Next Article in Journal
Can Low-Cost, Handheld Spectroscopy Tools Coupled with Remote Sensing Accurately Estimate Soil Organic Carbon in Semi-Arid Grazing Lands?
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Key Soil Parameters Relevant to Arsenic and Cadmium Accumulation in Rice Grain in Southern China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Germination of Triticum aestivum L.: Effects of Soil–Seed Interaction on the Growth of Seedlings

1
Department of Seed and Plant Improvement Research, Hamadan Agriculture and Natural Resources, Research and Education Center, Agriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization, Hamadan 6519991169, Iran
2
Hamadan Agriculture and Natural Resources, Research and Education Center, Agriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization, Hamadan 6519991169, Iran
3
Department of Agronomy, Agriculture College, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan 7718897111, Iran
4
Department of Plant Production & Genetics, University of Zanjan, Zanjan 4537138791, Iran
5
Department of Plant Protection, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman 7618411764, Iran
6
Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK
7
Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soil Syst. 2022, 6(2), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6020037
Submission received: 13 March 2022 / Revised: 9 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022

Abstract

:
Seed size, sowing depth, and seed disinfection can affect seed germination and seedling establishment, which, in turn, can directly affect crop growth and yield. The current study was comprised of two experiments, the first of which was conducted in the laboratory, and a second which was performed under glasshouse conditions. The objective of these experiments was to investigate the effects of seed size, sowing depth, and seed disinfection on seed germination and initial seedling growth of selected wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. The treatments in laboratory experiment were arranged in a completely randomized design, which included: (Ι) four wheat cultivars (Pishgam, Haydari, Soissons, and Mihan), (ΙΙ) two seed size classes (x < 2.25 mm, and x > 2.25 mm), and two disinfection treatments (no-disinfection and disinfection), (ΙΙΙ) with five replicates. In addition to the aforementioned treatments, the effect of planting depth (4, 6, and 8 cm) was also investigated in the subsequent glasshouse experiment. The best results were obtained at a sowing depth of 4 cm, in the non-disinfected treatment, using large seeds. In contrast, the lowest percentage and speed of seed germination and vigor index were observed in seeds sown at 8 cm depth, in the disinfected seed treatment, using small seeds. Large seeds contain larger nutrient stores which may improve seed germination indices, which would therefore result in improved percentage and speed of seed germination, followed by faster coleoptile and seedling growth, higher seedling dry weight and seed vigor. These data also illustrated that seed disinfection in the Pishgam and Haydari cultivars had inhibitory effects upon coleoptile growth and seedling length, which could be related to the fungicide’s chemical composition. Unlike other cultivars, disinfection did not show a significant effect on the Soissons cultivar. Based on our data, in order to improve both the speed of wheat seed germination and subsequent plant growth and development; it is necessary to select high-quality, large seeds, planted at a specific planting depth, which have been treated with an effective disinfectant; all of which will be specific for the wheat cultivar in question. Overall, the current study has provided useful information on the effect size seed, sowing depth, and disinfection have upon germination characteristics and seedling growth of wheat cultivars, which can form the basis for future field scale trails.

1. Introduction

As the most widely cultivated cereal crop, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a staple foodstuff worldwide. Despite major increases in yield in recent decades, some problems such as poor seed germination have reducedthe yield potential of this crop in some parts of the world [1]. A first step towards alleviating this problem is to enhance our understanding of the factors affecting seed germination and seedling establishment, in conjunction with an assessment of the effect(s) of seed size and seed sowing depth [2,3,4]. High-quality seed can increase yields by 15–20% [4]. Seeds differ by size, weight, and density due to the production environment and cultivation practices. Seed size is one of the key parameters of seed quality that affects subsequent crop performance [5,6,7]. Size is a widely accepted measure of seed quality, and large seeds have high survival growth and establishment [8]. A wide array of factors related to seedling growth, including seed germination, emergence, and agronomical aspects, are affected by seed size [9,10,11,12]. Many studies have reported a direct correlation between seedling vigor, improved stand establishment, and higher cereal productivity with plants originating from large seeds compared to those grown from smaller seeds [9]. Larger seeds with a higher germination rate produce seedlings with a heightened competitive ability against weeds and pests [13,14,15,16]. Indeed, a larger food reserve (endosperm) in the larger seeds results in increased vigor [1,17]. The size of wheat seeds has been shown to influence crop emergence and establishment and also affect a variety of yield components and, ultimately, grain yield [18,19,20]. In general, plants grown from larger seeds have been shown to outperform plants germinated from small seeds [21,22,23]. However, these results not only vary widely between crop species, but also between cultivars of an individual species.
The depth at which seed is sown is another critical factor determining subsequent seed germination and seedling establishment. However, opinions on this topic are varied and it is a complex area of research [24,25,26,27,28].
With regards to plant nutrition, in mainstream crop production, nutrient management has focused on enriching the soil surface by fertilization with nutrients. However, the subsoil contains high amounts of nutrients and water that are potentially available for plant use [24,25,26,29]. In most agroecosystems, greater exploitation of subsoil resources may lead to reduced nutrient resources and more significant sequestration of atmospheric carbon [25,26,27,28]. Thus, increasing the rate of root elongation, the maximal rooting depth, and root length density in the subsoil can all provide promising strategies with which to improve the crop productivity [30]. However, several reports in the literature do not consider deep seed sowing beneficial for germination and seedling establishment [31,32]. The increase in coleoptile length before emergence is the most critical indicator of seedling establishment. A recent study has shown that deep seed sowing affects coleoptile growth, and thus the seedlings fail [33]. Kimmelshue and colleagues stated that one of the major problems facing agriculture programs in the Sahel is sowing depth, which imposes high soil pressure during seed germination and shoot up-thrust [34]. Incorrect planting depth of seed is widely considered as one of the most common errors that occur in global agriculture [34]. Alngiemshy and collaborators stated that each plant species has a specific optimal sowing depth requirement based upon the type of seed and the prevailing environmental conditions [32]. Sowing depth is thus an important factor in achieving strong stand establishment and higher crop yields [32]. Plants sown at shallow depths receive inadequate soil moisture in the topsoil layer, resulting in poor germination [35]. Conversely, sowing seed too deep can also significantly reduce germination and growth [31].
From the perspective of plant pathology, healthy seeds are essential to increase production efficiency. Seed health is a well-accepted component in modern agricultural research to achieve the appropriate plant population and yield. Healthy seeds are regarded as those either free of contamination, or which have acceptable levels of contamination, that do not prevent their germination and which can produce strong and healthy seedlings [36].
Numerous disinfection treatments are used on seed surfaces to eliminate pathogenic infection, increase production efficiency, and extend the duration of seed storage [37]. These treatments include agricultural biological agents [38], hot water immersion, ionizing radiation, radioisotopes, and exposure to laser light [37]. Among the disinfection method used, chemical treatment is a common practice used for surface sterilization/disinfection [37]. However, some studies have reported that using such chemicals as seed disinfectants has delayed germination and seedling establishment.
Here, we report the results of a study, based upon the assumption that planting large seeds of widely used productive cultivars, with the application of appropriate agrochemicals, sown at an optimal depth, all have a major influence on successful seed germination, seedling establishment, and higher yields. In order to test this hypothesis, the current study was conducted on selected cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with the following aims: (1) to determine the effect of seed size on seed germination and initial seedling growth, (2) to assess the effect of sowing depth on seed germination and growth-related criteria, and (3) to determine the effect of seed disinfection on the percentage and speed of seed germination and the vigor index.

