In the original publication (Gagliardi et al., 2024), there was an error in Section 2, and the “Institutional Review Board Statement” and “Informed Consent Statement” were missing from the backmatter. The corrected statements are provided below.
Text Correction
The following correction has been made to 2. Methods and Materials, Paragraph 1:
“This study relied on four clinical cases concerning patients who completed the ACQ before starting therapy and received treatment from one of the first three authors. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper. The investigations were conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The ACQ received ethics approval first from the University of Sheffield (Ref. 032300, 16 March 2020), and then from the University of Greenwich (Ref. 21.5.7.14, 20 December 2022). A copy of the instrument is included in the Supplementary Materials.”
Institutional Review Board Statement Correction
The following correction has been made to the Institutional Review Board Statement:
“The investigations were conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (1975, revised in 2013). The ACQ was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Sheffield (Ref. 032300, 16 March 2020) and the University of Greenwich (Ref. 21.5.7.14, 20 December 2022).”
Informed Consent Statement Correction
The following correction has been made to the Informed Consent Statement:
“Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.”
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. These corrections were approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Gagliardi, M., Bonadeni, M., Billai, S., & Marcialis, G. L. (2024). A novel approach to personalized personality assessment with the attachment-caregiving questionnaire: First evidence in favor of interpretation-oriented inventory designs. Psychology International, 6(4), 796–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).