Next Article in Journal
The Treasure Vault Can be Opened: Large-Scale Genome Skimming Works Well Using Herbarium and Silica Gel Dried Material
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Drought and Salinity on Two Commercial Varieties of Lavandula angustifolia Mill
Previous Article in Journal
Silicon and Plant–Animal Interactions: Towards an Evolutionary Framework
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 4
10.3390/plants9040431
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exogenous Ascorbic Acid Induced Chilling Tolerance in Tomato Plants Through Modulating Metabolism, Osmolytes, Antioxidants, and Transcriptional Regulation of Catalase and Heat Shock Proteins

by
Amr Elkelish
1,
Sameer H. Qari
2,
Yasser S. A. Mazrou
3,4,
Khaled A. A. Abdelaal
5,
Yaser M. Hafez
5,
Abdelghafar M. Abu-Elsaoud
1,*,
Gaber El-Saber Batiha
6,
Mohamed A. El-Esawi
7 and
Nihal El Nahhas
8
1
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
2
Biology Department, Aliumum University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 21955, Saudi Arabia
3
Business Administration Department, Community college, King Khalid University, Guraiger, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
4
Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31512, Egypt
5
EPCRS Excellence Center, Plant Pathology and Biotechnology Laboratory, Agricultural Botany Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt
6
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22511, AlBeheira, Egypt
7
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31512, Egypt
8
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Moharram baik 21515, Alexandria, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(4), 431; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040431
Submission received: 9 March 2020 / Revised: 20 March 2020 / Accepted: 22 March 2020 / Published: 1 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop and Medical Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chilling, a sort of cold stress, is a typical abiotic ecological stress that impacts the development as well as the growth of crops. The present study was carried to investigate the role of ascorbic acid root priming in enhancing tolerance of tomato seedlings against acute chilling stress. The treatments included untreated control, ascorbic acid-treated plants (AsA; 0.5 mM), acute chilling-stressed plants (4 °C), and chilling stressed seedlings treated by ascorbic acid. Exposure to acute chilling stress reduced growth in terms of length, fresh and dry biomass, pigment synthesis, and photosynthesis. AsA was effective in mitigating the injurious effects of chilling stress to significant levels when supplied at 0.5 mM concentrations. AsA priming reduced the chilling mediated oxidative damage by lowering the electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation, and hydrogen peroxide. Moreover, up regulating the activity of enzymatic components of the antioxidant system. Further, 0.5 mM AsA proved beneficial in enhancing ions uptake in normal and chilling stressed seedlings. At the gene expression level, AsA significantly lowered the expression level of CAT and heat shock protein genes. Therefore, we theorize that the implementation of exogenous AsA treatment reduced the negative effects of severe chilling stress on tomato.

1. Introduction

Global warming represents one of the most significant research concerns currently confronted by biologists and agronomists [1]. Plants were grown under open environments often pass through intervals of abiotic stress throughout their lifetime [2]. Previous studies recorded the adaptable responses of crop plants to various abiotic stresses, in which focus has been laid on particular stress factors [3]. Based on the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the human population is growing fast and may reach around 10 billion in 2050. Additionally, food production is lowering due to different abiotic stresses. Consequently, the earth will need 70% more food by 2050 [4,5]. Thus, it is essential to acquire crops that exhibit equally improved vigor and tolerance to different environmental factors to face the upcoming challenge of food security [6].
Chilling stress may appear within temperatures among 0 and 15 °C [7,8]. Chilling stress causes numerous phenotypic signs, such as reductions in photosynthetic pigments, chlorosis, wilting, and cell death [9]. Furthermore, various metabolic modifications are triggered as a result of chilling stress, such as decreases in unsaturated fatty acid contents and increases in the permeability of cell membranes, which collectively reduce plant efficiency [8]. Subsequently, plants undergo different mechanisms for adaptation and protection in low-temperature stress. This maintenance mechanism simplifies the decreases in the efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), modifies the carbon reduction cycle and photosynthetic complex systems and speeds up the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [10]. Moreover, it activates downstream signaling approaches for transcriptional regulation [11]. Up-regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase transduction pathway [12], ROS signaling, and heat shock protein (HSP)/signaling pathways seem to be the leading players in the transcriptional regulation of plant under chilling/heat stress [12]. HSPs comprise a stress-responsive family of proteins whose were initially recognized when they accrued in plants as a result of heat stress, and then on it was found that they play essential functions in thermotolerance [13]. Several environmental and developmental conditions found to induce accumulation of HSPs, such as fruit ripening [14], low temperature [15], and oxidative stress [16,17]. Furthermore, the deposition of HSPs usually not just confers defense as opposed to the stress that triggers its synthesis, it even towards all upcoming nerve-racking scenario [18].
However, transgenic or breeding strategies revealed considerable outcomes in improving stress tolerance in plants [19]. Nevertheless, it cannot be effectively accepted to the agronomical community. Thus, extensive attention has been focused on lowering the deleterious effect of chilling stress through the exogenic implementation of various priming forms [20,21]. The usage of several compounds like sitosterol, magnesium, and potassium nitrate ready boost plant stress tolerance [11,22]. As a result of urbanization and the reduction in water resources and farmland, modification in the growth medium is a choice for sustainability [23]. The recognition of hydroponics strategies is increasing because of its excellent results in saving resources and improving food production [24]. Most plants might be grown using hydroponics such as leafy vegetables and tomatoes [25]. Root priming is one of the recent and efficient priming strategies, and the priming compounds are directly employed in the root region and stimulate abiotic stress tolerance. Root priming is also a popular research practice due to the direct exposure to the tested priming agent to evaluate its further consequences on the plant.
Ascorbic acid (AsA) is among the valuable metabolites associated with cell division, and osmotic adjustment. Vitamin C additionally possesses powerful antioxidant potential and assists in controlling the formation and scavenging of ROS [26]. Remarkably, the exogenous implementation of AsA might boost the endogenous AsA level [27]. Within the current study, we assumed that 0.5 mM ascorbic acid might trigger systemic tolerance in tomato under low-temperature stress (4 °C, 7 h). Hence, the impact of the root priming with ascorbic acid were evaluated on the biochemical, and molecular level.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotypic Remarks

The subjection of tomato to chilling stress leads to various morphological and phenotypic deformation, including leaf curling, wilting, and shrinkage of leaf blade (Figure 1). On the other hand, plants pretreated with exogenous ascorbic acid (0.5 mM AsA) showed an obvious alleviated effect against chilling-induced stress, as supported by the leaf phenology, turgor, and structure (Figure 1). Tomato plants treated with exogenous AsA and exposed to chilling stress displayed similar phenotypes with control plants (Figure 1), confirming that AsA has a potential role in alleviating the chilling stress damage symptoms in tomato plants.
Before exposing the plants to chilling stress, tomato plants showed an average shoot, root, and plant fresh weight of 3.57, 1.32, and 4.90 g FW−1 Plant, respectively (Table 1), with the major part of biomass allocated towards the shoot system (about 72% of biomass). The lengths of the shoot, root, and plant measured were 12.86, 11.81, and 24.67 cm, respectively (Table 1).
The tomato plant leaf area decreased significantly after exposure to chilling (28.94 cm2 in control group compared to 7.16 cm2 in stressed plants). However, plants treated with exogenous AsA showed leaf area compared to control (22.76 cm2; Figure 1A). Leaf length and width showed no significant difference among all treatments, including the control group (Figure 1B,C). Leaf perimeter showed a similar trend as by leaf area; no significant difference between control and plants treated with AsA before chilling (Figure 1D). Image analysis by image J showed a non- significant difference in mean grey values between control, chilling stressed plants, and plants pretreated with exogenous AsA (Figure 1E); however, the leaf mean integrated intensity normalized to the leaf area was significantly decreased from 1875.0 in untreated control plants to a level of 463.4 in chilling stressed plants and increased to 1372.9 in stressed plants pretreated with exogenous AsA (Figure 1F), reflecting that AsA treatment alleviated the chilling stress-induced damage in tomato plants.

