AI-Based Assessment and Learning Analytics: Psychological Constructs, Validity and the Human-in-the-Loop in AI-Enabled Education

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Educational Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 16 October 2026 | Viewed by 3235

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, 60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Interests: digital education; AI in education; teacher education

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, 60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Interests: AI in education; individual differences.

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into institutional educational settings is reshaping learning and fundamentally transforming paradigms of assessment, monitoring, and pedagogical support. Two developments are particularly transformative: the synergy of AI-enabled adaptive assessment (e.g., computer-adaptive testing, automated feedback, and AI-supported scoring) and learning analytics (e.g., process data, dashboarding, prediction, and early-warning systems). By combining these approaches, educational systems can now provide personalized learning pathways and support more timely instructional decisions across schools, universities, and professional training environments. At the same time, their growing adoption raises questions, from an educational psychological perspective, regarding construct representation, measurement validity, and responsible use.

This Special Issue focuses on the intersection of AI-based educational systems and the psychological constructs that underpin learning and instruction. As AI systems increasingly infer attributes such as competence, engagement, self-regulation, motivation, or collaboration from behavioral traces, construct clarity and measurement validity, as well as the alignment between computational models and psychometric theory, become paramount. We invite submissions that scrutinize construct representation, model-to-construct alignment, and fairness across diverse learner groups and contexts. Central questions include the following: What evidence supports the validity of AI-derived indicators? Under which conditions do adaptive assessments improve learning outcomes, and when might they introduce bias? How can learning analytics be translated into actionable insights without oversimplifying complex cognitive and affective processes?

A distinctive emphasis of this Special Issue is the “human-in-the-loop” approach in AI-based institutional education. Effective and responsible implementation of AI-based assessments and analytics depends on educators’ readiness to employ AI (e.g., attitudes, self-efficacy, trust, and adoption intentions) and their AI-related competencies (e.g., assessment literacy, data literacy, the ability to interpret outputs, and ethical judgment). We, therefore, explicitly welcome research on educators’ AI readiness, professional development interventions, and organizational conditions that enable or hinder the meaningful use of AI in instruction.

We welcome (a) systematic reviews and meta-reviews that consolidate the state of the art and identify open problems; (b) empirical studies, including field studies, experiments, quasi-experiments, and intervention studies; and (c) conceptual frameworks or position papers that advance the theoretical integration of educational psychology with AI-based measurement. By integrating perspectives from educational psychology, measurement theory, and applied AI research, this Special Issue will clarify what AI-based systems in institutional education can validly claim, how their outputs should be interpreted, and which human competencies are essential for their responsible and effective use.

Prof. Dr. Holger Horz
Dr. Maria Zirenko
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence in education (AIEd)
  • adaptive assessment
  • learning analytics
  • educational measurement
  • construct validity
  • human-in-the-loop
  • educator AI-related competencies
  • educator‘ AI readiness
  • algorithmic fairness and bias

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

26 pages, 1730 KB  
Article
From Foundation to Intelligence Integration: The Synergistic Associations of ICT and AI Support with Pre-Service Teachers’ TPACK Development
by Xu Liu, Jiaoyang Du, Jiacheng Wang and Huan Song
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 922; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16060922 - 4 Jun 2026
Viewed by 532
Abstract
Digital-intelligence transformation in education has made pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) a strategic concern in teacher preparation. Survey data from 11,818 pre-service teachers across 17 local normal universities in China were analyzed through hierarchical regression, quantile regression, and structural equation modeling [...] Read more.
Digital-intelligence transformation in education has made pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) a strategic concern in teacher preparation. Survey data from 11,818 pre-service teachers across 17 local normal universities in China were analyzed through hierarchical regression, quantile regression, and structural equation modeling to examine how perceived university ICT support and perceived AI support in education are associated with self-reported TPACK. Both forms of support showed significant direct and model-conform indirect associations with self-reported TPACK, but the quantile coefficients varied across the TPACK distribution: university ICT support showed a modestly fluctuating descriptive pattern, whereas AI support in education peaked at the median and attenuated at upper quantiles. ICT self-efficacy and AI competency expectancy each formed significant indirect pathways in the hypothesized model, although the ICT pathway was more strongly indirect and the AI pathway remained more strongly direct. Additional checks of university-level ICCs, cluster-robust standard errors, and measurement invariance across key subgroups supported the robustness and comparability of the findings. These patterns clarify how perceived ICT and AI support are differentially associated with self-reported TPACK and provide empirical grounds for more precise, human-in-the-loop support designs in teacher education. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 593 KB  
Article
Fine-Grained Intelligent Learning Diagnosis Model Based on the Exercise–Knowledge–Cognition Tensor for Educational Assessment
by Chunyan Zeng, Yulin Hou and Zhifeng Wang
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 637; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050637 - 24 Apr 2026
Viewed by 447
Abstract
Accurate and interpretable learning diagnosis is increasingly required in AI-enabled educational assessment. Existing cognitive diagnostic models typically represent item attributes with a binary Q-matrix and infer mastered or not mastered knowledge states. Although polytomous extensions allow graded mastery, item attributes rarely encode theory-aligned [...] Read more.
Accurate and interpretable learning diagnosis is increasingly required in AI-enabled educational assessment. Existing cognitive diagnostic models typically represent item attributes with a binary Q-matrix and infer mastered or not mastered knowledge states. Although polytomous extensions allow graded mastery, item attributes rarely encode theory-aligned cognitive-process demands, which limits pedagogical interpretation of diagnosed profiles. This study aims to operationalize revised Bloom’s taxonomy at the exercise–knowledge level by constructing an Exercise–Knowledge–Cognition tensor and to develop RLDM-EKC as a DINA-type cognitive diagnosis model that infers ordered knowledge–cognition profiles. The model defines EKC-based ideal responses, estimates slip and guess parameters with an Expectation–Maximization procedure, and derives learner profiles using Maximum A Posteriori inference with uncertainty summaries. We validate the approach on synthetic data and on TIMSS 2007 Grade 4 mathematics data, comparing against classical CDMs including DINA, PA-DINA, and pG-DINA. In simulation, RLDM-EKC attains a PMR of 81.7% and an AAMR of 91.6%, and in empirical data, it yields theory-aligned multi-level cognitive profiles with transparent uncertainty reporting. These properties support actionable, human-in-the-loop feedback for teachers and learners under realistic deployment constraints. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 375 KB  
Article
Generative Artificial Intelligence Self-Efficacy and Learning Engagement Among Special Education Teacher Trainees: A Moderated Mediation Model
by Xiage Liu, Juan Yang, Wei Zhao and Tingzhao Wang
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(4), 488; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040488 - 26 Mar 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1277
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), known for its personalization and intelligence, is gaining traction in special education as a tool to address diverse learner needs. As future key practitioners integrating intelligent technology to promote educational equity, how special education teacher trainees effectively utilize GenAI [...] Read more.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), known for its personalization and intelligence, is gaining traction in special education as a tool to address diverse learner needs. As future key practitioners integrating intelligent technology to promote educational equity, how special education teacher trainees effectively utilize GenAI has become a critical issue. In the context of Chinese higher education, this study employed a cross-sectional design and administered a questionnaire survey to 434 special education teacher trainees. The aim was to examine the association between their GenAI self-efficacy and learning engagement, with particular attention to the potential mediating association of problem-solving ability and the moderating role of critical thinking. The results revealed the following: GenAI self-efficacy was positively associated with learning engagement, and problem-solving ability played a mediating role in the relationship between self-efficacy and learning engagement. Moreover, critical thinking significantly moderated the relationship between self-efficacy and problem-solving ability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop