Frequency Distribution of Sward Heights and Forage Species Composition in Different Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Average Sward Height
3.2. Height Frequency and Classes
3.3. Frequency of Forage Species
3.4. Fitting the Height Distributions
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ICLS | Integrated crop–livestock systems |
| L | Livestock |
| LF | Livestock–forestry |
| CL | Crop–livestock |
| CLF | Crop–livestock–forestry |
References
- Bradbury, J.W.; Vehrencamp, S.L.; Clifton, K.E.; Clifton, L.M. The relationship between bite rate and local forage abundance in wild Thomson’s gazelles. Ecology 1996, 77, 2237–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, L.; Mezzalira, J.C.; Bremm, C.; Gonda, H.L.; Carvalho, P.D.F. Management targets for maximising the short-term herbage intake rate of cattle grazing in Sorghum bicolor. Livest. Sci. 2012, 145, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Faccio Carvalho, P.C. Harry Stobbs memorial lecture: Can grazing behavior support innovations in grassland management? Trop. Grassl.-Forrajes Trop. 2013, 1, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores, E.R.; Laca, E.A.; Griggs, T.C.; Demment, M.W. Sward height and vertical morphological differentiation determine cattle bite dimensions. Agron. J. 1993, 85, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benvenutti, M.A.; Gordon, I.J.; Poppi, D.P. The effect of the density and physical properties of grass stems on the foraging behaviour and instantaneous intake rate by cattle grazing an artificial reproductive tropical sward. Grass Forage Sci. 2006, 61, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heuermann, N.; van Langevelde, F.; van Wieren, S.E.; Prins, H.H. Increased searching and handling effort in tall swards lead to a type IV functional response in small grazing herbivores. Oecologia 2011, 166, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, L.; Carvalho, P.D.F.; Mezzalira, J.C.; Bremm, C.; Galli, J.R.; Gregorini, P. Effect of sward surface height and level of herbage depletion on bite features of cattle grazing Sorghum bicolor swards. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 4357–4365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Lima, L.C.; de Freitas, T.S.; Pontes-Prates, A.; Gómez, A.M.; Savian, J.V.; de Faccio Carvalho, P.C. Pasture management strategies to offer optimal sward structures for maximizing intake rate in continuous stocking. Livest. Sci. 2025, 299, 105761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezzalira, J.C.; Carvalho, P.C.F.; Amaral, M.F.; Bremm, C.; Trindade, J.K.; Gonçalves, E.N.; Genro, T.C.M.; Silva, R.W.S.M. Rotational grazing management in a tropical pasture to maximize the dairy cow’s herbage intake rate. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2013, 65, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson-Praplan, S.; George, M.R.; Buckhouse, J.C.; Laca, E.A. Spatial and temporal domains of scale of grazing cattle. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pontes-Prates, A.; de Faccio Carvalho, P.C.; Laca, E.A. Mechanisms of grazing management in heterogeneous swards. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, P.D.F.; Mezzalira, J.C.; Fonseca, L.; Wesp, C.D.L.; Da Trindade, J.K.; Neves, F.P.; Pinto, C.E.; do Amaral, M.F.; Bremm, C.; do Amaral, G.A.; et al. Do bocado ao sítio de pastejo: Manejo em 3D para compatibilizar a estrutura do pasto e o processo de pastejo. In Proceedings of the Simpósio De Forragicultura e Pastagens, Lavras, Brasil, 4 June 2009; pp. 116–137. [Google Scholar]
- Pauler, C.M.; Isselstein, J.; Suter, M.; Berard, J.; Braunbeck, T.; Schneider, M.K. Choosy grazers: Influence of plant traits on forage selection by three cattle breeds. Funct. Ecol. 2020, 34, 980–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes, P.A.A.; Bredemeier, C.; Bremm, C.; Caetano, L.A.M.; De Almeida, G.M.; De Souza Filho, W.; Anghinoni, I.; Carvalho, P.C.F. Grazing intensity determines pasture spatial heterogeneity and productivity in an integrated crop-livestock system. Grassl. Sci. 2019, 65, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuster, M.Z.; Barroso, A.A.; Gastal, F. Grassland phases as ecological buffers: Reducing invasive weeds even under drought-induced stress in cropping systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2026, 395, 109939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibb, M.J.; Ridout, M.S. The fitting of frequency distributions to height measurements on grazed swards. Grass Forage Sci. 1986, 41, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barthram, G.T.; Duff, E.I.; Elston, D.A.; Griffiths, J.H.; Common, T.G.; Marriott, C.A. Frequency distributions of sward height under sheep grazing. Grass Forage Sci. 2005, 60, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mott, G.O.; Lucas, H.L. The design, conduct and interpretation of grazing trials on cultivated and improved pastures. In Proceedings of the International Grassland Congresss, State College, PA, USA, 17–23 August 1952; PN (Proceedings). pp. 1380–1395. [Google Scholar]