2.2. Oxidative Damage

Oxidative damage was determined by measuring the hydrogen peroxide and electrolyte leakage. Chilling induced oxidative stress significantly by triggering the generation of hydrogen peroxide, and AsA was effective in mitigating the oxidative damage to considerable levels (Figure 2). Untreated plants displayed a H2O2 of 54.33 nmol g−1 FW, which significantly and intensely amplified to a level of 89.56 nmol g−1 FW exposed to chilling stress concern (Figure 2A). The minimum hydrogen peroxide amount (25.20 nmol g−1 FW) has been reported in plants pre-treated with AsA; nevertheless, seedlings exposed to chilling stress and pre-treated with AsA revealed hydrogen peroxide amounts of 72.72 nmol g−1FW. Hence, the exogenous application of ascorbic acid decreased H2O2 accumulation significantly in plants under chilling stress (Figure 2A). Furthermore, membrane leakage always associated with plant responses to stresses. The Membrane leakage in tomato is at its least degrees in plants pre-treated with AsA (6.7%, Figure 2B). The electrolyte leakage in untreated control group and plants under chilling stress and treated with exogenous AsA was non- significantly different from each other (10.3% and 10.12% respectively) however, stressed plants recorded the maximum degree of electrolyte leakage of 14.4%.

2.3. Antioxidant Capacity and Ascorbic Acid Content

The exogenous addition of AsA to plants increased total antioxidant capacity (TAC%) from 41.48% in chilling-stressed seedlings to a maximum of 75.5% (Figure 3A). Control plants and plants exposed to chilling with a previous treatment of AsA showed very similar results, however with significant difference between both, in favor of the latter (Figure 3A).
Both total oxidant capacity (TOC, µmol g−1 FW) and oxidative stress Index (OSI) showed the same trend, with the plants exposed to chilling stress manifesting the highest values, the plants treated with exogenous AsA showing the least values and the control group along with the group of plants pretreated with AsA before chilling showing comparable results, although significantly different from each other (Figure 3B,C).
Above all, incorporating AsA significantly (p < 0.05) elevated the cellular ascorbic acid level from 11.8 µg g−1 FW in control plants to 19.7 µg g−1 FW (Figure 4A). In addition, ascorbic acid significantly restored and improved the endogenous ascorbic acid in chilling-stressed seedling to an amount of 14.7 µg g−1 FW.

2.4. Proline Content

Proline increased from 9.5 µg g−1 FW to a level of 12.37 µg g−1 FW in chilling stressed plants (Figure 4B). AsA addition increased the proline content in plants significantly over the chilling-stressed group, although the level of increase was non-significantly different among both plants pretreated with AsA either exposed to chilling or not; 23.3 µg g−1 FW in AsA only treated plants and 23.2 µg g−1 FW in plants exposed to chilling stress after pretreatment.

2.5. Mineral Nutrition (NPK, Na, Mg)

Exogenous application of AsA substantially elevated the content of the plants of N, P, K to an amount greater than those of the controlled plants. Seedlings pretreated with exogenous AsA and exposed to chilling stress showed minerals contents higher than stressed ones (Figure 5A–E). In control plants, the content of minerals nutrients N, P, K, Na, Mg displayed an amount of 1.5, 0.24, 0.56, 0.8, and 0.2 mmole g−1 DW; respectively, while, AsA application significantly amplified minerals content (N, P, K, Na, Mg) in chilling-stressed seedlings to a level of 1.36, 0.20, 0.44, 0.62, and 0.17 mmole g−1 DW; respectively (Figure 5A–E).

2.6. Photosynthetic Pigments (Chl-a, Chl-b) and Anthocyanins

Photosynthetic pigments are important stress markers. Certainly, the chlorophyll-a, -b contents revealed a higher-level following AsA application (Table 2). Chlorophyll-a displayed a level of 74.2, 14.6, 80.6, 26.54 µg g−1FW in the control plants, chilling-stressed, pre-treated AsA, chilling-stressed plants pre-treated with AsA, respectively. Chlorophyll-a injury was observed while comparing chilling-stressed seedling to control by the decrease in one-third of its content; nevertheless, AsA application restored the chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b level (Table 2).
Chl-b content was 6.8, 0.61, 7.2, and 1.13 µg g−1FW in the untreated control, chilling-stressed plants, exogenous AsA, chilling-stressed plants with exogenous AsA, respectively (Table 2). Chl-a, and Chl-b content exhibited marked destruction recognized from the minimization from 80.93 µg g−1 FW in control to 15.25 µg g−1 FW in chilling-stressed seedling. The photosynthetic content reported by ascorbic acid application, acquiring a level of 87.8 µg g−1 FW with a considerable improve greater than both control and chilling-stressed seedling (Table 2). The ascorbic acid application might eradicate the destruction of photosynthetic apparatus under acute chilling stress.
Anthocyanins biosynthesis was severely affected by chilling shock as well. They increased from 0.6 Unit g−1FW in untreated control plants to a level of 1.08 Unit g−1FW in chilling-stressed plants. Application of AsA reserved and significantly improved the anthocyanin content from 1.08 to 1.23 in stressed plants pretreated with AsA (Table 2) revealed by one-way analysis of variance and DMRTs.

2.7. Gene Expression of Heat Shock Protein and Antioxident Genes

The gene expression of heat shock protein and antioxidant genes involved in chilling stress response are given in Figure 6A–D. The expression level of catalase and heat shock proteins genes were augmented by 1.2–1.4-times over the control plants demonstrating that chilling stress- upregulating the expression of these genes. The pre-treated plant with 0.5 mM AsA showed a lower expression of HSP70, HSP80, HSP90, and CAT genes. This verified mitigation of chilling stress significantly in comparison to plants exposed to chilling alone. The relative expression of catalase gene (CAT gene) also increased significantly to 1.16, 1.93, and 1.49 in seedlings treated with exogenous AsA, chilling, and chilling stressed pretreated with AsA respectively (Figure 6A). Exogenous application of AsA successfully over-expressed cat gene, which increases the antioxidants capacity of tomato seedlings under chilling stress (Figure 6A). The heat shock protein genes were also significantly over-expressed in seedlings pretreated with exogenous AsA (Figure 6B–D). The heat shock proteins HSP70, HSP80 and HSP90 genes he catalase enzyme (1.6, 1.8, and 1.9 in chilling stressed plants pretreated with exogenous AsA; respectively (Figure 6B–D).

3. Discussion

Chilling has been proven to show negative effects on plant growth and reduce crop production. As a means to cope with these extreme temperatures, plants develop their precise regulating mechanisms and the use of chemical compounds known to reduce the harmful impact of severe temperature may be crucial [28]. Among the various strategies that have been used recently for the induction of tolerance to abiotic stress in plants is the seed and/or plant priming [9].
Negative effects of chilling on rice seedling growth were apparent in the form of reduced elongation of roots and shoots, as well as less biomass accumulation [9]. Under low temperature, disturbance in seedling morphology is a secondary expression of chilling-induced damage to cell organelles and its interference with key physiological processes [8]. Chilling stress might have reduced the growth of the seedling by suppressing cell elongation and division or/and metabolic imbalance in plant tissues [29].

3.1. Phenotypic Observations and Leaf Morphology

Various deformations in the leaves of tomato; that were exposed to chilling stress (4 °C for 7h), were observed (Figure 1, Table 2). These chilling-induced phenotypic results are inconsistent with that reported by Hussain et al. [9,30]. Chilling adversely affects the growth and development of plants by influencing water relation and mineral uptake [20]. Temperature extremes impede cellular growth and proliferation by restricting the cell cycle transition and influencing the functioning of key regulatory enzymes. Leaf disorders during cold exposure may also arise from the differences between water loss by transpiration and water root absorption and translocation. That could result from a lower hydraulic conductance in the root system, or root death, once the coffee root system is extremely sensitive to cold [31]. Similar to what was found by Alayafi [28], the AsA pretreated plants showed obvious minimization for stress, as confirmed through the preservation of plant leaf turgor and structure [32].
Chilling-induced limitation in water status disturbs the osmotic balance, impairs metabolic activity at the cellular level, and increased ROS affect DNA, RNA and protein structures, reduce respiration and ATP production thereby restricting seed germination and vigor [33]. However, AsA is known to regulate cell division and mediate cellular signaling for active elicitation of stress responses [21].
The effect of chilling stress on the growth and development of a plant is stage-dependent [34]. Most studies focus, therefore, on the germination and the emergence of seedlings, where chilling stress shows a negative seasonal impact on the crop quantity and quality [20]. Fewer studies on growth and development have been conducted under chilling stress using post-emergent seedlings stages [34] and the current study.

3.2. Oxidative Damage and Antioxidant Capacity

Oxidative damage was determined as a measurement of hydrogen peroxide and electrolyte leakage (Figure 2). Chilling potentially enhances the release of fatty acids by inducing galactolipase, up-regulating the activity of lipoxygenase, and free radical-mediated damaging effects in plants [35]. Xu et al. [36] found that priming improved the chilling tolerance in tobacco during seed germination and seedling growth by the activation of the antioxidant system in the plant tissues. In the current study, the results are consistent with those revealed by Kader et al. [29] who demonstrated increased oxidative damage in wheat due to excessive generation of hydrogen peroxide due to chilling stress. AsA proved effective in improving the TAC (increasing it by 2 folds and decreasing TOC to the half, minimizing the oxidative damage in the present study (Figure 3). The increased level of antioxidant capacity confers the ability of plants to scavenge ROS and to withstand the chilling stress [37]. Reduced oxidative damage in AsA treated seedlings may be due to the up-regulation of the antioxidant system reflecting in reduced accumulation of ROS also of its role as potent ROS scavenger and redox component [38].
An increased rate of solute leakage in tissues is often correlated with the appearance of chilling injury (CI) symptoms [39] and measurement of the injury severity in many crops [40]. We found that electrolyte leakage in stressed plants increased. This was also recorded by Saltveit [39] who showed an enhancement in electrolyte leakage from tomato pericarp discs chilled at 2.5 °C after 3 days. However, pericarp discs from the same cultivar harvested during winter exhibited an increase in electrolyte leakage after 6–7 days of chilling at 2.5 °C [41]. Some crops are exceptions and show no increases in electrolyte leakage as a result of chilling stress. Electrolyte leakage was reported to be unaffected by the chilling of peach [42]. In the AsA treated plants the leakage decreased and those pretreated with AsA before being exposed to chilling showed a very near value compared to the control group which assures the role of exogenous AsA in alleviating the effect of chilling. Husain et al. [9] also reported that seed priming treatments effectively alleviated the negative effects of chilling stress.

3.3. Ascorbic Acid and Proline Contents

Oxidative damage caused by chilling intensifies due to the disequilibrium between oxidants and antioxidants [32]. Plants have evolved antioxidant protection mechanisms like enzymatic antioxidant and non-enzymatic antioxidants to avoid or combat the harmful effects of ROS to mitigate such circumstances, and to safeguard the plants against oxidative stress. [43] and contribute significantly to the antioxidant potential of plants [44].
In the current study, the chilling stress increased both proline and endogenous AsA significantly compared to the control plants. The addition of exogenous AsA either alone or before the exposure to the chilling resulted in even higher contents of both (Figure 4). Cao et al. [45] reported that proline content in chickpea plants exposed to chilling stress increased compared to the control. The same observation was reported with Pepino [46], and Casava plants [47] when all were subjected to stresses.
Proline is an important amino acid protecting plants against stresses through its active involvement in osmoregulation and antioxidant molecule [48]. Proline mediates stress signaling, scavenges ROS and maintains osmolarity of cells under stressful conditions, and in the present study, AsA mediated enhancement in proline reduced the oxidative damage by strengthening antioxidant system [49]. Increased proline protects the photosystem II functioning by eliminating the ROS generated in chloroplast due to stress [50]. Exogenous AsA mediated improvement in proline accumulation under normal and chilling stress conditions may have resulted from its effects on its metabolizing pathways. Stress-mediated increase in proline results from enhanced synthesis and reduced catabolism of proline [8,51] and AsA application may have imparted differential regulation on proline accumulation. Similar to our results, Hussain et al. [30] have also demonstrated improved accumulation of proline and sugars in chilling stressed maize plants. Exogenous proline application prevents oxidative damage to cells by up-regulating the antioxidant system and in the present study increased proline accumulation due to AsA application confirms the probable role of AsA in proline mediated growth regulation under stress [52].
The increase of proline linked to stress might be because it is a compatible solute for sustaining the osmotic equilibrium enabling the plants to adjust to undesirable conditions [53]. Many studies have demonstrated that heat tolerance in tomatoes and Arabidopsis is supported by an accumulation of proline levels in leaves [54].
Plants exposed to chilling stress, increased of its endogenous ascorbic acid as a predominant stress response [29]. Similar to our findings in the current study, pre-treatment with 0.5 mM increased endogenous AsA significantly when compared with AsA-untreated stressed plants [47], since exogenously applied ascorbic acid influences the endogenous AsA content [50].
Ascorbic acid is a strong antioxidant and the level of stress tolerance is positively correlated with ascorbic acid content [55]. In the study by Kader et al. [29] performed with two types of wheat, it was shown that endogen ascorbate content increased due to chilling stress. Tambussi et al. [56] reported that application of L-galactono-1, 4 lactone (Gal), which is the precursor of ascorbic acid, before chilling stress increased the reduced ascorbate content in leaves and decreased the oxidized ascorbate content [46]. Improved development of AsA-treated plants might be resulting from mitigation of oxidative stress by antioxidant system developed by high-content of endogenous AsA, SOD and CAT obtained in this investigation which preserved photosynthetic pigments and reinforced higher relative water content [9].
The application of ascorbic acid, however, allows the plant to develop stress tolerance under different stress conditions [57]. The endogenous ascorbic acid content was found to be significantly higher than the control group particularly in plants which had been subjected to pre-treatment with ascorbic acid. The explanation for this rise in ascorbic acid may be the indication for plant stress tolerance [46]. As a consequence, exogenous use of ascorbic acid is likely to increase those endogenous parameters to control chilling stress effects.

3.4. Mineral Nutrition (NPK, Na, Mg)

Abiotic stresses hinder the uptake of nutrients by down-regulating the expression of transport proteins including NRT1, AMT1, and PMT1 [58]. Reports discussing the role of AsA in plant mineral uptake and assimilation are scanty. Temperature fluctuations in root zone adversely influence the uptake of crucial mineral ions, including N, P, and K [59]. Chilling, in the current study, has led to significant reduction in Na, Mg, N, P, and K contents in plant leaves (Figure 5). Ions, such as magnesium (Mg2+) and calcium (Ca2+) ions, play important roles under abiotic stress, which has received little attention. Magnesium ion has a key role in both protein synthesis and maintaining chlorophyll content [60], whereas calcium ion is an important signaling molecule elaborate in several biochemical processes and responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses [61].
However, this intake was alleviated by the addition of AsA. This alleviation effect of exogenous AsA was also reported by Alayafi, [28]; Athar et al. [62]. The mechanism of AsA-mediated ion homeostasis is still unclear, but is possibly due to the improvement of cell membrane stability and/or plasma membrane Na+ -H+ antiporter SOS1 [63]. Another possible explanation is that increased uptake of mineral elements like N, P, K and Mg in AsA treated plants may have directly affected the metabolism by regulating the key functions like enzyme activity, protein synthesis, chlorophyll synthesis and osmoregulation [64].

3.5. Photosynthetic Pigments (Chl-a, Chl-b) and Anthocyanins

Stresses significantly reduce the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments by reducing the uptake of Mg and improving the chlorophyllase activity in addition to the significant damage to chloroplast apparatus [65]. The inhibitory effect of chilling stress on plant growth have been ascribed to a reduction in photosynthetic capacity and carbon metabolism [66]. Chilling increases generation of ROS and reduces the enzymatic activities in chloroplast, and leads to accumulation of hydrogen peroxide resulting in declined altered photosynthesis [57,67]. In several studies, freezing temperatures have been shown to have a detrimental effect on photosynthesis [56]. Kaur et al. [68] reported a decline compared with the control of chlorophyll in chickpea-leaves exposed to cold stress. In maize plants subjected to chilling stress, has determined decreased chlorophyll and carotenoid levels [55]. Kalisz et al. [69] have also demonstrated a significant decline in chlorophyll and photosynthesis in basil exposed to chilling stress. In the current study, chilling stress affected the synthesis of Chl a and b significantly compared to the control plants, and addition of AsA as a pretreatment prevented the drastic effect (Table 2). The decrease in both Chl a and b could be explained as cold temperatures limit light energy photochemical use, leading to an excess of energy absorption, hence, many evergreen plants were found to lower their energy absorption in winter by decreasing Chl content and up-regulating photoprotective mechanisms [70]. The involvement of oxidative stress often accompanies PSI photoinactivation in vivo, e.g., due to an overreduction of the acceptor side of PSI linked to decreased CO2 carboxylation [70,71].
However exogenous AsA application has been reported to prevent photosynthetic arrest by improving the uptake of Mg, chlorophyll synthesis and the activity of Rubisco with a concomitant reduction in ROS generation and lipid peroxidation [57]. The present study advocates the beneficial effect of exogenous AsA in the protection of photosynthesis and growth through improved chlorophyll production. Pretreatement of plants exposed to chilling with AsA was reported to enhance the photosynthetic pigments in Casava [9], pepino [46] and tomato [28]. It was reported that the foliar spray of AsA enhanced chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content in wheat and basil exposed to water stress [72].
Anthocyanins are water-soluble flavonoids, and their accumulation imparts photoprotection to plants under stressful conditions leading to maintenance of photosynthesis and other related plant functions [73]. Similar to our results, Ebrahimian and Bybordi [74] have demonstrated increased anthocyanin production in drought-stressed sunflower due to AsA treatment. In the present study also, AsA imparted significant enhancement in anthocyanin content probably preventing the chilling mediated deleterious effects on chloroplast structure and functioning, however exact mechanisms are not known. Kalisz et al. [69] have also demonstrated a significant decline in chlorophyll and photosynthesis in basil exposed to chilling stress.

3.6. Relative Gene Expression

Catalase is a crucial ROS scavenging enzyme leading to the elimination of hydrogen peroxide in the cell cytoplasm [8,75]. Increased antioxidant activities protect membrane structure and functioning hence leading to better plant performance [44]. Lee and Lee [76] have also demonstrated increased expression of antioxidant enzymes in cucumber exposed to chilling stress. CAT contributes to the scavenging of H2O2 [77]. Seed priming-induced increases CAT activities of rice seedlings have also been reported by Khaliq et al. [78] and Akram et al. [50], Ibrahim, and Opade [47].
HSPs are an essential group of proteins induced by environmental stress to protect plants from stress-mediated damage and to assist in repairing the damage caused by the stress [79,80]. HSPs are molecular chaperones involved in vivo enzyme and protein biogenesis. Increased expression of HSPs protects the structural stability of cold labile proteins [81], and AsA mediated enhancement in their expression indicates the potentiality to preserve protein structure and functioning.
Oxidative response also includes chilling stress-response genes [82]. Plant ROS levels also influence Hesp’s expression that responds to heat stress [83]. Both these results indicate a combination of ROS and temperature signals.
Plants Hsf and Hsp respond to stress under the thermal stress by changing their rates of transcription or the stability of their proteins [84]. Moreover, improvements in the AGO1 conformation, the elimination of passenger strands from the miRNA / miRNA* double chains complex and the formation of the RISC silence complex involve the connection of Hsp90 dimers during the miRNA biosynthesis cycle [85]. Such findings indicate that Hsp and Hsf may have a possible role in the resistance of heat stress and miRNA biosynthesis. Several studies have shown that miRNAs are able to control the HSF function by mediating the response to heat stress [86,87]. Although miR319 has recorded heat-induced expression in several species [88], it is still not understood how miR319 has been associated with heat stress control [89].
In the current study, the chilling stress resulted in enhanced relative expression of HSP70, HSP90, HSP80, and CAT genes. This was also observed by Alayafi [28] since Reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are regarded as stress signaling molecules [84], can be produced as a result of both chilling and heat stress [90]. Increased expression of HSPs observed in the present study may have also reduced the intensity of oxidative damage caused due to chilling, resulting in strengthening of tolerance to deleterious effects of stresses. Tomato seedlings over-expressing chloroplast HSP exhibit reduced the production of ROS and lipid peroxidation reflecting in increased photosynthetic performance [91].
AsA mediated enhancement in expression levels of HSPs under chilling stress confirms the existence of crosstalk link regulating the growth and development of tomato seedlings under chilling conditions. This was also reported as a result of seed priming by Hussain et al., [9] and Alayafi [28]. Pandey and his co-authors [92] found that membrane RNA helicases recognized, contributing to development, and stress tolerance. It is settled from the findings that AsA improved chilling stress tolerance of tomato seedlings concerning transcriptional induction of associated defensive genes, similar to the results of Kosová et al. [93] and Park and Park [94].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the present investigation revealed the significant potential role of AsA in alleviating the negative impacts of chilling stress in tomato plants by regulating antioxidant functioning, osmolyte, and ion homeostasis, and expression of catalase and heat shock proteins. Exogenous application prevented oxidative damage to chilled stressed tomato by up-regulating the antioxidant-functioning with a subsequent decline in the oxidant status. Ion homeostasis and increased chlorophyll and anthocyanin synthesis due to AsA treatment positively regulated the growth performance in tomato under chilling stress. Therefore, AsA application can be exploited to improve chilling tolerance in tomato by its active involvement in key regulatory functioning.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Experimental Design and Stress Condition

Tomato was grown in optimized soil for one month in a greenhouse of Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Egypt. The seedling was transferred and grown hydroponically in half-strength Hoagland nutrient solution [95]. The seedling was kept for one-week in the greenhouse at 60–70% relative humidity and temperature range 24–28 °C /20 °C day/night. The plants are divided into two groups; the first group is incubated in H2O. Whereas the second group is incubated in ascorbic acid solution (0.5 mM for 48 h). After that, the plants let to grow back again for 5 days in half-strength Hoagland solution. The first group is divided into the Control group (grown at room temperature), and chilling group (exposed to 4 °C for 7 h/day). The second group are divided into ascorbic acid group, where the plants roots are presubjected to 0.5 mM AsA and let to grow at room temperature, and ascorbic acid with chilling group, where the plants are presubjected to 0.5 mM AsA and were exposed to chilling stress (4 °C) for 7 h/day. A pilot experiment is being processed to determine the optimum and the best concentration of AsA for root priming and according to the previous experiment of other authors. Triplicate treatment was done for each treatment and three individual plants for each of the replicates. The leaves were collected for further laboratory examination in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

5.2. Leaf Measurements and Image Analysis

To evaluate the performance of tomato seedlings under different proposed treatments, seedlings were photographed with a digital camera. Digital images were further processed and analyzed by ImageJ, a robust program that was developed at the National Institutes of Health, USA. Calibrated ImageJ was used to generate various leaf measurements, including leaf area, leaf length, leaf blade width [96,97].

5.3. Determination of Chlorophyll (a, b) and Anthocyanins Content

The Chlorophyll (a, b) was extracted by 80% (v/v) acetone and determined in accordance to Holder [98]. While anthocyanin was extracted in acidified methanol and quantified, according to Mancinelli [99].

5.4. Determination of Electrolyte Leakage Lipid Peroxidation, and Hydrogen Peroxide

Electrolyte leakage (EL) was assayed according to the method of Dionisio-Sese and Tobita [100]. The tissue is raised in bi-distilled water; then, conductivity was measured before and after boiling for taking the respective electrical conductivities. Lipid peroxidation was quantified by the estimation of malondialdehyde content, which was estimated spectrophotometrically using thiobarbituric acid assays [101].
For the determination of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), leaves were homogenized in 0.1% trichloroacetic acid, and absorbance was measured at 390 nm, according to Sergiev et al. method [102].

5.5. Determination of Total Antioxidant Capacity, Total Oxidant Capacity, and Oxidative Stress Index

Assay of total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and total oxidant capacity (TOC) following Erel [103,104] method. The oxidative stress index (OSI) is calculated as follow:
OSI (arbitrary unit) = TOC (μmol H2O2Eq/L)/ TAC (μmol Trolox Eq/L)

5.6. Determination of Ascorbic Acid and Proline

Ascorbic acid was determined according to the method of Nweze et al. [105]. 25 mL of prepared juice was taken in each of six 100 mL conical flasks. 10 mL of 1 M H2SO4 was added and titrated with a standard iodine solution using 2 mL starch as indicator till the appearance of blue colour and then the amount of ascorbic acid was calculated. Proline was assayed by homogenizing leaves in 3% sulphosalicylic acid in accordance to Bates et al. [106].

5.7. Mineral Ions Content (N, P, K, Na, and Mg)

Total Nitrogen is being quantified according to according to Lennox and Flanagan [107] by Kjeldahl method. While the potassium and sodium quantification was achieved by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (Agilent, Hachioji, Japan). Phosphorus estimation in leaves was measured in accordance with Fogg and Wilkinson [108]. Finally, magnesium and calcium contents were quantified, according to Rowell [109] by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS-Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

5.8. RNA Extraction and Real-Time PCR Analysis

Total RNA extraction kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) is used for the isolation of RNA from tomato leaves. Then the SuperScript cDNA synthesis kit is used for cDNAs formation. 18s gene was used as a reference gene in the relative expression of gene expression; primers sequence of catalase and heat shock proteins are in Table 1. The reaction is made of 2 µL of forward primer, 2 µL of reverse primer, 10 µL of SYBR Green Master Mix, 2 µL of the template, and sterile water for a total volume of 20 µL. Livak equation 2−ΔΔCt are used for the calculation of relative gene expression [110].

5.9. Data Analyses

The Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS (version 23) are being used for biostatistics test, presenting and drawing data results. Inferential statistics for assessing and linking treatments by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan multiple range tests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.E.; methodology, A.E., S.H.Q., A.M.A.-E., K.A.A.A., M.A.E.-E., Y.M.H. and N.E.N.; validation, S.H.Q., Y.S.A.M., K.A.A.A., A.M.A.-E., and N.E.N.; formal analysis, A.E., S.H.Q., Y.M.H. and A.M.A.-E.; investigation, S.H.Q. and Y.S.A.M.; resources, S.H.Q., G.E.-S.B., and Y.S.A.M.; Data curation, A.E., S.H.Q., A.M.A.-E., K.A.A.A., M.A.E.-E. and N.E.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.E., S.H.Q., A.M.A.-E., K.A.A.A., M.A.E.-E., Y.M.H. and N.E.N.; writing—review and editing, A.E., S.H.Q., A.M.A.-E., G.E.-S.B., Y.S.A.M., K.A.A.A., M.A.E.-E. and N.E.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the deanship of scientific research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the program of research groups under grant number (R.G.P 1/106/40).

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the deanship of scientific research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the program of research groups under grant number (R.G.P 1/106/40).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Legave, J.M.; Farrera, I.; Almeras, T.; Calleja, M. Selecting models of apple flowering time and understanding how global warming has had an impact on this trait. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 83, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pereira, A. Plant Abiotic Stress Challenges from the Changing Environment. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Onaga, G.; Wydra, K. Advances in Plant Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses. In Plant Genomics; Abdurakhmonov, I.Y., Ed.; InTech: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-953-51-2455-9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nooghabi, S.N.; Burkart, S.; Mahmoudi, H.; Taheri, F.; Damghani, A.M.; Yazdanpanah, M.; Hosseininia, G.; Azadi, H. More food or better distribution? Reviewing food policy options in developing countries. Food Rev. Int. 2018, 34, 566–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Newton, D.E. Spotlight On Current Events: Essays on Contemporary World Issues; ABC-CLIO: Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-4408-7063-7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mabhaudhi, T.; Chimonyo, V.G.P.; Hlahla, S.; Massawe, F.; Mayes, S.; Nhamo, L.; Modi, A.T. Prospects of orphan crops in climate change. Planta 2019, 250, 695–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kratsch, H.A.; Wise, R.R. The ultrastructure of chilling stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soliman, M.H.; Alayafi, A.A.M.; El Kelish, A.A.; Abu-Elsaoud, A.M. Acetylsalicylic acid enhance tolerance of Phaseolus vulgaris L. to chilling stress, improving photosynthesis, antioxidants and expression of cold stress responsive genes. Bot. Stud. 2018, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hussain, S.; Khan, F.; Hussain, H.A.; Nie, L. Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Seed Priming-Induced Chilling Tolerance in Rice Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Saibo, N.J.M.; Lourenço, T.; Oliveira, M.M. Transcription factors and regulation of photosynthetic and related metabolism under environmental stresses. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 609–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Elkeilsh, A.; Awad, Y.M.; Soliman, M.H.; Abu-Elsaoud, A.; Abdelhamid, M.T.; El-Metwally, I.M. Exogenous application of β-sitosterol mediated growth and yield improvement in water-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum) involves up-regulated antioxidant system. J. Plant Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Von Koskull-Döring, P.; Scharf, K.-D.; Nover, L. The diversity of plant heat stress transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aghdam, M.S.; Sevillano, L.; Flores, F.B.; Bodbodak, S. Heat shock proteins as biochemical markers for postharvest chilling stress in fruits and vegetables. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 160, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Neta-Sharir, I.; Isaacson, T.; Lurie, S.; Weiss, D. Dual Role for Tomato Heat Shock Protein 21: Protecting Photosystem II from Oxidative Stress and Promoting Color Changes during Fruit Maturation. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1829–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lopez-Matas, M.-A.; Nuñez, P.; Soto, A.; Allona, I.; Casado, R.; Collada, C.; Guevara, M.-A.; Aragoncillo, C.; Gomez, L. Protein Cryoprotective Activity of a Cytosolic Small Heat Shock Protein That Accumulates Constitutively in Chestnut Stems and Is Up-Regulated by Low and High Temperatures. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1708–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Apostolova, P.; Yordanova, R.; Popova, L. Response of antioxidative defence system to low temperature stress in two wheat cultivars. Gen Appl Plant Physiol 2008, 34, 281–294. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jofré, A.; Molinas, M.; Pla, M. A 10-kDa class-CI sHsp protects E. coli from oxidative and high-temperature stress. Planta 2003, 217, 813–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saleh, A.A.H.; Abdel-Kader, D.; El Kelish, A. Role of Heat Shock and Salicylic Acid in Antioxidant Homeostasis in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) Plant Subjected to Heat Stress. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 2, 344–355. [Google Scholar]
  19. El-Esawi, M.A.; Elkelish, A.; Soliman, M.; Elansary, H.O.; Zaid, A.; Wani, S.H. Serratia marcescens BM1 Enhances Cadmium Stress Tolerance and Phytoremediation Potential of Soybean Through Modulation of Osmolytes, Leaf Gas Exchange, Antioxidant Machinery, and Stress-Responsive Genes Expression. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Farooq, M.; Hussain, M.; Nawaz, A.; Lee, D.-J.; Alghamdi, S.S.; Siddique, K.H.M. Seed priming improves chilling tolerance in chickpea by modulating germination metabolism, trehalose accumulation and carbon assimilation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 111, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fotopoulos, V. (Eds.) Priming and Pretreatment of Seeds and Seedlings: Implication in Plant Stress Tolerance and Enhancing Productivity in Crop Plants; Springer: Singapore, 2019; ISBN 9789811386244. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Rohman, M.M.; Anee, T.I.; Huang, Y.; Fujita, M. Exogenous Silicon Protects Brassica napus Plants from Salinity-Induced Oxidative Stress Through the Modulation of AsA-GSH Pathway, Thiol-Dependent Antioxidant Enzymes and Glyoxalase Systems. Gesunde Pflanz. 2018, 70, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security. FAO (Ed.) In The State of Food and Agriculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016; ISBN 978-92-5-109374-0. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sharma, N.; Acharya, S.; Kumar, K.; Singh, N.; Chaurasia, O.P. Hydroponics as an advanced technique for vegetable production: An overview. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2018, 17, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Asaduzzaman, M.; Saifullah, M.; Mollick, A.S.R.; Hossain, M.M.; Halim, G.M.A.; Asao, T. Influence of Soilless Culture Substrate on Improvement of Yield and Produce Quality of Horticultural Crops. In Soilless Culture—Use of Substrates for the Production of Quality Horticultural Crops; Asaduzzaman, M., Ed.; InTech: London, UK, 2015; ISBN 978-953-51-1739-1. [Google Scholar]
  26. Müller-Moulé, P.; Havaux, M.; Niyogi, K.K. Zeaxanthin deficiency enhances the high light sensitivity of an ascorbate-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 748–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chen, Z.; Gallie, D.R. The ascorbic acid redox state controls guard cell signaling and stomatal movement. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1143–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Alayafi, A.A.M. Exogenous ascorbic acid induces systemic heat stress tolerance in tomato seedlings: Transcriptional regulation mechanism. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kader, D.Z.A.; Saleh, A.A.H.; Elmeleigy, S.A.; Dosoky, N.S. Chilling-induced oxidative stress and polyamines regulatory role in two wheat varieties. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2011, 5, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hussain, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Khaliq, A.; Ashraf, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Men, S.; Wang, L. Chilling and Drought Stresses in Crop Plants: Implications, Cross Talk, and Potential Management Opportunities. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aroca, R.; Vernieri, P.; Irigoyen, J.J.; Sánchez-Díaz, M.; Tognoni, F.; Pardossi, A. Involvement of abscisic acid in leaf and root of maize (Zea mays L.) in avoiding chilling-induced water stress. Plant Sci. 2003, 165, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ecophysiology, Abiotic Stress Responses and Utilization of Halophytes; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Öztürk, M. (Eds.) Springer: Singapore, 2019; ISBN 9789811337611. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, J.; Cao, W.; Rui, Y. Interactions between nanoparticles and plants: phytotoxicity and defense mechanisms. J. Plant Interact. 2017, 12, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. DeRidder, B.P.; Crafts-Brandner, S.J. Chilling stress response of postemergent cotton seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 134, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bai, J.; Baldwin, E.A.; Imahori, Y.; Kostenyuk, I.; Burns, J.; Brecht, J.K. Chilling and heating may regulate C6 volatile aroma production by different mechanisms in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 60, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, S.; Hu, J.; Li, Y.; Ma, W.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, S. Chilling tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum induced by seed priming with putrescine. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 63, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Elkelish, A.A.; Alnusaire, T.S.; Soliman, M.H.; Gowayed, S.; Senousy, H.H.; Fahad, S. Calcium availability regulates antioxidant system, physio-biochemical activities and alleviates salinity stress mediated oxidative damage in soybean seedlings. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2019, 258–266. [Google Scholar]
  38. Elkelish, A.A.; Alhaithloul, H.A.S.; Qari, S.H.; Soliman, M.H.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Pretreatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates waterlogging-induced growth alterations in tomato seedlings by modulating physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 103946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saltveit, M.E. The rate of ion leakage from chilling-sensitive tissue does not immediately increase upon exposure to chilling temperatures. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002, 26, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Valenzuela, J.L.; Manzano, S.; Palma, F.; Carvajal, F.; Garrido, D.; Jamilena, M. Oxidative Stress Associated with Chilling Injury in Immature Fruit: Postharvest Technological and Biotechnological Solutions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Albornoz, K.; Cantwell, M.I.; Zhang, L.; Beckles, D.M. Integrative analysis of postharvest chilling injury in cherry tomato fruit reveals contrapuntal spatio-temporal responses to ripening and cold stress. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Furmanski, R.J.; Buescher, R.W. Influence of Chilling on Electrolyte Leakage and Internal Conductivity of Peach Fruits. Available online: https://eurekamag.com/research/000/680/000680703.php (accessed on 2 January 2020).
  43. El-Esawi, M.A.; Elkelish, A.; Elansary, H.O.; Ali, H.M.; Elshikh, M.; Witczak, J.; Ahmad, M. Genetic Transformation and Hairy Root Induction Enhance the Antioxidant Potential of Lactuca serriola L. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2017/5604746/ (accessed on 9 January 2018).
  44. Al Mahmud, J.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Anee, T.I.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Reactive Oxygen Species Metabolism and Antioxidant Defense in Plants Under Metal/Metalloid Stress. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Hasanuzzaman, M., Hakeem, K.R., Nahar, K., Alharby, H.F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 221–257. ISBN 978-3-030-06117-3. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cao, S.; Cai, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, Y. MeJA induces chilling tolerance in loquat fruit by regulating proline and γ-aminobutyric acid contents. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 1466–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sivaci, A.; Kaya, A.; Duman, S. Effects of ascorbic acid on some physiological changes of pepino (Solanum muricatum Ait.) under chilling stress. Acta Biol. Hung. 2014, 65, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ibrahim, O.R.; Opabode, J.T. Pre-treatment of two contrasting water-stressed genotypes of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) with ascorbic acid. I. Growth, physiological and antioxidant responses. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants Int. J. Funct. Plant Biol. 2019, 25, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abdul Jaleel, C.; Manivannan, P.; Wahid, A.; Farooq, M.; Jasim Al-Juburi, H.; Somasundaram, R.; Panneerselvam, R. Drought Stress in Plants: A Review on Morphological Characteristics and Pigments Composition. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2009, 11, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  49. Abrantes, F.D.L.; Ribas, A.F.; Vieira, L.G.E.; Machado-Neto, N.B.; Custódio, C.C. Seed germination and seedling vigour of transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) with increased proline accumulation under osmotic stress. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Akram, N.A.; Shafiq, F.; Ashraf, M. Ascorbic Acid-A Potential Oxidant Scavenger and Its Role in Plant Development and Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alhaithloul, H.A.; Soliman, M.H.; Ameta, K.L.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Elkelish, A. Changes in Ecophysiology, Osmolytes, and Secondary Metabolites of the Medicinal Plants of Mentha piperita and Catharanthus roseus Subjected to Drought and Heat Stress. Biomolecules 2019, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Alam, M.M.; Rahman, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. Exogenous Proline and Glycine Betaine Mediated Upregulation of Antioxidant Defense and Glyoxalase Systems Provides Better Protection against Salt-Induced Oxidative Stress in Two Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Varieties. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/757219/ (accessed on 19 November 2019).
  53. Allahveran, A.; Farokhzad, A.; Asghari, M.; Sarkhosh, A. Foliar application of ascorbic and citric acids enhanced ‘Red Spur’ apple fruit quality, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2018, 24, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, Y.; Huang, W.; Xian, Z.; Hu, N.; Lin, D.; Ren, H.; Chen, J.; Su, D.; Li, Z. Overexpression of SlGRAS40 in Tomato Enhances Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses and Influences Auxin and Gibberellin Signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Erdal, S. Androsterone-induced molecular and physiological changes in maize seedlings in response to chilling stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. PPB 2012, 57, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tambussi, E.A.; Bartoli, C.G.; Guiamet, J.J.; Beltrano, J.; Araus, J.L. Oxidative stress and photodamage at low temperatures in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) leaves. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alamri, S.A.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Al-Khaishany, M.Y.; Khan, M.N.; Ali, H.M.; Alaraidh, I.A.; Alsahli, A.A.; Al-Rabiah, H.; Mateen, M. Ascorbic acid improves the tolerance of wheat plants to lead toxicity. J. Plant Interact. 2018, 13, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Bista, D.; Heckathorn, S.; Jayawardena, D.; Mishra, S.; Boldt, J. Effects of Drought on Nutrient Uptake and the Levels of Nutrient-Uptake Proteins in Roots of Drought-Sensitive and -Tolerant Grasses. Plants 2018, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pregitzer, K.S.; King, J.S. Effects of Soil Temperature on Nutrient Uptake. In Nutrient Acquisition by Plants; BassiriRad, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; Volume 181, pp. 277–310. ISBN 978-3-540-24186-7. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tränkner, M.; Tavakol, E.; Jákli, B. Functioning of potassium and magnesium in photosynthesis, photosynthate translocation and photoprotection. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 163, 414–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Steinhorst, L.; Kudla, J. Signaling in cells and organisms—calcium holds the line. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 22, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Athar, H.-R.; Khan, A.; Ashraf, M. Inducing Salt Tolerance in Wheat by Exogenously Applied Ascorbic Acid through Different Modes. J. Plant Nutr. 2009, 32, 1799–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhu, J.K. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Farooq, M.; Irfan, M.; Aziz, T.; Ahmad, I.; Cheema, S.A. Seed Priming with Ascorbic Acid Improves Drought Resistance of Wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2013, 199, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, J.; Bao, F. Effects of Chilling on the Structure, Function and Development of Chloroplasts. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Hendrickson, L.; Ball, M.C.; Wood, J.T.; Chow, W.S.; Furbank, R.T. Low temperature effects on photosynthesis and growth of grapevine. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 795–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Meng, C.; Sui, N. Overexpression of maize MYB-IF35 increases chilling tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kaur, G.; Kumar, S.; Thakur, P.; Malik, J.A.; Bhandhari, K.; Sharma, K.D.; Nayyar, H. Involvement of proline in response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to chilling stress at reproductive stage. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 128, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kalisz, A.; Jezdinský, A.; Pokluda, R.; Sękara, A.; Grabowska, A.; Gil, J. Impacts of chilling on photosynthesis and chlorophyll pigment content in juvenile basil cultivars. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2016, 57, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Batista-Santos, P.; Lidon, F.C.; Fortunato, A.; Leitão, A.E.; Lopes, E.; Partelli, F.; Ribeiro, A.I.; Ramalho, J.C. The impact of cold on photosynthesis in genotypes of Coffea spp.—photosystem sensitivity, photoprotective mechanisms and gene expression. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 792–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hwang, H.J.; Kim, J.-H.; Eu, Y.-J.; Moon, B.Y.; Cho, S.H.; Lee, C.-H. Photoinhibition of photosystem I is accelerated by dimethyldithiocarbamate, an inhibitor of superoxide dismutase, during light-chilling of spinach leaves. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2004, 73, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hussein, M.M.; Alva, A.K. Effects of Zinc and Ascorbic Acid Application on the Growth and Photosynthetic Pigments of Millet Plants Grown under Different Salinity. Agric. Sci. 2014, 05, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Gould, K.S.; Markham, K.R.; Smith, R.H.; Goris, J.J. Functional role of anthocyanins in the leaves of Quintinia serrata A. Cunn. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ebrahimian, E.; Bybordi, A. Influence of ascorbic acid foliar application on chlorophyll, flavonoids, anthocyanin and soluble sugar contents of sunflower under conditions of water deficit stress. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 1026–1030. [Google Scholar]
  75. Batiha, G.E.-S.; Magdy Beshbishy, A.; Adeyemi, O.S.; Nadwa, E.H.; Rashwan, E.; kadry, M.; Alkazmi, L.M.; Elkelish, A.A.; Igarashi, I. Phytochemical Screening and Antiprotozoal Effects of the Methanolic Berberis vulgaris and Acetonic Rhus coriaria Extracts. Molecules 2020, 25, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Lee, D.H.; Lee, C.B. Chilling stress-induced changes of antioxidant enzymes in the leaves of cucumber: in gel enzyme activity assays. Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2000, 159, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  77. Anjum, S.A.; Tanveer, M.; Hussain, S.; Bao, M.; Wang, L.; Khan, I.; Ullah, E.; Tung, S.A.; Samad, R.A.; Shahzad, B. Cadmium toxicity in Maize (Zea mays L.): consequences on antioxidative systems, reactive oxygen species and cadmium accumulation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 17022–17030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Khaliq, A.; Aslam, F.; Matloob, A.; Hussain, S.; Geng, M.; Wahid, A.; ur Rehman, H. Seed Priming with Selenium: Consequences for Emergence, Seedling Growth, and Biochemical Attributes of Rice. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 166, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Al-Whaibi, M.H. Plant heat-shock proteins: A mini review. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2011, 23, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ungelenk, S.; Moayed, F.; Ho, C.-T.; Grousl, T.; Scharf, A.; Mashaghi, A.; Tans, S.; Mayer, M.P.; Mogk, A.; Bukau, B. Small heat shock proteins sequester misfolding proteins in near-native conformation for cellular protection and efficient refolding. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fowler, S.; Thomashow, M.F. Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1675–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Volkov, R.A.; Panchuk, I.I.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Schöffl, F. Heat stress-induced H2O2 is required for effective expression of heat shock genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61, 733–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ohama, N.; Sato, H.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional Regulatory Network of Plant Heat Stress Response. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Iki, T.; Yoshikawa, M.; Nishikiori, M.; Jaudal, M.C.; Matsumoto-Yokoyama, E.; Mitsuhara, I.; Meshi, T.; Ishikawa, M. In vitro assembly of plant RNA-induced silencing complexes facilitated by molecular chaperone HSP90. Mol. Cell 2010, 39, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Guan, Q.; Lu, X.; Zeng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, J. Heat stress induction of miR398 triggers a regulatory loop that is critical for thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013, 74, 840–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Stief, A.; Altmann, S.; Hoffmann, K.; Pant, B.D.; Scheible, W.-R.; Bäurle, I. Arabidopsis miR156 Regulates Tolerance to Recurring Environmental Stress through SPL Transcription Factors. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1792–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Zhou, X.; Zhao, H.; Cao, K.; Hu, L.; Du, T.; Baluška, F.; Zou, Z. Beneficial Roles of Melatonin on Redox Regulation of Photosynthetic Electron Transport and Synthesis of D1 Protein in Tomato Seedlings under Salt Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Shi, X.; Xu, S.; Mu, D.; Sadeghnezhad, E.; Li, Q.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L. Exogenous Melatonin Delays Dark-Induced Grape Leaf Senescence by Regulation of Antioxidant System and Senescence Associated Genes (SAGs). Plants 2019, 8, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Alam, M.M.; Roychowdhury, R.; Fujita, M. Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Mechanisms of Heat Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9643–9684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, L.; Zhao, C.-M.; Wang, Y.-J.; Liu, J. Overexpression of chloroplast-localized small molecular heat-shock protein enhances chilling tolerance in tomato plant. Zhi Wu Sheng Li Yu Fen Zi Sheng Wu Xue Xue Bao 2005, 31, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  92. Pandey, S.; Muthamilarasan, M.; Sharma, N.; Chaudhry, V.; Dulani, P.; Shweta, S.; Jha, S.; Mathur, S.; Prasad, M. Characterization of DEAD-box family of RNA helicases in tomato provides insights into their roles in biotic and abiotic stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 158, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kosová, K.; Vítámvás, P.; Urban, M.O.; Prášil, I.T.; Renaut, J. Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics: The Major Factors Determining Alterations in Cellular Proteome. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Park, C.-J.; Park, J.M. Endoplasmic Reticulum Plays a Critical Role in Integrating Signals Generated by Both Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Hoagland, D.R.; Dennis, R.; Arnon, D.I.; Daniel, I. The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil; College of Agriculture, University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1950. [Google Scholar]
  96. Aboukarima, A.; Zayed, M.; Minyawi, M.; Elsoury, H.; Tarabye, H. Image Analysis-based System for Estimating Cotton Leaf Area. Asian Res. J. Agric. 2017, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. O’Neal, M.E.; Landis, D.A.; Isaacs, R. An Inexpensive, Accurate Method for Measuring Leaf Area and Defoliation Through Digital Image Analysis. J. Econ. Entomol. 2002, 95, 1190–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Holder, M. Chlorophylls: Chemistry and biochemistry of plant pigments. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments; Goodwin, T.W., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  99. Mancinelli, A.L. Photoregulation of Anthocyanin Synthesis: VIII. Effect of Light Pretreatments. Plant Physiol. 1984, 75, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Dionisio-Sese, M.L.; Tobita, S. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Sci. 1998, 135, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. De Vos, C.H.R.; Schat, H.; De Waal, M.A.M.; Vooijs, R.; Ernst, W.H.O. Increased resistance to copper-induced damage of the root cell plasmalemma in copper tolerant Silene cucubalus. Physiol. Plant. 1991, 82, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sergiev, I.; Alexieva, V.; Yanev, S.; Karanov, E. Effect of Atrazine and Spermine on Free Proline Content and Some Antioxidants in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Plants. Comp Ren Acad. Bul Sci 1997, 51, 121:124. [Google Scholar]
  103. Erel, O. A novel automated method to measure total antioxidant response against potent free radical reactions. Clin. Biochem. 2004, 37, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Erel, O. A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clin. Biochem. 2005, 38, 1103–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Nweze, C.C.; Abdulganiyu, M.G.; Erhabor, O.G. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VITAMIN C IN FRESH FRUITS JUICE OF Malus domestica, Citrus sinensi, Ananas comosus AND Citrullus lanatus BY IODOMETRIC TITRATION. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol. 2015, 4, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  106. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lennox, L.J.; Flanagan, M.J. An automated procedure for the determination of total Kjeldahl nitrogen. Water Res. 1982, 16, 1127–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fogg, D.N.; Wilkinson, N.T. The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Analyst 1958, 83, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rowell, D.L. Soil science: methods and applications; Longman Scientific & Technical; Pearson Education Ltd.: Harlow, UK, 1994; ISBN 978-0-582-08784-2. [Google Scholar]
  110. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods San Diego Calif 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 09 00431 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenotypic measurements of tomato plants under chilling stress and pretreated with ascorbic acid (0.5 mM); (A) leaf area, (B) leaf length, (C) leaf width, (D) leaf perimeter, (E) mean grey value, and (F) leaf mean integrated intensity/area. Different lowercase letters indicate significant different according to one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Phenotypic measurements of tomato plants under chilling stress and pretreated with ascorbic acid (0.5 mM); (A) leaf area, (B) leaf length, (C) leaf width, (D) leaf perimeter, (E) mean grey value, and (F) leaf mean integrated intensity/area. Different lowercase letters indicate significant different according to one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 00431 g001
Plants 09 00431 g002 550
Figure 2. Oxidative damage of tomato plants with regards to (A) hydrogen peroxide, (B) lipid peroxidation (MDA) (C) electrolyte membrane leakage under chilling stress and pretreated with ascorbic acid. Data as mean and bars indicate the standard error for mean. Bars mentioned with various lowercase letters are significantly different in accordance with DMRTs.
Figure 2. Oxidative damage of tomato plants with regards to (A) hydrogen peroxide, (B) lipid peroxidation (MDA) (C) electrolyte membrane leakage under chilling stress and pretreated with ascorbic acid. Data as mean and bars indicate the standard error for mean. Bars mentioned with various lowercase letters are significantly different in accordance with DMRTs.
Plants 09 00431 g002
Plants 09 00431 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Total antioxidant capacity (TAC), (B) total oxidative capacity (TOC), and (C) oxidative stress index (OSI) of tomato plants exposed to chilling stress and pretreated with ascorbic acid. Data as mean and bars indicate the standard error for mean. Bars indicated with various characters are significantly different in accordance with DMRTs.
Figure 3. (A) Total antioxidant capacity (TAC), (B) total oxidative capacity (TOC), and (C) oxidative stress index (OSI) of tomato plants exposed to chilling stress and pretreated with ascorbic acid. Data as mean and bars indicate the standard error for mean. Bars indicated with various characters are significantly different in accordance with DMRTs.
Plants 09 00431 g003
Plants 09 00431 g004 550
Figure 4. Ascorbic acid contents (A) and proline contents (B) in tomato seedlings untreated (control group) and treated with chilling stress and ascorbic acid. Data plotted as mean and bars represent the standard error for mean. Bars expressed with different lowercase letters are significantly different according to DMRTs.
Figure 4. Ascorbic acid contents (A) and proline contents (B) in tomato seedlings untreated (control group) and treated with chilling stress and ascorbic acid. Data plotted as mean and bars represent the standard error for mean. Bars expressed with different lowercase letters are significantly different according to DMRTs.
Plants 09 00431 g004
Plants 09 00431 g005 550
Figure 5. Mineral ions content (A) N, (B) P, (C) K, (D) Na, and (E) Mg in tomato seedlings untreated (control group) and treated with chilling stress and ascorbic acid. Data plotted as mean and bars represent the standard error for mean. Bars expressed with different lowercase letters are significantly different according to DMRTs.
Figure 5. Mineral ions content (A) N, (B) P, (C) K, (D) Na, and (E) Mg in tomato seedlings untreated (control group) and treated with chilling stress and ascorbic acid. Data plotted as mean and bars represent the standard error for mean. Bars expressed with different lowercase letters are significantly different according to DMRTs.
Plants 09 00431 g005
Plants 09 00431 g006 550
Figure 6. Relative expression of (A) CAT gene, (B) HSP70 gene, (C) HSPS 80 gene, and (D) HSP90 gene of tomato seedlings untreated (control group) and treated with chilling stress and ascorbic acid. Data plotted as mean relative gene expression and bars represent the standard error for mean. Bars expressed with different letters are significantly different according to DMRTs at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Relative expression of (A) CAT gene, (B) HSP70 gene, (C) HSPS 80 gene, and (D) HSP90 gene of tomato seedlings untreated (control group) and treated with chilling stress and ascorbic acid. Data plotted as mean relative gene expression and bars represent the standard error for mean. Bars expressed with different letters are significantly different according to DMRTs at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 00431 g006
Table
Table 1. Shoot, root, and plant lengths and fresh of Tomato before exposure to chilling stress. Data represented as a mean of three replicate plants + standard error. Means with different letters are significantly different, according to Duncan’s multiple range tests (DMRTs).
Table 1. Shoot, root, and plant lengths and fresh of Tomato before exposure to chilling stress. Data represented as a mean of three replicate plants + standard error. Means with different letters are significantly different, according to Duncan’s multiple range tests (DMRTs).
VariableLength (cm)
Mean ± SE		FW (g plant−1) )
Mean ± SE
Shoot system12.86 a ± 0.403.57 b ± 0.16
Root system11.81 a ± 0.391.32 a ± 0.09
Whole Plant24.67 b ± 0.404.90 c ± 0.24
ANOVA
F-ratio331.712106.503
p-value< 0.001< 0.001
Table
Table 2. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll-b, and anthocyanin in tomato seedlings under different treatments (control, chilling stressed, AsA, chilling, and AsA). Data represented as a mean of three replicate plants ± standard error. Means with different letters are significantly different, according to Duncan’s multiple range tests (DMRTs).
Table 2. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll-b, and anthocyanin in tomato seedlings under different treatments (control, chilling stressed, AsA, chilling, and AsA). Data represented as a mean of three replicate plants ± standard error. Means with different letters are significantly different, according to Duncan’s multiple range tests (DMRTs).
TreatmentsChlorophyll-aChlorophyll-bAnthocyanin
µg g−1 FWµg g−1 FWUnit g−1 FW
Control74.17 ± 1.00 a6.76 ± 0.03 a0.59 ± 0.01 a
Chilling stress14.64 ± 0.03 b0.61 ± 0.02 b1.08 ± 0.03 b
AsA80.61 ± 0.73 d7.17 ± 0.07 d0.68 ± 0.01 d
AsA + Chilling Stress26.54 ± 0.03 c1.13 ± 0.14 c1.23 ± 0.02 c
One-way ANOVA
F-ratio2893.171947.63249.58
p-valuep < 0.001p < 0.001p < 0.001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elkelish, A.; Qari, S.H.; Mazrou, Y.S.A.; Abdelaal, K.A.A.; Hafez, Y.M.; Abu-Elsaoud, A.M.; Batiha, G.E.-S.; El-Esawi, M.A.; El Nahhas, N. Exogenous Ascorbic Acid Induced Chilling Tolerance in Tomato Plants Through Modulating Metabolism, Osmolytes, Antioxidants, and Transcriptional Regulation of Catalase and Heat Shock Proteins. Plants 2020, 9, 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040431

AMA Style

Elkelish A, Qari SH, Mazrou YSA, Abdelaal KAA, Hafez YM, Abu-Elsaoud AM, Batiha GE-S, El-Esawi MA, El Nahhas N. Exogenous Ascorbic Acid Induced Chilling Tolerance in Tomato Plants Through Modulating Metabolism, Osmolytes, Antioxidants, and Transcriptional Regulation of Catalase and Heat Shock Proteins. Plants. 2020; 9(4):431. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elkelish, Amr, Sameer H. Qari, Yasser S. A. Mazrou, Khaled A. A. Abdelaal, Yaser M. Hafez, Abdelghafar M. Abu-Elsaoud, Gaber El-Saber Batiha, Mohamed A. El-Esawi, and Nihal El Nahhas. 2020. "Exogenous Ascorbic Acid Induced Chilling Tolerance in Tomato Plants Through Modulating Metabolism, Osmolytes, Antioxidants, and Transcriptional Regulation of Catalase and Heat Shock Proteins" Plants 9, no. 4: 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040431

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop