International Journal of Neonatal Screening

Newborn screening (NBS) is a cost-effective public health strategy for the early detection of congenital disorders that cause neonatal/infant morbidity and mortality. It is standard care in many high-income and emerging economies. Nigeria, despite its high birth number, has no newborn screening (NBS) programme for any disorder, causing missed opportunities for early therapy. This manuscript is a workshop report and expert consensus of a three-day national workshop organised by the Newborn Screening Consortium–Nigeria (NSC-N) in conjunction with The Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria, Revvity, and international partners. The first meeting comprised experts in different fields of newborn screening and newborn care who reviewed priority congenital disorders, implementation barriers, and national NBS needs in Nigeria. Experts presented pilot data, opinions, and global best practice evidence. Contributions were examined and debated and conclusions were reached by guided discussions and consensus agreement for a pragmatic nationwide NBS plan. The key outcomes were the urgency for Nigeria to begin an integrated, comprehensive NBS programme. Based on standard prioritisation criteria, sickle cell disease and congenital hypothyroidism were selected. Key implementation strategies included integration into routine maternal and child health services, establishing a national screening database, and developing a robust legislative and policy framework. The NBS workshop developed a framework to commence and incorporate integrated NBS into the Nigerian healthcare system. Two conditions were selected to kickstart the programme and establish a foundation for future expansion. This would improve neonatal health outcomes and reduce the long-term burden of congenital disorders.

Newborn screening (NBS) for sickle cell disease (SCD) has been performed in the United States (US) for decades, significantly reducing infant morbidity and mortality. A landmark clinical trial demonstrated that early identification of SCD enabled timely and life-saving prophylactic penicillin; this led to recommendations for universal NBS across the US. Early use of hydroxyurea as a safe and effective treatment for SCD further improved clinical outcomes by preventing acute and chronic disease complications. These advances add to the importance of early diagnosis through NBS, providing an opportunity for early treatment intervention. In recent years, high-resource countries—including those in Europe, the UK, and Canada—have adopted NBS for SCD using diverse strategies. Simultaneously, pilot programs in lower-resource settings such as Africa, Brazil, and India have demonstrated local feasibility and impact through implementation efforts. An overarching equity gap for achieving global NBS for SCD is the variable access to simple, accurate, and affordable testing. Other challenges include timing of NBS testing, targeted populations, laboratory methods, and parental education with genetic counseling. Questions remain about the equitable enrollment of affected infants worldwide into comprehensive care to ensure early treatment. These challenges raise concerns about sustainability, underscore the need for long-term funding and a strategic plan, and highlight persistent inequities from the lack of global NBS standards.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic condition that causes the degeneration of motor neurons in the spinal cord. Newborn blood spot (NBS) screening can potentially enable diagnosis before symptoms, and presymptomatic treatment is considered to be more effective than symptomatic treatment. In this paper, we present an overview of a cost-effectiveness model of NBS screening for SMA in the UK, informed by key clinical trials and the relevant published literature. Our analyses suggest that implementing screening could result in better outcomes and lower costs compared to the current approach of no screening plus treatment. However, several uncertainties and limitations of the model remain. These include uncertainty in the reimbursement status of nusinersen and risdiplam in the future; the ‘actual’ costs of treatments, as they are under confidential commercial agreements; uncertainty in the long-term effectiveness of presymptomatic and symptomatic treatment; and uncertainty around the incidence of SMA and the costs and the accuracy of NBS screening. An SMA in-service evaluation (ISE) that could capture data specific to the UK is under consideration, and an appropriately designed ISE with ongoing data collection could support periodic updates of clinical and cost-effectiveness estimates of NBS screening for SMA in the UK.