Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice

A special issue of Arts (ISSN 2076-0752).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (21 June 2022) | Viewed by 26391

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Humanities, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
Interests: art and memory; art and trauma; colonial and postcolonial literatures; conflict studies; heritage studies
Department of Arts, Design and Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
Interests: visual art; experimental film; sculpture; collective memory; national identity; nostalgia; autotheory

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Autotheory is fast becoming a popular methodology across written and visual media, but its borders are unstable. This Special Issue seeks to interrogate autotheory as an extended contemporary visual art practice.

The contemporary visibility of the term autotheory starts with its mention by Maggie Nelson in The Argonauts (2015), although Nelson states that she borrowed the term from Paul B. Preciado’s 2008 novel, Testo Yonqui (Testo Junkie). The origins of autotheory are debated by academics and creative practitioners alike, and a consensus on its definition has yet to be agreed. Current working definitions of autotheory are varied, with Kyle C. Frisina asserting that autotheory is “a genre in search of consensus” [1]. Moreover, while the growing scholarship on autotheory deals largely with text-based works of autotheory, Lauren Fournier has described it as a distinct practice of contemporary art. Fournier suggests that, in a contemporary arts context, autotheory enables the taking of “one’s embodied experiences as a primary text or raw material through which to theorize, process, and reiterate theory to feminist effects”. [2]

As Fournier and others make evident, there are risks to working autotheoretically, and what makes working in this way risky, particularly in contemporary art practice, is essential to explore. These risks include the rivalries of virtue signalling; questions of sabalternity and voice; political and ethical concerns regarding interpreting existing knowledge; the potential pitfalls of reproducing neoliberal violence through autotheoretical forms of collaborative citation and plural-authorship; and the relationship between the authorial figure and the narrator in a work of autotheory.

This Special Issue aims to build upon the foundations laid by Fournier and others in the realm of autotheoretical contemporary visual art, in order to contribute to the growing discourse about autotheory. We invite articles, including autotheoretical modes of written and visual contributions, from visual arts practitioners who are engaged with autotheoretical methodologies. We are particularly interested in contributions from those exploring self-writing, visual arts practices, and practice-based research that push beyond the parameters of memoir to actively engage with theory. We invite submissions that explore the nuances of autotheory and the inherent risks present within this as-yet undefined genre/critical discourse/creative practice. We also encourage contributors to reflect on the conflicts and limits of autotheory, its blind spots, as well as its affordances.

To propose an article for publication, please send a title and short abstract to the Editors, Cat Auburn ([email protected]) and Katherine Baxter ([email protected]), with a copy to [email protected] by 7 January 2022. Full manuscripts of 5,000-8,000 words in length should be submitted by 21 June 2022.

[1] Frisina, Kyle C. "From Performativity to Performance: Claudia Rankine's Citizen and Autotheory." Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, vol. 76 no. 1, 2020, p. 142.

[2] Fournier, Lauren. “Sick Women, Sad Girls, and Selfie Theory: Autotheory as Con­temporary Feminist Practice.” A/b: Auto/Biography Studies 33.3 (2018), p. 645.

Prof. Dr. Katherine Baxter
Ms. Cat Auburn
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Arts is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • autotheory
  • memory
  • visual art
  • art practice
  • contemporary art
  • social history

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Other

8 pages, 240 KiB  
Editorial
Introduction for Special Issue ‘Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice’
by Katherine Baxter and Cat Auburn
Arts 2023, 12(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12010011 - 10 Jan 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2728
Abstract
This Special Issue concerns the artistic practice of autotheory and its associated af-fordances and risks as undertaken by artists, art writers, and those interested in the stakes of the practice of autotheory [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Other