2. Materials and Methods

For the current study, two sets of experiments were conducted, one under laboratory conditions and the second under glasshouse conditions. Both sets of experiments were performed at the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Hamadan (ANRRECH), Iran (34.8673° N, 48.5379° E, 1850 m).

2.1. Wheat Cultivars

Four wheat cultivars were selected for use in our study, namely: Pishgam, Haydari, Mihan, and Soissons, seed for which was obtained from the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Hamadan (ANRRECH), Iran. The average seed size in the wheat cultivars used was approximately 2.25 mm. The seeds were then graded into two groups by sieving, namely, large (x > 2.25 mm), and small (x < 2.25 mm).

2.2. Laboratory Experiment

All seeds were surface-sterilized using hypochlorite solution (3%v/v) for 30 s, followed by washing three times with distilled water.
For each treatment, 100 seeds were placed in a plastic container on top of two layers of filter paper. Ten milliliters of sterile distilled water (SDW) were then added to each container, in order to maintain the moisture level during the experiment. The containers were incubated at 25 °C, in a germinator for 10 days, until coleoptile elongation had ceased (see Figure 1). This was determined by monitoring until the first leaf had protruded from the tip of the coleoptiles [39,40]. The final lengths of the coleoptiles were then measured. This technique is widely used for the determination of seed germination and coleoptile length in seed certification tests. A 4 × 2 × 2 completely randomized factorial design, with five replications, was utilized for this experiment. The first factor consisted of the 4 wheat cultivars. The second factor included the two seed sizes, i.e., large (>2.25 mm) and small (<2.25 mm) seed size. The third factor involved two levels of seed treatment with fungicide and its related control (without fungicide).

2.3. Glasshouse Experiment

In the glasshouse experiment, the treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design, which included (Ι) four wheat cultivars, (ΙΙ) two seed size classes, (ΙΙΙ) two disinfection treatments, and (IV) three planting depths (4, 6, and 8 cm) with five replications. Sixteen seeds of each seed size of each cultivar were sown at 4, 6, and 8 cm depth in plastic pots (30 cm diameter). Each pot contained 4 kg of soil that was prepared atthe ANRRECH research farm (Table 1).
Pots were watered every other day, to prevent water stress, and maintained in the glasshouse at 24 ± 4 and 10 ± 4 °C (day/night), with an average relative humidity of 60% and approximately 14 h day length. The resultant wheat plants were thinned to 10 seedlings per pot, after emergence (see Figure 2).

2.3.1. Seed Disinfection

Seed disinfection was performed using the fungicide difenoconazole (Mahan Co. IRI) at 1/1000 (v/v) concentration based upon the manufacturer’s instructions. Seeds were tested under two disinfection treatments: Ι, disinfection; and ΙΙ, no-disinfection.

2.3.2. Sampling and Measurement

For the measurement of plant dry weight, the shoot and root were excised and oven-dried at 80 °C for 48 h, then weighted. Seedling length, root length, dry weight of seedlings, dry weight of root, speed of seed germination, and percentage of seed germination were all measured and recorded.

Speed and Percentage of Seed Germination

Seed germination (%) and root emergence were determined after 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days of incubation. The speed of germination (Equation (1)), seed germination percentage (Equation (2)), and vigor index (Equation (3)) were calculated using the following equations (ISTA, 1985):
SG = n i d i
GP = 100 × G N
“SG” is the speed of seed germination, “ni” is the number of germinated seeds, “di” is total number of days, “GP” is germination percentage, “G” is the number of germinated seeds during the test, and “N” is the total seeds.

Vigor Index

Vigor index evaluation was obtained from the final germination percentage (germination percentage on the last day) × Seedling length (Equation (3)).
VI = (Ls × Gp)/100
“VI” is the vigor index, “Ls” is the average seedling length (total seedling and root), and “Gp” is germination percentage.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All measurements were conducted in five replications. Data were subjected to the PROC GLM procedure for ANOVA in SAS (SAS 9.2, SAS Institute, SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.2, SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA, 2009.). Means were separated using the LSD (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Seed Germination

The results showed that seedling length was significantly affected by cultivar, seed size, and disinfection (Table 2).
The largestseedlings were observed in the Pishgam cultivar. The observed differences in coleoptile length may be due to differences in genotype [41]. Seeds larger than 2.25 mm produced the longest seedlings (3/85 ± 0/29 cm) (Figure 3A). The results also showed that the longest seedling length, about 4.29 ± 0.14 cm, was obtained in the Mihan and Haydari cultivars, and the seeds that were not treated with disinfectant produced the shortest seedling length (3.33 ± 0.07 cm) and were obtained usingthe Pishgam cultivar (Figure 3B).
The highest seedling length (ca. 13.94 ± 0.22 cm) was observed in the Pishgam and Soissons cultivars, from seeds larger than 2.25 mm.In contrast, the lowest seedling length (10.95 ± 1.02 cm) was observed in the Haydari and Mihan cultivars from seeds smaller than 2.25 mm (Figure 3C). The highest seedling length (13.42 ± 0.88 cm) was observed in the Pishgam and Mihan cultivars in the seeds that were not disinfected. The shortest length (10.92 ± 1.11 cm) was recorded in plants grown from the Haydari cultivar with seeds that had been disinfected (Figure 3D).
The seedling dry weight was also significantly affected (p < 0.01) by seed size and seed disinfection (Table 2). The highest seedling dry weight was 0.61 ± 0.08 g, in seed that had been disinfected and was lowest (0.58 ± 0.08 g), in seed that had not been disinfected (Figure 4A). The results also indicated that the highest dry weight of seedlings was obtained from seeds larger than 2.25 mm, in all the selected cultivars. Seedling dry weight for the Pishgam, Mihan, Soissons and Haydari cultivars was 0.68 ± 0.05 g, 0.65 ± 0.04 g, 0.68 ± 0.02 g, and 0.67 ± 0.03 g, respectively. The lowest value for the seedling dry weight (0.48 ± 0.03 g) was obtained from the Pishgam cultivar withseeds smaller than 2.25 mm (Figure 4B).
The highest germination percentage (93.5 ± 0.76%) was observed in the Pishgam and Mihan cultivars without seed disinfection, and the lowest germination percentage (91.0 ± 0.82%) was obtained in the Haydari cultivar without disinfection (Figure 5A). The highest value for the vigor index (12.83 ± 0.56) was obtained using the Mihan cultivar seeds that were larger than 2.25 mm (Figure 5B). These data also illustrated that the highest germination rate (12 seeds/day) was obtained in the Pishgam cultivar using large seeds. The lowest rate of germination (11 seeds/day) was obtained in the Haydari cultivar, using small seeds, without disinfection (Figure 5C).