- Mezzalira, J.C.; Carvalho, P.C.F.; Fonseca, L.; Bremm, C.; Cangiano, C.; Gonda, H.L.; Laca, E.A. Behavioural mechanisms of intake rate by heifers grazing swards of contrasting structures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2014, 153, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negri, R.; Dos Santos, G.B.; de Paulo Macedo, V.; da Silveira, M.F.; Wlodarski, L.; Kluska, S. Morphogenesis and tiller density of Aruana grass managed at different heights under sheep grazing. Semin. Ciênc. Agrár. 2019, 40, 2341–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paraná. Decreto N° 1753, de 06 de Maio de 1996; Área de Proteção Ambiental do Iraí: Curitiba, Brazil, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Barthram, G.T. Experimental techniques: The HFRO sward stick. In The Hill Farming Research Organization Biennial Report 1984/1985; Alcok, M.M., Ed.; HFRO: Penicuik, UK, 1985; pp. 29–30. [Google Scholar]
- Delignette-Muller, M.L.; Dutang, C. Fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 64, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, D.; Mächler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezzalira, J.C.; Bonnet, O.J.; Carvalho, P.C.D.F.; Fonseca, L.; Bremm, C.; Mezzalira, C.C.; Laca, E.A. Mechanisms and implications of a type IV functional response for short-term intake rate of dry matter in large mammalian herbivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 2017, 86, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allden, W.G.; McDWhittaker, I.A. The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: The interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1970, 21, 755–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, P.C.F.; Prates, A.P.; Moojen, F.G.; Szymczak, L.S.; Nunes, P.A.A.; Silva Neto, G.F.; Savian, J.V.; Eloy, L. Métodos de pastoreio: Uma perspectiva alternativa a décadas de debate e pouco avanço conceitual. In Anais do V Simpapasto V Simpósio de Produção Animal a Pasto; Nova Sthampa Gráfica e Editora: Maringá, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Karki, U.; Goodman, M.S. Cattle distribution and behavior in southern-pine silvopasture versus open-pasture. Agrofor. Syst. 2010, 78, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, P.C.F.; da Rocha, L.M.; Baggio, C.; Macari, S.; Kunrath, T.R.; de Moraes, A. Característica produtiva e estrutural de pastos mistos de aveia e azevém manejados em quatro alturas sob lotação contínua. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39, 1857–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Fedrigo, J.K.; Pablo, F.A.; Azambuja Filho, J.; Oliveira, L.V.; Jaurena, M.; Laca, E.A.; Overbeck, G.E.; Nabinger, C. Temporary grazing exclusion promotes rapid recovery of species richness and productivity in a long-term overgrazed Campos grassland. Restor. Ecol. 2017, 26, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Period | Systems | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | LF | CL | CLF | |
| Normal distribution | ||||
| Winter | 24,702.4 | 12,082.0 | 41,185.3 | 16,063.4 |
| Summer | 96,661.0 | 99,279.0 | 79,263.9 | 95,093.0 |
| Gamma distribution | ||||
| Winter | 24,290.1 † | 11,968.1 | 39,886.5 | 16,052.4 |
| Summer | 95,252.6 | 97,364.5 | 78,429.5 | 93,522.2 |
| Log-normal distribution | ||||
| Winter | 24,398.4 | 12,043.9 | 39,918.6 | 16,214.9 |
| Summer | 95,851.2 | 97,542.6 | 79,240.1 | 93,988.9 |
| Weibull distribution | ||||
| Winter | 24,546.1 | 12,004.9 | 40,351 | 16,036.7 |
| Summer | 95,592.8 | 98,507.3 | 78,530.0 | 94,096.7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Moraes, R.F.; Martin, D.M.; Prates, A.P.; Bremm, C.; Carvalho, P.C.d.F.; Alves, L.A.; Oliveira, L.B.d.; Moraes, A.d. Frequency Distribution of Sward Heights and Forage Species Composition in Different Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems. Grasses 2026, 5, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses5010008
Moraes RF, Martin DM, Prates AP, Bremm C, Carvalho PCdF, Alves LA, Oliveira LBd, Moraes Ad. Frequency Distribution of Sward Heights and Forage Species Composition in Different Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems. Grasses. 2026; 5(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses5010008
Chicago/Turabian StyleMoraes, Renata Franciéli, Daniela Maria Martin, Arthur Pontes Prates, Carolina Bremm, Paulo Cesar de Faccio Carvalho, Lucas Aquino Alves, Leandro Bittencourt de Oliveira, and Anibal de Moraes. 2026. "Frequency Distribution of Sward Heights and Forage Species Composition in Different Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems" Grasses 5, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses5010008
APA StyleMoraes, R. F., Martin, D. M., Prates, A. P., Bremm, C., Carvalho, P. C. d. F., Alves, L. A., Oliveira, L. B. d., & Moraes, A. d. (2026). Frequency Distribution of Sward Heights and Forage Species Composition in Different Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems. Grasses, 5(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses5010008