17 pages, 1953 KiB  
Article
Cinema Divina and Autotheory: An Interview with Marilyn Freeman
by Marilyn Freeman and Cat Auburn
Arts 2022, 11(6), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11060122 - 30 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2190
Abstract
This is an interview with moving image artist, writer, and contemplative practitioner, Marilyn (M) Freeman by artist, Cat Auburn. They explore Freeman’s contemplative filmmaking practice, ‘Cinema Divina’ and the relationship of Freeman’s life, artistic practice and research interests to autotheory. Autotheory is widely [...] Read more.
This is an interview with moving image artist, writer, and contemplative practitioner, Marilyn (M) Freeman by artist, Cat Auburn. They explore Freeman’s contemplative filmmaking practice, ‘Cinema Divina’ and the relationship of Freeman’s life, artistic practice and research interests to autotheory. Autotheory is widely held to be the coalescence of autobiography with theory (or philosophy) within a work of art or literature, often with an aim towards offering social or cultural narration and service. The impulse to collaborate on this interview came from Auburn’s encounter with Cinema Divina during an online group contemplative session facilitated by Freeman in February 2022. This interview covers Freeman’s development of Cinema Divina, such topics as Freeman’s theory of Vertical Dissonance, the risks of working autotheoretically, mysticism, interior life, the hierarchies of knowledge production and the potential for what Freeman calls ‘the illuminated space’ to create radical opportunities for personal transformation. Ultimately, this interview establishes that Cinema Divina can be seen as an autotheoretical practice that uses contemplative practices rooted in lectio divina, a meditative prayer ritual of early Benedictine monastics, to theorize through Freeman’s embodied, lived experiences and artistic outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2255 KiB  
Article
Rethinking the Spirit of “Self” and “Theory”: The Practice of “Autotheory” in Contemporary Chinese Art
by Wenwen Gu and Ke Su
Arts 2022, 11(6), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11060115 - 4 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2894
Abstract
From genre to interdisciplinary and trans-medial artistic practice, “autotheory” has attracted great attention for formally distilling a troublesome contradiction of dualistic opposition between theory and practice in arts and attempting to solve it. In this paper, autotheory is understood as the joining of [...] Read more.
From genre to interdisciplinary and trans-medial artistic practice, “autotheory” has attracted great attention for formally distilling a troublesome contradiction of dualistic opposition between theory and practice in arts and attempting to solve it. In this paper, autotheory is understood as the joining of reflective thinking through the “collective self” and the reflective thinking of “theory”. Based on Lauren Fournier’s research, this paper investigates two kinds of art practices in contemporary Chinese art. The first developed from the art movements of the late 1970s to the late 1980s, when there was a rethinking of collective selfhood in Chinese art circles. This “collective self” in Chinese culture expands the parameters of autotheory’s individualized, autobiographical “self”, as described by Fournier. The second example of autotheory discussed in this paper explores contemporary Chinese feminist art. Due to its cultural background and historical trajectory, different dimensions of individualized autotheoretical practices have developed in feminist contemporary art in China in the new era. The case studies presented in this paper show the flexibility of autotheory as a methodology, the complex conditions it applies to, and the potential to generate theory from expanded notions of “self” in art practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 595 KiB  
Article
Unclogging the Ears: Nonstop Languaging as Autotheory in Art and Academia
by Antrianna Moutoula
Arts 2022, 11(6), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11060114 - 3 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1898
Abstract
This text emerges from the autotheoretical performance practice of nonstop languaging, developed during my Master Studies at HOME OF PERFORMANCE PRACTICES, ArtEZ University of the Arts. My ongoing artistic research is enacted through this practice and proposes a writing of the self that [...] Read more.
This text emerges from the autotheoretical performance practice of nonstop languaging, developed during my Master Studies at HOME OF PERFORMANCE PRACTICES, ArtEZ University of the Arts. My ongoing artistic research is enacted through this practice and proposes a writing of the self that is not focused on recalling facts or narrating stories, but rather on tracing my thoughts in real time through language (languaging) and witnessing them simultaneously with another person. I perform autotheory by merging methods of articulating autobiography (carrying the self in language) with methods of forming and digesting theory. For this Special Issue, I created a new work in which nonstop languaging enters the framework of an academic paper. The autotheoretical work was developed through a series of radio performances at radio WORM, followed by a period of artistic research on transcription and citational practices. The result is an overload of words, thoughts, citations, experiences, theories, and memories that seek their own linearity. The practice of nonstop languaging contributes to the current artistic and academic discourse on autotheoretical modes of working with language, particularly within contemporary art, and further afield. This article invites readers to engage with an expanded view of autotheory in practice, and suggests that, by encouraging the shaping of an audience of engaged readers/listeners, autotheory can offer a space in which the confinements of knowledge production and dissemination within artistic academic discourse can be renegotiated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3235 KiB  
Article
We Continue Each Other
by Sofie Gielis, Eleanor Duffin and Ingel Vaikla
Arts 2022, 11(6), 111; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11060111 - 31 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1588
Abstract
Three female voices with different cultural backgrounds and practices explore the concept and possibilities of the we-narrative. Starting from a position of critical reflection, we dive into the question of how to speak as a female WE. WE is used to differentiate the [...] Read more.