3.2. Glasshouse Experiment

Dry weight, fresh weight, and seedling length were all shown to be affected by seed size, disinfection, and sowing depth, in all cultivars (Table 3). The highest seedling fresh weight (1.32 ± 0.61 g) was measured in large seeds, and the lowest value (0.77 ± 0.47 g) was measured in small seeds (Figure 6A). In addition, the highest seedling fresh weight (1.77 ± 0.54 g) was recorded in the Pishgam cultivar using disinfected seeds, at a sowing depth of 4 cm, and the lowest amount (0.32 ± 0.26 g) was observed using seeds of the Mihan cultivar, without disinfection with seed sown at adepth of 8 cm (Figure 6B).
The results also showed that the highest dry weight value of the seedling was 0.13 ± 0.06 g, using large seeds, and the lowest dry weight value was 0.07 ± 0.04 g, using the smaller seeds (Figure 7A). The results also demonstrated that the highest seedling dry weight (0.167 ± 0.02 g) was observed in the Haydari cultivar without disinfection, with seeds sown at 4 cm depth, and the lowest was approximately 0.032 ± 0.03 g in non-disinfected seeds of the Mihan cultivar, sown at a depth of 8 cm (Figure 7B).
The highest seedling length (14.1 ± 0.92 cm) was obtained in the Pishgam and Soissons cultivars, usinglarge seeds, and the lowest seedling length (9.57 ± 2.5 cm) was obtained in the Haydari and Mihan cultivars, using small seeds (Figure 8A). Furthermore, the results of comparisons of mean values related to the interaction of cultivar and sowing depth showed that the highest seedling length (14.62 ± 0.56 cm) was in the Soissons cultivar, at 4 cm depth, and the lowest seedling length (9.6 ± 0.38 cm) was also obtained in the seeds of theMihan cultivar soon, at a depth of 8 cm (Figure 8B).
The percentage and speed of germination, and vigor index, were all affected by seed size, disinfection, and depth of sowing, in all cultivars (Table 3). The highest values for germination percentage (93.75 ± 5.1%,), speed of germination (0.94 ± 0.05 seeds per day), and vigor index (13.78 ± 0.68), were obtained in non-disinfected seeds of the Pishgam cultivar atthe shallower sowing depth (4 cm), using large seeds (Table 4). The lowest germination percentage, speed of seed germination, and vigor index were obtained at the 8 cm depth, with seed disinfection, using the smaller size seeds (Table 4).

4. Discussion

4.1. Seed Size

The data reported have revealed the importance of seed size in the germination and growth and development of wheat plants in all the cultivars examined. Seeds larger than 2.25 mm showed a greater germination capacity, even in the presence of disinfection. As is well known, seed germination requires a large amount of energy, which is provided by the oxidation of the endosperm [42]. The seed must provide sufficient nutrients for seedling growth, because the seedling is dependent on the seed for adequate growth [17,43]. The results shown in Table 3 demonstrate that the seed size significantly influences the coleoptile length, the seedling length, the dry weight, the percentage of germination, the speed of germination and the vigor index. At the same time, the effect of the cultivar together with the size of the seed only show significant differences in the growth of the seedling, but not in the germination phases. Moreover, it seems that the cultivars do not differ in the germinative response, but rather in the subsequent stages of growth. In general, seeds retain all the genetic information inherited from the mother plant necessary for germination and growth [2]. At the same time, unfavorable environmental conditions can block germination [44]. In the current study, disinfection can be considered a stressful condition that can inhibit the germination processes of wheat seeds. Hence, larger seeds with developed endosperm are more likely to germinate and develop better. Indeed, large seeds are known to produce larger wheat seedlings, which most probably leads to better seedling establishment and increased yield productivity in the field [45]. According to previous studies, seed size is also positively correlated with vigor, and accordingly, larger seeds tend to produce stronger seedlings [46]. Once the germination process has started, the grain begins to develop coleoptile and other more complex structures. However, there are a number of other factors that reduce the growth of coleoptiles and thereby increase the risk of failure in seedling establishment [46]. For example, there is evidence that a change in the diameter of the coleoptile may be related to changes in embryo size. Our data confirm that wheat seeds with a diameter of less than 2.25 mm develop and grow more slowly. This supports the relationship between seed size and coleoptile diameter, with larger seeds also having larger embryos, leading to the production of larger-diameter coleoptiles that have the ability to grow better and more strongly even when grown in poor soil conditions [17,47].

4.2. Seed Disinfection

In the current study, seed disinfection was shown to have an inhibitory effect upon coleoptile growth in the Pishgam, Mihan, and Haydari cultivars, which may be related to the chemical composition of the materials used in the seed disinfectant. Another point to note is that the Soissons cultivar displayed a positive reaction to the use of fungicide for disinfection. There are several recent reports on the effect of seed disinfection on the vigor of seedling growth in the literature [48,49,50,51]. A study in 2019 showed that, although the fungicides procymidone and iprodione triadimenol are effective in protecting seedlings, they also possess phytotoxic effects, leading to a delay in seed germination and a reduction in the developmental speed of Allium cepa seedlings [52]. In addition to using high-quality seeds, the use of fungicides to achieve high yields is a widespread agricultural practice [53,54,55,56]. The chemical treatment of seeds is one of the most effective methods of controlling both fungi and insects [37]. However, Leslie and colleagues found that in wheat [57], and Rajjou and collaborators in studies of soybean [58], that some chemical treatments, when left on the seeds for a long time, may reduce seed germination and prevent seedling survival. According to Ayesha’s research, the seedling phytotoxicity effect of fungicides depends upon the type of fungicide used, and the storage time of the disinfected seeds [59]. In addition, the cytogenotoxicity effects of these chemical compounds were shown to cause chromosomal damage and cell death in meristematic cells [52]. Conversely, it has also been reported that some seeds treated with fungicides had higher germination rates than the control treatment [60]. The majority view in the literature is that chemical treatment of seeds has a negative effect on plant development [61]. When used in the seed treatment of wheat, the Triazole group of fungicides can cause cell toxicity, reduce mesocotyl length, and produce gaps in leaf tips, that prevent seedling emergence from the soil [62]. Abati’s results showed that treatment of wheat grains with the fungicide triadimenol increased the development of abnormal seedlings and the appearance of seedlings with twisted, thick, and wide leaves [63]. In addition, Radzikowska and colleagues observed that seed treatment with triadimenol resulted in lower values for seedling length [64]. These data suggest that this fungicide may have a phytotoxic effect on wheat seedlings, as a result of which the rate of seedling emergence in the field will be reduced [65].
As mentioned previously, different cultivars respond differently to different chemical products, which is consistent with our results [65]. Several studies have shown that increasing the rate and percentage germination of disinfected cotton seeds, may be due to the reduction of seed contamination and the stimulatory effect of germination in seed which has been disinfected. However, Sivachandiran and colleagues observed a decrease in the percentage and rate of germination in cotton seeds treated with high concentrations of fungicide and insecticide [66].

4.3. Sowing Depth

Our data have demonstrated that a greater sowing depth delays both the germination and growth processes of the wheat cultivars studied. In fact, plants sown at a depth of 8 cm have a significantly lower percentage and speed of germination and vigor index than those grown at a depth of 4 cm. Reducing in seed germination due to increasing planting depth has been proven in numerous studies [67,68]. Wheat plants that appear later in the field have less biomass and produce fewer spikes, which reduces the final yield. In Australia [42,65] and other countries [34,69], lower wheat yields have been reported to occur when seeds are sown too deep. Surveys of Australian farmers’ have shown that, when wheat with short coleoptiles isplanted at depths of more than 5 cm, grain yield is reduced by at least 10% [70]. According to Bazzaz, the optimal sowing depth for planting of wheat is 4 cm [71]. Studies have also demonstrated a direct association between coleoptile length and seedling emergence at different planting depths [34]. When seeds were treated with sowing depths of 2.4 and 4.1 inches, with tebuconazole fungicide, seedling emergence was slower than other treatments, which is consistent with the results of our study. The fungicide tebuconazole has been reported to reduce germination when compared to untreated seeds at a depth of 4.1 inches. Seedlings treated with tebuconazole appear to grow more slowly than other treatments, especially when planted more than 3 inches deep [64]. Enilconazole systemic fungicides have also been shown to inhibit seedling emergence and establishment in the field [72].

5. Conclusions

The results have shown that the highest percentage and speed of seed germination, as well as highest vigor index, were obtained at a seed sowing depth of 4 cm in non-disinfected wheat seeds, larger than 2.25 mm, using the Pishgam cultivar. Larger seeds contain larger nutrient stores, which thereby improves their seed germination indices, (germination percentage and speed of germination) followed by subsequent increases in coleoptile length, seedling length, seedling dry weight, and overall seed vigor. These data also illustrated that seed disinfection in the Pishgam and Haydari cultivars had inhibitory effects on coleoptile growth and seedling length, which could be related to the fungicide’s chemical composition. Overall, crop quality and quantity decrease when using poor quality small seed, with the application of inappropriate agrochemicals, and with seed sown at a suboptimal sowing depth. Bearing in mind the global importance of wheat in relation to food security, the results presented represent an important preliminary investigation of the effect of seed size, sowing depth, and disinfection on germination characteristics and seedling growth of wheat cultivars and may assist and inform future field studies of these phenomena.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C., A.N. and A.D.; methodology, M.C., A.N., M.H. (Moslem Heydari), M.H. (Mohadeseh Hassanisaadi) and A.R.Y.; formal analysis, M.C., A.N., A.D. and A.R.Y.; investigation, M.C., A.N., M.H. (Moslem Heydari) and A.R.Y.; resources, A.M.; data curation, M.C., M.H. (Moslem Heydari), A.M. and T.C.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C., A.N., M.H. (Moslem Heydari), A.D. and M.H. (Mohadeseh Hassanisaadi); writing—review and editing, A.M. and T.C.B.; supervision, A.M. and M.C.; funding acquisition, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sabouri, H.; Kazerani, B.; Fallahi, H.A.; Dehghan, M.A.; Alegh, S.M.; Dadras, A.R.; Katouzi, M.; Mastinu, A. Association analysis of yellow rust, fusarium head blight, tan spot, powdery mildew, and brown rust horizontal resistance genes in wheat. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 118, 101808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar, A.; Memo, M.; Mastinu, A. Plant behaviour: An evolutionary response to the environment? Plant Biol. 2020, 22, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gregory, P.J.; Atkinson, C.J.; Bengough, A.G.; Else, M.A.; Fernandez-Fernandez, F.; Harrison, R.J.; Schmidt, S. Contributions of roots and rootstocks to sustainable, intensified crop production. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1209–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Seidel, S.J.; Gaiser, T.; Kautz, T.; Bauke, S.L.; Amelung, W.; Barfus, K.; Ewert, F.; Athmann, M. Estimation of the impact of precrops and climate variability on soil depth differentiated spring wheat growth and water, nitrogen and phosphorus uptake. Soil Till. Res. 2019, 195, 104427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ambika, S.; Manonmani, V.; Somasundar, G. Review on Effect of Seed Size on Seedling Vigour and Seed Yield. Res. J. Seed Sci. 2014, 7, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Finch-Savage, W. Influence of Seed Quality on Crop Establishment, Growth, and Yield. In Seed Quality; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 361–384. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tabakovic, M.; Simic, M.; Stanisavljevic, R.; Milivojevic, M.; Secanski, M.; Postic, D. Effects of shape and size of hybrid maize seed on germination and vigour of different genotypes. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2020, 80, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lehtilä, K.; Ehrlén, J. Seed size as an indicator of seed quality: A case study of Primula veris. Acta Oecol. 2005, 28, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beyaz, R. The effect of seed size on in vitro seed germination, seedling growth and tissue culture response of callus from mature embryos of wheat (Triticum sp.). Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2019, 28, 502–508. [Google Scholar]
  10. Beyzi, E.; Gunes, A.; Beyzi, S.B.; Konca, Y. Changes in fatty acid and mineral composition of rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) oil with seed sizes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  11. Deb, P.; Sundriyal, R. Effect of seed size on germination and seedling fitness in four tropical rainforest tree species. Indian J. For. 2017, 40, 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  12. Domic, A.I.; Capriles, J.M.; Camilo, G.R. Evaluating the fitness effects of seed size and maternal tree size on Polylepis tomentella (Rosaceae) seed germination and seedling performance. J. Trop. Ecol. 2020, 36, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kaydan, D.; Yagmur, M. Germination, seedling growth and relative water content of shoot in different seed sizes of triticale under osmotic stress of water and NaCl. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 2862–2868. [Google Scholar]
  14. Clements, D.R.; Jones, V.L. Ten Ways That Weed Evolution Defies Human Management Efforts Amidst a Changing Climate. Agronomy 2021, 11, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gharibvandi, A.; Karimmojeni, H.; Ehsanzadeh, P.; Rahimmalek, M.; Mastinu, A. Weed management by allelopathic activity of Foeniculum vulgare essential oil. Plant Biosyst. 2022, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rad, S.V.; Valadabadi, S.A.R.; Pouryousef, M.; Saifzadeh, S.; Zakrin, H.R.; Mastinu, A. Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Sorghum bicolor L. under Intercropping with Legumes and Different Weed Control Methods. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, L.; Li, X.; Li, L.; Schnable, J.; Gu, R.; Wang, J. QTL identification and epistatic effect analysis of seed size-and weight-related traits in Zea mays L. Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Akhter, M.M.; Sabagh, A.E.; Alam, M.N.; Hasan, M.K.; Hafez, E.; Barutçular, C.; Islam, M.S. Determination of seed rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties with varying seed size. Sci. J. Crop Sci. 2017, 6, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao, Z.; Wang, E.; Kirkegaard, J.A.; Rebetzke, G.J. Novel wheat varieties facilitate deep sowing to beat the heat of changing climates. Nat. Clim. Change 2022, 12, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, D.K.; Singh, V. Seed size and adventitious (nodal) roots as factors influencing the tolerance of wheat to waterlogging. Aust.J. Agr. Res. 2003, 54, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ghassemi-Golezani, K.; Chadordooz-Jeddi, A.; Zehtab-Salmasi, S. Effects of seed size and aging on field performance of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) under different irrigation treatments. Acta Agric. Slov. 2015, 103, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pandey, R.; Bargali, S.; Bargali, K. Does seed size affect water stress tolerance in Quercus leucotrichophora A. camus at germination and early seedling growth stage. Biodivers. Int. J. 2017, 1, 00005. [Google Scholar]
  23. Karimmojeni, H.; Rahimian, H.; Alizadeh, H.; Yousefi, A.R.; Gonzalez-Andujar, J.L.; Sweeney, E.M.; Mastinu, A. Competitive Ability Effects of Datura stramonium L. and Xanthium strumarium L. on the Development of Maize (Zea mays) Seeds. Plants 2021, 10, 1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Barej, J.A.M.; Patzold, S.; Perkons, U.; Amelung, W. Phosphorus fractions in bulk subsoil and its biopore systems. Eur.J. Soil Sci. 2014, 65, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kirkegaard, J.A.; Lilley, J.M.; Howe, G.N.; Graham, J.M. Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 2007, 58, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bauke, S.L.; von Sperber, C.; Tamburini, F.; Gocke, M.I.; Honermeier, B.; Schweitzer, K.; Baumecker, M.; Don, A.; Sandhage-Hofmann, A.; Amelung, W. Subsoil phosphorus is affected by fertilization regime in long-term agricultural experimental trials. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2018, 69, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lynch, J.P.; Wojciechowski, T. Opportunities and challenges in the subsoil: Pathways to deeper rooted crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2199–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hobley, E.U.; Honermeier, B.; Don, A.; Gocke, M.I.; Amelung, W.; Kogel-Knabner, I. Decoupling of subsoil carbon and nitrogen dynamics after long-term crop rotation and fertilization. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 265, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zangani, E.; Afsahi, K.; Shekari, F.; Mac Sweeney, E.; Mastinu, A. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition to Soil Improves Seed Yield, Foliar Stomatal Conductance, and the Photosynthetic Response of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Agriculture 2021, 11, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. White, R.G.; Kirkegaard, J.A. The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil-implications for water uptake. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Korucu, T.; Arslan, S. Effects of Direct and Conventional Planting on Soil Properties and Yield Characteristics of Second Crop Maize. J. Agr Sci. Tarim Bili 2009, 15, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alngiemshy, N.F.; Alkharafi, J.S.; Alharbi, N.S.; Al-Sowayan, N.S. Effect of Seeds Size on Germination of Faba Bean Plant. Agric. Sci. 2020, 11, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ceseski, A.R.; Al-Khatib, K. Seeding depth effects on elongation, emergence, and early development of California rice cultivars. Crop Sci. 2021, 61, 2012–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kimmelshue, C.L.; Goggi, S.; Moore, K.J. Seed Size, Planting Depth, and a Perennial Groundcover System Effect on Corn Emergence and Grain Yield. Agronomy 2022, 12, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abbas, A.M.; Rubio-Casal, A.E.; De Cires, A.; Figueroa, E.M.; Pickart, A.J.; Castillo, J.M. Burial effects on seed germination and seedling emergence of two halophytes of contrasting seed size. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2020, 13, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsedaley, B. Review on Seed Health Tests and Detection Methods of Seedborne Diseases. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc. 2015, 5, 176–184. [Google Scholar]
  37. Evrendilek, G.A.; Karatas, B.; Uzuner, S.; Tanasov, I. Design and effectiveness of pulsed electric fields towards seed disinfection. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 3475–3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hassanisaadi, M.; Bonjar, G.H.S.; Hosseinipour, A.; Abdolshahi, R.; Barka, E.A.; Saadoun, I. Biological Control of Pythium aphanidermatum, the Causal Agent of Tomato Root Rot by Two Streptomyces Root Symbionts. Agronomy 2021, 11, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, J.; Lovett-Doust, J.; Lovett-Doust, L. Seed germination patterns in green dragon (Arisaema dracontium, Araceae). Am. J. Bot. 1999, 86, 1160–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Côme, D. Obstacles to germination. Obs. Germination. 1970, 6, 162. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sidhu, J.S.; Singh, D.; Gill, H.S.; Brar, N.K.; Qiu, Y.Y.; Halder, J.; Al Tameemi, R.; Turnipseed, B.; Sehgal, S.K. Genome-Wide Association Study Uncovers Novel Genomic Regions Associated With Coleoptile Length in Hard Winter Wheat. Front. Genet. 2020, 10, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Noryan, M.; Hervan, I.M.; Sabouri, H.; Kojouri, F.D.; Mastinu, A. Drought Resistance Loci in Recombinant Lines of Iranian Oryza sativa L. in Germination Stage. BioTech 2021, 10, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lemmens, E.; Moroni, A.V.; Pagand, J.; Heirbaut, P.; Ritala, A.; Karlen, Y.; Le, K.A.; Van den Broeck, H.C.; Brouns, F.J.P.H.; De Brier, N.; et al. Impact of Cereal Seed Sprouting on Its Nutritional and Technological Properties: A Critical Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 305–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Yousefi, A.R.; Rashidi, S.; Moradi, P.; Mastinu, A. Germination and Seedling Growth Responses of Zygophyllum fabago, Salsola kali L. and Atriplex canescens to PEG-Induced Drought Stress. Environments 2020, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Karasakal, A. Production of Wheat Seed Through Various Plantation Practices in Maternal Environment. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. 2021, 14, 549–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jorgensen, M.S.; Labouriau, R.; Olesen, B. Seed size and burial depth influence Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) seed survival, seedling emergence and initial seedling biomass development. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gough, R.E.a. Seed Quality: Basic Mechanisms and Agricultural Implications, 1st ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Subedi, M.; Willenborg, C.J.; Vandenberg, A. Influence of Harvest Aid Herbicides on Seed Germination, Seedling Vigor and Milling Quality Traits of Red Lentil (Lens culinaris L.). Front. Plant. Sci. 2017, 8, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ghiyasi, M.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Amirnia, R.; Damalas, C.A. Chemical Priming with Salt and Urea Improves Germination and Seedling Growth of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.) under Osmotic Stress. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1170–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bochenek, A.; Gielwanowska, I.; Czerminska, M.; Bojarowska, K. The effect of antifungal drugs and fungicides on the viability and vigour of barnyard millet (Echinochloa crus-galli) seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 2019, 47, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ambrico, P.F.; Simek, M.; Morano, M.; Angelini, R.M.D.; Minafra, A.; Trotti, P.; Ambrico, M.; Prukner, V.; Faretra, F. Reduction of microbial contamination and improvement of germination of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seeds via surface dielectric barrier discharge. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 305401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bernardes, P.M.; Andrade-Vieira, L.F.; Aragao, F.B.; Ferreira, A.; Ferreira, M.F.D. Toxicological effects of comercial formulations of fungicides based on procymidone and iprodione in seedlings and root tip cells of Allium cepa. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 21013–21021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Moshynets, O.V.; Babenko, L.M.; Rogalsky, S.P.; Iungin, O.S.; Foster, J.; Kosakivska, I.V.; Potters, G.; Spiers, A.J. Priming winter wheat seeds with the bacterial quorum sensing signal N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL) shows potential to improve plant growth and seed yield. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Aguado, A.; Savoie, J.M.; Chereau, S.; Ducos, C.; Aguilar, M.; Ferrer, N.; Aguilar, M.; Pinson-Gadais, L.; Richard-Forget, F. Priming to protect maize from Fusarium verticillioides and its fumonisin accumulation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Santo Pereira, A.D.; Oliveira, H.C.; Fraceto, L.F.; Santaella, C. Nanotechnology Potential in Seed Priming for Sustainable Agriculture. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Okey-Onyesolu, C.F.; Hassanisaadi, M.; Bilal, M.; Barani, M.; Rahdar, A.; Iqbal, J.; Kyzas, G.Z. Nanomaterials as Nanofertilizers and Nanopesticides: An Overview. Chemistryselect 2021, 6, 8645–8663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Leslie, J.F.; Moretti, A.; Mesterházy, Á.; Ameye, M.; Audenaert, K.; Singh, P.K.; Richard-Forget, F.; Chulze, S.N.; Ponte, E.M.D.; Chala, A.; et al. Key Global Actions for Mycotoxin Management in Wheat and Other Small Grains. Toxins 2021, 13, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rajjou, L.; Debeaujon, I. Seed longevity: Survival and maintenance of high germination ability of dry seeds. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2008, 331, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ayesha, M.S.; Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Nataraja, K.N.; Prasad, S.R.; Shaanker, R.U. Seed Treatment with Systemic Fungicides: Time for Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Capo, L.; Zappino, A.; Reyneri, A.; Blandino, M. Role of the Fungicide Seed Dressing in Controlling Seed-Borne Fusarium spp. Infection and in Enhancing the Early Development and Grain Yield of Maize. Agronomy 2020, 10, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karimmojeni, H.; Rezaei, M.; Tseng, T.-M.; Mastinu, A. Effects of Metribuzin Herbicide on Some Morpho-Physiological Characteristics of Two Echinacea Species. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Roman, D.L.; Voiculescu, D.I.; Filip, M.; Ostafe, V.; Isvoran, A. Effects of Triazole Fungicides on Soil Microbiota and on the Activities of Enzymes Found in Soil: A Review. Agriculture 2021, 11, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Abati, J.; Zucareli, C.; Foloni, J.S.S.; Henning, F.A.; Brzezinski, C.R.; Henning, A.A. Treatment with fungicides and insecticides on the physiological quality and health of wheat seeds. J. Seed Sci. 2014, 36, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Radzikowska, D.; Grzanka, M.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Głowicka-Wołoszyn, R.; Blecharczyk, A.; Nowicki, M.; Sawinska, Z. Influence of SDHI Seed Treatment on the Physiological Conditions of Spring Barley Seedlings under Drought Stress. Agronomy 2020, 10, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fernando, N.; Humphries, T.; Florentine, S.K.; Chauhan, B.S. Factors Affecting Seed Germination of Feather Fingergrass (Chloris virgata). Weed Sci. 2016, 64, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sivachandiran, L.; Khacef, A. Enhanced seed germination and plant growth by atmospheric pressure cold air plasma: Combined effect of seed and water treatment. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Carvalho, P.C.D.; Barro, R.S.; Neto, A.B.; Nunes, P.A.D.; de Moraes, A.; Anghinoni, I.; Bredemeier, C.; Bayer, C.; Martins, A.P.; Kunrath, T.R.; et al. Integrating the pastoral component in agricultural systems. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 2018, 47, e20170001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Khaliliaqdam, N.; Soltani, A.; Latifi, N.; Far, F.G. Soybean Seed Aging and Environmental Factors on Seedling Growth. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2013, 44, 1786–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Niedz, R.P.; Mohan, A.; Schillinger, W.F.; Gill, K.S. Wheat Seedling Emergence from Deep Planting Depths and Its Relationship with Coleoptile Length. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Flohr, B.M.; Ouzman, J.; McBeath, T.M.; Rebetzke, G.J.; Kirkegaard, J.A.; Llewellyn, R.S. Redefining the link between rainfall and crop establishment in dryland cropping systems. Agric. Syst. 2021, 190, 103105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bazzaz, M.M.; Hossain, A.; Timsina, J.; da Silva, J.A.T.; Nuruzzaman, M. Growth, yield attributes and yield of irrigated spring wheat as influenced by sowing depth. Open Agric. 2018, 3, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Andresen, M.; Wulff, E.G.; Mbega, E.R.; Stokholm, M.S.; Glazowska, S.E.; Zida, P.E.; Mabagala, R.B.; Lund, O.S. Seed treatment with an aqueous extract of Agave sisalana improves seed health and seedling growth of sorghum. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2014, 141, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. First experiment. Root emergence (A), root elongation (B), and excised root and stem preparations for subsequent measurements (C).
Figure 1. First experiment. Root emergence (A), root elongation (B), and excised root and stem preparations for subsequent measurements (C).
Soilsystems 06 00037 g001
Figure 2. Glasshouse experiment. Inside the glasshouse, each pot was filled with 4 kg of soil, as described in Table 1, and 10 seedlings were planted in eachpot.Watering of the pots took place every other day, and the ambient air temperature was maintained at 24 ± 4 and 10 ± 4 °C (day/night) with a relative humidity of 60% and a day duration of approximately 14 h. (A) Randomizing and (B) uniformly filling pots with soil, (C) preparing pots to measure traits and (D) separating samples based on treatments.
Figure 2. Glasshouse experiment. Inside the glasshouse, each pot was filled with 4 kg of soil, as described in Table 1, and 10 seedlings were planted in eachpot.Watering of the pots took place every other day, and the ambient air temperature was maintained at 24 ± 4 and 10 ± 4 °C (day/night) with a relative humidity of 60% and a day duration of approximately 14 h. (A) Randomizing and (B) uniformly filling pots with soil, (C) preparing pots to measure traits and (D) separating samples based on treatments.
Soilsystems 06 00037 g002
Figure 3. Effect of seed size on coleoptile length (A), seed disinfection on coleoptile length (B), seed size on seedling length (C), and seed disinfection on seedling length in different cultivars (D). The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Figure 3. Effect of seed size on coleoptile length (A), seed disinfection on coleoptile length (B), seed size on seedling length (C), and seed disinfection on seedling length in different cultivars (D). The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Soilsystems 06 00037 g003
Figure 4. Effect of seed disinfection (A), seed size (B) on dry weight of seedlings. The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Figure 4. Effect of seed disinfection (A), seed size (B) on dry weight of seedlings. The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Soilsystems 06 00037 g004
Figure 5. Effect of seed disinfection on GP (A), seed size on VI (B), and seed disinfection, seed size on SG (C) in different cultivars. The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Figure 5. Effect of seed disinfection on GP (A), seed size on VI (B), and seed disinfection, seed size on SG (C) in different cultivars. The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Soilsystems 06 00037 g005aSoilsystems 06 00037 g005b
Figure 6. Effect of seed size (A), disinfection, cultivars, and depth sowing (B) on seedling fresh weight. The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Figure 6. Effect of seed size (A), disinfection, cultivars, and depth sowing (B) on seedling fresh weight. The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Soilsystems 06 00037 g006
Figure 7. Effect of seed size (A), disinfection, cultivars, and depth of sowing (B) on seedling dry weight.The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Figure 7. Effect of seed size (A), disinfection, cultivars, and depth of sowing (B) on seedling dry weight.The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Soilsystems 06 00037 g007
Figure 8. Effect of seed size (A), cultivar and depth of sowing (B) on seedling length. The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Figure 8. Effect of seed size (A), cultivar and depth of sowing (B) on seedling length. The columns’ letters indicate the differences between the different treatments (p < 0.05) using the LSD test.
Soilsystems 06 00037 g008
Table 1. Physico-chemical characteristics of Soil.
Table 1. Physico-chemical characteristics of Soil.
Soil TypepHDepthC OrganicNClayLoamSandECPK
(cm)(%)(ds/m)(ppm)
Clay loam7/50–300/660.0665/53460/50/7527.6400
Table 2. Effect of cultivar, seed size, and seed disinfection on wheat germination traits.
Table 2. Effect of cultivar, seed size, and seed disinfection on wheat germination traits.
MS
TreatmentsdfCLSLDWPGSGVI
Cultivars 30.77 **5 **0.0042 ns0.058 ns0.38 ns5 **
Seed Size 10.27 **0.14 ns0.24 **0.75 ns0.08 ns0.028 ns
Disinfection 11.41 **0.89 ns0.008 *0.004 ns0.002 ns0.82 ns
Cultivars × Seed Size30.042 ns5.48 **0.00058 ns6.13 ns0.25 ns3.83 **
Cultivars × Disinfection30.39 **7.43 **0.0002 ns11.5 *0.27 ns6.89 ns
Seed Size × Disinfection10.076 ns0.01 ns0.0013 ns8.33 ns0.083 ns1.57 ns
Cultivars × Seed Size × Disinfection30.042 ns0.46 ns0.002 ns6.5 ns0.58 *0.52 ns
Error320.0210.490.0183.250.180.46
CV-5.863.711.957.165.613.88
Mean of squares (MS); Coefficient Variation (CV); coleoptile length (CL); seedling length (SL); dry weight (DW); percentage of germination (PG); speed of germination (SG); vigor index (VI). *, **, and ns significant at 5 and 1% probability levels and non-significant, respectively (LSD test; p < 0.05).
Table 3. Effect of cultivar, seed size, depth sowing, and seed disinfection on wheat germination characteristics.
Table 3. Effect of cultivar, seed size, depth sowing, and seed disinfection on wheat germination characteristics.
MS
TreatmentsdfFWSLDWPGSGVI
Cultivars 31.24 **59.24 **0.13 **4001.28 **0.402 **62.31 **
Seed Size 110.76 **135.91 **0.01 **5861.81 **0.59 **258.91 **
Disinfection 10.95 **2.58 ns0.011 ns1445.58 **0.14 **35.18 **
Sowingdepth27.76 **229.36 **0.0002 **13480.9 **1.35 **518.7 **
Cultivars × Size30.48 *15.06 **0.066 *243.32 ns0.024 ns2.72 ns
Cultivars × Disinfection30.53 *0.21 ns0.0052 *74.77 ns0.007 ns1.15 ns
Cultivars × Depth60.21 ns25.79 **0.0044 ns867.6 **0.085 **9.26 **
Size × Disinfection10.001 ns0.05 ns0.0025 ns13.29 ns0.001 ns0.26 ns
Size × Depth20.19 ns4.28 ns0.0029 ns376.79 *0.039 *12.76 **
Disinfection × Depth20.57 *0.02 ns0.0062 ns62.12 ns0.006 ns2.3 ns
Cultivars × Size × Disinfection30.19 ns0.094 ns0.0015 ns343.87 *0.035 *6.43 *
Cultivars × Disinfection × Depth60.45 **0.21 ns0.0044 *129.03 ns0.012 ns2.28 ns
Cultivars × Size × Depth60.10 ns2.5 ns0.00086 ns310.60 *0.030 **2.2 ns
Size × Disinfection × Depth20.004 ns0.19 ns0.00085 ns19.80 ns0.002 ns0.42 ns
Cultivars×Size×Disinfection× Depth120.15 ns1.3 ns0.0014 ns335.37 **0.033 **3.53 *
Error960.131.680.0014104.980.011.64
CV-14.7410.6615.8616.1316.0515.84
Mean of squares (MS); Coefficient Variation (CV); coleoptile length (CL); seedling length (SL); dry weight (DW); percentage of germination (PG); speed of germination (SG); vigor index (VI). *, **, and ns significant at 5 and 1% probability levels and non-significant, respectively (LSD test; p < 0.05).
Table 4. Effect of depth of sowing, disinfection, and seed size upon the percentage of germination, speed of seed germination, and vigor index in different cultivars.
Table 4. Effect of depth of sowing, disinfection, and seed size upon the percentage of germination, speed of seed germination, and vigor index in different cultivars.
CultivarsDepthDisinfectionSize (mm)PGSGVI
(%)(N/Day)
PHM4Dis>2.2579.1 ± 2.94 a–g*0.79 ± 0.02 a–i11.2 ± 0.03 c–f
<2.2566.7 ± 2.94 f–k0.67 ± 0.02 f–m9.5 ± 0.1 f–k
None-Dis>2.2593.7 ± 5.1 a0.94 ± 0.05 a13.7 ± 0.6 a
<2.2543.7 ± 5.1 m–q0.44 ± 0.05 o–q5.5 ± 0.62 p–t
6Dis>2.2583.3 ± 5.8 a–e0.84 ± 0.05 a–e12.1 ± 0.64 a–e
<2.2545.8 ± 10.6 i–p0.46 ± 0.1 n–q5.9 ± 1.5 p–t
None-Dis>2.2581.2 ± 10.2 a–f0.81 ± 0.1 a–g10.5 ± 0.6 e–i
<2.2552 ± 2.9 k–o0.52 ± 0.02 m–p6.2 ± 0.1 o–s
8Dis>2.2566.6 ± 7.7 h–k0.67 ± 0.07 f–m8.9 ± 1.2 h–m
<2.2514.5 ± 2.9 s0.15 ± 0.02 s1.5 ± 0.1 w
None-Dis>2.2562.5 ± 10.2 h–k0.63 ± 0.1 i–m7.6 ± 0.5 j–o
<2.2535.4 ± 4.7 p–q0.35 ± 0.14 q4 ± 1.1 t–v
MHN4Dis>2.2570.83 ± 2.9 e–i0.71 ± 0.02 d–i10 ± 1 f–i
<2.2566.7 ± 2.9 h–k0.67 ± 0.02 f–m9.3 ± 0.6 f–k
None-Dis>2.2587.5 ± 5.1 a-c0.88 ± 0.05 a–c13.3 ± 1.1 a–c
<2.2516.6 ± 2.8 s0.17 ± 0.12 s1.3 ±1 w
6Dis>2.2568.7 ± 5.1 e–i0.69 ± 0.05 e–i9.1 ± 0.8 g–m
<2.2537.5 ± 8.8 o–q0.38 ± 0.08 pq3.2 ± 1 u–w
None-Dis>2.2558.3 ± 5.8 j–m0.59 ± 0.05 k–o7.7 ± 1.2 j–o
<2.2533.3 ± 2.5 p–r0.33 ± 0.23 qr4.13 ± 0.9 t-u
8Dis>2.2570.8 ± 7.7 d–i0.71 ± 0.07 d–k9.4 ± 0.2 f–k
<2.2529.1 ± 2.1 q–s0.29 ± 0.02 q–s1.9 ± 0.1 vw
None-Dis>2.2543.7 ± 4.2 m–q0.44 ± 0.1 o–q5 ± 1.7 s–u
<2.2518.7 ± 1.5 r–s0.19 ± 0.13 rs1.3 ± 0.9 w
SSN4Dis>2.2589.5 ± 2.9 ab0.9 ± 0.02 ab13.1 ± 0.1 a–c
<2.2579.1 ± 5.8 a–g0.79 ± 0.05 a–h11.3 ± 0.9 b–e
None-Dis>2.2591.6 ± 5.8 a0.92 ± 0.05 ab13.7 ± 1.3 a
<2.2564.5 ± 2.9 g–k0.65 ± 0.02 h–m7.4 ± 0.2 i–p
6Dis>2.2568.7 ± 5.1 g–k0.69 ± 0.05 e–i9.9 ± 0.8 f–i
<2.2562.5 ± 5.1 h–k0.63 ± 0.05 i–m7.3 ± 0.8 m–q
None-Dis>2.2568.7 ± 5.1 e–i0.69 ± 0.05 e–i9.8 ± 0.4 f–k
<2.2554.1 ± 2.9 j–n0.54 ± 0.02 l–p7.1 ± 0.6 j–o
8Dis>2.2578.5 ± 10 abc0.87 ± 0.1 a-c12.6 ± 1.4 a–d
<2.2541.6 ± 2.9 n–q0.42 ± 0.02 pq5 ± 0.5 s–u
None-Dis>2.2570.82 ± 7.7 d–i0.71 ± 0.07 d–j9.6 ± 1.4 f–j
<2.2552 ± 11.7 k–o0.52 ± 0.11 m–p6.4 ± 1.5 o–s
HDI4Dis>2.2591.6 ± 2.9 ab0.92 ± 0.02 ab13.4 ± 0.6 ab
<2.2570.8 ± 7.7 d–i0.71 ± 0.07 d–k9 ± 1.1 g–m
None-Dis>2.2589.5 ± 5.8 ab0.9 ± 0.05 ab13.3 ± 1 a–c
<2.2564.5 ± 5.8 g–k0.65 ± 0.05 d–k7.2 ± 1.2 m–q
6Dis>2.2581.2 ± 8.8 a–f0.82 ± 0.08 a–f10.8 ± 1.6 d–h
<2.2562.5 ± 6.8 h–k0.62 ± 0.08 j–m6.8 ± 2 n–s
None-Dis>2.2566.6 ± 5.8 f–j0.68 ± 0.05 f–i8.7 ± 0.7 i–n
<2.2566.6 ± 5.8 f–j0.66 ± 0.05 f–i5.5 ± 0.5 p–t
8Dis>2.2585.42 ± 7.2 a–d0.68 ± 0.04 a–d11.07 ± 0.7d–g
<2.2577 ± 2.9 b–h0.77 ± 0.02 b–j5.5 ± 0.5p–t
None-Dis>2.2572.9 ± 7.7 c–i0.73 ± 0.07 c–k5.1 ± 0.4 q–u
<2.2560.4 ± 2.9 i–l0.61 ± 0.02 j–n5.2 ± 0.3 r–u
LSD (5%)16.60.162.08
PHM (Pishgam); MHN (Mihan); SSN (Soissons); HDI (Haydari); PG (percentage of germination; (SG) speed of germination; (VI) vigor index. * Mean of values ± standard deviatin of the respective traits. Values followed by different letters are significantly different according to an LSD test at p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chaichi, M.; Nemati, A.; Dadrasi, A.; Heydari, M.; Hassanisaadi, M.; Yousefi, A.R.; Baldwin, T.C.; Mastinu, A. Germination of Triticum aestivum L.: Effects of Soil–Seed Interaction on the Growth of Seedlings. Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6020037

AMA Style

Chaichi M, Nemati A, Dadrasi A, Heydari M, Hassanisaadi M, Yousefi AR, Baldwin TC, Mastinu A. Germination of Triticum aestivum L.: Effects of Soil–Seed Interaction on the Growth of Seedlings. Soil Systems. 2022; 6(2):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6020037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chaichi, Mehrdad, Ahmad Nemati, Amir Dadrasi, Moslem Heydari, Mohadeseh Hassanisaadi, Ali Reza Yousefi, Timothy C. Baldwin, and Andrea Mastinu. 2022. "Germination of Triticum aestivum L.: Effects of Soil–Seed Interaction on the Growth of Seedlings" Soil Systems 6, no. 2: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6020037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop