You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Proceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

15 March 2024

Development and Validation of Nutri S-Can, a Short Screener to Evaluate Adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations †

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), University Hospital Son Espases (HUSE), 07120 Palma, Spain
2
Consorcio CIBER, M.P. Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Psychometric and Statistical Procedures Applied to the Health Sciences (PSICOMEST) Research Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), University Hospital Son Espases (HUSE), 07120 Palma, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Proceedings The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023

Abstract

There is a lack of rapid dietary assessment tools to screen for compliance with guidelines for cancer prevention, such as those issued by the World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research. Our aim was to develop and validate a short screener (Nutri S-Can) to evaluate adherence to these recommendations, with the potential to be used in cancer prevention strategies. Four stages were defined: development, pilot study, refinement and validation study. The Nutri S-Can captures several domains of the WCRF/AICR recommendations: body composition, physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption, and breastfeeding. A first version was piloted in n = 100 PREDIMED-Plus study participants, for which comprehensive dietary, physical activity, and anthropometric measurements were available (+/− 6 months). Nutri S-Can was retested 6 months later in a subsample of 60 participants. Its validity was evaluated by comparing total and individual domain scores of the screener to those obtained from validated methods (breastfeeding not validated), and its reproducibility was measured comparing the first to the second administration (Pearson correlation). The first version of the Nutri S-Can included 15 questions distributed across five domains. Each question had three possible answers to determine whether participants meet (1 point), partially meet (0.5) or do not meet (0) the recommendations (score range: 0–7). Participant’s average age was 71.4 ± 5.03 y (41 women, 59 men), taking an average of 6.9 min to complete the screener. The total average score was 4.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.5 ± 0.9 using data from validated questionnaires (high correlation; r = 0.51). Individual domains presented a high and significant correlation (r = 0.25–0.85) when comparing Nutri S-Can to validated assessments, except for processed foods (r = 0.15). A high correlation (r > 0.3) was observed when comparing Nutri S-Can before and after 6 months for individual dimensions and overall score. The refinement study aimed to increase preciseness and accuracy: two additional questions were included (total: 17 questions) to reduce the under-estimation of processed foods and improve self-classification of physical activity, and the nº of answers available was increased to six. This final version is being validated in two different populations (university students (n = 100) and PREDIMED-Plus participants (n = 117)) with the aim of having a validated screener that can be used in clinical settings at the individual level.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R., A.S. and A.C.; methodology, D.R., A.S., A.C.; software, M.N., D.R., A.C.; validation, D.R. and A.C.; formal analysis, D.R., A.S. and A.C.; investigation, E.R., M.M. and L.P.; resources, D.R. and A.S.; data curation, A.C. and D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, D.R. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, D.R. and A.C.; visualization, D.R. and A.C.; supervision, D.R.; project administration, D.R. and A.S.; funding acquisition, D.R. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa, SYN21/05) and the Spanish National Health Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), through CIBEROBN and “Fondo de Investigación para la Salud” (FIS), which is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Research Ethical Committee of the Balearic Islands (protocol code IB 2242/14 PI and date of 26 May 2023).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the data are part of an ongoing study. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to alicemarylillian.chaplin@ssib.es.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.