Three female voices with different cultural backgrounds and practices explore the concept and possibilities of the we-narrative. Starting from a position of critical reflection, we dive into the question of how to speak as a female WE. WE is used to differentiate the particular collective dynamic that operates throughout this text from a more general use of the word ‘we’. Our framework is to work with the personal and vulnerable, but at the same time remain open to a dialogue that invites the other, through the concept of empathy. Our overarching aim is to look at what it means when we speak together collectively: whether it brings strength or dilution, and how speaking poly-vocally from a position of lived first person collective experience impacts current ideas around authorship. Is it possible to speak as a WE and write subjectively in a way that does not become a generalisation or a compromise? Guided by Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own, our text uses the format of autotheoretical writing, drawing on our creative–critical writing practices in the context of visual art. We seek to encompass our female ancestors in visual art. The text generates a dialogue that creates room for the articulation of one’s own voice and hand, whilst intending to leave space or gaps for the other to insert themselves. Appearing in seemingly disparate fragments, the text weaves together to form a tapestry, sometimes performative, sometimes narrative, incorporating both visual and language-based elements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)
22 pages, 3629 KiB  
Article
Quodlibet with Meninas
by Maria Gil Ulldemolins
Arts 2022, 11(5), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11050082 - 5 Sep 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2479
Abstract
In Diagrammatic Writing (2013), Johanna Drucker discusses the power dynamics between texts interacting on a page. So-called autotheoretical texts often engage in similar types of performative and relational lay-outs, and yet, not much has been written about this formal phenomenon. Bearing this in [...] Read more.
In Diagrammatic Writing (2013), Johanna Drucker discusses the power dynamics between texts interacting on a page. So-called autotheoretical texts often engage in similar types of performative and relational lay-outs, and yet, not much has been written about this formal phenomenon. Bearing this in mind, I propose an experiment that performs relations by thinking with, and through, Las Meninas, a self-portrait that is not strictly about the self. All that surrounds Velázquez in the painting (the work-in-progress we do not see, the ensemble of courtly characters, the framed reproductions of masters’ works, the much-discussed mirror reflection) informs and contextualises the portrait, but also explodes it into much more. This paper thus attempts to ask whether autotheory can, by being aware of performative and diagrammatic writing, together with the use of images as citations, decentralise the auto- and become a more choral scene, a cluster, a textual quodlibet or medley. Can a form of writing make space for a multitude, or even, a multitude into a space? Can the autotheoretical self be only one more of many characters, present, with agency, but off-centred? Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 276 KiB  
Article
Unsure Theory: Ambivalence as Methodology
by Caitlin Merrett King
Arts 2022, 11(4), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11040078 - 18 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3127
Abstract
Ambivalence is often regarded as a ‘negative’ emotion—an ‘ugly feeling’ as Sianne Ngai outlines—where not knowing and being unsure are seen as suspicious or mentally unhealthy. In this article, I outline the initial exploratory stage of the development of a new affective theory [...] Read more.
Ambivalence is often regarded as a ‘negative’ emotion—an ‘ugly feeling’ as Sianne Ngai outlines—where not knowing and being unsure are seen as suspicious or mentally unhealthy. In this article, I outline the initial exploratory stage of the development of a new affective theory that I have termed ‘Unsure Theory’, in which ambivalence is observed as a mobile and aporetic state that, from an individual perspective, embraces the holding of multiple contradictory personal opinions. Unsure Theory also outlines ambivalence as an appropriate contemporary, meta-modernist response to late stage capitalism, our current socio-political moment, and its often negative impact on mental health. The aesthetics of ambivalence is explored through embracing a hesitant vernacular, an oscillating humorous, dry and ironic to sincere tone, and an internal, anecdotal first person voice that often addresses the reader. This exploration of Unsure Theory operates in an adjacent, feminist lineage of, and in homage to, Sad Girl Theory, as coined by writer, critic and artist Audrey Wollen, and Sick Woman Theory, by artist, writer and musician Johanna Hedva, as well as Lauren Fournier’s critical responses to both. Written within the genre of art writing and in reference to my own interdisciplinary creative practice, this article exemplifies autotheoretical writing as an extension of contemporary visual art practice. This article is partially situated within my own personal experience of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy from 2020–2022 and reading the autotheoretical novel Chelsea Girls by Eileen Myles at the beginning of 2021. Through unpacking these personal experiences, I begin to outline an argument for embracing ambivalence, particularly within autotheoretical practice, where Unsure Theory seeks to repoliticise uncertainty towards a new generative, critical and personal perspective on not knowing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)
18 pages, 3388 KiB  
Article
Holding Our Nerves—Experiments in Dispersed Collective Silence, Waking Sleep and Autotheoretical Confession
by Grace Denton
Arts 2022, 11(4), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11040075 - 5 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2470
Abstract
As part of my practice-based research, I host a monthly radio show based on the principle of ‘waking sleep’, resulting in a largely silent experiment in dispersed communion with an audience. Silence—though frowned upon in standard broadcasting—has long been a feature of artworks [...] Read more.
As part of my practice-based research, I host a monthly radio show based on the principle of ‘waking sleep’, resulting in a largely silent experiment in dispersed communion with an audience. Silence—though frowned upon in standard broadcasting—has long been a feature of artworks from Marina Abramović (1973–present), to John Cage’s 4′33 (1952), to Gillian Wearing’s Sixty MinutesSilence (1996). The power of collective silence is harnessed by many doctrines: in Quaker meetings for worship, in the practice of Zen Buddhism, and in the Memorial observance of a minute’s silence. The practice of ‘waking sleep’ was coined by Ned Hallowell M.D. as a means of refreshing the brain and combatting the effects of ADHD. It is simply the act of letting the mind wander, without feeding it the next dopamine hit from a stimulant like a conversation or screen-scroll. Holding My Nerve is a radio show, and an ongoing autotheoretical artwork. It is part-field recording, part-endurance performance, and tracks my research process as it evolves. Using transcripts of the show, diaristic writing, and reflections on art history and my past works, this article explores the often-fraught relationships between autotheory, visual art, neurodivergence, and practice-based research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Editorial, Research

19 pages, 4704 KiB  
Essay
Trauma and Autotheory in an Expanded Practice of Life Drawing
by Gabrielle Amodeo
Arts 2022, 11(5), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11050080 - 26 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2946
Abstract
This article examines autotheory and clinical trauma theory in relation to the author’s studio-based visual arts practice. This is addressed through surveying the development of the drawing series An open love letter. This ongoing series stems from an expanded practice of life [...] Read more.
This article examines autotheory and clinical trauma theory in relation to the author’s studio-based visual arts practice. This is addressed through surveying the development of the drawing series An open love letter. This ongoing series stems from an expanded practice of life drawing and explores experiences of love in relation to PTSD. Trauma is an event that fractures the sense of self, sometimes culminating in PTSD. As someone who experiences PTSD, physical symptoms (sweating, vertigo, emotional flooding) have pulsed against researching trauma. Memory, symptoms, and theory tangle together, challenging expectations of objectivity. The article addresses how autotheory supports the validity of establishing visual arts research engaged with trauma and trauma theory from the embodied experiences of a trauma survivor. The article additionally traces how readings of clinical trauma theory and autotheory inflected across each other in this research. First, through a clinical-trauma-theory reading of autotheory, it examines how autotheory positions itself as restorative of ideological dissociations. Specifically, autotheory intervenes in trends in art practices by privileging conceptual modes over the embodied and emotional. Following, this research establishes the significance of an autotheoretical reading of trauma theory to articulate the embodied experience of the theory. This demonstrates the capacity of autotheory to embrace the associations between research, practice, and lived experiences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autotheory in Contemporary Visual Arts Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop