasson and Paola Marcato
Cancers 2021, 13(2), 296; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13020296 - 15 Jan 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5942
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the need for prioritization strategies for breast cancer treatment, where patients with aggressive disease, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are a high priority for clinical intervention. In this review, we summarize how COVID-19 has thus far impacted [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the need for prioritization strategies for breast cancer treatment, where patients with aggressive disease, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are a high priority for clinical intervention. In this review, we summarize how COVID-19 has thus far impacted the management of TNBC and highlighted where more information is needed to hone shifting guidelines. Due to the immunocompromised state of most TNBC patients receiving treatment, TNBC management during the pandemic presents challenges beyond the constraints of overburdened healthcare systems. We conducted a literature search of treatment recommendations for both primary and targeted TNBC therapeutic strategies during the COVID-19 outbreak and noted changes to treatment timing and drugs of choice. Further, given that SARS-CoV-2 is a respiratory virus, which has systemic consequences, management of TNBC patients with metastatic versus localized disease has additional considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Published dataset gene expression analysis of critical SARS-CoV-2 cell entry proteins in TNBCs suggests that the virus could in theory infect metastasized TNBC cells it contacts. This may have unforeseen consequences in terms of both the dynamics of the resulting acute viral infection and the progression of the chronic metastatic disease. Undoubtedly, the results thus far suggest that more research is required to attain a full understanding of the direct and indirect clinical impacts of COVID-19 on TNBC patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Translating Breast Cancer Diversity into Clinical Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop