cancers-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Pathophysiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (17 February 2025) | Viewed by 6045

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Lung Cancer and Chest Tumors Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
Interests: non-small cell lung cancer; pathology; molecular diagnosis; treatment

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Over the past decade, significant improvements in overall survival were observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. A backbone for improving prognosis are advanced diagnostic and treatment techniques. Today, non-small lung cancer is a heterogenous disease. Critical to the management of this cancer is a proper pathological diagnosis, including the phenotyping of tumor cells. All patients with nonsquamous NSCLC should have the results of testing for potentially targetable mutations before therapy for advanced lung cancer is implemented. Approximately 30–50% of patients with lung cancer tumors have potentially curable driver alterations. A group of patients without a driven mutation can be treated with immunotherapy. PDL1 expression  has many limitations as a biomarker. The establishment of a well-defined universal predictive biomarker for immunotherapy is an unmet need. This Special Issue aims to review the advances in pathology, molecular diagnosis and treatment techniques in non-small cell lung cancer.

Dr. Adam Płużański
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • non-small cell lung cancer
  • pathology
  • molecular diagnosis
  • treatment
  • prognosis

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 1458 KiB  
Article
Effectiveness of First-Line Treatment with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase and ROS1 Protoncogene Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients—Real-World Evidence of Two Polish Cancer Centers
by Michał Gil, Kinga Winiarczyk, Paweł Krawczyk, Kamila Wojas-Krawczyk, Aleksandra Łomża-Łaba, Adrian Obara, Łukasz Gajek, Katarzyna Reszka, Andrzej Tysarowski, Jarosław Buczkowski, Izabela Chmielewska, Tomasz Jankowski, Magdalena Szuba-Gil, Maciej Strzemski, Dariusz M. Kowalski, Janusz Milanowski and Maciej Krzakowski
Cancers 2025, 17(7), 1253; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17071253 - 7 Apr 2025
Viewed by 611
Abstract
Introduction: The use of ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1 (ROS1 protoncogene) inhibitors are the standard of care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangements (approximately 5.5% of patients). Three generations of inhibitors are available, but [...] Read more.
Introduction: The use of ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1 (ROS1 protoncogene) inhibitors are the standard of care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangements (approximately 5.5% of patients). Three generations of inhibitors are available, but there is no direct comparison of their efficacy in homogeneous Caucasian populations in real-world practice. In this retrospective study, we compare the efficacy of crizotinib, brigatinib, and alectinib in NSCLC patients with different clinical courses of the disease. Materials and Methods: One hundred four NSCLC patients with ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangement were enrolled for first-line therapy with ALK inhibitors (crizotinib in 25 patients, brigatinib in 22 patients, and alectinib in 41 patients) or the ROS1 inhibitor (crizotinib in 16 patients) as part of daily clinical practice in two Polish cancer centers. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared according to treatment methods and clinical data. Results: In ALK-rearranged patients, ORR was insignificantly higher in patients treated with second-generation ALK inhibitors than in patients receiving crizotinib (68.25% vs. 48% of patients, p = 0.0547). Median PFS in the crizotinib group was 8 months, and in the group that received second-generation ALK inhibitors this was not reached (HR = 5.2182, 95% CI: 2.6163–10.4079, p < 0.0001). Similarly, median OS was significantly lower in patients treated with crizotinib than in patients receiving second-generation ALK inhibitors (26 vs. not reached, HR = 3.529, 95% CI: 1.5559–7.2258, p = 0.002). The efficacy of crizotinib in patients with ROS1 and ALK gene rearrangement did not differ significantly (ORR—37.5 vs. 48%, median PFS—6 vs. 7 months, median OS—8 vs. 26 months, respectively). In ALK-rearranged patients, multivariate analysis showed that the only factor significantly increasing the risk of progression was liver metastases (HR = 2.1917, p = 0.0418). The risk of death was significantly higher in patients treated with crizotinib (HR = 2.4823, p = 0.0359) and in patients with liver metastases (HR = 3.1266, p = 0.0104). Conclusions: Second-generation ALK inhibitors are more effective than crizotinib in ALK-rearranged patients. Liver metastases, but not brain metastases, are the main clinical factors shortening PFS and OS in NSCLC patients treated with ALK inhibitors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 39302 KiB  
Article
Navigating the Maze: Exploring Non-Oncological Complexities in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
by Angela-Ștefania Marghescu, Silviu Vlăsceanu, Mădălina Preda, Mirela Țigău, Ștefan Dumitrache-Rujinski, Diana Gabriela Leonte, Elena Doina Măgheran, Adrian Tudor, Ioana Anca Bădărău, Livia Georgescu and Mariana Costache
Cancers 2024, 16(10), 1903; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101903 - 16 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1336
Abstract
Pulmonary oncological pathologies are an important public health problem and the association with other pulmonary lesions may pose difficulties in diagnosis and staging or require different treatment options. To address this complexity, we conducted a retrospective observational study at the Marius Nasta Institute [...] Read more.
Pulmonary oncological pathologies are an important public health problem and the association with other pulmonary lesions may pose difficulties in diagnosis and staging or require different treatment options. To address this complexity, we conducted a retrospective observational study at the Marius Nasta Institute of Pneumophthisiology, Bucharest, Romania. Our study focused on patients admitted in 2019 with non-small-cell lung carcinoma and associated pulmonary lesions identified through surgical resection specimens. Among the 314 included patients, multiple pulmonary nodules were observed on macroscopic examination, with 12% (N = 37) exhibiting nonmalignant etiologies upon microscopic examination. These findings underscore the challenge of preoperative staging. Patients with coexisting nonmalignant lesions were similar in age, smoking habits, and professional or environmental exposure by comparison with those who presented only malignant lesions. The presentation of coexisting malignant and nonmalignant lesions may pose difficulties in diagnosing and staging pulmonary cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 3805 KiB  
Article
The Diagnostic Value of ACSL1, ACSL4, and ACSL5 and the Clinical Potential of an ACSL Inhibitor in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
by Yunxia Ma, Miljana Nenkov, Alexander Berndt, Mohamed Abubrig, Martin Schmidt, Tim Sandhaus, Otmar Huber, Joachim H. Clement, Susanne M. Lang, Yuan Chen and Nikolaus Gaßler
Cancers 2024, 16(6), 1170; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061170 - 16 Mar 2024
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3330
Abstract
Abnormal expression of ACSL members 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 is frequently seen in human cancer; however, their clinical relevance is unclear. In this study, we analyzed the expression of ACSLs and investigated the effects of the ACSL inhibitor Triacsin C (TC) [...] Read more.
Abnormal expression of ACSL members 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 is frequently seen in human cancer; however, their clinical relevance is unclear. In this study, we analyzed the expression of ACSLs and investigated the effects of the ACSL inhibitor Triacsin C (TC) in lung cancer. We found that, compared to normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells, ACSL1, ACSL4, and ACSL6 were highly expressed, while ACSL3 and ACSL5 were lost in the majority of lung cancer cell lines. ACSL activity was associated with the expression levels of the ACSLs. In primary lung tumors, a higher expression of ACSL1, ACSL4, and ACSL5 was significantly correlated with adenocarcinoma (ADC). Moreover, ACSL5 was significantly reversely related to the proliferation marker Ki67 in low-grade tumors, while ACSL3 was positively associated with Ki67 in high-grade tumors. Combination therapy with TC and Gemcitabine enhanced the growth-inhibitory effect in EGFR wild-type cells, while TC combined with EGFR-TKIs sensitized the EGFR-mutant cells to EGFR-TKI treatment. Taken together, the data suggest that ACSL1 may be a biomarker for lung ADC, and ACSL1, ACSL4, and ACSL5 may be involved in lung cancer differentiation, and TC, in combination with chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs, may help patients overcome drug resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop